What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

What's the Worst QB Duo in the league? (1 Viewer)

What's the Worst QB Duo in the league?

  • Russell/Gradkowsi (Oakland)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Leinart/Anderson (Arizona)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Campbell/Grossman (Washington)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Delhomme/Wallace (Cleveland)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Hasselbeck/Teal (Seattle)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Orton/Quinn (Denver)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Smith/Carr (San Fran)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Feely/Null (St. Louis)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Dr. Octopus

Footballguy
Seems to be a lot of bad to mediocre QB combinations in the league right now.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think there's any question the Rams situation is by far the worst at the present moment.

 
Was the news of Marc Bulger cut not reported anywhere? I know he's likely to be released, but as of now, he's still a starter for St. Louis. Not sure it changes how bad the situation is, but still.....

 
Was the news of Marc Bulger cut not reported anywhere? I know he's likely to be released, but as of now, he's still a starter for St. Louis. Not sure it changes how bad the situation is, but still.....
fair enough. I made the assumption, but you are correct that technically he is still the starter, but...
 
Bills QBs have GOT to be on this list to make it relevant IMO. And in that same opinion of mine, they are the worst combo.

 
ScottNorwood said:
Sweet Love said:
I think Carolina should be in the running...Matt Moore and Player X...
I'd rather have Player X than several of these guys
I liked him better when he was Player Jones, before he got wrapped up in all that Nation of Islam foolishness.
 
ScottNorwood said:
Sweet Love said:
I think Carolina should be in the running...Matt Moore and Player X...
I'd rather have Player X than several of these guys
Today, Player X is Hunter Cantwell, and to that I would say you are out of your mind.
 
ScottNorwood said:
Sweet Love said:
I think Carolina should be in the running...Matt Moore and Player X...
I'd rather have Player X than several of these guys
Today, Player X is Hunter Cantwell, and to that I would say you are out of your mind.
Oh. I thought Player X was someone like QB Eagles from tecmo bowl
We ain't talking about the Christian Okoye of RBs here....BTW, my deepest condolences for the passing of Bonner.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dr. Octopus said:
theglorydays said:
where is buffalo?
Western NY?I did forget them, but sadly they likely are better than at least half the teams on this list.ETA: That I actually think Kyle Orton is a decent QB, but many do not.
Leinart/Anderson (Arizona) Campbell/Grossman (Washington) Hasselbeck/Teal (Seattle) Orton/Quinn (Denver) Smith/Carr (San Fran) I'd take all these over BUF
 
Dr. Octopus said:
theglorydays said:
where is buffalo?
Western NY?I did forget them, but sadly they likely are better than at least half the teams on this list.ETA: That I actually think Kyle Orton is a decent QB, but many do not.
I disagree there is no way Buffalo is better then any duo on this list aside from maybe the Rams, Cards and Browns but I think Buffalo is the worse duo in the league. Then you add in a coach like Gailey and they are in real trouble not that the Browns coaching is any better.
 
How did Feely get so many votes, regardless of his backup? He's better then at least two starters (Delhomme/Russell) on this list, and a decent argument could be made by some to a couple more (Leinart/Campbell).

 
It's impossible not to vote for the St Louis situation but Leinart/Anderson would be a close second IMO......only because Gradkowsi is probably the best out of the 4 QB's in Oak/Ari.

It pains.....but doesn't surprise me to see 3 teams from the NFC West here..... :popcorn:

 
If Big Ben is suspended then the Steelers combo is:

Dixon & No One

Obviously they'll need to pick someone else up but check out the FA wire. It isn't pretty.

At least they have Randle El....

 
How did Feely get so many votes, regardless of his backup? He's better then at least two starters (Delhomme/Russell) on this list, and a decent argument could be made by some to a couple more (Leinart/Campbell).
Feely has yet to do anything remotely sucessful in this league.. As bad as Delhomme was last year he did great things in CAR over his carreer. Russell is a lost cause..
 
How did Feely get so many votes, regardless of his backup? He's better then at least two starters (Delhomme/Russell) on this list, and a decent argument could be made by some to a couple more (Leinart/Campbell).
I think a lot of people just remember his time as a starter with Miami but as an Eagles back up I was very happy with him and he performed very well when they needed him to start. In the WCO he can be very productive and I would take him over guys like Delhomme, Gradkowski, Edwards and Anderson any day.
 
ScottNorwood said:
Edwards/Fitz belongs on the list
I came on here to vote for Buffalo.
me too.i still think aj feeley can be serviceable. that's more than either buffalo QB showed last year and like someone said, marc bulger has not been cut yet.
I actually think Trent Edwards could be decent behind a suitable o-line. He wasn't all that bad prior to last season - in fact one major publication (Sporting Newsw?) was supporting him for leagu MVP over the first 5-6 games in 2008.
 
While certainly not worse than some of the other combos on this list, I don't think that Miami's lineup of Henne/Thigpen/White/injured Pennigton is scaring anyone.....

 
While certainly not worse than some of the other combos on this list, I don't think that Miami's lineup of Henne/Thigpen/White/injured Pennigton is scaring anyone.....
You're mistaken. While they may not seem intimidating I promise you that Henne looked alright when you factor in many things last year like a lack of WR/TE, RB1 out for the 2nd half of the season.Lots of teams would be really happy with Henne/Penny right now, and Thigpen to boot at the #3...all these guys have NFL starting experience now and they have all had stretches of success. Thigpen should be the guy running the wildcat but we'll see if they give him the chance or not.
 
Dr. Octopus said:
bweiser said:
Edwards/Fitz belongs on the list
I came on here to vote for Buffalo.
me too.i still think aj feeley can be serviceable. that's more than either buffalo QB showed last year and like someone said, marc bulger has not been cut yet.
I actually think Trent Edwards could be decent behind a suitable o-line. He wasn't all that bad prior to last season - in fact one major publication (Sporting Newsw?) was supporting him for leagu MVP over the first 5-6 games in 2008.
i think that was just a matter of defenses adjusting to edwards. a lot of players play well in a short stretch. i think he's an ineffective starter the rest of his life.
 
Nagle2998 said:
How did Feely get so many votes, regardless of his backup? He's better then at least two starters (Delhomme/Russell) on this list, and a decent argument could be made by some to a couple more (Leinart/Campbell).
I think a lot of people just remember his time as a starter with Miami but as an Eagles back up I was very happy with him and he performed very well when they needed him to start. In the WCO he can be very productive and I would take him over guys like Delhomme, Gradkowski, Edwards and Anderson any day.
:shrug: Exactly. Feely HAS ALREADY SHOWN he can be productive in the right situation. Russel, OTOH....will never be a productive NFL QB. Feely would have to rank in the bottom 10 of NFL starters, but not the worst....not by a long shot.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top