I've been playing in the same league for about 4 years, and every year I look for the best way to prepare myself for the draft. It is a big deal in our league, as I'm sure it is for everyone else's league in which the owners get together, talk trash, eat wings, drink beer, and then pretend like they are masters of the fantasy football world.
I've read a lot about different strategies, but I'm wondering if there a better way to prepare. Currently I base a lot of my decision on projections, before I discovered FBG (2009) I was using CBS and ESPN projections averaged out, followed by a SOS rating by position (toolbox) as a deciding vote between players. I've used this strategy for the past 2 years and have luckly made the Super Bowl in back-to-back seasons. I've been proud of my drafts the last 3 years, but I'm tired of 2nd place.
Beyond just incorporating projections I feel that the SOS is the most important aspect of how I draft, because a stud player is going to do better vs the Lions than they will against the Ravens. So drafting the most quality players with weak defensive opponents should result in my fantasy success. Often times this burned me last year as I had Romo and Witten (drafted for projection over SOS) and they killed me due to injuries and 2nd half schedule. Obviously SOS is not a sure thing because Brees had one of the worst passing schedules and he was a Super Stud last year. But I wonder if SOS has a bigger effect on certain positions like RB than say QB and WR.
This is my dilemma, and Jason Wood has told me to use reverse SOS,
which of course I have no idea what he's talking about.
Nonetheless I was hoping to get a discussion on how and what everyone does to prepare for their draft. How do you organize yourself and what aspects tip your scale more than others. Do you use projections, or just expert ranking? Do you have a formula that has helped you to success or is it really just a gamble with every pick you call out. I'm excited about FBG's ranking access, and I'm curious about just trusting them as they have obviously put a lot of thought into how they are ranked.
Thoughts?
I've read a lot about different strategies, but I'm wondering if there a better way to prepare. Currently I base a lot of my decision on projections, before I discovered FBG (2009) I was using CBS and ESPN projections averaged out, followed by a SOS rating by position (toolbox) as a deciding vote between players. I've used this strategy for the past 2 years and have luckly made the Super Bowl in back-to-back seasons. I've been proud of my drafts the last 3 years, but I'm tired of 2nd place.
Beyond just incorporating projections I feel that the SOS is the most important aspect of how I draft, because a stud player is going to do better vs the Lions than they will against the Ravens. So drafting the most quality players with weak defensive opponents should result in my fantasy success. Often times this burned me last year as I had Romo and Witten (drafted for projection over SOS) and they killed me due to injuries and 2nd half schedule. Obviously SOS is not a sure thing because Brees had one of the worst passing schedules and he was a Super Stud last year. But I wonder if SOS has a bigger effect on certain positions like RB than say QB and WR.
This is my dilemma, and Jason Wood has told me to use reverse SOS,
which of course I have no idea what he's talking about.Nonetheless I was hoping to get a discussion on how and what everyone does to prepare for their draft. How do you organize yourself and what aspects tip your scale more than others. Do you use projections, or just expert ranking? Do you have a formula that has helped you to success or is it really just a gamble with every pick you call out. I'm excited about FBG's ranking access, and I'm curious about just trusting them as they have obviously put a lot of thought into how they are ranked.
Thoughts?


Mocks have gotten me into trouble because I think there's ton of really good info out there on undervalued/overvalued that doesn't seem to make it's way to ADP. I suspect it's because in a mock, people are MUCH more likely to time out or simply take the most valuable player the site itself has pre-determined which dumbs down the ADP of the more popular mid-rounders. Right now at FFCalc for instance, McFadden is 54th overall and Mendenhall is 100th. Players like that - if I go into a draft with 11 guys that are well read and weigh ADP too heavily, I seem to get cherry picked a lot.
I completely agree...I do the same thing. I'll gladly take a loss or two during the regular season if it gives me a better playoff matchup.This is getting away from the draft but I always do a lot of trades during the season. I will always trade for the biggest stud I can get, even if I have to overpay a little with good players. Imo, 1 stud + 1 mediocre player >>>>> 2 good players. A lot of owners will trade away the stud for two high quality players and you can usually find some scrub off the ww in a worst case scenario.