What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Value wide recievers (1 Viewer)

section 8

Footballguy
Last year Galloway and Glenn were picked after our draft on the waiver wire. Who do you see as this years overlooked and undervalued wide recievers ??

 
There are plenty of candidates and it depends what you mean by undervalued.

Ignoring guys like Harrison and Holt who I feel will outproduce their ADP, here are some cheaper possibilities:

Eric Parker - finished well last year

Amani Toomer - Manning still has room to improve

Michael Clayton - played hurt last year and has performed well in the past

Jenkins/White - whichever gets the lions share if Vick learns how to pass

Eric Moulds - could see a lot of targets as teams cover Johnson

Engram/Burleson - especially if Jackson misses any time

Joe Jurevicius - especially if Edwards isn't ready

Ferguson - Favre can't throw every pass to Driver

Brandon Stokley - maybe more emphasis on the passing game with Edge gone

Wilford/Jones/Williams - whoever emerges as the main target

K Robinson/Williamson - Burleson has gone and someone will step up

Derrick Mason - TD numbers stopped him being top 15 last year

Mark Clayton - strong finish

Muhsin Muhammad - better QB situation

Antonio Bryant - if Smith starts to improve

Isaac Bruce - always undervalued because of his age

Givens/Bennett - as long as Young isn't starting

Laveranues Coles - they might not use a 4th string QB this year

Reggie Brown - the Eagles love to pass

Rod Smith - will go later and produce better than Walker

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think you can add Andre Johnson to the Texans list. Moulds presence has gotta help his chances. I simply can't see Johnson playing as poorly as he did a year ago.

 
Here are my three:

Koren Robinson

Mark Clayton

Braylon Edwards

Braylon Edwards obviously has the injury concern so he's further down on my list, but I think that Clayton and Robinson both could put up nice numbers. If McNair ends up with the Ravens as expected, that should definitely help Clayton's numbers, even though McNair and Mason obviously would have a connection. And Robinson has always had great talent. If he continues to lay off the sauce I think he could conceivably reach his elite potential.

Edited to add Reggie Brown. Good one Musesboy. He picked up the Eagles offense really quickly and showed some pretty decent flashes. And we all know the Eagles will throw the ball 5000 times this season as always. With a healthy McNabb he could do alright.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I posted this in another thread. I think all of these guys will be solid values:

Joe Jurevicius - had a career year with Seattle and is going into a situation with the Browns where he may be the defacto WR1 until Edwards is healthy.

David Givens - Again, fell into a great situation with the Titans. Will form a great tandem with Drew Bennett (who is better and more comfortable as a WR2). Was undervalued in New England where he never put up quality fantasy stats because he was never featured in their offense.

Derrick Mason - Has been hampered with sub-quality QBs during his time with the Ravens. But, if he is reunited with Steve McNair, then his numbers should improve significantly.

 
Here are my three:

Koren Robinson

Mark Clayton

Braylon Edwards

Braylon Edwards obviously has the injury concern so he's further down on my list, but I think that Clayton and Robinson both could put up nice numbers. If McNair ends up with the Ravens as expected, that should definitely help Clayton's numbers, even though McNair and Mason obviously would have a connection. And Robinson has always had great talent. If he continues to lay off the sauce I think he could conceivably reach his elite potential.

Edited to add Reggie Brown. Good one Musesboy. He picked up the Eagles offense really quickly and showed some pretty decent flashes. And we all know the Eagles will throw the ball 5000 times this season as always. With a healthy McNabb he could do alright.
:goodposting: I forgot about Braylon Edwards. He definitely deserves to be on that list unless we hear negative injury news on by draft day.

 
Derrick Mason - Has been hampered with sub-quality QBs during his time with the Ravens. But, if he is reunited with Steve McNair, then his numbers should improve significantly.
:yes: What I like about Mason is that despite changing teams and with Boller/Wright at QB, he still had 86/1073.

McNair would improve the situation, but TD numbers are quite volatile things to predict and I like how involved he was in the offense. A year in the system should help him too.

 
I like a couple.

