Andy Hicks
Footballguy
If you have to, do it in here within board guidelines
i assume your moving this to the happy thread?I debate my flex decision and after putting in Donald Brown, change my mind at the last minute switch to Santana Moss. Brown already has a TD and supposedly Addai is hurt. This is going to be a bad decision.
I must withdraw this vent after Moss' long TD catch.I debate my flex decision and after putting in Donald Brown, change my mind at the last minute switch to Santana Moss. Brown already has a TD and supposedly Addai is hurt. This is going to be a bad decision.
LOL...I withdrew it at the same time you posted. The fact that Addai is fine and scored a TD makes me feel better as well.i assume your moving this to the happy thread?I debate my flex decision and after putting in Donald Brown, change my mind at the last minute switch to Santana Moss. Brown already has a TD and supposedly Addai is hurt. This is going to be a bad decision.
Dear Devin Hester,You had such a juicy matchup against Detroit that I HAD to plug you in over other capable WRs. Thanks for trying.-AIU

Dear Devin Hester,You had such a juicy matchup against Detroit that I HAD to plug you in over other capable WRs. Thanks for trying.-AIU

I started Benson. Brown has already outscored Benson, and it's not even halftime in the Miami game.I'm debating between Cedric Benson and Ronnie Brown next week. I'll pick the wrong RB.
why did houston have to demolish oakland so Schaub sucks it up in the 2nd half?
Ditto. 2 leagues. That the injury came one a and goal from the 4, and he got a quick slant where he almost scored, made this one especially painful.Dear Devin Hester,You had such a juicy matchup against Detroit that I HAD to plug you in over other capable WRs. Thanks for trying.-AIU
Brees, you are a joke.

Thats on you...Dear Ted Ginn Jr, why do you suck so bad and why did I draft you?
Really? 2 sub 200 yard passing days and zero TDs and you roll your eyes at me?Brees, you are a joke.![]()
Yes. It's not his fault that his d returned 2 for TDS, and thusly took the air out of the ball. That and the running games was working.Your joke probably almost singlehandely won you weeks 1 and 2.so IReally? 2 sub 200 yard passing days and zero TDs and you roll your eyes at me?Brees, you are a joke.![]()

He had decent matchups first two weeks. I'm only starting him against decent matchups from now on. He can't step up against a decent defense.Yes. It's not his fault that his d returned 2 for TDS, and thusly took the air out of the ball. That and the running games was working.Your joke probably almost singlehandely won you weeks 1 and 2.so IReally? 2 sub 200 yard passing days and zero TDs and you roll your eyes at me?Brees, you are a joke.![]()
![]()
you do that? Unless your back up is manning you are an idiot.He had decent matchups first two weeks. I'm only starting him against decent matchups from now on. He can't step up against a decent defense.Yes. It's not his fault that his d returned 2 for TDS, and thusly took the air out of the ball. That and the running games was working.Your joke probably almost singlehandely won you weeks 1 and 2.so IReally? 2 sub 200 yard passing days and zero TDs and you roll your eyes at me?Brees, you are a joke.![]()
![]()
Really? Because if I followed that strategy the past two weeks, I would have better results from the QB slot. He's scored at about QB 28-30 the past two weeks. Not sure how that shows I'd be wrong to only start Brees against a decent matchup.you do that? Unless your back up is manning you are an idiot.
When leagues let you decide starting lineups after the fact this will matter. Until then we move forward based on the best evidecne. The best evidence is that there is 1 qb (with another 4-5 with nice matchups) that you should bench him for. Anything else is just emotion based on whatever win or loss you had this week.Really? Because if I followed that strategy the past two weeks, I would have better results from the QB slot. He's scored at about QB 28-30 the past two weeks. Not sure how that shows I'd be wrong to only start Brees against a decent matchup.you do that? Unless your back up is manning you are an idiot.
Now that's fair vent. Gotta feel for oakland fans/ff owners. I mean we knew they'd suck, but this is taking sucking to a whole new level (from a ff persepctive) Even detroit last year had productive players who made their hay in garbage time.DMC you and your 1 point are dead to me. This was his one chance to have a big game and he gets -3 yards rushing, and 1 reception for 5 yds. YOU SUCK!!!!!!!!!
The evidence is already there. NO need to wait until after the fact. Either choose to accept the facts or ignore them.When leagues let you decide starting lineups after the fact this will matter. Until then we move forward based on the best evidecne. The best evidence is that there is 1 qb (with another 4-5 with nice matchups) that you should bench him for. Anything else is just emotion based on whatever win or loss you had this week.Really? Because if I followed that strategy the past two weeks, I would have better results from the QB slot. He's scored at about QB 28-30 the past two weeks. Not sure how that shows I'd be wrong to only start Brees against a decent matchup.you do that? Unless your back up is manning you are an idiot.
EdwardCat said:The evidence is already there. NO need to wait until after the fact. Either choose to accept the facts or ignore them.Hipple said:When leagues let you decide starting lineups after the fact this will matter. Until then we move forward based on the best evidecne. The best evidence is that there is 1 qb (with another 4-5 with nice matchups) that you should bench him for. Anything else is just emotion based on whatever win or loss you had this week.EdwardCat said:Really? Because if I followed that strategy the past two weeks, I would have better results from the QB slot. He's scored at about QB 28-30 the past two weeks. Not sure how that shows I'd be wrong to only start Brees against a decent matchup.Hipple said:you do that? Unless your back up is manning you are an idiot.
K, you bench Brees when he has "tough matchups" for David Garrard or whoever else you have at QB2 and let us know how that works for you. I prefer to keep rolling with my first and second rounders as long as they're healthy.Hindsight is 20-20. It's easy to say you "should have" plugged in the highest scoring players each week after the fact, regardless of what their projections were beforehand. My bet is that you'll still look at the weekly projections and find brees in the top 6 week in and week out, regardless of matchup, and your other QB at 13-20 and continue to plug Brees in.But anyway, feel free to be angry, this is the place for it.
About to lose to the weekly high scorer yet again.I feel for you. My 3 wins have come when I've been the weekly high scorer twice, and second highest once - and second highest has only been good for me half the time.1-3 for a team that Yahoo and FBG projected to be 30+ point favorites every week. It's one thing to close when you're ready for a tough matchup. But loss after loss when I go in full of confidence that I did a good job preparing a dominating lineup, only to get punched in the stomach on gameday?About to lose to the weekly high scorer yet again.
:XHad to pick up a D this week and chose the Bills over the Saints, good call! DMC killed me too, that's as bad an offence as I can remember. Rushing, passing, play calling, everything sucks, the waterboys and the guys selling beer in the stands probably suck too.