Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
This is what I am seeing too.
Which is usually the case. Best time to trade the pick IMO is usually right before the rookie draft, sometimes when you are on the clock with your pick.
Which is usually the case. Best time to trade the pick IMO is usually right before the rookie draft, sometimes when you are on the clock with your pick.
So pick 45-50.....I see players like MJD, Eric Decker, Murray, Antonio Brown in that range. So I guess that's the value of 1.01 this time. So pick 45-50.....I see players like MJD, Eric Decker, Murray, Antonio Brown in that range. So I guess that's the value of 1.01 this time.I own a couple of those players, and I would trade any of them in a heartbeat for the 1.01.
Foles would have to be on the plane to KC. Then it's a good deal.
So pick 45-50.....I see players like MJD, Eric Decker, Murray, Antonio Brown in that range. So I guess that's the value of 1.01 this time.I own a couple of those players, and I would trade any of them in a heartbeat for the 1.01.Decker is worth way more than the 1.01 rookie pick. Hes young and probably good for 1200 yards at least, 90 receptions and 7 or 8 tds with a much higher ceiling.
So pick 45-50.....I see players like MJD, Eric Decker, Murray, Antonio Brown in that range. So I guess that's the value of 1.01 this time.I own a couple of those players, and I would trade any of them in a heartbeat for the 1.01.Good God why cant you be in my leagueI own a couple of those players, and I would trade any of them in a heartbeat for the 1.01.Good God why cant you be in my leagueI would probably move any of them except for Murray for 1.01. Each to his own I guess.
I own a couple of those players, and I would trade any of them in a heartbeat for the 1.01.Good God why cant you be in my leagueI am in your league and would also trade any of those players for the 1.01. Recently traded Mike Wallace for the 1.01 and loved it.
I own a couple of those players, and I would trade any of them in a heartbeat for the 1.01.Good God why cant you be in my leagueI'd be more than willing to join your league, especially if you would trade the 1.01 for Antonio Brown.
Interesting. I would rather have Gillislee than Bell. Call me crazy but I won't be surprised if Gillislee goes before Bell in the NFL draft. There is very few 240 plus pound backs starting in the NFL.
So pick 45-50.....I see players like MJD, Eric Decker, Murray, Antonio Brown in that range. So I guess that's the value of 1.01 this time.I offered first for Decker and was turned down
I own a couple of those players, and I would trade any of them in a heartbeat for the 1.01.Good God why cant you be in my leagueI am in your league and would also trade any of those players for the 1.01. Recently traded Mike Wallace for the 1.01 and loved it.I was referring to Murray and Decker. Dont care as much about MJD or Brown.As for Mike Wallace, I have never been as high on him as others. And especially right now, who the hell knows where he even goes, and I don't see him teaming up with a top QB. I don't put Wallace up there with Decker or Murray
Bad idea.
Ill take rg3 all day.
Ill take rg3 all day.Alot depends on team/scoring. If he has another good QB and it is 1.5ppr for TE's, i take 1.01/AHern.
Alot depends on team/scoring. If he has another good QB and it is 1.5ppr for TE's, i take 1.01/AHern.I think it's a pretty darn close (and fair) trade either way. Agree it depends on team needs/depth.
I was hoping Lattimore might fall further than that. Obviously his location will affect the drafter's mindset, but with a IR season likely ahead, I really thought he might drop to the end of the first.blatant self interest alert - I am taking him there if possible.
I play to win with guys who I know can put up 1300 and 8 tds, not to get young guys with potential. Much rather have Decker than Eddie lacey who could be the next Ingram or Ryan Matthews.
Alot depends on team/scoring. If he has another good QB and it is 1.5ppr for TE's, i take 1.01/AHern.I think it's a pretty darn close (and fair) trade either way. Agree it depends on team needs/depth.I got Luck, Tanny and Locker as well; was rejected anyway
I agree with you 100%
Foles would have to be on the plane to KC. Then it's a good deal.I'd stick with Luck whether Foles gets on a plane or not.
I play to win with guys who I know can put up 1300 and 8 tds, not to get young guys with potential. Much rather have Decker than Eddie lacey who could be the next Ingram or Ryan Matthews.Decker was the 2nd most reliant on TDs for his fantasy production WR in all of football this year, behind only James Jones. I'm trying to find the link but can't right now. Everyone knows that relying on TDs every year isn't the best bet. Plus, Decker's value is tied to a declining asset in Peyton. The 1.01 is guaranteed to go up in value. If you trade Decker for it now, you'll be able to flip it for much more than Decker in a couple of months.