Terry Glenn - Again!! The new 2 TE set opens him up 1 on 1 all the time, he is almost uncoverable on deep routes. People think I'm crazy, but I say Glenn equals TO's TD output. (I predict 10)

Kevin Curtis - Emerging WR, good hands and could challlenge Bruce for more playing time.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
One guy I really like that seems to slip in initial Dynasty drafts is Donal Driver. The guy is only 31 and seems to be set for a good year. I know all bets are off when Favre retires.

Another guy that goes real late is Justin McCareins. Have to think that some sort of QB stability will help. He did have a ton of targets last year. Other than Coles, I do not see many viable receiving options for the Jets.

 
here is a guy way under the radar...

Dennis Northcutt he should start the season as a starter due to braylons rehab...then he should move back into the slot...his upside is limited but if he puts up a couple nice games early you might be able to deal him for something else before he moves back to being a number 3

 
here is a guy way under the radar...

Dennis Northcutt he should start the season as a starter due to braylons rehab...then he should move back into the slot...his upside is limited but if he puts up a couple nice games early you might be able to deal him for something else before he moves back to being a number 3
If you're tracking Northcutt, keep an eye on rookie Travis Wilson. In post draft talk, the Browns mentioned that they prefer Northcutt in the slot and Wilson would be considered to start opposite Joe J if Edwards is not ready to start the year (which sounds likely). It may just be GM/coach speak after the draft, but something to monitor.

LINK

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I really like Horn, perenial top 10 guy that will fall down probably to the 20's due to a hammy problem last year. Offense will probably improve and I'll be targetting him in my drafts this year.

Bryant

Moose

Mason

McCardell

K. Robinson

Djax (may fall a little in some leagues due to him being injured last year but he'll be top 10 this year)

 
here is a guy way under the radar...

Dennis Northcutt he should start the season as a starter due to braylons rehab...then he should move back into the slot...his upside is limited but if he puts up a couple nice games early you might be able to deal him for something else before he moves back to being a number 3
If you're tracking Northcutt, keep an eye on rookie Travis Wilson. In post draft talk, the Browns mentioned that they prefer Northcutt in the slot and Wilson would be considered to start opposite Joe J if Edwards is not ready to start the year (which sounds likely). It may just be GM/coach speak after the draft, but something to monitor.

LINK
Thank you. There are a few of us around here that love the guy. I always like hearing this kind of confidence from a coach to a rook.
 
1. Keenan McCardell

2. Derrick Mason

3. Kevin Curtis

4. Joey Galloway

(These are not waiver wire guys; just guys I see as undervalued.)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Even in this "value" thread, I see Curtis instead of Bruce. Curtis is being drafted ahead of Bruce. I think Bruce is indeed the value WR, while Curtis is the WR3 (slot ala Welker) and WR1/2 upon injury.

 
Even in this "value" thread, I see Curtis instead of Bruce. Curtis is being drafted ahead of Bruce. I think Bruce is indeed the value WR, while Curtis is the WR3 (slot ala Welker) and WR1/2 upon injury.
I'm not sure what the Rams offense will be this year but I know they won't be a passing machine like they were under Martz. Therefore, the #3 wr won't have the value that it once did. I might take one of them real real late but don't really see a lot of upside with either of them.
 
Here are my three:

Koren Robinson

Mark Clayton

Braylon Edwards

Braylon Edwards obviously has the injury concern so he's further down on my list, but I think that Clayton and Robinson both could put up nice numbers.  If McNair ends up with the Ravens as expected, that should definitely help Clayton's numbers, even though McNair and Mason obviously would have a connection.  And Robinson has always had great talent.  If he continues to lay off the sauce I think he could conceivably reach his elite potential.

Edited to add Reggie Brown.  Good one Musesboy.  He picked up the Eagles offense really quickly and showed some pretty decent flashes.  And we all know the Eagles will throw the ball 5000 times this season as always.  With a healthy McNabb he could do alright.
:goodposting: I forgot about Braylon Edwards. He definitely deserves to be on that list unless we hear negative injury news on by draft day.
I think there will be an injury concern with Edwards, which will cause him to be undervalued. He is a good pickup because he'll start the season with some concern, but will probably get better and better as the season goes on. Great to have him in case one of your main men goes down with injury.
 
1. Keenan McCardell

2. Derrick Mason

3. Kevin Curtis

4. Joey Galloway

(These are not waiver wire guys; just guys I see as undervalued.)
Why Curtis...expect him to beat out Bruce?
 
