What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

where will CJ play in 2014?Jets sign him (1 Viewer)

Unless you get bonus points for having your QB get hurt, having bad WRs or shifting up the O-line, that's all irrelevant for this discussion. When you're drafting a RB with a top 6ish pick and he ends up being the #16 RB, yeah, I'd say that's grounds for disappointment. I'm not looking at it relative to what he did prior, it's what he was expected to do that year, which is why you paid the high price. When guys under perform their draft slot by that much, it's a disappointment. It really shouldn't be controversial at all.
Just one last post on this point. And let me be clear that my point is about Chris Johnson's value, not about you. I'm sorry if it's coming off like I'm blasting you, especially for something you're not saying. That's definitely not my intention.This post right here, though, is specifically the sentiment that matters to me. I 100% agree with you that 2011 was a disappointment. Not a Trent Richardson, Doug Martin, CJ Spiller, Ray Rice or David Wilson kind of disappointment, but a disappointment nonetheless. When you pay a top five price for a guy and get RB16, you're going to have a hard time winning your league. It doesn't totally sink your season, but it sure doesn't help.

Where we seem to diverge, though, is in the value of discussing that disappointing season. You commented, "If you look at PPG or compare it to expectations, he hasn't been great lately. He was a stud his first 3 years, not so much the last 3." But as we've just discussed, if he hasn't been great lately, he's been close. He's put up remarkably consistent yardage - three years in a row within 30 yards of his average. His receptions and TDs have fluctuated, but he's been a poor RB1 or good RB2 three straight years. That might not be "a stud", but it's pretty damn good.

So what's the value of looking at his failure to meet expectations? I don't believe that there's any predictive value in comparing his ADP to his production. I don't think his performance will change one iota depending on whether fantasy football players in Wisconsin take him in the top 10 or outside of the top 50.

But there IS predictive value in looking at his past performance, and in looking at how people PERCEIVE his past "disappointments". Because it sure looks like people are going to discount him once again. And that's where his value comes from. He's an underrated player who should be a high end RB2 once again but will likely be drafted as a borderline RB3 and can be acquired at low end RB2 value.

Rotoworld's first blurb on him after he was signed was "The Jets get their man. Gang Green was the only team really showing legitimate interest in the 28-year-old six-time 1,000-yard rusher. Johnson visited with the Jets all day on Tuesday and said he had more visits to make. Either the Jets wooed him with more money to keep him from leaving town or Johnson simply didn't have any other clubs interested in him. In our opinion, Chris Ivory should remain the early-down back in New York with Johnson mixing in to see 8-12 touches per game. Johnson's fantasy value clearly takes a hit, if so.". Those are pretty low expectations for him. In a more recent post, they amended their projection to 12 to 15 touches per game, but reiterated "Johnson isn't going to be a true bell cow in New York". In other words, they're pretty pessimistic on him.

I tend to agree that his touches per game will go down. He's had a pretty steady 19-20 touches per game over the past three seasons, and I expect that to drop. But I also believe that his effectiveness per touch will improve. And that's where your comment "Unless you get bonus points for having your QB get hurt, having bad WRs or shifting up the O-line, that's all irrelevant for fantasy" is way off. I believe that it's entirely relevant when trying to predict how he will do with his touches. I believe that he's in a better situation and will get better opportunities (e.g. Ivory will take third and 1, but Chris Johnson will take third and long). If you predict a 20% decline in touches but a 20% increase in yards per touch, the numbers should stay close to even.

And to predict an increase in yards per touch, it absolutely helps to understand what he's trying to increase FROM. Johnson averaged close to 4.4 yards per carry in 2012, but 3.9 in 2013. It's meaningful that he was hurt in 2013, and that his line had massive turnover, and that his receivers sucked, and his QB got hurt, because it helps to explain why his numbers might have been down - and why we should project them to be better in 2014.

