I know this to be very true. The costs to run the live events are insane.'BusterTBronco said:I kinda disagree with that take. High Stakes fantasy football is a notoriously difficult industry for the game operators to make money. That's why most of them go out of business within 2-3 years. I highly doubt that WCOFF was ever an "easy cash cow" even when Lenny and Emil were running it. You may think they have an outlandish vig but there is a boatload of expenses that goes into running these contests.The WCOFF guys were already milking people for an outlandish vig, no surprise that they aren't paying on time.What surprises me is that someone could screw up such a simple and easy cash cow.
I disagree. After looking into the business model a few years back, I came to the conclusion that running a fantasy contest was far from a cash cow and that the margins would be razor thin for the first couple of years. I think there is very little money to be made in running a contest like this unless you go super big and get economies of scale. But you have to spend a fair amount on marketing and overhead to get there. Most players viewed WCOFF as the premier contest but how much money did they have to shell out to build the brand and get to that point? My guess is probably hundreds of thousands. Factoring in startup and overhead costs, I suspect that many of these contests have been operating at a loss since Day 1 and never reach profitability which is why they eventually go bust. I'm not sure if WCOFF falls into that category but it would not surprise me.The WCOFF guys were already milking people for an outlandish vig, no surprise that they aren't paying on time.What surprises me is that someone could screw up such a simple and easy cash cow.
Post a pic of the receipt. TIAJ'$5 sent to the Salvation Army.' $5 was giving to Salvation Army. Plus I throw in $25.00 more. I hope we can get this Topic back on track,now.Thanks
*Also, please remove me from your "friend list" TIAnow I'm no grammar nazi, but c'mon...'$5 sent to the Salvation Army.' $5 was giving to Salvation Army. Plus I throw in $25.00 more. I hope we can get this Topic back on track,now.Thanks
I just assumed he is from a different country. Every time i read something he writes the voice in my head uses an unidentified accent.now I'm no grammar nazi, but c'mon...'$5 sent to the Salvation Army.' $5 was giving to Salvation Army. Plus I throw in $25.00 more. I hope we can get this Topic back on track,now.Thanks
Yeah. We're all waiting for you to post proof of your donation.Any updates?
I just assumed he is from a different country. Every time i read something he writes the voice in my head uses an unidentified accent.
I actually LOL when I read this, I thought I was the only one that did that.Isn't it about time to get banned? Welching on the bet with plenty of time to scrounge up $5 and donate it.'Maroney=Speed said:Any updates?
Yes. You have 1 less friend and in the near future, one less board to visit.'Maroney=Speed said:Any updates?
*Also, please remove me from your "friend list" TIA
Kind of fitting that like most deadbeat commissioners and gaming sites, you've gone silent when it comes time to pay up.Post a pic of the receipt. TIAJ
I agree with your sentiment (and the few above), but also want to throw out there that there may be a niche market based on "honesty" in light of what has happened with these high stakes leagues in the past couple of years. if you think about how they attract, it is a very simple concept; they say "X amount of prize money" will be given to the winner and how much will be given overall. They come to this conclusion based on estimates of how many players they can attract and how much money that will generate. Up to this point, it was flat-out necessary in order to compete from a business standpoint. But without any kind of backing (i.e. the FBG contest), it really is a shot in the dark. I believe if someone created a contest and was extremely up front about what the minimums would be in prize money (based uppon participation) and then not only mentioned, but advertised to the contestants how many people signed up (and the price per head) and what the prizes would be when they "lock it down", not only would they have a sound business model (they can estimate at that point what they need to make a sound profit for their efforts), they also would buy some goodwill.I am a headhunter and have one particular client who is a consulting firm. they have a somewhat unique business model in that they have an "open book" with their consultants about how much they pay their consultants and what they bill them out at. My candidates love this...they are smart enough to understand the company has to pay operating costs and make a sound profit...what is ironic is that they tend to have a higher margin than their competition, but since they lay it all out for their employees, they have secured goodwill among their consultants, whereas other firms (who make less off their people) are still not trusted since they do not share this information. Just spitballing here, but I think someone could start a smaller contest, based on financial clarity, and have a nice little business going forward.I disagree. After looking into the business model a few years back, I came to the conclusion that running a fantasy contest was far from a cash cow and that the margins would be razor thin for the first couple of years. I think there is very little money to be made in running a contest like this unless you go super big and get economies of scale. But you have to spend a fair amount on marketing and overhead to get there. Most players viewed WCOFF as the premier contest but how much money did they have to shell out to build the brand and get to that point? My guess is probably hundreds of thousands. Factoring in startup and overhead costs, I suspect that many of these contests have been operating at a loss since Day 1 and never reach profitability which is why they eventually go bust. I'm not sure if WCOFF falls into that category but it would not surprise me.The WCOFF guys were already milking people for an outlandish vig, no surprise that they aren't paying on time.What surprises me is that someone could screw up such a simple and easy cash cow.