I think you can add Andre Johnson to the Texans list. Moulds presence has gotta help his chances. I simply can't see Johnson playing as poorly as he did a year ago.
When hasn't this guy played poorly? Him and DAvid Carr have apparently brainwashed everyone on the planet except for me into thinking they'll put up solid numbers every year.On topic, I will 3rd, 4th or 5th the nomination for Antonio Bryant. I also high on Joe Horn right now, not sure what his ADP is. I'm keeping my eye on the starters for Minnesota as well.

 
I would avoid Edwards this year. He will be rushed back and won't be 100% this year pretty much no matter what. He is bound to put up average numbers once he gets in the lineup. Add in that he plays on Cleveland and I'm betting he will disappoint those that try to grab him late hoping for a half season of big numbers. He'll be fine in 2007, but not so much in 2006.

As for Antonio Bryant, from what I've seen it looks like Arnaz Battle will start the year as the WR1 and Bryant as the WR2 in SF. Whether that plays out in their production is another thing entirely.

I'm also not sold on Koren Robinson either. He might be worth it depending upon when he gets drafted, but from what I've ssen there's also someone that really wants him and will take him a lot sooner than I would. I'm a bit squimish on pinning high hopes on a big year from a WR that had only 22 receptions the year before.

I also see very little to suggest that Bruce will sit behind Curtis unless Bruce gets hurt.

 
I'm also not sold on Koren Robinson either.  He might be worth it depending upon when he gets drafted, but from what I've ssen there's also someone that really wants him and will take him a lot sooner than I would.  I'm a bit squimish on pinning high hopes on a big year from a WR that had only 22 receptions the year before.
A) Somebody has to catch the balls and he's already been annointed the #1.B) Brad Johnson, the coaching and the O-line are solid.

C) He's done it before so his reception total from last year doesn't concern me.

D) I think his consensus ranking is about right.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would avoid Edwards this year.  He will be rushed back and won't be 100% this year pretty much no matter what.  He is bound to put up average numbers once he gets in the lineup.  Add in that he plays on Cleveland and I'm betting he will disappoint those that try to grab him late hoping for a half season of big numbers.  He'll be fine in 2007, but not so much in 2006.
:goodposting: Not a lot to like about Edwards this yeas IMHO.

On the other hand he has an excellent shot at being undervalued in '07.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm also not sold on Koren Robinson either.  He might be worth it depending upon when he gets drafted, but from what I've ssen there's also someone that really wants him and will take him a lot sooner than I would.  I'm a bit squimish on pinning high hopes on a big year from a WR that had only 22 receptions the year before.
A) Somebody has to catch the balls and he's already been annointed the #1.B) Brad Johnson, the coaching and the O-line are solid.

C) He's done it before so his reception total from last year doesn't concern me.

D) I think his consensus ranking is about right.
I'm curious if Minnesota becomes a 4-way free for all between the Robinsons, Taylor, and Williamson. A team can annoit a WR whatever they want, but the QB still has to concentrate on hitting that one guy and ignoring the other receivers.I'm not saying the K-Rob will be a bust, I'm just wondering how well he will do vs where he is drafted. I suspect his ranking will climb as we approach the season.

As for line item ©, he's has one Top 25 season. That is the same total as Marcus Robinson and Travis Taylor.

I'm all in favor of getting K-Rob cheap. The question is how cheap is cheap. IIRC, he's ranked 35 in the consensus ranking. But I've seen him grabbed already in the early to mid 20s. IMO, that's too early. I'd guess he ranks in the 25-30 range at this point.

 
I'm also not sold on Koren Robinson either.  He might be worth it depending upon when he gets drafted, but from what I've ssen there's also someone that really wants him and will take him a lot sooner than I would.  I'm a bit squimish on pinning high hopes on a big year from a WR that had only 22 receptions the year before.
A) Somebody has to catch the balls and he's already been annointed the #1.B) Brad Johnson, the coaching and the O-line are solid.

C) He's done it before so his reception total from last year doesn't concern me.

D) I think his consensus ranking is about right.
I'm curious if Minnesota becomes a 4-way free for all between the Robinsons, Taylor, and Williamson. A team can annoit a WR whatever they want, but the QB still has to concentrate on hitting that one guy and ignoring the other receivers.I'm not saying the K-Rob will be a bust, I'm just wondering how well he will do vs where he is drafted. I suspect his ranking will climb as we approach the season.

