Week 10 Multiple TD list (1 Viewer)

[rizzler]

My final projections for week 10 have been made... and I thought it'd be fun to post my list of players (non-QB) I have pegged for multiple touchdowns this week. Something to spice up the board, since not much new has been posted.

RB:

A. Foster - 1td (fail)

M. Jones-Drew - 2td (bingo)

L. McCoy

F. Gore - 1td (fail)

WR:

L. Fitzgerald - 0td

M. Wallace - 2td (bingo)

TE:

B. Celek (my ballsy callsy pick of the week)

D. Keller - 0td (fail)

FYI: I am 32% on the season on my multiple TD players... not a great record, but after 9 weeks, hitting on 1 of 3 doesn't seem too shabby either.

Post Sunday Night Games: 2/6 ... not bad

 

[HMKRich]

Fun thread.

I'm not to sure about McCoy, but I think Javhid Best is a prime candidate.

 

[rizzler]

always supported Best... and I know he's up against a weak Bills run D... but I don't see him putting in more than 1, if he even gets that.

but the opportunity is definitely there

 

[FF Newbie]

Why Celek?

 

[Wombat1]

Not so sure about McCoy and Gore, those seem like long shots for 2 td games to me

A few guys I think could go for multiple TD's-

Brandon Jacobs

MSW

Brandon Pettigrew

Blount

 

[Chaka]

Predicting individual players for single TDs let alone multiple TDs is perhaps the silliest thing one can do in fantasy football.

This type of prognostication probably shouldn't be allowed, but I understand why people are allowed to throw #### against the wall and see what sticks.

 

[emge]

Here are some guys I predict won't get 2 TDs. Yes I am starting these guys, and I have the worst luck.

Bradshaw, AJ, Steve Johnson, Charles. I have Fitz and Gore to, so I think they will get theirs either.

 

[thecardiackid]

I'm buying (3 units)

<------------------- owner of fitz, mjd, & mccoy.

so, OP, wrt the *stats* - are we due? (or some more than others)?? inquiring minds want to know.

 

[rizzler]

Predicting individual players for single TDs let alone multiple TDs is perhaps the silliest thing one can do in fantasy football.This type of prognostication probably shouldn't be allowed, but I understand why people are allowed to throw #### against the wall and see what sticks.

you must not play in a TD heavy league then... at 6 points a piece, gauging who has the best opportunity to score (esp. multiple times) is vital for victory... looking at the DEF your players will be up against, and their trends in the red zone (both of the offense and defense) help to give an idea of who may score, and possibly how many times.so, no... i don't believe it's a futile exercise. is it accurate and reliable to the point of confidence? of course not, but neither is saying player X will get Y yards in any given game

 

[⚡DEADHEAD⚡]

Predicting individual players for single TDs let alone multiple TDs is perhaps the silliest thing one can do in fantasy football.This type of prognostication probably shouldn't be allowed, but I understand why people are allowed to throw #### against the wall and see what sticks.

Come on dude. Lighten up a bit.

 

[rizzler]

Not so sure about McCoy and Gore, those seem like long shots for 2 td games to meA few guys I think could go for multiple TD's-Brandon JacobsMSWBrandon PettigrewBlount

Blount I won't throw in the mix only due to uncertainty of the amount of carries and lack of playbook knowledge to this point. But possible.Jacobs, along with Bradshaw also aren'tt thrown in the mix due to uncertainty of who gets the carries and where. Both are great candidates, but at the risk of making a long list, i try to keep it short and sweet, that way I don't get discredited for naming all of the studs

 

[tigerz]

Nicks.

 

[Donsmith753]

Roddy White?

 

[Iwannabeacowboybaby!]

Predicting individual players for single TDs let alone multiple TDs is perhaps the silliest thing one can do in fantasy football.This type of prognostication probably shouldn't be allowed, but I understand why people are allowed to throw #### against the wall and see what sticks.

Come on dude. Lighten up a bit.

Really, I dont' understand the hate. To the OP, if you're 32 percent I think that's outstanding. I don't think I've ever really tried to predict multiple Td's out of position players but I would think that getting 1 out of 3 is pretty good, especially if you're not taking all studs. You better not be right about Pettigrew and Best though. My opponent has S. Hill and I have Calvin Johnson, that would be a freaken nightmare if every TD goes to someone else but the best player on the team.

