Green Bay has plenty of cap room, and IMO, Longwell would not have resigned with Green Bay even if they offered him more than what the Vikings did. He wanted out.I'd be happy to see the Packers land arguably the best kicker in the NFL, it would be a nice upgrade. However, I wouldn't be all that thrilled to see them dump that kind of money on a kicker when there are other areas that need the money more. Also really curious as to what Vinatieri will ask for. If Longwell gets $2 mil/year, I'd be asking for atleast $3/year if I were him.I don't understand why the Pack will talk with Adam (who will cost upwards - without a doubt - of 2.5 million per year in a long-term deal) when they could have gotten Longwell for (at most) 2 million per year in a long-term deal.
I wouldn't have thought the Pack had that sort of money.
Keep in mind that the Patriots have only been in the top five in kicker scoring twice since Vinatieri arrived in 1996. Starting with last year first, here's where they finished:19, 1, 11, 10, 11, 15, 16, 7, 10, 5Patriots could probably find some kicker out of college after the draft, give him the minimum, and he would be a top 5 kicker.
linkThe NFL Network reported Tuesday that Adam Vinatieri would visit the Packers this week, probably on Friday, to meet with team officials.
Acquiring Vinatieri, the hero of two Super Bowl victories, won't come cheaply. The Patriots designated Vinatieri their franchise player each of the last two seasons, paying him base salaries equal to the average of the five highest-paid kickers in the league the previous year. In 2005, he was paid a base salary of $2.5 million. Had the Patriots used the tag on him again this year, his salary would have risen to $3 million. To sign Vinatieri, the Packers are going to have to surpass the $2 million average and $3 million signing bonus Ryan Longwell received Saturday from the Minnesota Vikings.
Vinatieri and Indianapolis' Mike Vanderjagt are still shopping themselves in a market that appears mixed for kickers. The Packers, Dallas, Miami, New England and Atlanta are all in need of help and would love to have the unflappable Vinatieri, 33.
In 10 seasons, Vinatieri has kicked 19 winning field goals with less than a minute left (including playoffs), missing just one. His career 81.9% field goal accuracy ranks fifth in NFL history.
Vinatieri is represented by the same agents who handle defensive end Aaron Kampman, so it’s possible the two sides have a structure in mind.
Patriots could probably find some kicker out of college after the draft, give him the minimum, and he would be a top 5 kicker.
In other words, they can find talent at the school of the blind's football team. Someone there knows how to pick players.Patriots could probably find some kicker out of college after the draft, give him the minimum, and he would be a top 5 kicker.
He has ties to GB's VP of player finance...Brandt was his agent a while back.I think Vinatierri is from South Dakota o there may be incentive to get closer to home? I'm not sure what sort of SD ties he still has there.
Looks like he's hooked an the pheasants and JoDean's diner.I think Vinatierri is from South Dakota o there may be incentive to get closer to home? I'm not sure what sort of SD ties he still has there.
linkBut no matter how far afield he goes, the birds always lure him back home. “The pheasant hunting in South Dakota is simply the best.”
Hotspots:
I do most of my hunting down in the Yankton-Utica area in the southeastern part of South Dakota near my grandfather’s farm. There is a lot of good hunting across the state, but a lot of places are being bought up, and people are bringing in the pen-raised birds and doing corporate hunts. Although there are some public lands still left, it seems they are getting harder and harder to find. After football is over, I usually hunt on private farms like the Warne Ranch in Pierre [605-224-1445] or the E Circle E Lodge in Meckling [605-624-2800] because they are open after the regular season ends.
What I Shoot:
My dad gave me my first gun, a side-by-side Italian 12-gauge my great-great-grandfather brought over from Italy. Using that gun is a family tradition. It’s been passed on from my older brother to me and then to my younger brother. When you’re 12 you want a brand-new gun, but we all had to start with the family gun and work our way up. Now I shoot my Benelli Super Black Eagle 12-gauge for upland game. An autoloader is the way to go out there because if 10 birds flush, which can happen, and you’re carrying an over/under, you’re always going to wish you had another shot.