As for line item ©, he's has one Top 25 season. That is the same total as Marcus Robinson and Travis Taylor.

I'm all in favor of getting K-Rob cheap. The question is how cheap is cheap. IIRC, he's ranked 35 in the consensus ranking. But I've seen him grabbed already in the early to mid 20s. IMO, that's too early. I'd guess he ranks in the 25-30 range at this point.
I agree mid 20s is too high, but I do believe he has 90 reception upside.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was wondering when someone was going to mention T. Taylor in the Minny situation. People sure are quick to put Williamson on there when he has done a thing. BJ seemed to like Taylor and was hitting KRob too...I'd imagine that Taylor is the possesion guy while krob stretches the field.

 
I was wondering when someone was going to mention T. Taylor in the Minny situation. People sure are quick to put Williamson on there when he has done a thing. BJ seemed to like Taylor and was hitting KRob too...I'd imagine that Taylor is the possesion guy while krob stretches the field.
Yeah, the #2 situation is one to keep an eye on. Don't count out Marcus either...that guy can still play when he's healthy, which obviously isn't often enough.
 
I agree mid 20s is too high, but I do believe he has 90 reception upside.
I personally don't see him doing as well as in SEA, where he maxed out at 78 receptions. He maxhad a single game high of 4 receptions last year and pretty much only had one noteworty game. Maybe Burleson's departure will give him a lot more looks, but M-Rob and Taylor are capable and I'm sure they want Williamson to start paying dividends. I think K-Rob 2006 could approach Burleson 2004, but that's about it in my book.
 
I agree mid 20s is too high, but I do believe he has 90 reception upside.
I personally don't see him doing as well as in SEA, where he maxed out at 78 receptions. He maxhad a single game high of 4 receptions last year and pretty much only had one noteworty game. Maybe Burleson's departure will give him a lot more looks, but M-Rob and Taylor are capable and I'm sure they want Williamson to start paying dividends. I think K-Rob 2006 could approach Burleson 2004, but that's about it in my book.
Why the comparison to Burleson with a new coaching staff? FWIW, I think Robinson is easily the best overall WR on the team.

It's hard to say exactly how many targets Childress will give him though, nobody really knows is the correct answer.

 
More on Koren, not too many WRs can say they averaged over 70 receptions in years 2&3 of their careers.

Code:
+--------------------------+-------------------------+                 |          Rushing         |        Receiving        |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| Year  TM |   G |   Att  Yards    Y/A   TD |   Rec  Yards   Y/R   TD |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| 2001 sea |  16 |     4     13    3.2    0 |    39    536  13.7    1 || 2002 sea |  16 |     8     56    7.0    0 |    78   1240  15.9    5 || 2003 sea |  15 |     4     15    3.8    0 |    65    896  13.8    4 || 2004 sea |  10 |     1      3    3.0    0 |    31    495  16.0    2 || 2005 min |  14 |     4     27    6.8    1 |    22    347  15.8    1 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+|  TOTAL   |  71 |    21    114    5.4    1 |   235   3514  15.0   13 |
 
I agree mid 20s is too high, but I do believe he has 90 reception upside.
I personally don't see him doing as well as in SEA, where he maxed out at 78 receptions. He maxhad a single game high of 4 receptions last year and pretty much only had one noteworty game. Maybe Burleson's departure will give him a lot more looks, but M-Rob and Taylor are capable and I'm sure they want Williamson to start paying dividends. I think K-Rob 2006 could approach Burleson 2004, but that's about it in my book.
Why the comparison to Burleson with a new coaching staff? FWIW, I think Robinson is easily the best overall WR on the team.

It's hard to say exactly how many targets Childress will give him though, nobody really knows is the correct answer.
The Burleson comparison was only to show the type of production I thought K-Rob might see this year. Leave Burlseon out of it altogether. I see K-Rob around 60/1000/8 witht he team spreading it around more than some may project.
 
