What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

What opinion do your school-age kids have of Michelle Obama? (1 Viewer)

Mad Cow

Welshers and Dawdlers Beware!
I am sure I cannot be alone, but all I hear about every week from my kids is how much they cannot stand what Obama did to their school lunches. Were they healthy before? No. Mass lunches are impossible to make healthy, but all I hear now is that they are terrible tasting and they come home hungry every day. Lunches are just being tossed into the garbage from their account. I know in the times I have joined my kids in school I could say that they look less and less appealing.

Just curious if that is the same everywhere else.

Oh, THANKS OBAMA! :hot:

 
I am sure I cannot be alone, but all I hear about every week from my kids is how much they cannot stand what Obama did to their school lunches. Were they healthy before? No. Mass lunches are impossible to make healthy, but all I hear now is that they are terrible tasting and they come home hungry every day. Lunches are just being tossed into the garbage from their account. I know in the times I have joined my kids in school I could say that they look less and less appealing.

Just curious if that is the same everywhere else.

Oh, THANKS OBAMA! :hot:
Why?

 
What age we talking about here? How do they even know MO is responsible for this change? There's always the brown bag option.

 
:goodposting:

Some thirty years later I can almost taste those delectable meals served to us by the lunch ladies when we were kids. I shudder when I hear how bad today's youth has it when it comes to cafeteria cuisine. Nary a Michelin Star to be found since NObama installed the Lunch Tsars.

 
:goodposting:

Some thirty years later I can almost taste those delectable meals served to us by the lunch ladies when we were kids. I shudder when I hear how bad today's youth has it when it comes to cafeteria cuisine. Nary a Michelin Star to be found since NObama installed the Lunch Tsars.
Yeah, those meals were great, Of course, we didn't have soda machines. Not sure how anyone thought that was a good idea. Maybe if the childhood obesity rate hadn't skyrocketed in the last 30 years, this wouldn't be an issue.

 
:goodposting:

Some thirty years later I can almost taste those delectable meals served to us by the lunch ladies when we were kids. I shudder when I hear how bad today's youth has it when it comes to cafeteria cuisine. Nary a Michelin Star to be found since NObama installed the Lunch Tsars.
At my last residence, the school district used to serve ridiculously good lunches. I was shocked at how much better they were compared to the 80s and 90s. I dunno what they taste like post-Obama though.

 
Oh believe me, pretty much 3rd grade and up know where it all came from, whether it is in the home or at school. At one point, I know they were requiring kids to take a piece of fruit from a bowl. The kicker is most of the kids would then just throw it away. So you have waste thrown into the mix, as well. Just ridiculous in so many ways.

THANKS OBAMA! :hot:

 
Oh believe me, pretty much 3rd grade and up know where it all came from, whether it is in the home or at school. At one point, I know they were requiring kids to take a piece of fruit from a bowl. The kicker is most of the kids would then just throw it away. So you have waste thrown into the mix, as well. Just ridiculous in so many ways.

THANKS OBAMA! :hot:
So instead of eating the fruit, they went home hungry. Smart kids.

 
MONDAY, July 28, 2014 (HealthDay News) -- Elementary school students seem to be satisfied with the healthier school lunches being offered to them, according to a new study of school officials.

New meal standards -- issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture -- went into effect in the fall of 2012. At the time, there was concern that kids would stop buying lunch, or throw away most of their food. But the new study of nearly 600 elementary schools suggests that this isn't the case.

"The updated meals standards are resulting in healthier meals for tens of millions of kids," Lindsey Turner, of Boise State University and a co-investigator for Bridging the Gap, a research program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, said in a university news release.

"Our studies show that kids are OK with these changes, and that there have not been widespread challenges with kids not buying or eating the meals," added Turner. Turner was a research scientist at the Institute for Health Research and Policy at the University of Illinois at Chicago when the study was conducted.

Roughly six months after the healthier meal standards were implemented, researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago and the University of Michigan surveyed school leaders, such as principals and school food-service providers, about how their students reacted to the new meals being offered to them.

Although 56 percent of those polled said the kids initially complained, they noted the students became more accepting of their new food choices over time.

The survey also revealed what the kids were choosing for their lunch and how much they were eating. Most of those polled, or 84 percent, said about the same number of students were buying their lunch and 79 percent reported the kids were also eating about the same amount or more than they did the year before. The researchers concluded the new meal standards did not result in kids wasting food or not buying their lunch anymore.