 

[Team Smokin']

Predicting individual players for single TDs let alone multiple TDs is perhaps the silliest thing one can do in fantasy football.This type of prognostication probably shouldn't be allowed, but I understand why people are allowed to throw #### against the wall and see what sticks.

Come on dude. Lighten up a bit.

Really, I dont' understand the hate. To the OP, if you're 32 percent I think that's outstanding. I don't think I've ever really tried to predict multiple Td's out of position players but I would think that getting 1 out of 3 is pretty good, especially if you're not taking all studs. You better not be right about Pettigrew and Best though. My opponent has S. Hill and I have Calvin Johnson, that would be a freaken nightmare if every TD goes to someone else but the best player on the team.

I actually like the new thread...I can see Calvin bouncing back. The Giants look primed for an offensive show...I can see either of the big guns getting multiple TD's: Nicks, Bradshaw, Jacobs, and even Manningham. It wouldn't surprise me to see Sims-Walker have a good day as well. Peterson and Foster are prime candidates. Maybe Dustin Keller...Hey, keep up the new post. We can use some extra excitement. Keep track of your track record.

 

[cubbie5150]

Roddy White?

Yeah, I like his chances for 2 TDs week 10.....

 

[crowe1130]

Predicting individual players for single TDs let alone multiple TDs is perhaps the silliest thing one can do in fantasy football.This type of prognostication probably shouldn't be allowed, but I understand why people are allowed to throw #### against the wall and see what sticks.

Come on dude. Lighten up a bit.

 

[Sinrman]

Roddy White?

Yeah, I like his chances for 2 TDs week 10.....

hehe you beat me to it. Umm, White has already had played and had two. That wouldn't be a prediction a day or two AFTER he played. I like some of the picks for multiple TDs. I do agree with the individual who said Bradshaw. With no Steve Smith, I think Dallas has to focus a bitmore on Nicks, and it will open up lanes more for Bradshaw and Jacobs. Heck, Bradshaw AND Jacobs might be a safe pick. I think Best could be added to the list. I'm also going with Mendenhall. NE was exposed last week by Cleveland in the running game, and Mendycould very well continue this. Tomlin will be more than happy to oblige and continue "Steeler football."

 

[RenegadeGM]

Roddy White?

Yeah, I like his chances for 2 TDs week 10.....

hehe you beat me to it. Umm, White has already had played and had two. That wouldn't be a prediction a day or two AFTER he played.

 

[Raiderfan32904]

Predicting individual players for single TDs let alone multiple TDs is perhaps the silliest thing one can do in fantasy football.This type of prognostication probably shouldn't be allowed, but I understand why people are allowed to throw #### against the wall and see what sticks.

 

[JuniorNB]

Predicting individual players for single TDs let alone multiple TDs is perhaps the silliest thing one can do in fantasy football.

This type of prognostication probably shouldn't be allowed, but I understand why people are allowed to throw #### against the wall and see what sticks.

Shouldn't be allowed? I agree. Every post should have to be read by a moderator before actually being posted to the board. Anyone caught trying to sneak an "Unallowable" post through would be subjected to lifetime banning and possibly legal charges being brought against him.

 

[The Dude]

Alright, give me your 3 TD QB list....

 

[Jed]

Roddy White?

Yeah, I like his chances for 2 TDs week 10.....

hehe you beat me to it. Umm, White has already had played and had two. That wouldn't be a prediction a day or two AFTER he played.

 

[NajehHejan]

This is a really cool thread. Fun and interesting and valuable. Hating on a thread like this is not unlike hating baby puppies.

I look forward to you tracking your hit rate and reporting your results.

My two cents, I like J Charles to score twice against a soft Bills D. Hopeful owner

 

[bleedgreen]

Celek is a "ballsy callsy"

My "ballsy callsy" of the week is Lynch.

 

[Wet Doggg]

This is a really cool thread. Fun and interesting and valuable. Hating on a thread like this is not unlike hating baby puppies.I look forward to you tracking your hit rate and reporting your results.My two cents, I like J Charles to score twice against a soft Bills D. Hopeful owner

You do realize that Charles is playing the soft Broncos D this week, right . I hope you are right...might start him over Hillis.

