Ghost Rider
Footballguy
Only three legit options, IMO.
Didn't the NFC East also get a handful of games against the NFC west? I know Dallas lost to Zona and Washington lost to St Louis, can't recall who the other two played though I think I recall the NYG playing Seattle.East...though the South is in consideration.AFC East IMO is benefitting from playing 8 games against the NFC and AFC West teams.
nfc east is yesterday's news.I'd vote for them if I had a time machine to go back to before they got waxed by the brutal nfc west.dallas = suxphilly = suxafc south has 2 good teams --- that's only half a division.afc east has THREE good teams and buffalo, who was everybody's sleeper pick to win the division, so they get points for that.Here's how Sagarin ranks the teams in the three divisions:NFC East (Giants)NFC South (Bucs)NFC South (Panthers)NFC East (Eagles)NFC East (Cowboys)NFC South (Falcons)AFC East (Jets)NFC East (Redskins)NFC South (Saints)AFC East (Dolphins)AFC East (Patriots)AFC East (Bills)I don't see how the AFC East is in the discussion. The AFC East's best team is clearly the weakest of the three; the AFC East's worst team is clearly the weakest of the three. The AFC East's 2nd and 3rd best teams are the weakest as well.The NFC East and NFC South are pretty even; it depends what criteria you want to use. It also depends how you really want to rate teams like the Cowboys (should be impressive going forward, not that impressive to date) and the Eagles (2nd highest points differential in the league; average record). I'd give the NFC East the slight edge, mostly on the basis of the Giants being the clear best team among the two divisions.
Everyone has bad losses. Here's the points differential for each division, which obviously eliminates the beat each other up argument.193 NFC East176 NFC South106 AFC East64 AFC South-30 AFC North-72 NFC North-213 AFC West-224 NFC WestWins differential doesn't tell a much different story:13 NFC East12 NFC South8 AFC East6 AFC South-3 AFC North-10 NFC North-12 NFC West-14 AFC WestThe NFC East lost all of its luster when the Cowboys and Skins lost to the Rams and the Iggs tied the Bengals. You can't go on about how you beat each other up and then produce crap like that.
you knocked this post out of the park imoHere's how Sagarin ranks the teams in the three divisions:NFC East (Giants)NFC South (Bucs)NFC South (Panthers)NFC East (Eagles)NFC East (Cowboys)NFC South (Falcons)AFC East (Jets)NFC East (Redskins)NFC South (Saints)AFC East (Dolphins)AFC East (Patriots)AFC East (Bills)I don't see how the AFC East is in the discussion. The AFC East's best team is clearly the weakest of the three; the AFC East's worst team is clearly the weakest of the three. The AFC East's 2nd and 3rd best teams are the weakest as well.The NFC East and NFC South are pretty even; it depends what criteria you want to use. It also depends how you really want to rate teams like the Cowboys (should be impressive going forward, not that impressive to date) and the Eagles (2nd highest points differential in the league; average record). I'd give the NFC East the slight edge, mostly on the basis of the Giants being the clear best team among the two divisions.
this one too, muy bien!Everyone has bad losses. Here's the points differential for each division, which obviously eliminates the beat each other up argument.193 NFC East176 NFC South106 AFC East64 AFC South-30 AFC North-72 NFC North-213 AFC West-224 NFC WestWins differential doesn't tell a much different story:13 NFC East12 NFC South8 AFC East6 AFC South-3 AFC North-10 NFC North-12 NFC West-14 AFC WestThe NFC East lost all of its luster when the Cowboys and Skins lost to the Rams and the Iggs tied the Bengals. You can't go on about how you beat each other up and then produce crap like that.
-baller said:nfc east is yesterday's news.I'd vote for them if I had a time machine to go back to before they got waxed by the brutal nfc west.dallas = suxphilly = suxafc south has 2 good teams --- that's only half a division.afc east has THREE good teams and buffalo, who was everybody's sleeper pick to win the division, so they get points for that.Chase Stuart said:Here's how Sagarin ranks the teams in the three divisions:NFC East (Giants)NFC South (Bucs)NFC South (Panthers)NFC East (Eagles)NFC East (Cowboys)NFC South (Falcons)AFC East (Jets)NFC East (Redskins)NFC South (Saints)AFC East (Dolphins)AFC East (Patriots)AFC East (Bills)I don't see how the AFC East is in the discussion. The AFC East's best team is clearly the weakest of the three; the AFC East's worst team is clearly the weakest of the three. The AFC East's 2nd and 3rd best teams are the weakest as well.The NFC East and NFC South are pretty even; it depends what criteria you want to use. It also depends how you really want to rate teams like the Cowboys (should be impressive going forward, not that impressive to date) and the Eagles (2nd highest points differential in the league; average record). I'd give the NFC East the slight edge, mostly on the basis of the Giants being the clear best team among the two divisions.
Yeah NFC West down?Challenge Everything said:Shouldn't there be 8 options? FLA\/\/ED
Outside of the Giants, the Panthers and Bucs are the next best 2 teams IMO. And I'm a Jets fan.
But frankly, top to bottom I think the NFC East is THIRD after the NFC South and AFC East. Eagles Suck, Skins are average, Dallas was bad while Romo was out, but will come back to life now. But Atlanta has proven to be pretty solid and New Orleans (for whatever reason) hasn't played as most expected.
Then the AFC East. The Jets and Pats are both very good, make no mistake. Schedule's be damned, these are good teams. The Dolphins have proven they can play with anyone and the Bills are average.
Give the Eagles a different QB and this discussion changes. McNabb is killing them. The Skins' Campbell hasn't been any better. Many expected this to be his breakout year and I'm not seeing it in the 4 Skins games I've seen in their entirety. The Giants and Cowboys are the class of that division hands down and it will show these last 6 weeks.