Moreover, 70 percent of the school leaders questioned said their students generally liked the healthier lunches provided at school. The researchers noted, however, there were some geographic and socioeconomic differences in the reactions to the new meal standards.

The schools with more students from lower-income families reported an increase in the percentage of students buying lunch. The opposite was true at schools with more children that had a higher socioeconomic status. Urban and suburban school students had fewer children stop buying lunch. These students also complained less and wasted less food than children attending rural schools, the investigators found.

Although those polled didn't report much change in the amount of food that was wasted at lunchtime, students from lower-income areas had less plate waste, the researchers noted.

The study, which was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, was released online in advance of publication in the August issue of Childhood Obesity.
 
I can't think of any scenario where Michelle Obama should be criticized for trying to get schools to provide healthier food for children.

 
1. My question was your child's opinion.

2. Is it healthier if you are giving kids food that taste worse and are thus not getting eaten?

3. It is like tossing a net out into the ocean if you question anything associated with Obama.

 
1. My question was your child's opinion.

2. Is it healthier if you are giving kids food that taste worse and are thus not getting eaten?

3. It is like tossing a net out into the ocean if you question anything associated with Obama.
Well I provided an answer based on polling 600 elementary schools. Of course children complained to begin with. I think Michelle should come out and say breathing is good. Then we could tell just how far the derangement has gone on the right.

 
MONDAY, July 28, 2014 (HealthDay News) -- Elementary school students seem to be satisfied with the healthier school lunches being offered to them, according to a new study of school officials.

New meal standards -- issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture -- went into effect in the fall of 2012. At the time, there was concern that kids would stop buying lunch, or throw away most of their food. But the new study of nearly 600 elementary schools suggests that this isn't the case.

"The updated meals standards are resulting in healthier meals for tens of millions of kids," Lindsey Turner, of Boise State University and a co-investigator for Bridging the Gap, a research program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, said in a university news release.

"Our studies show that kids are OK with these changes, and that there have not been widespread challenges with kids not buying or eating the meals," added Turner. Turner was a research scientist at the Institute for Health Research and Policy at the University of Illinois at Chicago when the study was conducted.

Roughly six months after the healthier meal standards were implemented, researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago and the University of Michigan surveyed school leaders, such as principals and school food-service providers, about how their students reacted to the new meals being offered to them.

Although 56 percent of those polled said the kids initially complained, they noted the students became more accepting of their new food choices over time.

The survey also revealed what the kids were choosing for their lunch and how much they were eating. Most of those polled, or 84 percent, said about the same number of students were buying their lunch and 79 percent reported the kids were also eating about the same amount or more than they did the year before. The researchers concluded the new meal standards did not result in kids wasting food or not buying their lunch anymore.

Moreover, 70 percent of the school leaders questioned said their students generally liked the healthier lunches provided at school. The researchers noted, however, there were some geographic and socioeconomic differences in the reactions to the new meal standards.

The schools with more students from lower-income families reported an increase in the percentage of students buying lunch. The opposite was true at schools with more children that had a higher socioeconomic status. Urban and suburban school students had fewer children stop buying lunch. These students also complained less and wasted less food than children attending rural schools, the investigators found.

Although those polled didn't report much change in the amount of food that was wasted at lunchtime, students from lower-income areas had less plate waste, the researchers noted.

The study, which was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, was released online in advance of publication in the August issue of Childhood Obesity.
Wait. They didn't even bother to survey the kids. They just asked principals what they thought the kids thought of the new lunches?

 
MONDAY, July 28, 2014 (HealthDay News) -- Elementary school students seem to be satisfied with the healthier school lunches being offered to them, according to a new study of school officials.

New meal standards -- issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture -- went into effect in the fall of 2012. At the time, there was concern that kids would stop buying lunch, or throw away most of their food. But the new study of nearly 600 elementary schools suggests that this isn't the case.

"The updated meals standards are resulting in healthier meals for tens of millions of kids," Lindsey Turner, of Boise State University and a co-investigator for Bridging the Gap, a research program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, said in a university news release.

"Our studies show that kids are OK with these changes, and that there have not been widespread challenges with kids not buying or eating the meals," added Turner. Turner was a research scientist at the Institute for Health Research and Policy at the University of Illinois at Chicago when the study was conducted.

Roughly six months after the healthier meal standards were implemented, researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago and the University of Michigan surveyed school leaders, such as principals and school food-service providers, about how their students reacted to the new meals being offered to them.

Although 56 percent of those polled said the kids initially complained, they noted the students became more accepting of their new food choices over time.