When we look at his decline from 2008-10 to 2011-13, it's meaningful to point out that the quarterback, offensive line and receivers all sucked during that timeframe, too. And that his best numbers came from working with a mobile quarterback who forced teams to play contain over here when the running back's over there. And that Ivory will help to improve his yards per rush by virtue of softening the defense and taking undesirable carries.

I find that much more meaningful than predicting him to disappoint because he's disappointed before. That's what your posts seemed to be advocating, but more importantly, it's what the rest of the fantasy football community seems to have done with him.
Likewise, this is just an attempt at clarification, not argument. There are a few different posters going back and forth, so it can be confusing.

Most of my comments are concerning his performance relative to where he was drafted. I didn't say it has predictive value going forward, I'm just countering other posters who have said that he has been a great value when that pretty clearly hasn't been the case recently. Absolutely there are other factors at play, like the team, injuries, etc., but that doesn't change the reality that he has under performed expectations 2 out of the last 3 years, even if it does possibly explain why. That would be much more relevant if I were saying "he sucks", which I'm not.

I'm not predicting that he is going to disappoint next year at all, we don't even know where he's going to be drafted yet. I may end up agreeing that he represents good value this year, but the proof will be in the pudding- if he finishes higher than his ADP, he'll have been a good value, if not, he won't. For some reason we have people arguing the opposite in this thread. My guess is that their anecdotal stories of hearing people bash Johnson have led them to believe his ADP has been a lot lower than it has been.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
people should also factor in with Ivory's 2 mil salary that he cost them a draft pick (4th rder I think). But hes better as a COP back IMO than a starter or 50% load guy. Even in his declining stage CJ is better than Ivory and CJ plays hurt, CJ is going to see majority of snaps.

 
I'd say just over on both.

I wouldn't say this is a great fit, CJ is better than Ivory but how much better at this point?

I think they're banking on the fact that Rex can get the most out of him. Which may or may not work, this move is very meh for me.

The comical part will be Vick attempting to tell CJ where the blitz is coming from(he has no clue) and watching CJ attempt to block(not a strong suit).
Not sure if this has already mentioned but Vick has rarely any clue about where a blitz is coming from. :popcorn:

 
. Shonn Greene and McCluster are more of a threat than Ivory and Powell,
Uh, no.
We've gone back and forth on Ivory and Powell enough and just disagree, which is fine.

Re: Greene, Ivory is pretty clearly a better runner than Greene, but the Titans invested significantly more money in Greene than the Jets did in Ivory, and IMO that means something. Greene is also probably more likely to stay healthy all year.

Re: McCluster, the Titans gave him a pretty decent chunk of money also, and while he's not really a RB at all, he is really dynamic as a receiver out of the backfield. I think he's going to have a decent year as a poor man's Sproles / Woodhead / Vereen type PPR RB3 or flex play.
Greene is better than Ivory. He has two thousand yard seasons and Ivory doesn't have any.

I can't think of a WR or RB that was made to be a novelty act and has done well. That's my concern with McCluster. Love the speed and quickness and how well he can catch and that he can play WR and....he's still going to be brutal for FF. I hope he can find a role in TEN and/or a regular set number of touches we can bank on.

 
Greene is better than Ivory. He has two thousand yard seasons and Ivory doesn't have any.
Greene is healthier but I wouldn't call him better. Greene has a career 4.1 YPC (and below 4.0 the past two years) while Ivory has a career 4.9 YPC.

 
Bostonfred pretty much just outlined how I was able to draft CJ in 3 leagues last year and ride him to deep playoff runs and a Championship in all the leagues. High RB2 production at a low RB3 price.
agreed and the mentality persists....rinse / repeat.
Ok, then keep it down in here. I'd like to be able to do it again....
I know...I questioned why I even keep beating the drum....just shut up and take the value.
Seriously- are you saying that Chris Johnson has been a great value every year? :lmao:
Every year, no. The last 2 years, absolutely. Looks like this year as well.
Absolutely not- he finished well behind his ADP 2 years ago. Last year he finished slightly higher, which isn't "great" value, it's good.Do you guys really not know this?
Last year he was an unbelievable value. His ADP was RB25. His finish in PPG was RB12.
Is this the bizarro thread? Per the link provided his ADP last year was RB 12.
That link is wrong. His ADP was no where near that. Here's a more reliable one.http://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/adp.php?year=2012&teams=12&pos=rb
The link isn't wrong it is just averaging drafts from MFL. You can argue whether or not that data is "good" or not but it is certainly valid data points and that can be filtered in about as many ways as you could want. I definitely find it valuable but certainly understand if you find other site data to be better for that sort of thing.

