I agree with that, as things are now. I was actually thinking more about guys who might be available on dynasty waiver wires.None of them were startable before, and none of them are startable now.
I dont know about NOT startable?? Buck was really good when filling in for Westy? Although I know it was filling in, he could be a good two year starter!! And Arrington has always been a RB1 on a NFL team in my opinion?? Arz just dont use him as such?Good signings for Den! But why two?? Arrington alone would have been good enough??None of them were startable before, and none of them are startable now.
It makes sense that you are asking this question.I dont know about NOT startable?? Buck was really good when filling in for Westy? Although I know it was filling in, he could be a good two year starter!! And Arrington has always been a RB1 on a NFL team in my opinion?? Arz just dont use him as such?Good signings for Den! But why two?? Arrington alone would have been good enough??None of them were startable before, and none of them are startable now.
And what does that mean?It makes sense that you are asking this question.I dont know about NOT startable?? Buck was really good when filling in for Westy? Although I know it was filling in, he could be a good two year starter!! And Arrington has always been a RB1 on a NFL team in my opinion?? Arz just dont use him as such?Good signings for Den! But why two?? Arrington alone would have been good enough??None of them were startable before, and none of them are startable now.

It makes sense that you are asking this question.I dont know about NOT startable?? Buck was really good when filling in for Westy? Although I know it was filling in, he could be a good two year starter!! And Arrington has always been a RB1 on a NFL team in my opinion?? Arz just dont use him as such?Good signings for Den! But why two?? Arrington alone would have been good enough??None of them were startable before, and none of them are startable now.

DOWNAny Patriots RB, including Fred (For Now)UP
Fred Taylor
DOWN
LaMont Jordan
Sammy Morris
fixedNoGum said:CAN'T PLAY: Lorenzo Booker
That's a very good question.Does Braylon get a bump with Winslow being traded?

