Rusty Barr
Footballguy
league full
-
-
Last edited by a moderator:
Chris,You are also way off base with regards to our league, and I don't appreciate you referring that I ripped anyone off in trades. You're also wrong about my league not having a way to do something about it, we have a veto process (see below). I've lost a lot on deals as well as gained on them. You think my team is too strong, yet I have one shared title in the 4 year history of the league, and two first round exits the last two years. What looks great today sometimes doesn't look so great next year or the year after that. Baseball slumps, football doesn't. I think our format is better than anything you could come up with to be honest. Everyone seems to really like our format except you. The problem with you is that you don't know how to recognize young talent, so you have to limit the amount that others can obtain until you come up to speed on their value, so you couldn't hack it in our league. You had a roster full of geezers that made it to the World Series your last year, then you bailed on your team. Because of your inability, or lack of initiative to know the minors, our league wasn't for you and I can respect that. Because of the roster size of our league, I think it is perfect for allowing player development, but not hoarding.Rusty Barr said:From another forum I am running the ad....
"Rusty,
I'm eyeing your league with interest. I'm a long time fantasy player and commissioner of 3 existing CBS leagues, one of which is going into it's 5th year...
What I see in your league peaks my interest but I'm a little confused if there is a tie at the end of a playoff week and who would advance.
Also, how are the keepers kept? In one of the 3 leagues I run, we keep players for a maximum of 3 years in a row and they are kept in the round they are drafted. This makes a keeper list extremely interesting because it removes the "keep my 5 best players" from the mix and turns it into a decision based on my 5 best draft picks... Guys draft somebody like Joey Votto in the 20th round last year may keep him over say Grady Sizemore in the 1st round because of the value pick. It's fairly easy to track with a spreadsheet (I can send you ours as a sample) and works out really well..
Would love to hear more.. Drafting 35 rounds seems a little 'daunting' and maybe excessive for a 12 team league, but I could be open to that..
Jon"
Jon. First off, I would love to have you join us. I would probably ask you to help me admin it if you do. Dont worry I am not asking you to be a co-admin. Just a backup to me if I am not available or I, as GM, am directly involved in some sort of dispute, and we need someone to be the arbitrator in those cases. It rarely happens, but in my years of running the football league, it has come up and Ive got a guy who steps up in the football league in that way and it works great. He mostly helps me watch over things, like legal rosters, and stuff like that. Having an extra pair of "commissioner" eyes has been very valuable over the years.
My past fantasy baseball experience mostly comes from running a full dynasty Strat-o-Matic league from 1982 through 1997 with guys I knew face to face locally where I lived and grew up in New Jersey. Not sure if you are familiar with that game or not, but we had 45 man rosters, and you kept everyone forever until you traded them or cut them. I saw the flaws of keeping everyone at no cost, but we had such a great group of GMs I just couldn't leave. Well, I did leave. I got a job transfer to South Carolina, and not being able to play face to face, I sadly dropped out. After that I joined (a stranger's league through an ad in a forum like this) a full 5 x 5 roto H2H dynasty league. The guys in the league were good guys. Got to know a bunch of them over the years through trade talk, but after a number of years, one team, in particular (the commish's team) was becoming way too strong in my opinion. There was no trade veto rule and he was just ripping off a couple of guys on a monthly basis (again, my opinion. Some of these guys read the threads here and I dont want to piss anyone off). But to me, the guy running the league was a good guy, but it was just ridiculous how strong his team was becoming and there was nothing to keep that in check in the rules. To me, It was as if he had farm teams that he would pluck for players when he needed them. There was nothing anyone could do or say because he had no rules to prevent this. It was out of control. ....
There was one other guy in the league, who was basically, always playing for three years down the road. The league had no rules on min innings or min at bats, so his entire roster was one giant team of prospects. What was maddening, was once a player started to develop, he'd trade him for two or three MORE prospects. I mean, thats his right, but it just killed the league balance.
Oh, that brings up a big point, there are NO DIVISIONS in this league and we will have a (as close as we can) have a completely balanced schedule. We will all be in one big 12 team division. See, in that league, there was two divisions, and an imbalanced schedule. Of course the one super strong team was in a division with all the weak teams and the farm team, and that league had a almost 2 to 1 imbalanced schedule. Which to me was just crazy. Youd play everyone twice as many times in your own division as you did in the other division! So, again, with the divisions, not balanced, being in the OTHER division, was TOTALLY unfair. (again, my opinions here, folks)
Anyway, I'm running down all kinds of rabbit trails here.
Bottom line, is, I have tried with this league, to take all of the best rules, of all my experience and bring them into this league. But I dont want to make it too complicated. The football league I run also has keepers and we do something similar to what you are proposing, and to be honest, its just too complicated, I mean, we've got it set up that way in the football league now, and we just have to live with it, but in hindsight, if I could I would dumb that system down, cause its just overwhelming for a newbie when he comes in and has to learn the nuances of that system. ....
