What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WAS TE Fred Davis (1 Viewer)

certificate

Footballguy
If Cooley has a broken ankle as reported, pick him up. 8 Receptions 78 Yards and a TD taking over for Cooley. Can't block worth a damn, but the TE has too big of a role in this offense for them to take him off the field.

 
Kind of sneaky too because they have a week 8 bye. It means carrying an extra TE but he could be a TE1 down the stretch.

 
It's official; make your way to the wire and place your claims now!

Tight end Chris Cooley broke his right foot late in the second quarter of the Redskins' game against the Philadelphia Eagles on Monday night.

Cooley was hurt when he tried to change direction.

"He's got a break in his ankle," Coach Jim Zorn said. "It's on the inner side of his tibia. I haven't seen the X-rays yet, but we're quite certain it's broke or fractured in some way; we'll have a better diagnosis tomorrow. He'll be out for a while. I don't know that it's a season-ending injury yet. I can't say that."
Source: Jason Reid for the Washington Post's "Redskins Insider" - http://voices.washingtonpost.com/redskinsi...roken-foot.html
 
This is the kind of performance people who watched him at USC expected to see out of him. It's not a fluke. He's got good hands and is a good, instinctive route runner who's also not bad with the ball in his hands. His blocking sucks which concerns me about him being on the field enough, but that might work itself out.

 
Between the terrible o-line, Jason's preference for passing to the guy closest to him, and Fred's own poor blocking - could see him becoming a steady target.

 
His blocking skills won't really kill his playing time. He has to play now. A lot.

I was impressed with what I saw, if only for 1 game. I wouldn't be shocked if he averaged 4 catches per game with an occasional 7-84-1 type showing.

 
He can't block worth a damn, which will kill his playing time.
Not right now it wont. Who is going to take his playing time now that Cooley is out for the season?Davis has freakish athletic skills and is a great pass catcher. In fantasy, that is what matters. Under regular circumstances we would have to worry about his lack of blocking keeping him from the field but this isn't a regular circumstance. Davis should come off of every WW in fantasy this week.
 
Any new thoughts/word beyond the fact that he stayed behind to work during the bye week?
Not really new anymore, but since it hasn't been mentioned in this thread, it's worth noting that Cooley isn't on IR. He's expecting a return this season, maybe only missing 3-4 games.
That's the story, anyway. It's certainly subject to revision based upon how his recovery goes. Also, it's not like the team is playing for anything, so I could easily see this turning into an IR trip for Cooley if there's any doubt at all about reinjuring or reaggravating the injury.
 
Any new thoughts/word beyond the fact that he stayed behind to work during the bye week?
Not really new anymore, but since it hasn't been mentioned in this thread, it's worth noting that Cooley isn't on IR. He's expecting a return this season, maybe only missing 3-4 games.
That's the story, anyway. It's certainly subject to revision based upon how his recovery goes. Also, it's not like the team is playing for anything, so I could easily see this turning into an IR trip for Cooley if there's any doubt at all about reinjuring or reaggravating the injury.
True. I believe the pins are supposed to be in for about 15 days and then they'll have a better idea of how quickly he can return. But, the fact that they haven't put him on IR indicates they have every intention of playing him again if he recovers in a decent amount of time.
 
Any new thoughts/word beyond the fact that he stayed behind to work during the bye week?
Not really new anymore, but since it hasn't been mentioned in this thread, it's worth noting that Cooley isn't on IR. He's expecting a return this season, maybe only missing 3-4 games.
That's the story, anyway. It's certainly subject to revision based upon how his recovery goes. Also, it's not like the team is playing for anything, so I could easily see this turning into an IR trip for Cooley if there's any doubt at all about reinjuring or reaggravating the injury.
True. I believe the pins are supposed to be in for about 15 days and then they'll have a better idea of how quickly he can return. But, the fact that they haven't put him on IR indicates they have every intention of playing him again if he recovers in a decent amount of time.
Personally, didn't plan on Davis being a permanent solution (would be nice "lightning in a bottle") if that happened. Was just curious if there was any insight offered as to the Skins' plans on how to use him, as well as what makes him a better option than the other WW fodder than may be out there?
 
Something to bear in mind.... (From a washington homer who picked up Davis in 3 leagues) Their O-line is in shambles. He may be kept in to block a lot. A lot.