A bump up or down is the real question.Does Braylon get a bump with Winslow being traded?
I would think Braylon would be downgraded with K2 gone. Who else do you have to cover in Cleveland? Stallworth?I'd also say Winslow's value probably drops slightly due to uncertainty of how he'll fit in Tampa. Will he be targeted like he was in Cleveland?I think the big winner here is Luke McCown. Of course he has to win the starting job, but if he does I think you could do a lot worse for a QB2.A bump up or down is the real question.Does Braylon get a bump with Winslow being traded?
I initially was going to bump Braylon down but the more I thought about it, the more I think he gets a verrrrrry slight bump upwards if anything at all.I remembered that Jurevicius is supposed to be back this year and I think that between Jurevicius and Rucker (or whoever takes over at TE) that the majority of KW2's targets get accounted for... However, the remaining 10% or so could end up going to Braylon. Big x-factors in that are:- Will Brady shift his KW2-love towards Jurevicius in the slot, the new TE, or Braylon?- Does Stallworth factor in more this year?- And of course: Can Braylon hold onto the friggin' ball???A bump up or down is the real question.Does Braylon get a bump with Winslow being traded?
UP
Fred Taylor
DOWN
LaMont Jordan
Sammy Morris
BenJarvus Green-Ellis
Why? I can see if it was Ray Lewis...Value Downavid Harris
According to reports, under Ryan's scheme - Scott would take the role of Lewis in the Jet's defense and Harris would take over the role previously played by Scott in the Raven's defense. In other words, Harris would take on the initial downfield blockers beit offensive linemen or the FB and Scott would be free to make the tackle. Hence Scott's value goes up and Harris' value plummets. It has yet to be seen if this will be the case but I am sure Ryan brought Scott in to NY based on his knowledge of how he would want Scott to play in the role of the agressive MLB.Why? I can see if it was Ray Lewis...Value Downavid Harris
So Baker made and makes that much of a difference? Maybe it's because NWE hasn't had a good TE (if Baker falls into that category) in a long time but it doesn't seem like much would change from either side. How long have we heard about Watson blowing up or Dave Thomas getting his shot finally. It def. doesn't hurt NWE as a team or Brady but Moss seems like he'd stay even..they spread it around too much?Bump Up:
Randy Moss
Dustin Keller
I think Moss' value goes up not because of the addition of Baker (although I can no see how you misunderstood my post), but because of a more consistent running game with the signing of Fred Taylor. Keller's upgrade is not becuase of the loss of Baker, but more because of the loss of Coles.So Baker made and makes that much of a difference? Maybe it's because NWE hasn't had a good TE (if Baker falls into that category) in a long time but it doesn't seem like much would change from either side. How long have we heard about Watson blowing up or Dave Thomas getting his shot finally. It def. doesn't hurt NWE as a team or Brady but Moss seems like he'd stay even..they spread it around too much?Bump Up:
Randy Moss
Dustin Keller
It means only someone who thinks Arrington is a #1 RB would wonder why the Broncos signed two RB's. Im not trying to pick on you, but fact is, neither RB is close to a full time starter. I would think Mcdaniels will run a similar offense to what NE has done over the last couple years. Buckhalter filling the Morris role, and Arrington the Faulk role.And what does that mean?It makes sense that you are asking this question.I dont know about NOT startable?? Buck was really good when filling in for Westy? Although I know it was filling in, he could be a good two year starter!! And Arrington has always been a RB1 on a NFL team in my opinion?? Arz just dont use him as such?Good signings for Den! But why two?? Arrington alone would have been good enough??None of them were startable before, and none of them are startable now.![]()
gottcha, this thread's going to turn into a big Kevin Bacon 6 degrees thread. The whole NWE running game is just hard to trust, it's just THE meaning of RBBC in it's truest form it seems. You know by about Week 3 Maroney will be the one to own, Week 6 you'll see Morris blow up for 2 games, Week 8 Green-Ellis could be starting again due to injuries, then by week 10 Morris will come back after a quad pull and he and Faulk will have good games all with a little Fred sprinkled in there everywhere! It's just constantly changine and you can't rely on one person for very long. I mean Kevin Faulk was probably a Top 20 back in most PRR leagues, that's not happening again?I think Moss' value goes up not because of the addition of Baker (although I can no see how you misunderstood my post), but because of a more consistent running game with the signing of Fred Taylor. Keller's upgrade is not becuase of the loss of Baker, but more because of the loss of Coles.So Baker made and makes that much of a difference? Maybe it's because NWE hasn't had a good TE (if Baker falls into that category) in a long time but it doesn't seem like much would change from either side. How long have we heard about Watson blowing up or Dave Thomas getting his shot finally. It def. doesn't hurt NWE as a team or Brady but Moss seems like he'd stay even..they spread it around too much?Bump Up:
Randy Moss
Dustin Keller
Actually, i dont think his value depends much on QB at all. I might even argue his numbers might be better with a lesser QB.Winslow Value all depends on the QB... and I would find it hard to believe that TB makes a move like they did without a plan.
Not so fastBart Scott reportedly is going to give the Ravens a chance to match the Jets' five-year, $40 million contract offer.In an effort to break the story, many national sources said the deal was officially agreed to. But it was never signed and it now appears Scott is having second thoughts and wants to give Baltimore another shot. We don't see why Baltimore wouldn't match now, but it's no lock. We'll find out shortly.According to reports, under Ryan's scheme - Scott would take the role of Lewis in the Jet's defense and Harris would take over the role previously played by Scott in the Raven's defense. In other words, Harris would take on the initial downfield blockers beit offensive linemen or the FB and Scott would be free to make the tackle. Hence Scott's value goes up and Harris' value plummets. It has yet to be seen if this will be the case but I am sure Ryan brought Scott in to NY based on his knowledge of how he would want Scott to play in the role of the agressive MLB.Why? I can see if it was Ray Lewis...Value Downavid Harris