Just a thought.. could the Eagles lack of FA movement come from how they treated the TO mess???
And players just don't want to be part of the Philly movement?
Not saying TO was not a mess, but the Eagles also screwed up as well..IMO
And on that note, why would any agent encourage their player to play for them?
Players have left the Eagles and come back after chasing the money. See Jeremiah Trotter, Hugh Douglas, and now Shawn Barber.The Eagles are a class organization and Jeff Lurie has spent well on facilities, staff and an organization.
Add in the fact that the Eagles have been in the hunt since 2001 every year (minus 2005), and there's plenty of incentive to head to Philly.
There's a difference between players coming back to a team after chasing the money, and choosing not to come to a team in the first place.The Eagles did not act like a class organization with their handling of the Owens situation. You can call them tough, or no-nonsense, but not classy. That was one of the worst things that a team has done to a player in sports, and yet the media ate it up while letting the wife beaters slide.
The Eagles were not in the hunt, specifically because of the way they treated Owens. And now they're actually worse off at receiver than before, worse off at running back with McNabb hurt most of the season, nothing but Westbrook at RB, and a defense that looked nonplussed last year. I think they'll bounce back some, but I expect more of a 2005 Dolphins year than a 2004 Eagles year.
The NFL is a fraternity. A lot of players backed Owens in this deal, and a lot of others wouldn't get in the middle of it. Going to the Eagles is bad mojo right now for any player. The agents have to be wary of going to a team that seems hell bent on making them look bad in the media. And neither the coach, the team, nor the destination are so exciting that a player feels like they have to go there to win a Superbowl or play with one of the truly great players.