 
Greene is better than Ivory. He has two thousand yard seasons and Ivory doesn't have any.
Greene is healthier but I wouldn't call him better. Greene has a career 4.1 YPC (and below 4.0 the past two years) while Ivory has a career 4.9 YPC.
He has a 4.8 average. PFR makes an oops here and averages the averages rather than just simply dividing yards by total carries. Not that I'm saying .2 matters.

I don't like using YPC when RBs don't have many yards. It seems a lot of 3rd down backs have had high numbers and over time I just came to not appreciate ypc if the total is low. I'm not calling Ivory a 3rd down back, it's just how that feeling developed. Two years Ivory didn't get 100 carries and that makes me apprehensive.

Total yards is not close between these two and I don't see Ivory catching up this year and closing that gap.

I would be fine with a wait N see approach or "it's close" or anything other than Ivory is clearly better.

Some Jets fans and/or Ivory fans are not being all that reasonable this offseason and it's odd. To some you'd think he was a 2k yard back and on the level of ADP. That love for Ivory is great, but to discuss actual stats with such people has been difficult.

I have never and will never think 374 yards or 210 yards on the season was a "good job" and embrace a runner. Greene was hurt last year but like I said earlier, I preferred Battle. His stats last year weren't good.

The way I see it, Greene is unexciting and 1000 was like a milestone he reached and his ceiling. I'm not a big fan of his. Ivory seems to be one of the types that people will always say has potential-at some point, the potential is realized and a player has to be given a what you see is what you get mindset for FF. It's fine if that point hasn't been reached for some.

Santonio Holmes was(I don't know that he still is) an exciting player with the capability to explode for big plays. Since he left Pitt, he has roughly 750, 650, 250, and 450 yards. None of that is acceptable IMO for a #1 WR. In fact, I would consider it below average. I feel like the Jets have stockpiled players that could be special and never realize it and am concerned for them for 2014. Kerley is the only one that seems predictable. I figure he'd be a fine 3rd WR. Neither Stephen Hill, nor Cj, nor Ivory have yielded expected weekly results in years past.

In the long quoted post above, absent from that discussion is that you needed to start CJ in FF. If he got (numbers just thrown out for discussion, made up...) 40 yards the week before and 30 before that, were you about to start him for the week he got 150? Obviously my point is about FF, but I do also believe an NFL team needs X amount of production from some players that they can count on.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chris Johnson - RB - Jets

Coach Rex Ryan told reporters Monday the Jets made no promises about Chris Johnson's 2014 workload before signing him.

"Nothing was ever promised (like) 'You're going to get X amount of carries'," Ryan insisted. "No role has been determined for really anyone." Ryan likened the Johnson-Chris Ivory-Bilal Powell triumvirate to the Jets' 2009 backfield, when Thomas Jones toted the rock 331 times, Shonn Greene handled 108 runs, and Leon Washington got 87 touches. We don't anticipate Johnson getting over 300 rushing attempts like Jones did, but he certainly could wind up with more than 200. CJ?K projects as the Jets' lead ball carrier ahead of Ivory.

Source: Manish Mehta on Twitter

Apr 21 - 1:51 PM
 
rumblings coming out that they plan on leaning on/giving more than just a split to CJ. They are going to run the ball a lot and have a very good defense.

 
Like last year, CJ will be a top 10 fantasy RB you can draft as a RB2 or RB3.
It's possible but I'm more worried about Ivory than I was about Greene/Battle.

