bingo.I'm keeping him on the bench until he plays a game or two.
Thought this was a no brainerbingo.I'm keeping him on the bench until he plays a game or two.
he will be a wr 1 in about 2 weeks.Trading him to people penciling him in as a WR1.
PPR? Wouldn't be surprised. Non-PPR? I wouldn't count on it.Phenix said:he will be a wr 1 in about 2 weeks.Mistabishi said:Trading him to people penciling him in as a WR1.
As always, depends on options.fantasycurse42 said:Thought this was a no brainerSaint said:bingo.fantasycurse42 said:I'm keeping him on the bench until he plays a game or two.
Wow you just named my 3 starters and I have Harvin on the bench. I am waiting a week or 2.As always, depends on options.A: options are Myles white and Miles Austin, I'll start Percy if he's playing.fantasycurse42 said:Thought this was a no brainerSaint said:bingo.fantasycurse42 said:I'm keeping him on the bench until he plays a game or two.
B: options are Gordon, Cruz, Blackman he's benched.
Depending on what news comes out of practice today and tomorrow I think this is the prudent move.MAC_32 said:Unless you have golden tate in your holster you're not starting him.
while I completely agree about no need to rush him back vs Rams, if they deem him healthy, why not get him a handful of snaps to get him accustomed to game speed?No way they play him this week. No reason to rush him back against the Rams.
No ####### way - Way too valuable, fresh off of hip surgery... Def not this season.Anyone know if they plan on having him do returns? Obviously not right away, but I have no idea who they use now
Yeah, I'm starting Riley Cooper and Kris Durham in one league. If they announce Percy will play before Sunday, I'll probably put him in.As always, depends on options.A: options are Myles white and Miles Austin, I'll start Percy if he's playing.fantasycurse42 said:Thought this was a no brainerSaint said:bingo.fantasycurse42 said:I'm keeping him on the bench until he plays a game or two.
B: options are Gordon, Cruz, Blackman he's benched.
He's put up WR1 numbers in the past when he's been healthy, and he's moving into a very productive offense. Obviously nothing is guaranteed, but with that potential upside and considering his owners have reserved a spot on the bench for him all this time, you can't blame them for wanting the equivalent of a top 15 WR in return. If I trade him for a Nicks or Jerome Simpson and he blows up like before, I'm kicking myself. But if I didn't own him, would I trade, say, Torrey Smith or Blackmon for him? No way. Because I haven't seen it yet. Thus I would guess he's not being traded much in leagues right now.I think he would have been a good guy to sell, seems like his value is already perceived as a WR1 or very close to that, which is pretty crazy for a guy that hasnt practiced or player all year. I have inquired about him in all my league and everyone wants a stud for him which doesnt seem like its worth the risk without seeing him play yet. who knows if he will be back 100% and be a focal part of Sea offense right away or even at all.
this thinking of not playing him if they don't need him is wrong. if he is healthy, he plays. Seattle doesn't need Lynch this week but he will play alsonot this week, not with a monday night game, not with a team they should handle.
seattle is thinking super bowl, they dont need him this week.
i doubt he travels. im assuming they are traveling saturday also.
if i had to guess.. i'd say next week he starts to see some touches but not until after their bye week 12 will we see him really gett involved
comparing different things there.this thinking of not playing him if they don't need him is wrong. if he is healthy, he plays. Seattle doesn't need Lynch this week but he will play alsonot this week, not with a monday night game, not with a team they should handle.
seattle is thinking super bowl, they dont need him this week.
i doubt he travels. im assuming they are traveling saturday also.
if i had to guess.. i'd say next week he starts to see some touches but not until after their bye week 12 will we see him really gett involved
If the goal is the Super Bowl, then if healthy he will play. "Rushing" him back is silly, if he isn't ready to play then he won't, but like Gronk, he will play if ready. You want him to get as many reps as possible (like Gronk), so that he is 100% in sync come playoff time and a huge weapon (why they traded a first for him).comparing different things there.this thinking of not playing him if they don't need him is wrong. if he is healthy, he plays. Seattle doesn't need Lynch this week but he will play alsonot this week, not with a monday night game, not with a team they should handle.
seattle is thinking super bowl, they dont need him this week.
i doubt he travels. im assuming they are traveling saturday also.
if i had to guess.. i'd say next week he starts to see some touches but not until after their bye week 12 will we see him really gett involved
Harvin they have been winning without.. Is harvin 100% is he 75%? harvin has had health issues in the past as we have seen.
Why would you rush him back, especially on the road, this week, when the goal is Super Bowl
same scenario as Graham. get the guy to 100% before running him out there for some guys who need him for fantasy
its week 8, not week 15.If the goal is the Super Bowl, then if healthy he will play. "Rushing" him back is silly, if he isn't ready to play then he won't, but like Gronk, he will play if ready. You want him to get as many reps as possible (like Gronk), so that he is 100% in sync come playoff time and a huge weapon (why they traded a first for him).comparing different things there.this thinking of not playing him if they don't need him is wrong. if he is healthy, he plays. Seattle doesn't need Lynch this week but he will play alsonot this week, not with a monday night game, not with a team they should handle.
seattle is thinking super bowl, they dont need him this week.
i doubt he travels. im assuming they are traveling saturday also.
if i had to guess.. i'd say next week he starts to see some touches but not until after their bye week 12 will we see him really gett involved
Harvin they have been winning without.. Is harvin 100% is he 75%? harvin has had health issues in the past as we have seen.
Why would you rush him back, especially on the road, this week, when the goal is Super Bowl
same scenario as Graham. get the guy to 100% before running him out there for some guys who need him for fantasy
As someone posted above, they probably don't need Lynch to win against Bradfordless Rams, so why does he play? They want Harvin to be rolling in the playoffs, not "rested" and out of sync.
I own him in 2 of 3 leagues, partially because I can keep him cheap (drafted him), and in one league where I have a lot of WR options (Blackmon, DThomas, Randle, Douglas and Boykin) and I wouldn't start him week 1 he is active, especially on a Monday night. In my other league where I just lost Wayne, I play him if there is an indication on Sunday that he has fully practiced and will play. With Gronk, I didn't hesitate when he was active. I don't believe in Harvin the same way because it is his first game with Wilson, but week 2 he is active, definitely.
Like a referee?Harvin is gonna come back and injury something else. Book it.
Good luck with that, he's out this week.Starting with confidence.
Copy & Paste for next week... Just saw he isn't active.Looking for a handful of touches, one big play while he sits on my bench.
Then becomes trade bait week 9.