What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

What is Steven Spielberg's best movie? (1 Viewer)

What is Steven Spielberg's best movie?

  • Jaws

    Votes: 32 20.5%
  • Close Encounters of the Third Kind

    Votes: 3 1.9%
  • Raiders of the Lost Ark

    Votes: 39 25.0%
  • E.T., The Extra Terrestrial

    Votes: 7 4.5%
  • The Color Purple

    Votes: 2 1.3%
  • Empire of the Sun

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • Jurassic Park

    Votes: 7 4.5%
  • Schindler's List

    Votes: 22 14.1%
  • Amistad

    Votes: 2 1.3%
  • Saving Private Ryan

    Votes: 34 21.8%
  • Munich

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • War Horse

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lincoln

    Votes: 3 1.9%
  • War of the Worlds

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • Other

    Votes: 2 1.3%

  • Total voters
    156

timschochet

Footballguy
I just named Steven Spielberg as #53 on my list of 100 greatest Americans, so I thought this poll would be interesting.

I voted Schindler, though Jaws is pretty close for me.

 
That is a tough one because my favorite move (Saving Private Rryan) is different from what i think is his best movie (Schindlers List)

 
timschochet said:
I just named Steven Spielberg as #53 on my list of 100 greatest Americans, so I thought this poll would be interesting.

I voted Schindler, though Jaws is pretty close for me.
Tell me more about this list of Americans.

 
I may be the only one who votes for it, and I am fine with that.

Amidst all the damn supehero movies, reboots, remakes, ROMCOMs, and other crap put out there over the last 5 years, Lincoln was like a shining beacon of light that there is still hope for quality film in America.

I loved Raiders, Jaws, E.T., and Shindler's List.... but there are a thousand other movies I enjoyed during the times those came out.

Lincoln, well, there are about 3. Going against the norm to make something compelling gets the nod for me. Even if it isn't his best movie, I wanted to make sure it got at least one vote.

 
timschochet said:
I voted Schindler, though Jaws is pretty close for me.
This for me too.

Saving Private Ryan is a very good movie, but overrated. The beginning is probably the greatest battle scene ever filmed, the rest of it is kind of a cheese-fest. Almost a Cameron Crowe movie.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I went Jaws as its extremely engaging, eminently rewatchable and historically significant. Raiders is probably more pure fun, but its not as important. Schindler's is haunting filmmaking and his most important work.

 
timschochet said:
I voted Schindler, though Jaws is pretty close for me.
This for me too.

Saving Private Ryan is a very good movie, but overrated. The beginning is probably the greatest battle scene ever filmed, the rest of it is kind of a cheese-fest. Almost a Cameron Crowe movie.
Yea, but the opening battle scene was one of the few movie moments that had me :shock:

 
While the Jaws theater experience was unique, my Raiders theater experience was my best ever. Went Raiders.

 
dparker713 said:
Charlie Steiner said:
Raiders for me...Indiana Jones reminds me of myself sometimes
You realize he was completely superfluous to the story?
He's not there and the Nazi's would reclaim the Ark as eventually someone goes to check in on the expedition. Who knows what they figure out after that.
And it's a shallow criticism to begin with. It's not every story that a protagonist has to have direct bearing on the outcome.

The events in Jurassic Park would have unfolded the same with or without Dr Grant. He's not superfluous to the story.

The evens in SPR would have unfolded the same with or without Upham. He's not superfluous to the story.

Sometimes the hero drives the plot resolution, other times he drives the resolution. If it's the former, it doesn't mean he's irrelevant to the story.

In the case of Raiders, Indy might not have affected the outcome, but he certainly affected the path TO the outcome. And in the case of storytelling, the path is at least as important as the resolution.

Amy Farrah Fowler can get bent. :angry:

 
For purposes of answering the poll, I can't pick between ET and Raiders. It's like asking me which of my children I love more.

Close Encounters is an utter bore.

 
For purposes of answering the poll, I can't pick between ET and Raiders. It's like asking me which of my children I love more.

Close Encounters is an utter bore.
:o
I've tried. Really tried.But Neary is just a really unlikable guy, even if his wife is terrible. He still left his family to satisfy his obsession.

I get that it's Spielberg trying to reach catharsis in his own father leaving but it doesn't make for compelling viewing.

I found it a similar experience to Star Trek: The Motion(less) Picture.

The soundtrack is great though. I found it on vinyl the other day and was most pleased at that.

 
dparker713 said:
Charlie Steiner said:
Raiders for me...Indiana Jones reminds me of myself sometimes
You realize he was completely superfluous to the story?
He's not there and the Nazi's would reclaim the Ark as eventually someone goes to check in on the expedition. Who knows what they figure out after that.
And it's a shallow criticism to begin with. It's not every story that a protagonist has to have direct bearing on the outcome.

The events in Jurassic Park would have unfolded the same with or without Dr Grant. He's not superfluous to the story.

The evens in SPR would have unfolded the same with or without Upham. He's not superfluous to the story.

Sometimes the hero drives the plot resolution, other times he drives the resolution. If it's the former, it doesn't mean he's irrelevant to the story.