When to Go:
Every year is a little different. Obviously opening weekend is great because everyone takes part. I remember going on opening day with my dad, my brother, cousins, nieces, nephews—you name it. It’s a lot of fun to have everyone together, and the hunting can be really good if most of the crops are harvested. But if it’s a late farming season—there’s been a lot of moisture and the crops are still in—it’s better to wait. When the corn is still in the ground it’s hard to get to the birds because they can hide in so many places.
Local Chow:
There is an all-you-can-eat, mom-and-pop place called JoDean’s [Highway 81 in Yankton, 605-665-9884], that’s loaded with hunters. It’s not a fancy place—they’re famous for their huge buffets. It’s just regular old American—warm and a lot of it. Also, my mom does a real good job with a pheasant, mushroom, and rice casserole. She has a few different pheasant recipes that have been passed down from generation to generation, so at the end of a day, after we’ve put in 10 miles chasing birds, we go home and eat until we bust.
This guy knows stuff. The Brandt connection is very real, and bodes well for Green Bay. Also, I'd rather have Vinatieri than Longwell.He has ties to GB's VP of player finance...Brandt was his agent a while back.I think Vinatierri is from South Dakota o there may be incentive to get closer to home? I'm not sure what sort of SD ties he still has there.
Depending the on the price, I agree. More of a clutch kicker whose accuracy is right there with Longwell.Though, I do not think he is great on kickoffs either...my knock on Longwell.This guy knows stuff. The Brandt connection is very real, and bodes well for Green Bay. Also, I'd rather have Vinatieri than Longwell.He has ties to GB's VP of player finance...Brandt was his agent a while back.I think Vinatierri is from South Dakota o there may be incentive to get closer to home? I'm not sure what sort of SD ties he still has there.
I get that part, I'm just playing up the Andrew Brandt connection.IMO, Adam V.'s destination almost has to be a playoff caliber team that is in need of a kicker as a difference maker in close games. Does anyone think Green Bay fits the profile? Investing $3 million a year in a kicker when your team was 4-12 makes no sense to me.
you realize they were 4-12 with a rookie G on one side and an inexperienced G on the other, injuries to thier 1, 2, & 3 HBs, 1 & 3 WRs, & TE, right?I mean, seriously, dont' take thier whole offense away last year and the Packers would have been 10-6 AT LEAST...IMO, Adam V.'s destination almost has to be a playoff caliber team that is in need of a kicker as a difference maker in close games. Does anyone think Green Bay fits the profile? Investing $3 million a year in a kicker when your team was 4-12 makes no sense to me.
Dallas seems like a much better fit, as the 'Boys finished 9-7 but lost 5 games by less than a TD and 3 by 3 points or less. Vinatieri could help turn a 9 or 10 win team into a 12 win team. The question is whether Dallas wants to pony up $3 million a year for a kicker.
Was there a major problem with Longwell's kicking? He's been one of the better kickers for 10 years and has hit at 80%+ on his kicks in 8 seasons. IIRC, he was around 75% on FGs last year.As for the team, injuries happen. The Pats had more injuries than the Packers did yet were a couple plays/calls/turnovers away from going back to the AFC title game--a far cry from 4-12.you realize they were 4-12 with a rookie G on one side and an inexperienced G on the other, injuries to thier 1, 2, & 3 HBs, 1 & 3 WRs, & TE, right?I mean, seriously, dont' take thier whole offense away last year and the Packers would have been 10-6 AT LEAST...IMO, Adam V.'s destination almost has to be a playoff caliber team that is in need of a kicker as a difference maker in close games. Does anyone think Green Bay fits the profile? Investing $3 million a year in a kicker when your team was 4-12 makes no sense to me.
Dallas seems like a much better fit, as the 'Boys finished 9-7 but lost 5 games by less than a TD and 3 by 3 points or less. Vinatieri could help turn a 9 or 10 win team into a 12 win team. The question is whether Dallas wants to pony up $3 million a year for a kicker.
plus, they were like 1-8 or so before they finally lost by more combined than they beat NO by... they were losing close games, what do you need when you lose close games? A clutch kicker...
Care to elaborate?Vinateiri is a proven clutch kicker, and kicks very well in bad weather. Green Bay has bad weather.If the Packers sign Vinatieri, Thompson will have officially lost his mind.
