Here are my three:
Koren Robinson
Mark Clayton
Braylon Edwards
Braylon Edwards obviously has the injury concern so he's further down on my list, but I think that Clayton and Robinson both could put up nice numbers. If McNair ends up with the Ravens as expected, that should definitely help Clayton's numbers, even though McNair and Mason obviously would have a connection. And Robinson has always had great talent. If he continues to lay off the sauce I think he could conceivably reach his elite potential.
Edited to add Reggie Brown. Good one Musesboy. He picked up the Eagles offense really quickly and showed some pretty decent flashes. And we all know the Eagles will throw the ball 5000 times this season as always. With a healthy McNabb he could do alright.
Derrick Mason - Has been hampered with sub-quality QBs during his time with the Ravens. But, if he is reunited with Steve McNair, then his numbers should improve significantly.
If you're tracking Northcutt, keep an eye on rookie Travis Wilson. In post draft talk, the Browns mentioned that they prefer Northcutt in the slot and Wilson would be considered to start opposite Joe J if Edwards is not ready to start the year (which sounds likely). It may just be GM/coach speak after the draft, but something to monitor.here is a guy way under the radar...
Dennis Northcutt he should start the season as a starter due to braylons rehab...then he should move back into the slot...his upside is limited but if he puts up a couple nice games early you might be able to deal him for something else before he moves back to being a number 3
Agreed - these are the two I thought of immediately.Michael Clayton
L. Coles
Thank you. There are a few of us around here that love the guy. I always like hearing this kind of confidence from a coach to a rook.If you're tracking Northcutt, keep an eye on rookie Travis Wilson. In post draft talk, the Browns mentioned that they prefer Northcutt in the slot and Wilson would be considered to start opposite Joe J if Edwards is not ready to start the year (which sounds likely). It may just be GM/coach speak after the draft, but something to monitor.here is a guy way under the radar...
Dennis Northcutt he should start the season as a starter due to braylons rehab...then he should move back into the slot...his upside is limited but if he puts up a couple nice games early you might be able to deal him for something else before he moves back to being a number 3
LINK
I'm not sure what the Rams offense will be this year but I know they won't be a passing machine like they were under Martz. Therefore, the #3 wr won't have the value that it once did. I might take one of them real real late but don't really see a lot of upside with either of them.Even in this "value" thread, I see Curtis instead of Bruce. Curtis is being drafted ahead of Bruce. I think Bruce is indeed the value WR, while Curtis is the WR3 (slot ala Welker) and WR1/2 upon injury.
I think there will be an injury concern with Edwards, which will cause him to be undervalued. He is a good pickup because he'll start the season with some concern, but will probably get better and better as the season goes on. Great to have him in case one of your main men goes down with injury.Here are my three:
Koren Robinson
Mark Clayton
Braylon Edwards
Braylon Edwards obviously has the injury concern so he's further down on my list, but I think that Clayton and Robinson both could put up nice numbers. If McNair ends up with the Ravens as expected, that should definitely help Clayton's numbers, even though McNair and Mason obviously would have a connection. And Robinson has always had great talent. If he continues to lay off the sauce I think he could conceivably reach his elite potential.
Edited to add Reggie Brown. Good one Musesboy. He picked up the Eagles offense really quickly and showed some pretty decent flashes. And we all know the Eagles will throw the ball 5000 times this season as always. With a healthy McNabb he could do alright.I forgot about Braylon Edwards. He definitely deserves to be on that list unless we hear negative injury news on by draft day.
Why Curtis...expect him to beat out Bruce?1. Keenan McCardell
2. Derrick Mason
3. Kevin Curtis
4. Joey Galloway
(These are not waiver wire guys; just guys I see as undervalued.)
When hasn't this guy played poorly? Him and DAvid Carr have apparently brainwashed everyone on the planet except for me into thinking they'll put up solid numbers every year.On topic, I will 3rd, 4th or 5th the nomination for Antonio Bryant. I also high on Joe Horn right now, not sure what his ADP is. I'm keeping my eye on the starters for Minnesota as well.I think you can add Andre Johnson to the Texans list. Moulds presence has gotta help his chances. I simply can't see Johnson playing as poorly as he did a year ago.