It's against the UIGEA to have contest prizes based solely on participation.I believe if someone created a contest and was extremely up front about what the minimums would be in prize money (based uppon participation)
Ban him!'Sudoku_in_the_Bathtub said:Yes. You have 1 less friend and in the near future, one less board to visit.'Maroney=Speed said:Any updates?![]()
*Also, please remove me from your "friend list" TIA
Kind of fitting that like most deadbeat commissioners and gaming sites, you've gone silent when it comes time to pay up.Post a pic of the receipt. TIAJ
That you haven't paid your $5 bet and proven it? I know.....Unreal.
You got paid under the former ownership. They had everything paid in full in rapid fashion. The same can not be said for the current group. 3 years and every year they have not hit their self-imposed deadlines for payment and this year is the worst by far. Many people have yet to be paid. Can I ask if you completed your registration for the upcoming season?'efactor said:Sad situation.Played in 2003-2005 and got paid on time both times I cashed. Was going to play again this year and was shocked to see this situation when I registered. Too bad..........
If you have something to add, than please do.Thanks'gianmarco said:That you haven't paid your $5 bet and proven it? I know.....'Maroney=Speed said:Unreal.
Pretty sure I did. You're posting about a company welching on payouts when you've done the same thing on a smaller scale. The owner of this site has called you out on it and yet you continue to return without "paying up". I'd say it's relevant when the topic has been discussed in this thread.Of course, you could just post the receipt and then get it back to the topic at hand.......If you have something to add, than please do.Thanks'gianmarco said:That you haven't paid your $5 bet and proven it? I know.....'Maroney=Speed said:Unreal.

Can we please stay on topic there are players out there owed alot of money from one of the biggest high stakes fantasy football league. Can you guys PM each other about your bets or whatever it is. Thanks in advanced.Pretty sure I did. You're posting about a company welching on payouts when you've done the same thing on a smaller scale. The owner of this site has called you out on it and yet you continue to return without "paying up". I'd say it's relevant when the topic has been discussed in this thread.Of course, you could just post the receipt and then get it back to the topic at hand.......If you have something to add, than please do.Thanks'gianmarco said:That you haven't paid your $5 bet and proven it? I know.....'Maroney=Speed said:Unreal.![]()
Can we please stay on topic there are players out there owed alot of money from one of the biggest high stakes fantasy football league. Can you guys PM each other about your bets or whatever it is. Thanks in advanced.Pretty sure I did. You're posting about a company welching on payouts when you've done the same thing on a smaller scale. The owner of this site has called you out on it and yet you continue to return without "paying up". I'd say it's relevant when the topic has been discussed in this thread.Of course, you could just post the receipt and then get it back to the topic at hand.......If you have something to add, than please do.Thanks'gianmarco said:That you haven't paid your $5 bet and proven it? I know.....'Maroney=Speed said:Unreal.![]()

Take it up with Joe.Can we please stay on topic there are players out there owed alot of money from one of the biggest high stakes fantasy football league. Can you guys PM each other about your bets or whatever it is. Thanks in advanced.Pretty sure I did. You're posting about a company welching on payouts when you've done the same thing on a smaller scale. The owner of this site has called you out on it and yet you continue to return without "paying up". I'd say it's relevant when the topic has been discussed in this thread.Of course, you could just post the receipt and then get it back to the topic at hand.......If you have something to add, than please do.Thanks'gianmarco said:That you haven't paid your $5 bet and proven it? I know.....'Maroney=Speed said:Unreal.![]()
Post a pic of the receipt. TIA.J'$5 sent to the Salvation Army.' $5 was giving to Salvation Army. Plus I throw in $25.00 more. I hope we can get this Topic back on track,now.Thanks
'RUSF18 said:A guy waiting on a check for over $100M.