"Clutch kickers" don't exist. (Or did you forget Vinatieri's fourth-quarter playoff miss this year, or his two misses in the Super Bowl?)Care to elaborate?Vinateiri is a proven clutch kicker, and kicks very well in bad weather. Green Bay has bad weather.If the Packers sign Vinatieri, Thompson will have officially lost his mind.
Historically, yes Longwell has been a very accurate kicker. However with the loss of Doug Peterson he hasn't been comfortable with his holder(s) and his accuracy had gone down in '04 and '05.I'm not saying that Longwell himself cost the Packers these games but there are 3 games in particular where the Packers could have been in a better postition to win if he were on his game.Was there a major problem with Longwell's kicking? He's been one of the better kickers for 10 years and has hit at 80%+ on his kicks in 8 seasons. IIRC, he was around 75% on FGs last year.As for the team, injuries happen. The Pats had more injuries than the Packers did yet were a couple plays/calls/turnovers away from going back to the AFC title game--a far cry from 4-12.you realize they were 4-12 with a rookie G on one side and an inexperienced G on the other, injuries to thier 1, 2, & 3 HBs, 1 & 3 WRs, & TE, right?I mean, seriously, dont' take thier whole offense away last year and the Packers would have been 10-6 AT LEAST...IMO, Adam V.'s destination almost has to be a playoff caliber team that is in need of a kicker as a difference maker in close games. Does anyone think Green Bay fits the profile? Investing $3 million a year in a kicker when your team was 4-12 makes no sense to me.
Dallas seems like a much better fit, as the 'Boys finished 9-7 but lost 5 games by less than a TD and 3 by 3 points or less. Vinatieri could help turn a 9 or 10 win team into a 12 win team. The question is whether Dallas wants to pony up $3 million a year for a kicker.
plus, they were like 1-8 or so before they finally lost by more combined than they beat NO by... they were losing close games, what do you need when you lose close games? A clutch kicker...
I'm not saying that the Packers weren't better than their record indicated, only that I don't think the kicking game was the cause (or the solution) to their problems.
Dallas kickers missed more than 35% of their FG attempts and without a doubt cost them several games and a playoff spot had they made even some of those kicks.
In '04 he was 24/28 on field goals (85.7%) and 48/48 on extra points.Historically, yes Longwell has been a very accurate kicker. However with the loss of Doug Peterson he hasn't been comfortable with his holder(s) and his accuracy had gone down in '04 and '05.
I stand corrected. I thought he had been blaming bad holds for his misses for 2 years now.In '04 he was 24/28 on field goals (85.7%) and 48/48 on extra points.Historically, yes Longwell has been a very accurate kicker. However with the loss of Doug Peterson he hasn't been comfortable with his holder(s) and his accuracy had gone down in '04 and '05.
linkAdam Vinatieri was scheduled to touch down in Green Bay yesterday and meet with Packers officials last night and into today. The question is whether the Packers will use a similar tactic as the Browns did with linebacker Willie McGinest and attempt to keep Vinatieri in town until his name is on a contract.
-- Boston Globe
Uh, OK. Well, read into this what you will then:http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=408839"Clutch kickers" don't exist. (Or did you forget Vinatieri's fourth-quarter playoff miss this year, or his two misses in the Super Bowl?)Care to elaborate?Vinateiri is a proven clutch kicker, and kicks very well in bad weather. Green Bay has bad weather.If the Packers sign Vinatieri, Thompson will have officially lost his mind.
He has made plenty of clutch kicks. He has also missed plenty of clutch kicks, including his most recent kick. The question is whether the fact that he has made clutch kicks in the past means it's more likely he'll make clutch kicks in the future; the answer is no.Uh, OK. Well, read into this what you will then:http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=408839"Clutch kickers" don't exist. (Or did you forget Vinatieri's fourth-quarter playoff miss this year, or his two misses in the Super Bowl?)Care to elaborate?Vinateiri is a proven clutch kicker, and kicks very well in bad weather. Green Bay has bad weather.If the Packers sign Vinatieri, Thompson will have officially lost his mind.
