Seems like these rankings are just blocs of guys. Not bad perhaps, but there are some issues.
5 QB's in the top 5 spots?
Peyton and Brady in the top 5 of dynasty overall.
Next five picks are WRs. In a 10 team league a RB wouldn't go until the second round.
Has Leshoure as a major outlier, 18 spots lower than the other three guys with RB rankings up. But, Waldman doesn't have Best higher than anyone. Will the Lions ground game offer no value? Is the future RB of the Lions not there yet?
The positional rankings seem well done, but the overall rankings don't mesh as well.
If you read my draft strategy articles and my study on RB turnover, you'll get more insight into why I value QBs and WRs a little more - especially in dynasty leagues. As for Best-Leshoure, not sure I follow your logic on Best needing to be higher than anyone else if I have Leshoure lower. The future of the Lions running game isn't here yet - still needs to see the line get better than Stafford to stay healthy. Might happen this year, but my expectations are starting lower rather than higher.
If you believe that a RB is the most important, or even equally important in re-draft, what about dynasty leagues changes that? Assuming your rankings are based on Value Over Replacement, wouldn't the RB turnover only make elite options more valuable? It seems like even 2nd tier guys are being thrown in RBBCs left and right. Wouldn't' that suggest that those with elite talent, who have no threat of RBBC (ADP,CJ) or who can produce in RBBCs (Charles, Rice, McCoy) are worth more, based on the difference in value between an elite RB and a good RB?I have a hard time believing that the difference between your QB1 and QB12 is greater than that of your RB1 and RB12. Most leagues start 2 RBs, so the value gap would actually need to be bigger than that of RB1 and RB24. That it is only if we assume no flex spots.
In this draft alone, 5+ guys who looked to be starters took a hit in value and had their starter status challenged, based simply on the fact that they were not elite. As an owner who has invested in ADP, McCoy, Charles, et cetera, I am happy I don't have to worry about that at my RB1 spot. My league mates who waited on RB, who invested in 2nd tier talents at the position are now scrambling, and in many cases, don't even have 2 guys on their roster with more that a 50/50 shot to start on their NFL teams, let alone a 12 team fantasy league.
I am fine using guys like Austin and Bowe as opposed to Calvin, Nicks and Fitzgerald (Romo/Brady instead of Rodgers/Rivers), if it means I have one or two top end RBs and the other owners in my league don't even have reliable starters at two spots in their starting lineup. In dynasty, that value is magnified as every April, more and more good RBs are being replaced and inserted into RBBCs. Even a 4 year run in which you are immune from that gives you more advantage than most QBs will ever offer, even with their extended careers.
Thanks for your thoughts on the above.