What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

What part of subscriber info can we discuss? (1 Viewer)

Ministry of Pain

Ministry of Pain

Footballguy
I won't print where they have him ranked, but I think Roy Williams is way over ranked this week. He's somehwere in the top20...is that based on potential? The guy has been so erratic since he got in the league...and the match up to me is pretty tough...why print him that high?

Curious more than anything...and what can we talk about and not talk about on the boards?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Talk about anything you want - but don't REPRINT sunscriber content and do not give "a great bulk" of our pay content away. There is no hard line on how much is "too much" but if you give out more informationthan you are actually discussing, it's a problem.

Example:

-Reprinting the top-20 WRs on our rankings sheet and talking about how low Roy Williams is = no-no

-Talking about Roy Williams being ranked #17, and below players X, Y, Z is probably OK as long as you don't also say exactly where we rank X, Y, and Z/.

Is that clear as mud?

 
Marc Levin said:
Talk about anything you want - but don't REPRINT sunscriber content and do not give "a great bulk" of our pay content away. There is no hard line on how much is "too much" but if you give out more informationthan you are actually discussing, it's a problem.Example:-Reprinting the top-20 WRs on our rankings sheet and talking about how low Roy Williams is = no-no-Talking about Roy Williams being ranked #17, and below players X, Y, Z is probably OK as long as you don't also say exactly where we rank X, Y, and Z/.Is that clear as mud?
Click to expand...
Definitively ambiguous in an absolute, indistinct sort of way... Well done.
 
Example: I'm high on Vick as well, but to have him that high? Above the likes of Brady? I realize Tom has none to throw to but he's going against the Jets. The thought is Maroney and Dillon will run rampant?

 
AnonymousBob said:
Example: I'm high on Vick as well, but to have him that high? Above the likes of Brady? I realize Tom has none to throw to but he's going against the Jets. The thought is Maroney and Dillon will run rampant?
Click to expand...
That's fine, too. I am not sure you even discussed our pay content much except to say we have Vick above Brady (do we REALLY? That is shameful - I'd expect that to be revised - The Bucs have a great pass d, and a history of keeping Vick in check, but last year's version of the Bucs gave up 20 FPs per game to him, including a 300 yard PASSING day!!).
 
Ministry of Pain said:
I won't print where they have him ranked, but I think Roy Williams is way over ranked this week. He's somehwere in the top20...is that based on potential? The guy has been so erratic since he got in the league...and the match up to me is pretty tough...why print him that high?
Click to expand...
I was also surprised at his ranking vs. Chicago this week. Considering benching him, but my alternative is ranked below Williams. Still might go with my gut.
 
Marc Levin said:
AnonymousBob said:
Example: I'm high on Vick as well, but to have him that high? Above the likes of Brady? I realize Tom has none to throw to but he's going against the Jets. The thought is Maroney and Dillon will run rampant?
Click to expand...
That's fine, too. I am not sure you even discussed our pay content much except to say we have Vick above Brady (do we REALLY? That is shameful - I'd expect that to be revised - The Bucs have a great pass d, and a history of keeping Vick in check, but last year's version of the Bucs gave up 20 FPs per game to him, including a 300 yard PASSING day!!).
Click to expand...
Vick is ranked as #8. I really like the guy this year and will play him this week but that's mainly due to the fact my other option isn't really an option. Vick is ranked higher than Plummer vs. KC (based on last week ok), Eli, Brady, McNair (vs. Oakland)...
 
Ministry of Pain said:
Curious more than anything...and what can we talk about and not talk about on the boards?
Click to expand...
Its sort of like reading the rules of posting. Pretty specific in alot of areas but people still get away with things they shouldn't. You need to use your best judgment in determining if what you post would be "giving away" information otherwise only obtained by subscribing. Good luck. Godspeed.
 
Marc Levin said:
Talk about anything you want - but don't REPRINT sunscriber content and do not give "a great bulk" of our pay content away. There is no hard line on how much is "too much" but if you give out more informationthan you are actually discussing, it's a problem.Example:-Reprinting the top-20 WRs on our rankings sheet and talking about how low Roy Williams is = no-no-Talking about Roy Williams being ranked #17, and below players X, Y, Z is probably OK as long as you don't also say exactly where we rank X, Y, and Z/.Is that clear as mud?
Click to expand...
What he said.Discussing individual rankings is encouraged. Lots of good discussion there. Copying and pasting entire lists or articles would be a no go.
 