I agree mid 20s is too high, but I do believe he has 90 reception upside.
I personally don't see him doing as well as in SEA, where he maxed out at 78 receptions. He maxhad a single game high of 4 receptions last year and pretty much only had one noteworty game. Maybe Burleson's departure will give him a lot more looks, but M-Rob and Taylor are capable and I'm sure they want Williamson to start paying dividends. I think K-Rob 2006 could approach Burleson 2004, but that's about it in my book.
Why the comparison to Burleson with a new coaching staff? FWIW, I think Robinson is easily the best overall WR on the team.

It's hard to say exactly how many targets Childress will give him though, nobody really knows is the correct answer.
The Burleson comparison was only to show the type of production I thought K-Rob might see this year. Leave Burlseon out of it altogether. I see K-Rob around 60/1000/8 witht he team spreading it around more than some may project.
Yeah, that's about where I've got him at, although he'll find some of my rosters because of his upside.
 
I would avoid Edwards this year. He will be rushed back and won't be 100% this year pretty much no matter what. He is bound to put up average numbers once he gets in the lineup. Add in that he plays on Cleveland and I'm betting he will disappoint those that try to grab him late hoping for a half season of big numbers. He'll be fine in 2007, but not so much in 2006.
:goodposting: Not a lot to like about Edwards this yeas IMHO.

On the other hand he has an excellent shot at being undervalued in '07.
I know that Joe Jurevicius has never been a featured WR and has had a lot of injuries keep him off the field over the years, but I'm beginning to wonder if he's the next "old" WR to surprise everyone and put up some really eye-popping numbers. With both Edwards and Winslow inexperienced, with possible health concerns, and not fully integrated into the offense yet; rookie Wilson possibly on the other side if Edwards isn't ready (Browns want to keep Northcutt as #3); and QB Frye with some experience now but still young; 6'5" Jurevicus may be focused on as a security blanket much like Muhammad in 2004 and Galloway in 2005.

Jurevicius was 55-694-10 last year in a complementary role. He could get 70 or 80 receptions in 2006 if none of the other WRs are ready / able / healthy enough to contribute heavily.

It seems crazy to talk about big Joe in these terms, but it was just as crazy to talk that way about Muhammad or Galloway before the last two seasons, and both came through in large part due to injuries to the other WRs.

ETA: I'm talking primarily about reception and TD totals here. His YPC has always been pretty meager, and even with 75-80 catches I would only expect to see 1,000 yards or so.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm also not sold on Koren Robinson either.  He might be worth it depending upon when he gets drafted, but from what I've ssen there's also someone that really wants him and will take him a lot sooner than I would.  I'm a bit squimish on pinning high hopes on a big year from a WR that had only 22 receptions the year before.
A) Somebody has to catch the balls and he's already been annointed the #1.B) Brad Johnson, the coaching and the O-line are solid.

C) He's done it before so his reception total from last year doesn't concern me.

D) I think his consensus ranking is about right.
interested to see this documented
 
I agree mid 20s is too high, but I do believe he has 90 reception upside.
I personally don't see him doing as well as in SEA, where he maxed out at 78 receptions. He maxhad a single game high of 4 receptions last year and pretty much only had one noteworty game. Maybe Burleson's departure will give him a lot more looks, but M-Rob and Taylor are capable and I'm sure they want Williamson to start paying dividends. I think K-Rob 2006 could approach Burleson 2004, but that's about it in my book.
Why the comparison to Burleson with a new coaching staff? FWIW, I think Robinson is easily the best overall WR on the team.

It's hard to say exactly how many targets Childress will give him though, nobody really knows is the correct answer.
The Burleson comparison was only to show the type of production I thought K-Rob might see this year. Leave Burlseon out of it altogether. I see K-Rob around 60/1000/8 witht he team spreading it around more than some may project.
DY, what you predict puts KRob at about 10th; How can you say he should be about 25-30 and then say being picked around 20th is too early then :shrug:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm also not sold on Koren Robinson either. He might be worth it depending upon when he gets drafted, but from what I've ssen there's also someone that really wants him and will take him a lot sooner than I would. I'm a bit squimish on pinning high hopes on a big year from a WR that had only 22 receptions the year before.
A) Somebody has to catch the balls and he's already been annointed the #1.B) Brad Johnson, the coaching and the O-line are solid.

C) He's done it before so his reception total from last year doesn't concern me.