The survey also revealed what the kids were choosing for their lunch and how much they were eating. Most of those polled, or 84 percent, said about the same number of students were buying their lunch and 79 percent reported the kids were also eating about the same amount or more than they did the year before. The researchers concluded the new meal standards did not result in kids wasting food or not buying their lunch anymore.

Moreover, 70 percent of the school leaders questioned said their students generally liked the healthier lunches provided at school. The researchers noted, however, there were some geographic and socioeconomic differences in the reactions to the new meal standards.

The schools with more students from lower-income families reported an increase in the percentage of students buying lunch. The opposite was true at schools with more children that had a higher socioeconomic status. Urban and suburban school students had fewer children stop buying lunch. These students also complained less and wasted less food than children attending rural schools, the investigators found.

Although those polled didn't report much change in the amount of food that was wasted at lunchtime, students from lower-income areas had less plate waste, the researchers noted.

The study, which was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, was released online in advance of publication in the August issue of Childhood Obesity.
Wait. They didn't even bother to survey the kids. They just asked principals what they thought the kids thought of the new lunches?
Exactly my point. I am shocked administrators would have differing opinions of the students.

ETA I cannot believe they constructed a study to support the changes.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
MONDAY, July 28, 2014 (HealthDay News) -- Elementary school students seem to be satisfied with the healthier school lunches being offered to them, according to a new study of school officials.

New meal standards -- issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture -- went into effect in the fall of 2012. At the time, there was concern that kids would stop buying lunch, or throw away most of their food. But the new study of nearly 600 elementary schools suggests that this isn't the case.

"The updated meals standards are resulting in healthier meals for tens of millions of kids," Lindsey Turner, of Boise State University and a co-investigator for Bridging the Gap, a research program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, said in a university news release.

"Our studies show that kids are OK with these changes, and that there have not been widespread challenges with kids not buying or eating the meals," added Turner. Turner was a research scientist at the Institute for Health Research and Policy at the University of Illinois at Chicago when the study was conducted.

Roughly six months after the healthier meal standards were implemented, researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago and the University of Michigan surveyed school leaders, such as principals and school food-service providers, about how their students reacted to the new meals being offered to them.

Although 56 percent of those polled said the kids initially complained, they noted the students became more accepting of their new food choices over time.

The survey also revealed what the kids were choosing for their lunch and how much they were eating. Most of those polled, or 84 percent, said about the same number of students were buying their lunch and 79 percent reported the kids were also eating about the same amount or more than they did the year before. The researchers concluded the new meal standards did not result in kids wasting food or not buying their lunch anymore.

Moreover, 70 percent of the school leaders questioned said their students generally liked the healthier lunches provided at school. The researchers noted, however, there were some geographic and socioeconomic differences in the reactions to the new meal standards.

The schools with more students from lower-income families reported an increase in the percentage of students buying lunch. The opposite was true at schools with more children that had a higher socioeconomic status. Urban and suburban school students had fewer children stop buying lunch. These students also complained less and wasted less food than children attending rural schools, the investigators found.

Although those polled didn't report much change in the amount of food that was wasted at lunchtime, students from lower-income areas had less plate waste, the researchers noted.

The study, which was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, was released online in advance of publication in the August issue of Childhood Obesity.
Wait. They didn't even bother to survey the kids. They just asked principals what they thought the kids thought of the new lunches?
Exactly my point. I am shocked administrators would have differing opinions of the students.
The survey also revealed what the kids were choosing for their lunch and how much they were eating. Most of those polled, or 84 percent, said about the same number of students were buying their lunch
That seems to suggest that children are still buying the lunches you claim they hate and don't eat.

 
Oh believe me, pretty much 3rd grade and up know where it all came from, whether it is in the home or at school. At one point, I know they were requiring kids to take a piece of fruit from a bowl. The kicker is most of the kids would then just throw it away. So you have waste thrown into the mix, as well. Just ridiculous in so many ways.

THANKS OBAMA! :hot:
So instead of eating the fruit, they went home hungry. Smart kids.
seriously. maybe get your dumb kids to eat better or pack a lunch that they want.

 
She is about the most hated person amongst my HS kids. Black kids just as much as white students bad mouth her constantly.

 
It is a good thing for kids to have healthier lunches but I can see why people don't like Michelle because she definitely has the body of someone that doesn't eat healthy.

