I've always thought that cover 2 cornerbacks were more valuable than non-cover 2 corners.
The exception being rookie corners, who get a lot of activity.
The thinking is that cover 2 corners get so many more tackles that they become viable DB options.
However, I didn't see production from a lot of cover 2 corners other than the top guys.
Now, I see an article discussing fantasy DBs and the author said he wasn't including the corners because so many play cover 2 nowadays. I thought this implied that they don't score enough to warrant discussion. WTF? Just the opposite of what I thought.
So I've been targeting Justin Miller as a corner to pick up because Ty Law is likely to be gone and Miller will inherit the corner position, which should get plenty of tackle opportunities, and he will sort of be a rookie, and he returns kickoffs. I smell goldmine. But nobody else even bid on the guy, leading me to question my thought process.
Where am I going wrong on this cover 2 corner thinking?
The exception being rookie corners, who get a lot of activity.
The thinking is that cover 2 corners get so many more tackles that they become viable DB options.
However, I didn't see production from a lot of cover 2 corners other than the top guys.
Now, I see an article discussing fantasy DBs and the author said he wasn't including the corners because so many play cover 2 nowadays. I thought this implied that they don't score enough to warrant discussion. WTF? Just the opposite of what I thought.
So I've been targeting Justin Miller as a corner to pick up because Ty Law is likely to be gone and Miller will inherit the corner position, which should get plenty of tackle opportunities, and he will sort of be a rookie, and he returns kickoffs. I smell goldmine. But nobody else even bid on the guy, leading me to question my thought process.
Where am I going wrong on this cover 2 corner thinking?