 
Any new thoughts/word beyond the fact that he stayed behind to work during the bye week?
Not really new anymore, but since it hasn't been mentioned in this thread, it's worth noting that Cooley isn't on IR. He's expecting a return this season, maybe only missing 3-4 games.
That's the story, anyway. It's certainly subject to revision based upon how his recovery goes. Also, it's not like the team is playing for anything, so I could easily see this turning into an IR trip for Cooley if there's any doubt at all about reinjuring or reaggravating the injury.
True. I believe the pins are supposed to be in for about 15 days and then they'll have a better idea of how quickly he can return. But, the fact that they haven't put him on IR indicates they have every intention of playing him again if he recovers in a decent amount of time.
Personally, didn't plan on Davis being a permanent solution (would be nice "lightning in a bottle") if that happened. Was just curious if there was any insight offered as to the Skins' plans on how to use him, as well as what makes him a better option than the other WW fodder than may be out there?
I have my doubts about Cooley's effectiveness even if he's not IR'd. Foot injuries are tough to come back from within the same season, and doubly so with surgery involved. Also, Cooley is a good blocker, and they were already keeping him in to block a lot given the injuries to the O-line. The point is that Davis figures to get some receiving opportunities even if Cooley returns. I think Davis is a good play for this season as a backup fantasy TE. Frankly, I've been saying for more than a year that the should have been running more 2-TE sets with Davis out running patterns given that he's a good receiving TE, but the team has simply refused to do that.
 
Something to bear in mind.... (From a washington homer who picked up Davis in 3 leagues) Their O-line is in shambles. He may be kept in to block a lot. A lot.
Won't happen. He's not a good blocker. This has been mentioned as a common fear with Cooley and it just never happened. This season, Cooley has been sent out for a pass 182 times and pass blocked 27 times. Davis has run 63 patterns while pass blocking 16 times. Cooley's most active game blocking was against Carolina when Samuels went out during the game. They had to adjust on the fly. This past game against a Philly rush that was killing Jason Campbell, Davis ran 33 patterns and pass blocked 8 times.Yes, Cooley was asked to block more (12.9% of passing plays) than guys like Gonzalez (6.8%), Gates (5.1%), and Winslow (4.5%). But, other guys like Owen Daniels (12.8%), Dallas Clark (13.3%), and Jason Witten (13.2%) pass block just as much. And, Shockey (20.4%) is a top 10 TE while doing a lot of pass blocking. So, I really don't think it's about whether you are asked to pass block 5 more plays or not. Those 5 extra plays weren't called for you anyway, so you probably weren't getting the ball.I just don't see Davis being turned into a blocking TE because...1) He sucks at it.2) The Redskins, despite having a pitiful OL, won't change their offensive philosophy.
 
dgreen said:
Prinefan said:
Something to bear in mind.... (From a washington homer who picked up Davis in 3 leagues) Their O-line is in shambles. He may be kept in to block a lot. A lot.
Won't happen. He's not a good blocker. This has been mentioned as a common fear with Cooley and it just never happened. This season, Cooley has been sent out for a pass 182 times and pass blocked 27 times. Davis has run 63 patterns while pass blocking 16 times. Cooley's most active game blocking was against Carolina when Samuels went out during the game. They had to adjust on the fly. This past game against a Philly rush that was killing Jason Campbell, Davis ran 33 patterns and pass blocked 8 times.Yes, Cooley was asked to block more (12.9% of passing plays) than guys like Gonzalez (6.8%), Gates (5.1%), and Winslow (4.5%). But, other guys like Owen Daniels (12.8%), Dallas Clark (13.3%), and Jason Witten (13.2%) pass block just as much. And, Shockey (20.4%) is a top 10 TE while doing a lot of pass blocking. So, I really don't think it's about whether you are asked to pass block 5 more plays or not. Those 5 extra plays weren't called for you anyway, so you probably weren't getting the ball.I just don't see Davis being turned into a blocking TE because...1) He sucks at it.2) The Redskins, despite having a pitiful OL, won't change their offensive philosophy.
:mellow: The question remains though, is Davis startable? We are still talking about a Washington offense which has yet to score more than 17 points in a game. 8 Receptions for 78 yards is sure encouraging however.
 
Who else is JC going to throw to? Randle El? HAHAHA

Davis will get PLENTY of work. His strength has always been known as a receiver. He was drafted under Vinny/Zorn and will get every opportunity to succeed that Coolley has gotten.

He'll do similar if not more than Shockey did to ATL.

5 catches 72 yards, maybe with a TD

 
My tight ends are so filth puke garbage as soon as I saw cooley go down and them throw it to this guy on back to back plays inside the five i said this is my man lol :goodposting:

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top