His record kicking in the clutch sets Vinatieri apart from others. In his career, he has connected on 19 of 20 deciding field goals attempted in the final minute of a game. Two of those occurred in Super Bowl victories and many others occurred in poor weather conditions in New England.
"The guy's a quality kicker," said a special teams coach from another team. "He's performed in big games and made big kicks under pressure. I think he still has a lot of life in him. He can still be effective as a kickoff guy."
Sure, but that's like saying after some Broncos losses in the 80's that John Elway wasn't more likely to more likely to be clutch in the future. Maybe Vinitieri will miss more big kicks than he has in the past, but the odds are that he'll still be one of a handful of kickers you'd want when a game is on the line. Certain players respond better under pressure than others and it's hard to deny that Vinitieri is great under pressure.He has made plenty of clutch kicks. He has also missed plenty of clutch kicks, including his most recent kick. The question is whether the fact that he has made clutch kicks in the past means it's more likely he'll make clutch kicks in the future; the answer is no.Uh, OK. Well, read into this what you will then:http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=408839"Clutch kickers" don't exist. (Or did you forget Vinatieri's fourth-quarter playoff miss this year, or his two misses in the Super Bowl?)Care to elaborate?Vinateiri is a proven clutch kicker, and kicks very well in bad weather. Green Bay has bad weather.If the Packers sign Vinatieri, Thompson will have officially lost his mind.
His record kicking in the clutch sets Vinatieri apart from others. In his career, he has connected on 19 of 20 deciding field goals attempted in the final minute of a game. Two of those occurred in Super Bowl victories and many others occurred in poor weather conditions in New England.
"The guy's a quality kicker," said a special teams coach from another team. "He's performed in big games and made big kicks under pressure. I think he still has a lot of life in him. He can still be effective as a kickoff guy."
Vinatieri is someone you want to be kicking late in games, because he's a good kicker. But there are probably five kickers in the league who are at least as good, and I don't think there's any real evidence that Vinatieri is better in clutch situations than at any other time. (Unless you edit out his Super Bowl and playoff misses from your "clutch" stats).Sure, but that's like saying after some Broncos losses in the 80's that John Elway wasn't more likely to more likely to be clutch in the future. Maybe Vinitieri will miss more big kicks than he has in the past, but the odds are that he'll still be one of a handful of kickers you'd want when a game is on the line. Certain players respond better under pressure than others and it's hard to deny that Vinitieri is great under pressure.
linkKicker Adam Vinatieri was home in Orlando last night after visiting with Green Bay Packers officials. An NFL source said he left town without a contract offer. Vinatieri had dinner in Green Bay with coach Mike McCarthy Thursday, as the Packers gauged whether Vinatieri was serious about leaving New England or just trying to drive up the Patriots' initial offer. Vinatieri told the Packers he will leave New England if the Packers offer the better deal.
The Packers lost kicker Ryan Longwell, who signed a five-year, $10 million deal with Minnesota that included a $3 million signing bonus. According to the source, team brass are debating whether to offer Vinatieri just as much, or more. It would likely take more to pry Vinatieri from the Patriots. The Patriots are likely to match an offer, or at least come close, unless there are some unusual guarantees. New England elected not to put a franchise tag on Vinatieri because of the $3 million salary and hit to the salary cap, but a Longwell-like deal is probably not out of line with the team's budget. The Packers, who are some $25 million under the salary cap, have room to make a higher offer, but general manager Ted Thompson is reluctant to make huge free agent deals.
if I remember right, Longwell missed clutch kicks a lot...and he wanted out of GB...Was there a major problem with Longwell's kicking? He's been one of the better kickers for 10 years and has hit at 80%+ on his kicks in 8 seasons. IIRC, he was around 75% on FGs last year.As for the team, injuries happen. The Pats had more injuries than the Packers did yet were a couple plays/calls/turnovers away from going back to the AFC title game--a far cry from 4-12.you realize they were 4-12 with a rookie G on one side and an inexperienced G on the other, injuries to thier 1, 2, & 3 HBs, 1 & 3 WRs, & TE, right?I mean, seriously, dont' take thier whole offense away last year and the Packers would have been 10-6 AT LEAST...IMO, Adam V.'s destination almost has to be a playoff caliber team that is in need of a kicker as a difference maker in close games. Does anyone think Green Bay fits the profile? Investing $3 million a year in a kicker when your team was 4-12 makes no sense to me.
