dparker713 said:
Charlie Steiner said:
Raiders for me...Indiana Jones reminds me of myself sometimes
You realize he was completely superfluous to the story?
He's not there and the Nazi's would reclaim the Ark as eventually someone goes to check in on the expedition. Who knows what they figure out after that.
And it's a shallow criticism to begin with. It's not every story that a protagonist has to have direct bearing on the outcome.
The events in Jurassic Park would have unfolded the same with or without Dr Grant. He's not superfluous to the story.
The evens in SPR would have unfolded the same with or without Upham. He's not superfluous to the story.
Sometimes the hero drives the plot resolution, other times he drives the resolution. If it's the former, it doesn't mean he's irrelevant to the story.
In the case of Raiders, Indy might not have affected the outcome, but he certainly affected the path TO the outcome. And in the case of storytelling, the path is at least as important as the resolution.
Amy Farrah Fowler can get bent.