What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

very good team trading for a top QB (1 Viewer)

Bri

Footballguy
After Luck, Rodgers and a handful of others replaced a "legend" and kept the team going real real well.

How far fetched is it to think that a team with an older top QB trade for a top QB in this draft?

Suppose the Saints or Pats trade for Mariotta or any other team you can think of.

Are the fans of those teams dreading when the star retires and...is this an option for teams like this?

 
After Luck, Rodgers and a handful of others replaced a "legend" and kept the team going real real well.

How far fetched is it to think that a team with an older top QB trade for a top QB in this draft?

Suppose the Saints or Pats trade for Mariotta or any other team you can think of.

Are the fans of those teams dreading when the star retires and...is this an option for teams like this?
As a Pats fan, I think we have found Brady's heir in Garoppolo

 
I'm not looking forward to the day Tom hangs it up, but I'm ready to see the second coming in the based GOATroppolo

 
I'm not looking forward to the day Tom hangs it up, but I'm ready to see the second coming in the based GOATroppolo
Call me crazy, but I still see the Pats as an 11 win playoff team without Brady. They are the youngest team in the league and would have gotten even younger if they don't have Vince, Revis, and Connolly.
 
I feel like Pats have handled that situation correctly.

Take advantage of the uncertainty that comes with scouting QB's when you have a long-term legend under wraps.

Avoid the pitfalls of risking big dollars on high-round QB's that may or may not have what it takes upstairs to get it done as an NFL QB. Keep drafting lower-round guys that have something about them that tickles your fancy, give them a couple years to see if they have a makeup that you feel will bring success at the position, and if not, cut bait and try again.

Seems like they've got their guy, and risked next to nothing to get him. Good work by a good franchise. :thumbup:

Feel like most teams with similar QB situations -- PIT, NO, SD, etc. -- are kind of dragging their feet, meaning they're relying on getting lucky with another high-rounder when the time comes. Might work out, but I don't think it's as reliable a plan, nor as fiscally prudent.

 
I think the Saints are a perfect team to go fetch a 1st or 2nd round QB. Not sure about moving UP for one of the top 2-3 guys though.

 
I'm not looking forward to the day Tom hangs it up, but I'm ready to see the second coming in the based GOATroppolo
Call me crazy, but I still see the Pats as an 11 win playoff team without Brady. They are the youngest team in the league and would have gotten even younger if they don't have Vince, Revis, and Connolly.
You and Freelove are both crazy today. Today, that is.

Garopollo is not winning 11 games with that team. No way. Brady is locked in for about three more years with you guys. It's almost moot.

 
Feel like most teams with similar QB situations -- PIT, NO, SD, etc. -- are kind of dragging their feet, meaning they're relying on getting lucky with another high-rounder when the time comes. Might work out, but I don't think it's as reliable a plan, nor as fiscally prudent.
Well, to be fair, New England has not been riddled with other needs over the years, meaning they could afford the luxury of drafting QBs who wouldn't play. I don't follow PIT or NO but I do follow SD, and they have continually had major needs at several other positions.

Take this offseason, for example. Despite being 9-7 each of the two seasons, entering this offseason, they had major needs at OL (needed to resign Dunlap plus 2 starters plus depth), DL (desperately need NT plus depth), LB (Freeney and Jarrett Johnson both gone, Gachkar maybe gone, weak ILB play), CB (resign Flowers plus depth), SS, WR (Floyd 34, Royal gone), RB (only Oliver, Donald Brown, and Woodhead on roster). And apparently the team felt they needed to upgrade at kick returner as well.

That is a lot of needs to go out and spend a draft pick on a QB who the team doesn't expect to see the field for 2+ seasons. Especially when the teams' best players (Rivers, Weddle, Gates) have a fairly small window in which the team can make a push to win.

Consider the Packers' situation. They made the right call with Rodgers, but at the time it obviously wasn't a given he would be the QB he has become. Meanwhile, they used a first rounder on him, a guy who didn't play until Favre was gone. What if they had drafted a different player instead of Rodgers? Could that player, who would have potentially been a third year starter, have made the difference in the 2007 conference championship game? it is possible the Packers gave up a chance at the 2007 Super Bowl by drafting Rodgers. Given they won one later with him and he is set to be a successful QB for many more years, it was worth it. But that is hindsight. If other teams look at that and try to follow suit, it is likely that most of their picks won't work out so well.

Looking forward, I certainly wouldn't want the Chargers to use a first rounder on Winston or Mariotta and forego help with one of their other needs. And if you go deep into the draft, it becomes much less likely you will find a starting caliber QB.

 
After Luck, Rodgers and a handful of others replaced a "legend" and kept the team going real real well.

How far fetched is it to think that a team with an older top QB trade for a top QB in this draft?

Suppose the Saints or Pats trade for Mariotta or any other team you can think of.

Are the fans of those teams dreading when the star retires and...is this an option for teams like this?
I mocking around with the idea that Mariota falls and Arizona (not the Eagles) trades up to get him. I think Arizona might be the perfect situation for Mariota. He would be able to sit behind Palmer for a year or two. Arizona also took Logan Thomas last year who was more of athlete than a QB. So I don't think it hard to imagine them liking Mariota as a QB they can actually develop.

 
I think the Saints are a perfect team to go fetch a 1st or 2nd round QB. Not sure about moving UP for one of the top 2-3 guys though.
The Saints are right about at the point of having to make plans to find a successor for Brees. Draft a QB too high and one too good and there becomes pressure on what to do with Brees. The ideal situation is the new QB takes over just when Brees wants to retire. There is visceral connection between Brees and the city. If the team is smart and not just for football reasons they will let him retire here. Basically he owns the city, his presence on the roster only brings goodwill. And needless to say he is still posting 5K per year. I would like to think that if there is an inner strategy it is to move up to get an elite WR to squeeze the very last bit of the very best stuff Brees has to offer.

There were noises they were interested in Garropolo last year. They have Ryan Griffin as the project in waiting right now and he has at times looked good. They also just resigned McCown.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top