 
The problem is healthy food products need to be fresh to have any flavor. I don't know any school locally that spends the money to make fresh lunches so the kids end up getting mush no one will eat. A good idea with poor implementation. I preferred the more mixed bag that was served prior. It was healthy, it just wasn't as healthy. At least the food was eaten though.

We had to switch to making lunches. It's kind of a pain, but at least they get something healthy that they will actually eat.

 
My kids are not happy at all with it. Sweet potato french fries? :yucky:

One thing I do not understand with my district is that the middle school and high school have an ala carte option. Kids can buy additional food separate from their meal (everything from $1 for another sandwich to $.50 for another cookie) and parents are not able to put a restriction on their child's account to prevent them from making these purchases. If we are so worried about childhood obesity why don't we eliminate these first and foremost?

 
2. Is it healthier if you are giving kids food that taste worse and are thus not getting eaten?
This probably depends on a bunch of factors. For some kids, I'd say not eating lunch at all might be healthier than eating junk food for lunch.
The previous options weren't junk food. At least not at our schools.
Yeah, this is why I said it "depends on a bunch of factors." What the old lunches were like, what the kid is eating outside of school, etc.

 
MONDAY, July 28, 2014 (HealthDay News) -- Elementary school students seem to be satisfied with the healthier school lunches being offered to them, according to a new study of school officials.

New meal standards -- issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture -- went into effect in the fall of 2012. At the time, there was concern that kids would stop buying lunch, or throw away most of their food. But the new study of nearly 600 elementary schools suggests that this isn't the case.

"The updated meals standards are resulting in healthier meals for tens of millions of kids," Lindsey Turner, of Boise State University and a co-investigator for Bridging the Gap, a research program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, said in a university news release.

"Our studies show that kids are OK with these changes, and that there have not been widespread challenges with kids not buying or eating the meals," added Turner. Turner was a research scientist at the Institute for Health Research and Policy at the University of Illinois at Chicago when the study was conducted.

Roughly six months after the healthier meal standards were implemented, researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago and the University of Michigan surveyed school leaders, such as principals and school food-service providers, about how their students reacted to the new meals being offered to them.

Although 56 percent of those polled said the kids initially complained, they noted the students became more accepting of their new food choices over time.

The survey also revealed what the kids were choosing for their lunch and how much they were eating. Most of those polled, or 84 percent, said about the same number of students were buying their lunch and 79 percent reported the kids were also eating about the same amount or more than they did the year before. The researchers concluded the new meal standards did not result in kids wasting food or not buying their lunch anymore.

Moreover, 70 percent of the school leaders questioned said their students generally liked the healthier lunches provided at school. The researchers noted, however, there were some geographic and socioeconomic differences in the reactions to the new meal standards.

The schools with more students from lower-income families reported an increase in the percentage of students buying lunch. The opposite was true at schools with more children that had a higher socioeconomic status. Urban and suburban school students had fewer children stop buying lunch. These students also complained less and wasted less food than children attending rural schools, the investigators found.

Although those polled didn't report much change in the amount of food that was wasted at lunchtime, students from lower-income areas had less plate waste, the researchers noted.

The study, which was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, was released online in advance of publication in the August issue of Childhood Obesity.
Wait. They didn't even bother to survey the kids. They just asked principals what they thought the kids thought of the new lunches?
Exactly my point. I am shocked administrators would have differing opinions of the students.
The survey also revealed what the kids were choosing for their lunch and how much they were eating. Most of those polled, or 84 percent, said about the same number of students were buying their lunch
That seems to suggest that children are still buying the lunches you claim they hate and don't eat.
Many of them don't have much of a choice, and/or are receiving subsidized/free lunches.

 
My kids are not happy at all with it. Sweet potato french fries? :yucky:

One thing I do not understand with my district is that the middle school and high school have an ala carte option. Kids can buy additional food separate from their meal (everything from $1 for another sandwich to $.50 for another cookie) and parents are not able to put a restriction on their child's account to prevent them from making these purchases. If we are so worried about childhood obesity why don't we eliminate these first and foremost?
Sweet potato French fries are a perfect example. My kids love them (so do I), but they have to be at least lightly fried. They can't be the soggy noodle crap they put in the lunches. Moderately healthy and edible is much, much better than slightly more healthy and unedible.

This goes to the chocolate milk debate as well. Make some ####### chocolate milk with a bit of actual cocoa and you get a great source of calcium that kids will drink. When they discuss these options it's either no chocolate milk or #### chocolate milk with HFCS. It drives me nuts. It's like common sense is being eradicated from public school decision-making.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top