TheFanatic
Footballguy
I think I learnt that when there is just one game to talk about in the NFL that it will be analyzed well beyond any reasonable discussion. I'm OK with that...
i was at the game and i haven't seen many replays so your perspective might be better than mine, but it looked to me that the issue with the steelers running game wasn't the backs but the line. i would hesitate to stick a fork in FWP or to dismiss Mendenhall based on last night's game. looked to me that there was absolutely no room to run.
I'm FAR from sold on Mendenhall, but he had nowhere to go last night. I was impressed with his strength. On several carries he was met in the backfield and carried the defender back to the line...where he got hit by two more defenders, and STILL fell forward. He NEVER had open space to work with, so I think any realistic evalutaion has to wait a bit longer.DISCLAIMER: I traded away Mendenhall this summer and own him in exactly ZERO leagues.Ben could be in for an excellant year.Collins was neither good nor bad last night. He had a few poor throws, but made generally made good decisions and kept his team in the game. The interception should not have been (terrible job by Britt there!), but the ball was horribly underthrown. He's a game manager, a low end QB2 for fantasy purposes.Tennessee will struggle this year on defense.I noticed that too. Its probably just a matter of time before he's starting. There was a miscue on the first run, but Mendenhall missed most of his rookie season. So its not that surprising. Had he stayed healthy last year, he'd already be starting IMO.All I can say for M'hall is that despite having NO blocking or lanes and being hit in the backfield, he pushed forward very well.Ben looked at Mendenhall on the play and tapped his own chest as if to say it was his fault, not RM.I noticed that too. Its probably just a matter of time before he's starting. There was a miscue on the first run, but Mendenhall missed most of his rookie season. So its not that surprising. Had he stayed healthy last year, he'd already be starting IMO. That play could've been Ben's fault as well. But the line play was horrible and he finishes his runs to get whatever yardage he can. He gained yards after contact....showing good power. No he didn't break anything....but neither did any other steelers RB.I'm not sure where I would rank him against this year's rookies, but he looked HORRIBLE. Granted, the Titans are not an easy matchup even without Haynesworth, but he didn't look great in the preseason, or last year.IIRC, his first handoff last night he ran straight into Ben. It looked like somebody was playing Madden with the kid - and not in a good way. He took the ball, did a spin (whether it appeared necessary or not), then proceeded to run smack into whoever or whatever was in front of him. I don't know if he magically expected the hole to just open up in front of him or he thought he could run through both his offensive line and the Titans' defensive line, but he missed a couple small holes.Mendenhall -Anymore thoughts on Mendenhall, folks?How would you rank against this year's rookie RB crop?![]()
![]()
![]()
They also had a hammer of a FB that could be utilized &block when they had to pound the ball in short yardageand the o-line really can't run blockA couple years ago Parker had 13 rushing TDs. The main problem is a change in philosophy and a crappy o-line.What you saw with Willie Parker in short yardage last night is no different than what you saw the last 2 years from him against every team in the league. Or do you think the Steelers try guys like Russell and Davenport in short yardage because they were elite talents and FWP can do the job? The reason FWP was announced as the short yardage back is because a) Russell is gone b) Moore is the 3rd down back and not ideal c) Mendenhall plays like a deer in the headlights. All that being said, Parker is one of the worst short yardage backs in the league. Shotgun on 3rd and 1 all year. Watch.You know all this after 1 game against one of the best run defenses in the league? Go you.This I know - the Steelers will miss Gary Russell more than they ever imagined. Looks like every 3rd and a yard and a half will be from the shotgun. FWP has shown that he can't get even a yard without a hole - can't drive a pile. Not what you want in a short yardage back.
I am sorry but I honestly don't know how Pittsburgh managed to win two Super Bowls with Roethlisberger at QB.

In my view, he is a very average QB. He still plays the same he did as a rookie. He has really shown no progression.I am sorry but I honestly don't know how Pittsburgh managed to win two Super Bowls with Roethlisberger at QB.![]()
Oh, but did we ever miss fossball. Even if it is the debil.Peace.Oh BTW, Steeler fan is becoming almost unbearable as Cowboy or Yankee fan....Peace out.I think I learnt that when there is just one game to talk about in the NFL that it will be analyzed well beyond any reasonable discussion. I'm OK with that...
What progression is past the SuperBowl? Scoreboard.Signed,Trent Dilfer's Ring and Dan Marino's/Dan Fouts Empty FingerPeaceIn my view, he is a very average QB. He still plays the same he did as a rookie. He has really shown no progression.I am sorry but I honestly don't know how Pittsburgh managed to win two Super Bowls with Roethlisberger at QB.![]()
This is perhaps the foulest smelling bait the Shark Pool has ever seen.In my view, he is a very average QB. He still plays the same he did as a rookie. He has really shown no progression.I am sorry but I honestly don't know how Pittsburgh managed to win two Super Bowls with Roethlisberger at QB.![]()
I'll take a passIn my view, he is a very average QB. He still plays the same he did as a rookie. He has really shown no progression.I am sorry but I honestly don't know how Pittsburgh managed to win two Super Bowls with Roethlisberger at QB.![]()
Go back and watch Super Bowl XLIII. That should refresh your memoryI am sorry but I honestly don't know how Pittsburgh managed to win two Super Bowls with Roethlisberger at QB.