Marc Levin said:
Talk about anything you want - but don't REPRINT sunscriber content and do not give "a great bulk" of our pay content away. There is no hard line on how much is "too much" but if you give out more informationthan you are actually discussing, it's a problem.Example:-Reprinting the top-20 WRs on our rankings sheet and talking about how low Roy Williams is = no-no-Talking about Roy Williams being ranked #17, and below players X, Y, Z is probably OK as long as you don't also say exactly where we rank X, Y, and Z/.Is that clear as mud?
Click to expand...
Was my joke deleted instantly?
 
cr8f said:
Marc Levin said:
Talk about anything you want - but don't REPRINT sunscriber content and do not give "a great bulk" of our pay content away. There is no hard line on how much is "too much" but if you give out more informationthan you are actually discussing, it's a problem.Example:-Reprinting the top-20 WRs on our rankings sheet and talking about how low Roy Williams is = no-no-Talking about Roy Williams being ranked #17, and below players X, Y, Z is probably OK as long as you don't also say exactly where we rank X, Y, and Z/.Is that clear as mud?
Click to expand...
Was my joke deleted instantly?
Click to expand...
The software is set to auto-delete poor attempts at humor in the Shark Pool.
 
Shick! said:
cr8f said:
Marc Levin said:
Talk about anything you want - but don't REPRINT sunscriber content and do not give "a great bulk" of our pay content away. There is no hard line on how much is "too much" but if you give out more informationthan you are actually discussing, it's a problem.Example:-Reprinting the top-20 WRs on our rankings sheet and talking about how low Roy Williams is = no-no-Talking about Roy Williams being ranked #17, and below players X, Y, Z is probably OK as long as you don't also say exactly where we rank X, Y, and Z/.Is that clear as mud?
Click to expand...
Was my joke deleted instantly?
Click to expand...
The software is set to auto-delete poor attempts at humor in the Shark Pool.
Click to expand...
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
 
Shick! said:
Marc Levin said:
Talk about anything you want - but don't REPRINT sunscriber content and do not give "a great bulk" of our pay content away. There is no hard line on how much is "too much" but if you give out more informationthan you are actually discussing, it's a problem.Example:-Reprinting the top-20 WRs on our rankings sheet and talking about how low Roy Williams is = no-no-Talking about Roy Williams being ranked #17, and below players X, Y, Z is probably OK as long as you don't also say exactly where we rank X, Y, and Z/.Is that clear as mud?
Click to expand...
What he said.Discussing individual rankings is encouraged. Lots of good discussion there. Copying and pasting entire lists or articles would be a no go.
Click to expand...
Cool
 
Sabertooth said:
Why the heck was my post deleted? That's pretty weak.
Click to expand...
I sent you a PM because I figured you would rather I didn't point it out publicly. You asked for the ranking of a specific player because you aren't a subscriber to the site. :mellow: So, you want to know where a player is ranked, but don't want to pay for the service. :mellow: That's weak? Okay. :mellow:
 
Sabertooth said:
Shick! said:
Sabertooth said:
Why the heck was my post deleted? That's pretty weak.
Click to expand...
I sent you a PM because I figured you would rather I didn't point it out publicly. You asked for the ranking of a specific player because you aren't a subscriber to the site. :mellow: So, you want to know where a player is ranked, but don't want to pay for the service. :mellow: That's weak? Okay. :mellow:
Click to expand...
PM returned.
Click to expand...
Golden. Glad we could clear up the misunderstanding.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Ministry of Pain
Let's discuss Offensive Coordinators - We have some new ones like Philly, LVR, SEA, DET, HOU
Replies
38
Views
928
TheDirtyWord
TheDirtyWord
TheDirtyWord
Can we talk about SuperFlex? Why isn't this the default now...?
2
Replies
57
Views
1K
pinkstapler
P
Stinkin Ref
Why is Malik Nabers Ranked So High....
2
Replies
95
Views
3K
Chaka
Chaka

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top