-
That is a flat out lie. First of all, I only know one person in my league. The rest are online internet users that I've never met. Just because your referendums were voted down, don't make it sound like I had something to do with it. People on this board know me as a commish and my reputation is very good. Some may not like what I post here, but they know me as a stand up commish. You proposed a roster increase that was voted in, LOL. You dropped out of my league because you had a roster full of old guys on their last leg, and didn't want to learn the minors. Watch out for lying, it's not beholding. Taking cheap shots at me and my league is not needed. Our owners love our league, and I expect if anyone read my rules they can see why they like it so much. Our current owners know the value of long term committment to the league, and have taken an active effort to learn the minors. A successful dynasty league is condusive to multiple apporaches, both long term and win now. My league does that. Owners who are afraid of learning about prospects should only play in redraft leagues.Rusty Barr said:when I was in that league I had MANY conversations with other experience fantasy GMs and we talked and talked for hours about how to fix that league we were in. We would type up a HUGE proposal and submit it, and the commish, was not willing to change the rules. He would put it up for a vote, but he had five or six close friends of his in the league, and they would just all vote the way he told them to. So, needless to say, NOTHING changed, I got frustrated and dropped out, ironically, right after winning second place. .....
Reading comprehension down? I said that I only know one person from my baseball league personally, and the rest I knew only online. Also, I said you lied about what you said about me, not whether you talked to others in the league. Hell, we all know that you talked to most everyone. Just a FYI, when recruiting for your leagues, keep that trash about me and my league out of it and we'll be just fine.Rusty Barr said:You say I lied that you didn't know anyone? Or you didn't have any friends in the league? I thought you told me most of the guys played in a fantasy football league with you? If my memory is not right, I honestly thought you told me that. I remember specifically Noel telling me about you, and what a great commissioner you were, when he recruited ME. I asked him how he knew you and he told me you guys went way back and that most of the guys knew you from some dynasty football league or something? Again, maybe he was exaggerating to sell me on joining? But I honestly remember him telling me that. I know I'm 46 and my memory ain't what it should be, but you did have friends in that league that you knew before the league started..... No? Well, if thats not true, then I am wrong, and I stand corrected, and I should not have said that. But I was not trying to lie. And, in any event, if you DIDN'T know most of the guys before the league started? It sure FELT that way to me.
You say I lied that I didn't continually talk with other owners in the league? LOL. C'mon how would you know that? What? do you want me to list the guys I talked to all the time about how to fix the league? LOL. Trust me, there was others who were frustrated by some of the rules. Frustrated enough to leave? No. Obviously not. But please, you're crazy if you think there weren't guys in the league other than me who were frustrated by some of the original rules that weren't getting changed.
-
No, what was uncalled for was to insinuate that I colluded with other owners to vote down your referendums. I put each up to a vote, and you even won a few of them. Also, that you lied about my league not having veto rules to overrule some of the trades I made that you claimed that I "ripped" off an owner. We've always had veto rules (see league constitution). I've had trades where I've got the shaft, and some where I came out on top. Thus the nature of trading. I simply came in here and Rotojunkie to defend my honor and my league's honer. Which by the way is going into it's 5th year and is very successful and active. The best thing you can do now is just drop this, because the more you post the deeper you fall.Rusty Barr said:Go through the thread.... Use that quote feature.... Please? Tell me one time I personally mentioned you or anyone else directly by name? Tell me one time anyone would ever be able to directly attach anything I said in this thread about you or Paul or anyone in the league for that matter.But have you personally come after me? Have you personally tried to destroy my credibility DIRECTLY? Destroy the thread here and at Roto-junkie?I hope you post a long thread here tomorrow about something, in a different forum, and unlike my intent, you can lie all you want about me, have at it, just dont DIRECTLY mention my name or my User ID OK?Watch and see if I post in your thread?I wont do that Chuck. And if you still think its right what you did to my thread and to me personally here and at Roto-junkie?You and Paul.You were wrong to do that here. You were wrong to do it at Roto-junkie. Think about it.-
I knew what league you were talking about and I wasn't about to let your lying go without defending myself and my league.Rusty Barr said:You're missing the whole thing!
You came in here and slandered me directly. I never did that to you. Not one time. No one here knows what league I was in. Go through the thread. Why did you take things personally? I mean, yes, NOW they know what league I was in, obviously. Now you've made it a personal thing. But they did not get that through the thread, till you chimed in.
Yes, I will drop it. But, please, you're the one who kicked up the dirt. You're the one who started with the mud.
Why couldn't you just stay out of the thread?
When did I attack you or Paul or the league personally? Like you have done to ME??????
-
I've said my peace, I'm done with this.Rusty Barr said:OK?So, I attack you and Paul in a private closet, where no one else but you and he can take offense?Then, you and he attack me here, in the MALL?And that makes it even? OK to do what you guys did to me?Got it.-
I'm re-reading my earlier "attack" post on this thread. Pretty mild "attack" in my mind. You brought Chuck and I by example into your recruiting thread. We saw it, as did a few other owners in our league who read these boards. Once you bring "others" into the fray, you open the door for rebuttal.Rusty Barr said:OK?So, I attack you and Paul in a private closet, where no one else but you and he can take offense?Then, you and he attack me here, in the MALL?And that makes it even? OK to do what you guys did to me?Got it.-