What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

What is the Deal w/ D FOSTER (1 Viewer)

I have Foster in my leagued and tried to trade him, but no takers.

Everyone was buying Williams. Word was Williams was going to be the starter in a week or two.

Now what? How much does this help Foster's Value? Is he a keeper or try and move after he had 20 carries?

 
I have Foster in my leagued and tried to trade him, but no takers.Everyone was buying Williams. Word was Williams was going to be the starter in a week or two.Now what? How much does this help Foster's Value? Is he a keeper or try and move after he had 20 carries?
Fox has a reputation of being loyal to his veterans and nothing in the preseason, or early regular season, has given any indication that Williams will be nothing more than a backup this season, barring injury.Most of the Williams hype is pure pipe dreams, driven by rookie mania. Happens every year.
 
I think DeShaun is the guy to start off every game. If he's going pretty good, he's the guy. If he's struggling a bit, Williams comes in for a spark. Seems to be the way of it so far.

 
I think DeShaun is the guy to start off every game. If he's going pretty good, he's the guy. If he's struggling a bit, Williams comes in for a spark. Seems to be the way of it so far.
Basically.Word of a job transitioning doesn't equal it actually happening. Foster is a decent RB3 but is most likely untradable. I would say Rhodes and Dillon are similar.
 
Why did Williams see almost no action, at least according to the stat line?
Foster didn't lose yardage on any carries and DeW had -4 and -3 on two of his four carries. The Panthers also took a big lead early and maybe Foster was considered the safer back (even though he did lose a fumble in the 3rd quarter).
 
I sense a low-buy oppurtunity coming soon for the Foster owners, who weren't able to get DeWilliams in the draft.

 
It is funny how opinions change on guys so quickly. Where were all these posts last week? Why weren't all the experts saying, not to worry, Foster will still get the majority of the carries even though Williams out performed Foster. Easy to say after the fact.

 
It is funny how opinions change on guys so quickly. Where were all these posts last week? Why weren't all the experts saying, not to worry, Foster will still get the majority of the carries even though Williams out performed Foster. Easy to say after the fact.
there have been many on the board who emphasized fox is very loyal to vets (played davis when it was obvious to everybody that foster was better), long before last week...
 
It is funny how opinions change on guys so quickly. Where were all these posts last week? Why weren't all the experts saying, not to worry, Foster will still get the majority of the carries even though Williams out performed Foster. Easy to say after the fact.
You just weren't listening to the right experts...primary John Fox.
 
Neither Foster nor Williams are worth using at this point.

Foster's going to be the guy all season unless:

1) He gets hurt

2) The Panthers keep losing games and Fox makes a changes to try and jump start the offense.

I don't think the Panthers will keep losing, so unless Foster get hurt, he'll probably be the guy.

The problem is that Foster's not that good and Carolina's offense in general hasn't been that good. Maybe the whole dynamic will change with Steve Smith back, but to this point, I wouldn't want to have to depend on Foster or be clinging to some hope that Williams is going to take the job.

 
Lauryn Hill said:
He's just not that good.
20 > 4that's all
that makes him good? :confused:
No. But id does make him more valuable from a FF perspective. It doesn't matter how good D. Williams is, if Fox keeps the 80%/20% split working, Williams would have to average about 12 yards a carry to be valuable. Some have said FF production = talent + opportunity. I would submit to you that if you imagine it as a math equation it is more like "FF production = talent times opportunity".
 
Some have said FF production = talent + opportunity. I would submit to you that if you imagine it as a math equation it is more like "FF production = talent times opportunity".
It doesn't matter if it is a plus or a multiplier - the problem is quantifying "talent" in the equation.Certainly, if you quantify it as YPC, a multiplier is what you want to use.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top