That was the change in philosophy I was talking about.They also had a hammer of a FB that could be utilized &block when they had to pound the ball in short yardageand the o-line really can't run blockA couple years ago Parker had 13 rushing TDs. The main problem is a change in philosophy and a crappy o-line.What you saw with Willie Parker in short yardage last night is no different than what you saw the last 2 years from him against every team in the league. Or do you think the Steelers try guys like Russell and Davenport in short yardage because they were elite talents and FWP can do the job? The reason FWP was announced as the short yardage back is because a) Russell is gone b) Moore is the 3rd down back and not ideal c) Mendenhall plays like a deer in the headlights. All that being said, Parker is one of the worst short yardage backs in the league. Shotgun on 3rd and 1 all year. Watch.You know all this after 1 game against one of the best run defenses in the league? Go you.This I know - the Steelers will miss Gary Russell more than they ever imagined. Looks like every 3rd and a yard and a half will be from the shotgun. FWP has shown that he can't get even a yard without a hole - can't drive a pile. Not what you want in a short yardage back.
This board gets more clueless every year. Mendenhall's first carry was Ben's fault. Kemo was pulling and it was a counter play and Ben forgot the counter part. Mendenhall had what 2 carries and got more when there was nothing than FWP did with his carries. FWP is great when the OL is creating huge holes to utilize his speed and he does not have to think or use any instincts. FWP just does not have the runners instincts that the good rbs possess.I'm not sure where I would rank him against this year's rookies, but he looked HORRIBLE. Granted, the Titans are not an easy matchup even without Haynesworth, but he didn't look great in the preseason, or last year.IIRC, his first handoff last night he ran straight into Ben. It looked like somebody was playing Madden with the kid - and not in a good way. He took the ball, did a spin (whether it appeared necessary or not), then proceeded to run smack into whoever or whatever was in front of him. I don't know if he magically expected the hole to just open up in front of him or he thought he could run through both his offensive line and the Titans' defensive line, but he missed a couple small holes.Mendenhall -Anymore thoughts on Mendenhall, folks?How would you rank against this year's rookie RB crop?![]()
![]()
![]()
I think I saw the play. fairly early in the game. he was running toward the sideline, and the commentator said he should have come back to the QB.He also had at least one play that I saw where he ran a sloppy route on a come back leading to an incomplete and he should have stopped the Interception.the numbers look good, but most of his yards came on one catch where the DB didnt cover him. It wasnt a great move he made to gain separation or anything like that. The Steelers corner just messed up. He did get some good yards after the catch, and looked like he had some potential on other plays. I think realistically he wont be a stud until next year.TheFanatic said:Hines Ward is a great possession WR. Nobody runs against either of these teams all yearMy boy Britt gonna be a stud...
Its because the Steelers offensive line has probably 3 HOFers on it. He has so much time to pass, I think anyone could play QB for PittsburghI am sorry but I honestly don't know how Pittsburgh managed to win two Super Bowls with Roethlisberger at QB.
I think Mendenhall has definitely improved. He's basically looked like FWP since he's been around too. When there's a hole, Mendy shows a lot of burst through it and breaks an 8 yarder with ease. When there's nothing, he looks terrible.I doubt he takes carries away from FWP, but in those "easy" games, I could definitely see a pretty even split between the 2.re: FWP - pretty good chance he puts up some big numbers in several games this year, despite the mediocre o-line. Pretty sweet spots in the schedule against poor run defenses.Mendy has looked awful every time I have watched him the last two years. Lots of chatter about he keeps his legs churning, and he can move a pile, but if that is true, why hasn't it ever resulted in a big run? Too small a sample size to argue either way, but I honestly don't think he will ever be the starter.MeMo will have an important role on the 2009 Stillers, but his upside is limited. Just can't get it done in between the tackles. The Steelers have to improve on 3rd/4th and short. I don't know what the answer is given the personnel limitations they have right now (the backs and the line both).
Great post. Great point about how biased our vocabulary is as football fans when we refer to a game like that as a defensive struggle.I've never heard of a 41-38 game being described as an offensive struggle. Well done.Old School footballheidbrink said:I think I learned that: If you are riding the waiver wire with your defense, one should always consider whoever plays Pittsburgh because you are guaranteed at least few sacks. Ben refuses to throw the ball away. Reminds me of Terry Bradshaw in as much as he could easily play in that era with his style of play. I also learned that that was a fantastic way to start the football season this year. Great game. Defensive success (why do they say struggle?) for both teams. I imagine that was a long way back to the locker room for Rob Bironas.