A) Somebody has to catch the balls and he's already been annointed the #1.B) Brad Johnson, the coaching and the O-line are solid.I'm also not sold on Koren Robinson either. He might be worth it depending upon when he gets drafted, but from what I've ssen there's also someone that really wants him and will take him a lot sooner than I would. I'm a bit squimish on pinning high hopes on a big year from a WR that had only 22 receptions the year before.
I would avoid Edwards this year. He will be rushed back and won't be 100% this year pretty much no matter what. He is bound to put up average numbers once he gets in the lineup. Add in that he plays on Cleveland and I'm betting he will disappoint those that try to grab him late hoping for a half season of big numbers. He'll be fine in 2007, but not so much in 2006.
I'm curious if Minnesota becomes a 4-way free for all between the Robinsons, Taylor, and Williamson. A team can annoit a WR whatever they want, but the QB still has to concentrate on hitting that one guy and ignoring the other receivers.I'm not saying the K-Rob will be a bust, I'm just wondering how well he will do vs where he is drafted. I suspect his ranking will climb as we approach the season.A) Somebody has to catch the balls and he's already been annointed the #1.B) Brad Johnson, the coaching and the O-line are solid.I'm also not sold on Koren Robinson either. He might be worth it depending upon when he gets drafted, but from what I've ssen there's also someone that really wants him and will take him a lot sooner than I would. I'm a bit squimish on pinning high hopes on a big year from a WR that had only 22 receptions the year before.
C) He's done it before so his reception total from last year doesn't concern me.
D) I think his consensus ranking is about right.
I agree mid 20s is too high, but I do believe he has 90 reception upside.I'm curious if Minnesota becomes a 4-way free for all between the Robinsons, Taylor, and Williamson. A team can annoit a WR whatever they want, but the QB still has to concentrate on hitting that one guy and ignoring the other receivers.I'm not saying the K-Rob will be a bust, I'm just wondering how well he will do vs where he is drafted. I suspect his ranking will climb as we approach the season.A) Somebody has to catch the balls and he's already been annointed the #1.B) Brad Johnson, the coaching and the O-line are solid.I'm also not sold on Koren Robinson either. He might be worth it depending upon when he gets drafted, but from what I've ssen there's also someone that really wants him and will take him a lot sooner than I would. I'm a bit squimish on pinning high hopes on a big year from a WR that had only 22 receptions the year before.
C) He's done it before so his reception total from last year doesn't concern me.
D) I think his consensus ranking is about right.
As for line item ©, he's has one Top 25 season. That is the same total as Marcus Robinson and Travis Taylor.
I'm all in favor of getting K-Rob cheap. The question is how cheap is cheap. IIRC, he's ranked 35 in the consensus ranking. But I've seen him grabbed already in the early to mid 20s. IMO, that's too early. I'd guess he ranks in the 25-30 range at this point.
Yeah, the #2 situation is one to keep an eye on. Don't count out Marcus either...that guy can still play when he's healthy, which obviously isn't often enough.I was wondering when someone was going to mention T. Taylor in the Minny situation. People sure are quick to put Williamson on there when he has done a thing. BJ seemed to like Taylor and was hitting KRob too...I'd imagine that Taylor is the possesion guy while krob stretches the field.
I personally don't see him doing as well as in SEA, where he maxed out at 78 receptions. He maxhad a single game high of 4 receptions last year and pretty much only had one noteworty game. Maybe Burleson's departure will give him a lot more looks, but M-Rob and Taylor are capable and I'm sure they want Williamson to start paying dividends. I think K-Rob 2006 could approach Burleson 2004, but that's about it in my book.I agree mid 20s is too high, but I do believe he has 90 reception upside.
Why the comparison to Burleson with a new coaching staff? FWIW, I think Robinson is easily the best overall WR on the team.I personally don't see him doing as well as in SEA, where he maxed out at 78 receptions. He maxhad a single game high of 4 receptions last year and pretty much only had one noteworty game. Maybe Burleson's departure will give him a lot more looks, but M-Rob and Taylor are capable and I'm sure they want Williamson to start paying dividends. I think K-Rob 2006 could approach Burleson 2004, but that's about it in my book.I agree mid 20s is too high, but I do believe he has 90 reception upside.
