This. I just dropped them for Garrett Graham (Jordan Reed owner). I'd rather roll with the Chiefs at home against a Chargers team that might be without Keenan Allen (also an ownerHouston sucks
This isn't your daddy's Steelers.Can we really start the browns vs Pitt?
Jax ,sure
but Pitt?
Pryor, Tolzien, Freeman, and Barkley are the main reasons the Giants have been fantasy candy the past several weeks. Deploying them against Romo seems like a dangerous plan.This is going to be a tough week. I've received great performances from rolling with the Giants the past two weeks...but I just don't think I can hold on to them against the Cowboys.
It's tempting though, after four weeks of 20+ fantasy points from the Giants in my league's scoring.
thanks for the goose egg tennessee .. woof,After the Tenn, NYJ debacle we maybe better off leaving DEF out of our rosters, So we don't go Negative. Who you got this week?
STL vs. Chicago....STL maybe dropped over bye week
BAL vs. NYJ
NO vs ATL
Tough decision there...whether or not to bench KC Defense at homeThis. I just dropped them for Garrett Graham (Jordan Reed owner). I'd rather roll with the Chiefs at home against a Chargers team that might be without Keenan Allen (also an ownerHouston sucks).
Edited to add;
Another factor in my decision to drop the Texans defense was that if there is even the slightest chance that Schaub starts, I don't want any part of this defense. He and his Pick 6 specials kill defenses.
The Chiefs haven't had a sack or even hit the QB in two weeks, so it isn't like they're a lead-pipe lock against a Charges team that can put up points. That said, if I didn't have the "luxury" of the Chiefs option, I'd go with:Tough decision there...whether or not to bench KC Defense at home![]()
Hmm, that sounds like another "bad D with good match-up" trap game. Packers have only hit double figures in fantasy points once this year (Week 3 vs. Cinci). The fact that their offense has tanked without Rodgers doesn't help, either.The Chiefs haven't had a sack or even hit the QB in two weeks, so it isn't like they're a lead-pipe lock against a Charges team that can put up points. That said, if I didn't have the "luxury" of the Chiefs option, I'd go with:Tough decision there...whether or not to bench KC Defense at home![]()
GB vs Minny
Who are available on my waiver wire. The Vikings are God-awful and Peterson's groin sound like it's a problem.
Guess you're all screwed this week then, sorry.Hmm, that sounds like another "bad D with good match-up" trap game. Packers have only hit double figures in fantasy points once this year (Week 3 vs. Cinci). The fact that their offense has tanked without Rodgers doesn't help, either.GB vs Minny
Who are available on my waiver wire. The Vikings are God-awful and Peterson's groin sound like it's a problem.
How well did Washington do with their "dream matchup" vs Minny last week?
Agree. Like the Rams ROS but not sure about this week. On the bright side, they should have a pretty high floor vs Chicago -- it's not like McCown is going to hang 40 on them.Not sure what to think about the rams. They've had some amazing games but chicago is a bad matchup I think. Leaning them or baltimore
Yeah, I am in the same boat...have to pay for waivers so I am leaning towards sticking with the Giants D. They have been good the last few weeks and Cowboys are always a candidate for 2-3 turnovers, but they scare me because they can put 30+ up any week as well.I grabbed up the Giants for this week. Not so sure about them against the Cowboys offense....the only thing I like about it is they are at home and they are playing well and with confidence.
Of that group, I think I like Indy the most. Palmer is usually good for an INT or 2 and their OL doesn't do a good job protecting him.Tough week indeed. CIN on bye and waiver wire has been picked over pretty good. How would anyone rate:
DAL @ Giants
OAK vs Tenn
IND @ Arizona
PIT @ Clevelend
Horrible options, I know.
Indy has been awful besdies the Jax week.Of that group, I think I like Indy the most. Palmer is usually good for an INT or 2 and their OL doesn't do a good job protecting him.Tough week indeed. CIN on bye and waiver wire has been picked over pretty good. How would anyone rate:
DAL @ Giants
OAK vs Tenn
IND @ Arizona
PIT @ Clevelend
Horrible options, I know.
I have limited options, too, and am going with IndyOf that group, I think I like Indy the most. Palmer is usually good for an INT or 2 and their OL doesn't do a good job protecting him.Tough week indeed. CIN on bye and waiver wire has been picked over pretty good. How would anyone rate:
DAL @ Giants
OAK vs Tenn
IND @ Arizona
PIT @ Clevelend
Horrible options, I know.
My concern is that they just lost the heart and soul of their defense.zftcg said:Here's why I'm leaning toward Dallas: They're the Dennis Green of fantasy defenses. They are who we thought they were.
When faced with a bad match-up (KC, Denver, NO, Detroit) they've averaged fewer than 4 FPG. But against bad offenses (NYG, STL, Minn, PHI with Barkley) they've taken care of business, averaging more than 16 FPG. And with so-so matchups (SD, Wash) they've averaged 8 FPG. This might seem like a truism, but it's not. Check out Cinci this year, or ask anyone who started Indy at home vs STL.
Giants are playing better, and Eli's slowed his INT rate, so maybe it's not the dream match-up we thought we had a few weeks ago. Still, in a week with few options, I want to crown their a##, so I'll crown their a##.