D) I think his consensus ranking is about right.
He'll bite you, I'm telling you. He'll get you chunk of points in games when you win handily and don't need them. And when you need production from him, HE'LL DROP THE ####### BALL!!! I saw it from him in their last game, he tipped a ball to e defender's hands. The man is unreliable! His punt returns are coloring his rep a nice rosy shade, but as a WR he's still a bust.
 
I'll say Rod Gardner. He's had the full offseason to absorb the playbook and he's one of the guys that Thompson wanted back. He perfectly fits the description of what McCarthy wanted in his wideouts.

Plus his only competition for the WR2 spot in Green Bay is Robert Ferguson and Marc Boerigter. Greg Jennings may come on a bit, but I doubt he gets meaningful time if Gardner shows anything at all.

 
I'll say Rod Gardner. He's had the full offseason to absorb the playbook and he's one of the guys that Thompson wanted back. He perfectly fits the description of what McCarthy wanted in his wideouts.

Plus his only competition for the WR2 spot in Green Bay is Robert Ferguson and Marc Boerigter. Greg Jennings may come on a bit, but I doubt he gets meaningful time if Gardner shows anything at all.
:goodposting: sabertoothall packer homers will be drafting this guy late or trading for him on the cheap. gardner has little/no value right now and he'll send up starting for quite a few teams in need of WR play this year

 
Keyshawn's only been good for about 800/6 the last three years, Carolina could be a good spot for him to improve while not drawing the defense's best cover man.

 
I agree mid 20s is too high, but I do believe he has 90 reception upside.
I personally don't see him doing as well as in SEA, where he maxed out at 78 receptions. He maxhad a single game high of 4 receptions last year and pretty much only had one noteworty game. Maybe Burleson's departure will give him a lot more looks, but M-Rob and Taylor are capable and I'm sure they want Williamson to start paying dividends. I think K-Rob 2006 could approach Burleson 2004, but that's about it in my book.
Why the comparison to Burleson with a new coaching staff? FWIW, I think Robinson is easily the best overall WR on the team.

It's hard to say exactly how many targets Childress will give him though, nobody really knows is the correct answer.
The Burleson comparison was only to show the type of production I thought K-Rob might see this year. Leave Burlseon out of it altogether. I see K-Rob around 60/1000/8 witht he team spreading it around more than some may project.
DY, what you predict puts KRob at about 10th; How can you say he should be about 25-30 and then say being picked around 20th is too early then :shrug:
There are a lot of WR that get over 1000 yards and 8 TD. I should have said 6-8 TD, as that's what I see with 8 being the high side. That gives K-Rob a projected total of 136 to 148 fantasy points.136 points is usually in the low 20s as far as year end rankings. However, it should be noted that most preseason projections are normally on the high side, so relatively speaking projections for other WR will be too high too.

However, as I already outlined, I think MIN is a tough situation to gauge, as they have 3 guys that have been #1 WR befiore and Williamson who they are trying to groom as a legit WR stud for years to come. So I think whoever the #3 and #4 guys turn out to be will get more production than most team's WR3/4, taking away from the top 2 guys on the team.

Even though I may project K-Rob in the 20s, I think he is a risky pick at the same spot in drafts as he is a pretty risky pick. FBG has him in the mid 30s, which I think is good value at that point. I'd probably buy once it hit WR30, maybe as early as WR25 depending on how my squad was looking.

But I generally let other owners load up on risky picks and then take older proven commodoties , so K-Rob still might not make it on one of my teams if there were still a ton of guys hanging around undrafted.

 
I'm also not sold on Koren Robinson either.  He might be worth it depending upon when he gets drafted, but from what I've ssen there's also someone that really wants him and will take him a lot sooner than I would.  I'm a bit squimish on pinning high hopes on a big year from a WR that had only 22 receptions the year before.
A) Somebody has to catch the balls and he's already been annointed the #1.B) Brad Johnson, the coaching and the O-line are solid.

C) He's done it before so his reception total from last year doesn't concern me.

D) I think his consensus ranking is about right.
He'll bite you, I'm telling you. He'll get you chunk of points in games when you win handily and don't need them. And when you need production from him, HE'LL DROP THE ####### BALL!!! I saw it from him in their last game, he tipped a ball to e defender's hands. The man is unreliable! His punt returns are coloring his rep a nice rosy shade, but as a WR he's still a bust.
FYI-He was drunk.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top