tombonneau
Footballguy
So between the knowledge of superfans of each team who watch every game twice along with the advent of the Game Rewind on iPad (which is frankly amazing being able to watch condensed games in 25-30 minutes) there's really no reason that the faithful of the SP should ever have to fall victim to glancing at a final score and being deceived.
That's why I'd like to try to start weekly threads that point out a handful of games that if you just look at the final score you might get a wrong idea of how the game went.
To me what really jumped out as a deceptive final score both as I was now-and-then watching it at the sports bar on Sunday and then when I watched the condensed version last night is:
Falcons 40
Chiefs 24
This game was very close until midway through the third Cassel just made a couple of really boneheaded passes that gave the Falcons short fields and they blew the game open. What's hidden in this score is that KC has a competitive offense that if it can limit turnovers can hang with alleged high octane offenses like Atlanta.
I think you also get a somewhat false positive that Atlanta has a big time high scoring offense. They moved the ball, yes, but to me they weren't quite at that NE/NO/GB level which some who swallowed the preseason Kool-Aid will certainly believe looking at the final score; they were certainly helped by the aforementioned short fields, along with KC being short two of their best defenders in Flowers & Hali. Which also IMO yielded a false negative on the KC defense; I don't think they are nearly this bad.
So what other games did some of you watch that feel the final score is not indicative of the actual on-the-field product?
That's why I'd like to try to start weekly threads that point out a handful of games that if you just look at the final score you might get a wrong idea of how the game went.
To me what really jumped out as a deceptive final score both as I was now-and-then watching it at the sports bar on Sunday and then when I watched the condensed version last night is:
Falcons 40
Chiefs 24
This game was very close until midway through the third Cassel just made a couple of really boneheaded passes that gave the Falcons short fields and they blew the game open. What's hidden in this score is that KC has a competitive offense that if it can limit turnovers can hang with alleged high octane offenses like Atlanta.
I think you also get a somewhat false positive that Atlanta has a big time high scoring offense. They moved the ball, yes, but to me they weren't quite at that NE/NO/GB level which some who swallowed the preseason Kool-Aid will certainly believe looking at the final score; they were certainly helped by the aforementioned short fields, along with KC being short two of their best defenders in Flowers & Hali. Which also IMO yielded a false negative on the KC defense; I don't think they are nearly this bad.
So what other games did some of you watch that feel the final score is not indicative of the actual on-the-field product?