I think it is more likely that CJ will be a high end RB2 when all is said and done. Even with the addition of Decker and the hope for improvement from Geno

 
With the talk the past few days (leaning more on CJ), it looks like his draft position will rise, but grabbing him in 5+ would be a nice steal.

Probably a lot of owners writing a veteran off too soon, like usual. I think the Jets rid him until the wheels come off.

 
Like last year, CJ will be a top 10 fantasy RB you can draft as a RB2 or RB3.
I agree that Johnson is looking like a good value this year, but top-10 seems a bit too high IMO. Powell and Ivory combined for only 4 total TDs last year, and while the Jets will be better on offense, I still think it'll be tough for CJ to reach double digit scores -- I expect slightly less touches than last year, slightly greater efficiency, similar total yardage, and maybe 6 - 8 scores. High end RB2 production with a borderline RB2 / RB3 pricetag -- sign me up. His high floor d/t his ridiculous durability makes him appealing also.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rotoworld:

Chris Johnson - RB - Jets

Jets RBs coach Anthony Lynn indicated the team will limit Chris Johnson's usage in an effort to "keep him fresh."

The Jets may believe Johnson would produce more big plays if given fewer carries. "He's got some miles on him," Lynn acknowledged. "So we're going to have to be strategic in how we use him, and when we use him, to keep him fresh so that he can be the explosive guy that I know that he can be." Lynn suggested Johnson, Chris Ivory, and Bilal Powell will all be involved. With declining volume, Johnson is going to be a dicey RB2 fantasy investment.

Source: Newark Star-Ledger

Jun 25 - 9:10 PM
 
A healthy CJ2K changes everything for NYJ

By Rich Cimini | ESPN.com

Eric Decker gets the money and Michael Vick gets the headlines, but Chris Johnson is the key newcomer on the New York Jets' offense. If healthy, he's the one player who can change the way opponents look at the Jets. He gives Rex Ryan something he has never had -- a home-run threat in the backfield.

Forget about Ground & Pound. If Johnson is anywhere close to his "CJ2K" level of 2009, it'll be Ground & Hound -- as in greyhound.

Johnson, 28, is the Jets' most accomplished skill-position player since LaDainian Tomlinson, a rare talent who transcends the "what have you done for me lately?" principle. Johnson was just ordinary last season for the Tennessee Titans, but a player of his stature gets the benefit of the doubt. His past is good enough to impact the present. He will command respect, and that gives the Jets a legitimate X factor.

"That guy, he's one of the best," Titans cornerback Jason McCourty said last week. "A lot of people have talked about how he's lost it. I think he'll get out there and prove he hasn't lost a step and can still play."

Obviously, the Jets think so, signing Johnson to a two-year, $8 million contract when he was unceremoniously fired by the Titans after five 1,000-yard seasons and one 2,000-yard season. It's a cold business, the NFL.

Anticipating his release, the Jets did a lot of tape study on Johnson. What they saw was a still-gifted back who was restricted by a bum knee and a mediocre offensive line in Tennessee. Doctors took care of the knee, repairing a torn meniscus with an arthroscopic procedure in January. Now it'll be up to the Jets' line to take care of the blocking.

You don't have to be Nate Silver at FiveThirtyEight to detect the downward trend in Johnson's career. His production dropped significantly in two of the past three years, underscored by his 3.9 yards per rush last season, a career low.

On the flip side, he has never failed to reach the 1,000-yard mark and he has never missed a game due to injury, extraordinary durability for a running back. McCourty said he can't recall Johnson missing more than five practices over the past five years.

The Jets kept their pre-owned Ferrari in the garage during the offseason, taking no chances. Johnson was limited to light work on the field, but he should be ready for training camp. The goal is to make sure he's humming by Sept. 7, the season opener.

Barring a setback, Johnson will change the dynamics of the Jets' rushing game. For years, they've been a predictable, five-hole attack, with the likes of Chris Ivory and Shonn Greene pounding away between the tackles. Because of his speed to the outside -- the man once raced a cheetah on TV -- Johnson can stretch a defense horizontally. That will soften the belly of the defense.