Nah, I'm waiting for a receipt pic as well.Perhaps the guy who started the thread about welching on a payment could actually not welch on a payment?Can we please stay on topic there are players out there owed alot of money from one of the biggest high stakes fantasy football league. Can you guys PM each other about your bets or whatever it is. Thanks in advanced.Pretty sure I did. You're posting about a company welching on payouts when you've done the same thing on a smaller scale. The owner of this site has called you out on it and yet you continue to return without "paying up". I'd say it's relevant when the topic has been discussed in this thread.Of course, you could just post the receipt and then get it back to the topic at hand.......If you have something to add, than please do.Thanks'gianmarco said:That you haven't paid your $5 bet and proven it? I know.....'Maroney=Speed said:Unreal.![]()
At least it's keeping this thread bumped...For the life of me I dont understand why a $5 bet is more important than a High Stakes Fantasy Football League like WCFF not paying their customers and owe 6 figures to their players. Sure the guy should pay his $5 bet but come one this is a sad day for High Stakes Fantasy Football with this happening to the original contest. Very sad to these players.
No one said the $5 bet was more important. It's simply being discussed in the same thread. As RUSF just pointed out, it's keeping it bumped too so you should be thrilled. Of course it sucks for the people that may potentially lose money as a result of this and it definitely needs exposure. That said, M=S needs to pay on his bet as well especially after starting thread talking about others not paying up when they're supposed to.For the life of me I dont understand why a $5 bet is more important than a High Stakes Fantasy Football League like WCFF not paying their customers and owe 6 figures to their players. Sure the guy should pay his $5 bet but come one this is a sad day for High Stakes Fantasy Football with this happening to the original contest. Very sad to these players.
Not after seeing that they seem to be running a Ponzi scheme. I will look at the other high stakes leagues that escrow their money and see which one appeals to me the most. I really enjoyed the first two years of WCOFF. The third year wasn't much fun (team sucked after a hot start and then a ton of injuries which is a big reason why it wasn't much fun) so I stopped playing. Got the bug this year to go for some big money and since my son is 21 now, was going to take him as a co-manager. Couldn't believe the crap that was going on. Didn't know Emil and Lenny had sold out either'fourd said:You got paid under the former ownership. They had everything paid in full in rapid fashion. The same can not be said for the current group. 3 years and every year they have not hit their self-imposed deadlines for payment and this year is the worst by far. Many people have yet to be paid. Can I ask if you completed your registration for the upcoming season?'efactor said:Sad situation.Played in 2003-2005 and got paid on time both times I cashed. Was going to play again this year and was shocked to see this situation when I registered. Too bad..........
Yes we are definitely back this year. We will be guaranteeing a top prize of $100K out of the gate as well (as long as an NFL season is played).Don't know if the FBGs players championship is considered high stakes but I enjoyed playing that last year.Does anyone know if that will be held again this year?Seems to me that is the contest to play in if you want a bigger payout.I did not worry one time last season about being paid if I was lucky enough to win.
Great I'm in again this year.Great contest and a lot of fun.I'll be donating my entry fees to the prize pool.Yes we are definitely back this year. We will be guaranteeing a top prize of $100K out of the gate as well (as long as an NFL season is played).Don't know if the FBGs players championship is considered high stakes but I enjoyed playing that last year.Does anyone know if that will be held again this year?Seems to me that is the contest to play in if you want a bigger payout.I did not worry one time last season about being paid if I was lucky enough to win.
Almost certainly not, but it is at least theoretically possible that WCOFF could pull it off. Their brand is a lot stronger than someone like AFFL, whose line was "we have this great software that people will pay us for" (uh, not), so an investor might be interested in swooping in to take over the name and contest.But every day they don't pay, the brand value diminishes.has any "transfer to new owners" ever worked well for the consumer in the land of high stakes contests? I am asking since I do not know the answer.