Dallas seems like a much better fit, as the 'Boys finished 9-7 but lost 5 games by less than a TD and 3 by 3 points or less. Vinatieri could help turn a 9 or 10 win team into a 12 win team. The question is whether Dallas wants to pony up $3 million a year for a kicker.
plus, they were like 1-8 or so before they finally lost by more combined than they beat NO by... they were losing close games, what do you need when you lose close games? A clutch kicker...
I'm not saying that the Packers weren't better than their record indicated, only that I don't think the kicking game was the cause (or the solution) to their problems.
Dallas kickers missed more than 35% of their FG attempts and without a doubt cost them several games and a playoff spot had they made even some of those kicks.
linkThough the Green Bay Packers gave kicker Adam Vinatieri their hard sell on his free-agent visit to their offices late last week, negotiations for his contract have yet to yield a deal with the Packers or New England Patriots. The Packers are in the thick of the race to sign Vinatieri, who’s the NFL’s premier kicker. But all appearances suggest Vinatieri is waiting out the market rather than trying to strike a quick deal to return to the Patriots or join the Packers.
The Packers and Patriots appear to be the only teams in the bidding, which is sure to conclude with the best contract ever signed by a kicker. There’s always the chance another team steps in if talks drag on, but with only two bidders, the Packers have to think they have a legitimate shot at signing Vinatieri. “I think (the chances of signing him) are good,” coach Mike McCarthy said. “I only base that on the conversations I had with him and the conversations we had with him (on his visit). When it reaches negotiations, I have nothing to comment on, because it’s not in my control.”
Vinatieri, 33, is represented by Neil Cornrich, a suspended agent whose firm is handling the negotiations. Neither Vinatieri nor his representatives have commented on anything, and the Patriots have given no indication of the financial lengths they’re willing to go to sign Vinatieri.
They've got plenty of cap money and kickers are at a premium. Vinatierri has a few years left in him so why not sign him. I hope it doesn't take the Packers years to rebuild. They still have plenty of cap room to help out the defense and add a Hawk or Williams in the draft and the Pack won't be too bad this year.Packers | Vinatieri leaves town without an offer
Fri, 17 Mar 2006 22:34:42 -0800
Michael Felger, of the Boston Herald, reports free agent PK Adam Vinatieri (Patriots) left Green Bay Friday night, March 17, without a contract offer from the Green Bay Packers following a two-day visit. The prevailing wisdom was that the Packers were serious about offering Vinatieri a mega-deal; otherwise the visit would not have taken place. Vinatieri is likely looking for the largest deal ever given to a kicker, which would mean an annual salary well over $2 million per season and a signing bonus north of $3 million.
The Packers are better off spending this money in other areas, like defense. Why spend all this money on a kicker, when the packers will be entering a rebuilding year (s)
I think how long it takes will have to do with how quickly Rodgers develops...or shows he is not good enough and they replace him.They've got plenty of cap money and kickers are at a premium. Vinatierri has a few years left in him so why not sign him. I hope it doesn't take the Packers years to rebuild. They still have plenty of cap room to help out the defense and add a Hawk or Williams in the draft and the Pack won't be too bad this year.Packers | Vinatieri leaves town without an offer
Fri, 17 Mar 2006 22:34:42 -0800
Michael Felger, of the Boston Herald, reports free agent PK Adam Vinatieri (Patriots) left Green Bay Friday night, March 17, without a contract offer from the Green Bay Packers following a two-day visit. The prevailing wisdom was that the Packers were serious about offering Vinatieri a mega-deal; otherwise the visit would not have taken place. Vinatieri is likely looking for the largest deal ever given to a kicker, which would mean an annual salary well over $2 million per season and a signing bonus north of $3 million.
The Packers are better off spending this money in other areas, like defense. Why spend all this money on a kicker, when the packers will be entering a rebuilding year (s)