"He's unique because, at any moment, he can score," Hall of Famer Curtis Martin said.

Martin knows great running backs. On his personal list, he lists Jim Brown, Barry Sanders and Adrian Peterson as the best in history. Martin said Johnson "had a chance" to challenge the big three. He spoke of Johnson in the past tense, but that doesn't mean Martin thinks he's washed up.

"With things even across the board -- the blocking is the same, quarterback is the same -- I still think he's one of the best running backs in the league," Martin said. "I'll say this: He has as much talent as anyone in the league."

Johnson has 12 rushes of 50-plus yards since 2008, second only to Peterson (17), according to ESPN Stats & Information. Johnson didn't break any long highlight-film runs last year -- who can forget his 94-yard touchdown against the Jets in 2012? -- but his mere presence forced opponents to crowd the line of scrimmage. Only two backs, Peterson and Frank Gore, ran against more eight-man fronts in 2013.

"He's a first-ballot Hall of Famer," Jets offensive coordinator Marty Mornhinweg said.

You put Johnson with a mobile quarterback, whether it's Geno Smith or Vick, and you're putting stress on a defense. You're forcing the defense to bring down a safety, creating opportunities in the passing game. You're doing something the Jets haven't done in a long time: putting a player out there who actually scares a defense.

Decker is a solid receiver, but he's not a game-changer. Vick, if he's playing, isn't that guy anymore. Johnson still has a chance.

"Oh man, he's that one-shot, home run guy," McCourty said.

McCourty didn't want to get into his former teammate's bitter divorce from the Titans, and how Johnson has criticized the organization for mistreating him. But McCourty knows this: Johnson's fire is raging. As Tomlinson showed in 2010, a once-great runner with a chip on his shoulder can be dangerous.

"When a team releases you and there are doubters, people saying stuff, it definitely gives you that kick in the ### that you need," McCourty said. "I look forward to watching him and I hope he has an amazing year. I hope he crushes every team he faces -- except us."
 
http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/jets/post/_/id/40341/training-camp-preview-running-back?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Chris Johnson - RB - Jets

ESPN New York expects the Jets to take a backfield-by-committee approach.

The only one surprised by this take is Chris Johnson, who still seems to be under the assumption he's an every-down workhorse. Running backs coach Anthony Lynn has already stated that Johnson's load will be monitored, an effort to keep a 29-year-old (in September) with 2,014 career touches fresh. Chris Ivory and possibly Bilal Powell will have chances to seize a hot hand, leaving CJ?K with far less volume than he saw in Tennessee.

Related: Chris Ivory, Bilal Powell

Source: ESPN New York Jul 14 - 8:42 AM

 
Last edited by a moderator:
CJ likely makes OMG plays in practice and they re-discuss or argue plans for him.

He's got that barry-esque need to have X amount of carries until he breaks one. When he's 10 for 20 yards, yeah Ivory or Powell will seem better or a committee approach will be an option, but when he's 11 for 80 yards it's gotta make them think.

He's a tough back to figure out.

I would assume in spot duty they could set him up to have a favorable matchup if their passing game does well. He can take a screen just as far as a run.

I think everything with CJ can quickly become confusing

 
Rotoworld:

Chris Johnson - RB - Jets

According to the New York Post, the Jets put Chris Johnson "in motion" and "flexed him out as a wide receiver quite a few times" during his first practice of training camp Thursday.

Johnson played some receiver at East Carolina. Playing wideout and slot could give the Jets increased flexibility on offense, perhaps with CJ?K and Chris Ivory on the field together in some formations. "Having that kind of game-breaker out of the backfield certainly will get your attention," coach Rex Ryan said. "The kid at Buffalo, Spiller, is one of those guys that has that kind of speed. Chris, obviously, your antenna is up every time he comes out of that backfield. If he motions out, the DBs know, like wait a second, heres a 4.2. Youll approach him differently than you would most halfbacks."