In the case of Raiders, Indy might not have affected the outcome, but he certainly affected the path TO the outcome. And in the case of storytelling, the path is at least as important as the resolution.

Amy Farrah Fowler can get bent. :angry:
They probably don't let go of the German that kills Miller without Upham being there.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
dparker713 said:
Charlie Steiner said:
Raiders for me...Indiana Jones reminds me of myself sometimes
You realize he was completely superfluous to the story?
He's not there and the Nazi's would reclaim the Ark as eventually someone goes to check in on the expedition. Who knows what they figure out after that.
And it's a shallow criticism to begin with. It's not every story that a protagonist has to have direct bearing on the outcome.The events in Jurassic Park would have unfolded the same with or without Dr Grant. He's not superfluous to the story.

The evens in SPR would have unfolded the same with or without Upham. He's not superfluous to the story.

Sometimes the hero drives the plot resolution, other times he drives the resolution. If it's the former, it doesn't mean he's irrelevant to the story.

In the case of Raiders, Indy might not have affected the outcome, but he certainly affected the path TO the outcome. And in the case of storytelling, the path is at least as important as the resolution.

Amy Farrah Fowler can get bent. :angry:
Without Indy they probably never even find the ark.

 
Without Indy, they find Marion (even if they don't follow Indy to her), kill her, take the headpiece and march right to the Ark's location.

 
I think his best movies are Schindlers List, Jaws, and Munich.

IMO the best not listed is Minority Report.

War Horse is horrible.

 
Andy I can't believe you're comparing Close Encounters to Star Trek I.

Close Encounters is the quintessential Spielberg movie. If most moviegoers of a certain age watched that film for the first time without any credits, they would immediately say, "This is a Spielberg movie." Everything about it has that epic feel that he is so well known for, and which very few other filmmakers are able to achieve.

KP, I never saw Minority Report; I didn't hear good things. Now I guess I'll have to see it. But I really liked War Horse, especially the early scenes in Britain. I thought it was a really good movie.

 
My top 5. And it's tough as he has made numerous great films.

1) Jaws

2) Raiders Of The Lost Ark

3) Schindlers List

4) Saving Private Ryan

5) Munich

I adore Close Encounters Of The Third Kind and Jurassic Park as well. But those 5 really have stuck for me. Especially the top 3. ET is also another fantastic movie.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Without Indy, they find Marion (even if they don't follow Indy to her), kill her, take the headpiece and march right to the Ark's location.
They weren't looking for Marion. They were looking for Abner. Nazis are stupid, they may never have found her.
After they find out Abner's dead, they'd pursue and find Marion.Nazi's are crazy. Not stupid.

Indy couldn't have immediately known where she was - they hadn't spoken in years. If he could find her so could Toht.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Without Indy, they find Marion (even if they don't follow Indy to her), kill her, take the headpiece and march right to the Ark's location.
They weren't looking for Marion. They were looking for Abner. Nazis are stupid, they may never have found her.
After they find out Abner's dead, they'd pursue and find Marion.Nazi's are crazy. Not stupid.

Indy couldn't have immediately known where she was - they hadn't spoken in years. If he could find her so could Toht.
I suppose. But that would be a boring movie.

 
Without Indy, they find Marion (even if they don't follow Indy to her), kill her, take the headpiece and march right to the Ark's location.
They weren't looking for Marion. They were looking for Abner. Nazis are stupid, they may never have found her.
After they find out Abner's dead, they'd pursue and find Marion.Nazi's are crazy. Not stupid.

Indy couldn't have immediately known where she was - they hadn't spoken in years. If he could find her so could Toht.
I suppose. But that would be a boring movie.
That's my point. Without Indy there's not much of a story at all.Amy Fowler clearly doesn't like fun.

 
Andy I can't believe you're comparing Close Encounters to Star Trek I.

Close Encounters is the quintessential Spielberg movie. If most moviegoers of a certain age watched that film for the first time without any credits, they would immediately say, "This is a Spielberg movie." Everything about it has that epic feel that he is so well known for, and which very few other filmmakers are able to achieve.

KP, I never saw Minority Report; I didn't hear good things. Now I guess I'll have to see it. But I really liked War Horse, especially the early scenes in Britain. I thought it was a really good movie.
I estimate the number of wrong things in this post at about five.
 
Andy I can't believe you're comparing Close Encounters to Star Trek I.

Close Encounters is the quintessential Spielberg movie. If most moviegoers of a certain age watched that film for the first time without any credits, they would immediately say, "This is a Spielberg movie." Everything about it has that epic feel that he is so well known for, and which very few other filmmakers are able to achieve.

KP, I never saw Minority Report; I didn't hear good things. Now I guess I'll have to see it. But I really liked War Horse, especially the early scenes in Britain. I thought it was a really good movie.
Minority Report does break down a bit in the 3rd act, and people do tend to reject Cruise movies because of his personality a bit too. I just really appreciated the amount of detail and attempt to be realistic with the tech and science. Overall I thought it was one of the best sci-fi movies of the past 15 years or so.

Imo War Horse is Spielberg at his sentimental, gooey worst. Usually don't like that side of him in his movies as he tends to lay it on too thick.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top