+--------------------------+-------------------------+ | Rushing | Receiving |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| Year TM | G | Att Yards Y/A TD | Rec Yards Y/R TD |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| 2001 sea | 16 | 4 13 3.2 0 | 39 536 13.7 1 || 2002 sea | 16 | 8 56 7.0 0 | 78 1240 15.9 5 || 2003 sea | 15 | 4 15 3.8 0 | 65 896 13.8 4 || 2004 sea | 10 | 1 3 3.0 0 | 31 495 16.0 2 || 2005 min | 14 | 4 27 6.8 1 | 22 347 15.8 1 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| TOTAL | 71 | 21 114 5.4 1 | 235 3514 15.0 13 |
The Burleson comparison was only to show the type of production I thought K-Rob might see this year. Leave Burlseon out of it altogether. I see K-Rob around 60/1000/8 witht he team spreading it around more than some may project.Why the comparison to Burleson with a new coaching staff? FWIW, I think Robinson is easily the best overall WR on the team.I personally don't see him doing as well as in SEA, where he maxed out at 78 receptions. He maxhad a single game high of 4 receptions last year and pretty much only had one noteworty game. Maybe Burleson's departure will give him a lot more looks, but M-Rob and Taylor are capable and I'm sure they want Williamson to start paying dividends. I think K-Rob 2006 could approach Burleson 2004, but that's about it in my book.I agree mid 20s is too high, but I do believe he has 90 reception upside.
It's hard to say exactly how many targets Childress will give him though, nobody really knows is the correct answer.
Yeah, that's about where I've got him at, although he'll find some of my rosters because of his upside.The Burleson comparison was only to show the type of production I thought K-Rob might see this year. Leave Burlseon out of it altogether. I see K-Rob around 60/1000/8 witht he team spreading it around more than some may project.Why the comparison to Burleson with a new coaching staff? FWIW, I think Robinson is easily the best overall WR on the team.I personally don't see him doing as well as in SEA, where he maxed out at 78 receptions. He maxhad a single game high of 4 receptions last year and pretty much only had one noteworty game. Maybe Burleson's departure will give him a lot more looks, but M-Rob and Taylor are capable and I'm sure they want Williamson to start paying dividends. I think K-Rob 2006 could approach Burleson 2004, but that's about it in my book.I agree mid 20s is too high, but I do believe he has 90 reception upside.
It's hard to say exactly how many targets Childress will give him though, nobody really knows is the correct answer.
I know that Joe Jurevicius has never been a featured WR and has had a lot of injuries keep him off the field over the years, but I'm beginning to wonder if he's the next "old" WR to surprise everyone and put up some really eye-popping numbers. With both Edwards and Winslow inexperienced, with possible health concerns, and not fully integrated into the offense yet; rookie Wilson possibly on the other side if Edwards isn't ready (Browns want to keep Northcutt as #3); and QB Frye with some experience now but still young; 6'5" Jurevicus may be focused on as a security blanket much like Muhammad in 2004 and Galloway in 2005.I would avoid Edwards this year. He will be rushed back and won't be 100% this year pretty much no matter what. He is bound to put up average numbers once he gets in the lineup. Add in that he plays on Cleveland and I'm betting he will disappoint those that try to grab him late hoping for a half season of big numbers. He'll be fine in 2007, but not so much in 2006.Not a lot to like about Edwards this yeas IMHO.
On the other hand he has an excellent shot at being undervalued in '07.
interested to see this documentedA) Somebody has to catch the balls and he's already been annointed the #1.B) Brad Johnson, the coaching and the O-line are solid.I'm also not sold on Koren Robinson either. He might be worth it depending upon when he gets drafted, but from what I've ssen there's also someone that really wants him and will take him a lot sooner than I would. I'm a bit squimish on pinning high hopes on a big year from a WR that had only 22 receptions the year before.
C) He's done it before so his reception total from last year doesn't concern me.
D) I think his consensus ranking is about right.