Source: New York Post

Jul 25 - 1:36 PM
 
Ill buy that for a dollar in my PPR league.

In PPR, I think he's golden this year in your last flex spot or as your 2 in start 2RB PPR.

40-50 receptions no problem this year. He'll outperform his ADP in PPR.

I think carries are going to go 65 CJ/35 other guys with Ivory getting goaliline.

Ivory's enticing but if he plays a lot he's going to get hurt. But you have to handcuff CJ with him for sure.

If CJ goes down he could have a big year until he gets hurt so youll have to go get Powell if CJ goes down LOL.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's not wrong in wanting more carries, if only because CJ always seemed like the kind of back who needed to get into that rhythm. He still has big play ability, which comes with more carries -- which he won't get with an effective Ivory, and the ability the Jets have to feature carries. This is still one of the better rushing teams this season, in part by splitting the workload.

I have both CJ and Ivory (picked up off waivers after wk 1) as more of a defensive move to keep them off other teams -- either one alone is a risky start, and unless it's against a putrid run D, there likely isn't worth starting both. Perhaps with Geno looking terrible and Decker banged up, the Jets need to rely on the run more, which might revive CJ with the corresponding bump in carries.

 
The carry and reception total for CJ is absurd.

His production in the NFL is better than most playing the game now.

The Jets knew what they were getting and that he'd have a slew of carries that were right into the DL and just looked terrible, but there'd be a handful of beautiful runs and the one wow is he fast bolt toward the end zone.

If they wanted a backup to Ivory, they should have signed one. This is a total waste of $ and talent.

CJ has lined up wide several times in his career. A million years ago the Jets did that with both Richie Anderson and Curtis.

If they have a determination to give the ball to Ivory and have a mediocre running game, then they should at least utilize CJ in the passing game. He has plenty of highlights where he takes a screen and goes the distance. 1 or 2 targets to him is so wrong.

I've watched him for years and will be shocked if he doesn't blow up to a reporter after a game soon and this time, this will be the first time I'm gonna agree with him.

 
Cut him after his Monday Nite game. That spot has been re-cut several times and eventually turned out to be Turbin. He's one of those guys who I refuse to have on a roster. Good enough to tempt you to start him but then disappoints in a huge way. Two injuries away from a majority of the carries.

 
Rotoworld:

Chris Johnson rushed three times for nine yards in New York's Week 6 loss to the Broncos, adding a two-yard reception.

CJ?K's lone other target in the passing game was a brutal drop. The 11 total yards were his fewest of the season, but he's now been held under 25 in back-to-back games, and in 3-of-6 2014 efforts. Johnson's lone score came in Week 4. He's a weak RB4.

Oct 12 - 6:47 PM
 
Rotoworld:

Chris Johnson played 21 of the Jets' 63 offensive snaps in Week 6.

That's 33.3 percent. Slowly but surely, CJdoneK is being phased out of the Jets' offense. His carry totals with New York, in chronological order from Weeks 1-6, are 13, 12, 10, 6, 7, and 3. Johnson is Pro Football Focus' No. 52-graded runner out of 56 qualifiers. He finished last year 48th out of 55.


Source: Pro Football Focus
Oct 13 - 4:21 PM
 
Rotoworld:

Jets RB Chris Johnson says he has "nothing to be excited about or look forward to" because he isn't playing enough.

Ever the team player, Johnson said he doesn't want to be viewed as a "complainer," but then went on to heartily complain about his role. "This is the first time I've ever felt this type of frustration, but there's nothing I can really do about it right now," Johnson said. Averaging just eight touches over his past five games, Johnson is managing a modest 4.0 yards per carry this season. Considering his usage, that number should be much higher. A shell of the player who rushed for 2,000 yards in 2009, Johnson will soon be out of the league if he can't accept that he's a role player at this stage of his career.

Source: ESPN New York

Oct 30 - 6:09 PM
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top