 

[NajehHejan]

This is a really cool thread. Fun and interesting and valuable. Hating on a thread like this is not unlike hating baby puppies.I look forward to you tracking your hit rate and reporting your results.My two cents, I like J Charles to score twice against a soft Bills D. Hopeful owner

You do realize that Charles is playing the soft Broncos D this week, right . I hope you are right...might start him over Hillis.

My bad. Hung over. I knew it was a bad AFC team that started with "B".

 

[Football Critic]

Predicting individual players for single TDs let alone multiple TDs is perhaps the silliest thing one can do in fantasy football.This type of prognostication probably shouldn't be allowed, but I understand why people are allowed to throw #### against the wall and see what sticks.

Come on dude. Lighten up a bit.

Really, ones gettin on someone for an opinion, after all to be blunt this is not meant for the SP, so to be honest just allow others to their opinions as well.

 

[Football Critic]

I'll tell you who wont get multiple....

Garrard

Marshall

MWTB

Garcon

LT

Benson

Tamme

Bironas will miss 3 xp

chicago will give up 36 points and no tos or sax

...cuz they are all on my team....just sayin!

 

[HMKRich]

Predicting individual players for single TDs let alone multiple TDs is perhaps the silliest thing one can do in fantasy football.

This type of prognostication probably shouldn't be allowed, but I understand why people are allowed to throw #### against the wall and see what sticks.

Shouldn't be allowed? I agree. Every post should have to be read by a moderator before actually being posted to the board. Anyone caught trying to sneak an "Unallowable" post through would be subjected to lifetime banning and possibly legal charges being brought against him.

This is Fantasy Football people. No predicting. No guessing. Only facts. Roddy Whiite is the only person allowed on this list!

 

[rizzler]

There's so many guys to list and when you look back and hear diff. points of view, it's easy to say "ya, shoulda added him".

But I stick to my lists. FOr what it's worth, i did NOT have Roddy White pegged for 2 TD's this week... only ONE (seeing as how I have him ranked as my no1 WR since preseason, I drop his name in the 1td category near weekly)

I will make a couple of calls here.... I got BLASTED on this board when I dropped a WR list one week, and I stated a NO v MIN game would end very low scoring w their WR's not doing much in terms of FF production... well, maybe some of you will remember the score.

1) I have that feeling about the KC run game this week. I say it gets somewhat kept in check (due to a high scoring Bronc's passing game).

2) Call me NUTS, but Dallas keeps the score within 3

Just excited as hell it's sunday!!!

 

[BigDave]

Mario Manningham NYG versus Mike Jenkins Dallas = 2 tds!!!!

 

[G-King]

Tampa Mike, because everyone (including Carolina) expects lots of Blount and Caddy. TM gets one early in the gameplan, and the other very late on a blown coverage by a give up defense.

 

[rizzler]

Tampa Mike, because everyone (including Carolina) expects lots of Blount and Caddy. TM gets one early in the gameplan, and the other very late on a blown coverage by a give up defense.

as a Tampa Mike owner, I'm buying... er, hoping!

 

[display name]

Predicting individual players for single TDs let alone multiple TDs is perhaps the silliest thing one can do in fantasy football.This type of prognostication probably shouldn't be allowed, but I understand why people are allowed to throw #### against the wall and see what sticks.

Does it makes sense to project the top fantasy back for the week to have 1.3 TDs?I think a more common sense approach would actually be to look at how many times per week running backs have multiple touchdowns and then build your projections around that, trying to pick who the good candidates are each week. Another good common sense approach is to look at average for RB1 each week, RB2, RB3 , RBN+1, and project points in that manner. You could also track the extreme for each, RBN, RBN+1, and use those to adjust based on what each week presents. I think it is appropriate to project and predict huge games rather than just trying to project averages all the time.I think projections based on actual real world averages and results would make a whole lot more sense than projecting the top 24 RBs to score between 20-10 points, when it never breaks down that way in the real world.