You gotta like a guy who is an injury away from being a stud.Stallworth
Booker
Stokely
not only that, but I think the Colts won't be as successful running the ball this year without Edge. You could see a passing game closer to 04 than 05You gotta like a guy who is an injury away from being a stud.Stallworth
Booker
Stokely
DY, what you predict puts KRob at about 10th; How can you say he should be about 25-30 and then say being picked around 20th is too early thenThe Burleson comparison was only to show the type of production I thought K-Rob might see this year. Leave Burlseon out of it altogether. I see K-Rob around 60/1000/8 witht he team spreading it around more than some may project.Why the comparison to Burleson with a new coaching staff? FWIW, I think Robinson is easily the best overall WR on the team.I personally don't see him doing as well as in SEA, where he maxed out at 78 receptions. He maxhad a single game high of 4 receptions last year and pretty much only had one noteworty game. Maybe Burleson's departure will give him a lot more looks, but M-Rob and Taylor are capable and I'm sure they want Williamson to start paying dividends. I think K-Rob 2006 could approach Burleson 2004, but that's about it in my book.I agree mid 20s is too high, but I do believe he has 90 reception upside.
It's hard to say exactly how many targets Childress will give him though, nobody really knows is the correct answer.
He'll bite you, I'm telling you. He'll get you chunk of points in games when you win handily and don't need them. And when you need production from him, HE'LL DROP THE ####### BALL!!! I saw it from him in their last game, he tipped a ball to e defender's hands. The man is unreliable! His punt returns are coloring his rep a nice rosy shade, but as a WR he's still a bust.A) Somebody has to catch the balls and he's already been annointed the #1.B) Brad Johnson, the coaching and the O-line are solid.I'm also not sold on Koren Robinson either. He might be worth it depending upon when he gets drafted, but from what I've ssen there's also someone that really wants him and will take him a lot sooner than I would. I'm a bit squimish on pinning high hopes on a big year from a WR that had only 22 receptions the year before.
C) He's done it before so his reception total from last year doesn't concern me.
D) I think his consensus ranking is about right.
I'll say Rod Gardner. He's had the full offseason to absorb the playbook and he's one of the guys that Thompson wanted back. He perfectly fits the description of what McCarthy wanted in his wideouts.
Plus his only competition for the WR2 spot in Green Bay is Robert Ferguson and Marc Boerigter. Greg Jennings may come on a bit, but I doubt he gets meaningful time if Gardner shows anything at all.
There are a lot of WR that get over 1000 yards and 8 TD. I should have said 6-8 TD, as that's what I see with 8 being the high side. That gives K-Rob a projected total of 136 to 148 fantasy points.136 points is usually in the low 20s as far as year end rankings. However, it should be noted that most preseason projections are normally on the high side, so relatively speaking projections for other WR will be too high too.DY, what you predict puts KRob at about 10th; How can you say he should be about 25-30 and then say being picked around 20th is too early thenThe Burleson comparison was only to show the type of production I thought K-Rob might see this year. Leave Burlseon out of it altogether. I see K-Rob around 60/1000/8 witht he team spreading it around more than some may project.Why the comparison to Burleson with a new coaching staff? FWIW, I think Robinson is easily the best overall WR on the team.I personally don't see him doing as well as in SEA, where he maxed out at 78 receptions. He maxhad a single game high of 4 receptions last year and pretty much only had one noteworty game. Maybe Burleson's departure will give him a lot more looks, but M-Rob and Taylor are capable and I'm sure they want Williamson to start paying dividends. I think K-Rob 2006 could approach Burleson 2004, but that's about it in my book.I agree mid 20s is too high, but I do believe he has 90 reception upside.
It's hard to say exactly how many targets Childress will give him though, nobody really knows is the correct answer.![]()
FYI-He was drunk.He'll bite you, I'm telling you. He'll get you chunk of points in games when you win handily and don't need them. And when you need production from him, HE'LL DROP THE ####### BALL!!! I saw it from him in their last game, he tipped a ball to e defender's hands. The man is unreliable! His punt returns are coloring his rep a nice rosy shade, but as a WR he's still a bust.A) Somebody has to catch the balls and he's already been annointed the #1.B) Brad Johnson, the coaching and the O-line are solid.I'm also not sold on Koren Robinson either. He might be worth it depending upon when he gets drafted, but from what I've ssen there's also someone that really wants him and will take him a lot sooner than I would. I'm a bit squimish on pinning high hopes on a big year from a WR that had only 22 receptions the year before.
C) He's done it before so his reception total from last year doesn't concern me.
D) I think his consensus ranking is about right.