Decker was the 2nd most reliant on TDs for his fantasy production WR in all of football this year, behind only James Jones. I'm trying to find the link but can't right now. Everyone knows that relying on TDs every year isn't the best bet. Plus, Decker's value is tied to a declining asset in Peyton. The 1.01 is guaranteed to go up in value. If you trade Decker for it now, you'll be able to flip it for much more than Decker in a couple of months.Thats why I said 8 tds. He had 13 last season, which likely wont happen again, and 8 in 2011 with crap at quarterback. Plus, you know hes good for 80 receptions. Peyton or not, hes shown to be a reliable receiver. I understand your point but I think you're looking to far ahead. You said the 1.01 is guaranteed to go up in value and this is simply not true. This is a weak class coming out and no one has any clue who the top rookie or 2 will be. That player could easily be a bust as we've seen over the past few years. They were some great players that came out but there is no Julio, Green, luck or rg3 here.
Ill take rg3 all day.Well not all day because half the time he will probably be injured and I don't think it will get better going forward. I like RG3 but don't think he can play the way he does and stay healthy but then again Hernandez isn't Cal Ripken
Decker was the 2nd most reliant on TDs for his fantasy production WR in all of football this year, behind only James Jones. I'm trying to find the link but can't right now. Everyone knows that relying on TDs every year isn't the best bet. Plus, Decker's value is tied to a declining asset in Peyton. The 1.01 is guaranteed to go up in value. If you trade Decker for it now, you'll be able to flip it for much more than Decker in a couple of months.Thats why I said 8 tds. He had 13 last season, which likely wont happen again, and 8 in 2011 with crap at quarterback. Plus, you know hes good for 80 receptions. Peyton or not, hes shown to be a reliable receiver. I understand your point but I think you're looking to far ahead. You said the 1.01 is guaranteed to go up in value and this is simply not true. This is a weak class coming out and no one has any clue who the top rookie or 2 will be. That player could easily be a bust as we've seen over the past few years. They were some great players that came out but there is no Julio, Green, luck or rg3 here.Sorry, I should have been more clear. I think the 1.01 is guaranteed to go up in value between now and whenever your rookie draft is. I believe that if you traded Decker for the 1.01 right now, let the combine and draft play out, and then traded the 1.01 the day before the draft, you'd get a better WR than Decker.
Thats why I said 8 tds. He had 13 last season, which likely wont happen again, and 8 in 2011 with crap at quarterback. Plus, you know hes good for 80 receptions. Peyton or not, hes shown to be a reliable receiver. I understand your point but I think you're looking to far ahead. You said the 1.01 is guaranteed to go up in value and this is simply not true. This is a weak class coming out and no one has any clue who the top rookie or 2 will be. That player could easily be a bust as we've seen over the past few years. They were some great players that came out but there is no Julio, Green, luck or rg3 here.'lbouchard said:
I would agree.I also think people tend to go gaga over the landing spot of the rookies a lot of times. I will take talent over situation in the large majority of cases.Didn't people think Ingram to the Saints was a great landing spot?? On the flip side a lot of people didn't like AJ Green's landing spot, or Blackmon. Talent wins out.
Decker was the 2nd most reliant on TDs for his fantasy production WR in all of football this year, behind only James Jones. I'm trying to find the link but can't right now. Everyone knows that relying on TDs every year isn't the best bet. Plus, Decker's value is tied to a declining asset in Peyton. The 1.01 is guaranteed to go up in value. If you trade Decker for it now, you'll be able to flip it for much more than Decker in a couple of months.I'm guessing that Denver decides to still use a QB after Manning retires.'lbouchard said:
I would agree.I also think people tend to go gaga over the landing spot of the rookies a lot of times. I will take talent over situation in the large majority of cases.Didn't people think Ingram to the Saints was a great landing spot?? On the flip side a lot of people didn't like AJ Green's landing spot, or Blackmon. Talent wins out.Ingram was probably a bad example if you're using him based upon talent alone, or lack thereof, because Sean Peyton or the Saints offensive philosophy has to be the worst landing spot for any RB more than Ingram's lack of talent.
I would agree.I also think people tend to go gaga over the landing spot of the rookies a lot of times. I will take talent over situation in the large majority of cases.Didn't people think Ingram to the Saints was a great landing spot?? On the flip side a lot of people didn't like AJ Green's landing spot, or Blackmon. Talent wins out.Agree, but talent disparity is marginal this year. Situation matters more.