 

[cmv5]

Mario Manningham NYG versus Mike Jenkins Dallas = 2 tds!!!!

This is where my money is at. By the way, this gets my vote as one of the more interesting threads. Boring is Blount's (or fill in a name) trade value threads.

 

[Dought Man]

always supported Best... and I know he's up against a weak Bills run D... but I don't see him putting in more than 1, if he even gets that.but the opportunity is definitely there

Best will have no TDs. Shaun Hill will throw 2..no rushing tds for the Lions....again.

 

[NumNums]

Kevin Walter

 

[Dought Man]

Frank Gore is the only sure thing for 2 td's + this week.

 

[bbuster]

You nailed MJD

 

[rizzler]

MJD nice so far... long way to go still

 

[rizzler]

post sunday night stats.... not bad. some close close calls, coulda been more!

 

[OU#1]

You got 1/4. Might as well throw darts at a dartboard blindfolded.

 

[rizzler]

You got 1/4. Might as well throw darts at a dartboard blindfolded.

a) 2/6 is 1/3... not 1/4. b) how many players got 2tds this weekend? I pegged 2 of them in a list of 6 so far. .. but I applaud your attempt at humiliation and degradation... but as the kids say. "fail" on your part

 

[OU#1]

You got 1/4. Might as well throw darts at a dartboard blindfolded.

a) 2/6 is 1/3... not 1/4. b) how many players got 2tds this weekend? I pegged 2 of them in a list of 6 so far. .. but I applaud your attempt at humiliation and degradation... but as the kids say. "fail" on your part

You said in your edited OP that you were 27%. I was quoting you, but you obviously removed that to make yourself look good.Like somebody said before predicting TDs is nuts. Don't you think this is why FBGs never predicts full TDs for anybody? They use fractions and averages.Gratz on picking two though. Let's see you do this for the whole season and see how it pans out...

 

[rizzler]

You got 1/4. Might as well throw darts at a dartboard blindfolded.

a) 2/6 is 1/3... not 1/4. b) how many players got 2tds this weekend? I pegged 2 of them in a list of 6 so far. .. but I applaud your attempt at humiliation and degradation... but as the kids say. "fail" on your part

You said in your edited OP that you were 27%. I was quoting you, but you obviously removed that to make yourself look good.Like somebody said before predicting TDs is nuts. Don't you think this is why FBGs never predicts full TDs for anybody? They use fractions and averages.Gratz on picking two though. Let's see you do this for the whole season and see how it pans out...

Yes, I did say i was hitting 1 of 4 on the season... and I removed it figuring that's where you got confused... not to hide it. I've been projecting TDs and multiple TDs for years... I don't give two craps whether or not FBG do it or not... are they the Omniscient source for all that is fantasy!?!? How many times has MJD scored 0.7 TDs? Yaaaaaa, that's what I thought. I either hit, or I miss. I make no bones about it... fractional scoring helps pad your stats. it's a safety net. I make my projections for a small group, but mainly for myself... and I'd say I'm pretty happy with my performances in doing so.note: This is not meant as a knock on FBG... I use loads of their info and projections as well.

 

[Football Critic]

I'll tell you who wont get multiple....GarrardMarshallMWTBGarconLTBensonTammeBironas will miss 3 xpchicago will give up 36 points and no tos or sax...cuz they are all on my team....just sayin!

How accurate was I not ONE td except for Garrard, lmfao. such a brutal year for predicting who blows up, but easy to tell who sucks!

 

[Rovers]

People whining about a light hearted fun thread likie this one? Gimmee a break.

As someone mentioned, projecting 0.6 TD's for any player is pretty wimpy. I find those projections useless. Safe, and useless. I know TD's can't be accurately projected, but that is what we have to attempt to do in FF. Stick yer neck out and do some hard projections. So be it if they are wrong.

 

[rizzler]

Stick yer neck out and do some hard projections. So be it if they are wrong.

Exactly. Works for me, and has for a long time. I guessed correctly on mult touchdown on 2/6 on my list... and on the same list, was also correct of 4/6 of getting a TD.how is this a futile exercise?This isn't a one week show, Ive been doing this for years... And no, I don't have an 80% success rate, I wish. But doing well enough to always be contending for a league championship.