Which HC job would you want? (1 Viewer)

[Godsbrother]

So you are the hot head coaching prospect and all 5 teams looking for a head coach offer you a job. Which one do you want?

 

[Andy Dufresne]

Do I get GM control as well?

 

[simmonjm]

Cardinals job

Positives:

New stadium, young nucleaus on offense and some talent on the defensive side of the ball.

Negatives:

Lack of talent on o-line, and a losing tradition.

Through the draft revamp the offensive line and bring in Hudson Houck as O-line and you will be a contender and hailed as a genius because so many coaches have failed in the desert.

 

[B. Nugget]

So you are the hot head coaching prospect and all 5 teams looking for a head coach offer you a job. Which one do you want?

If you want to win right away, the Steelers has to be the #1 option.However, if you want to live in the lap of luxury making $$$$$ to coach and like warm weather the AZ and Miami gigs have to be at the top. Plus, I think there are guys out there that would rather start from the bottom and know that they have the potential to be a legend in that city because the teams have not had success for several years (Miami has gone 5 years w/o making the playoffs, but AZ has sucked for a long time.).Plus in Miami and AZ you get the hot women in skimpy clothes factor mixed with some awesome golf!The others would fall in line behind those if it were me.

 

[Andy Dufresne]

In order:

Positive

Pittsburgh - One year removed from a Super Bowl and a team that has the most talent of all five. Replacing two legends would be tough, but working for the Rooney's would be awesome.

Arizona - An offensive line away from being really good.

Negative

Atlanta - The Vick headache would be nearly unbearable.

Miami - The entire defense is about to start collecting Social Security benefits. And it would kill me to figure out what to do with Daunte Culpepper.

Oakland - No way. I could never work for Al.

 

[ffchamp1]

So you are the hot head coaching prospect and all 5 teams looking for a head coach offer you a job. Which one do you want?

I knew there was some talk but I have not checked my messages today.Pitt will be my first choice if they call me

 

[Memphis Foundry]

Now with poll goodness.

 

[Mr. Brownstone]

Steelers.

Great and influential ownership. Well-stocked team.

I'm looking at a franchise that has had two head coaches in the last 38 years. I know that there is an insane amount of pressure because of this, but if I was the hot prospect, then I shouldn't have anything to worry about.

 

[BassNBrew]

First I'd rule out the teams with morons for owners - Oakland, Arizona

Then I'd rule out cheap owners and franchises with limited legacy upside - Pittsburg

Lastly I'd rule out any teams geographally challenged - Miami

Which leaves Atlanta as the job of choice.

 

[bryhamm]

The easy pick for coming in and having success right away would be PIT.

But if you want to put your stamp on a team by spending 3-4 years and turn it around and claim "I did that", then one of the other's would be better.

 

[Frenchy Fuqua]

First I'd rule out the teams with morons for owners - Oakland, ArizonaThen I'd rule out cheap owners and franchises with limited legacy upside - PittsburgLastly I'd rule out any teams geographally challenged - MiamiWhich leaves Atlanta as the job of choice.

When did Pittsburg get an NFL team?

 

[Mr. Brownstone]

First I'd rule out the teams with morons for owners - Oakland, ArizonaThen I'd rule out cheap owners and franchises with limited legacy upside - PittsburgLastly I'd rule out any teams geographally challenged - MiamiWhich leaves Atlanta as the job of choice.

When did Pittsburg get an NFL team?

Come on now, is there really any confusion of which franchise he is talking about? Some people outside of the city really don't care how it is spelled.

 

[Frenchy Fuqua]

First I'd rule out the teams with morons for owners - Oakland, ArizonaThen I'd rule out cheap owners and franchises with limited legacy upside - PittsburgLastly I'd rule out any teams geographally challenged - MiamiWhich leaves Atlanta as the job of choice.

When did Pittsburg get an NFL team?

Come on now, is there really any confusion of which franchise he is talking about? Some people outside of the city really don't care how it is spelled.

Not really. It just amazes me that some people don't know how to spell major cities, states, presidents, etc.

 

[Ozymandias]

Pittsburgh is the best situation. But it is tough to follow a legend, as many coaches have found out. You are constantly being compared unfavorably with your predecessor.

 

[simmonjm]

Pittsburgh is the best situation. But it is tough to follow a legend, as many coaches have found out. You are constantly being compared unfavorably with your predecessor.

I would have to disagree. Pittsburgh has alot of drawbacks. First you follow a legend so if you struggle in your first year you would constantly be hounded by the media, second you never get free agents and any good players that you draft end up leaving 4-5 years later via free agency. Lastly add in the fact that you have to face the Bengals, and Ravens 4x in one year and this just does not seem like the most appealing job.

 

[Tom Servo]

Then I'd rule out cheap owners and franchises with limited legacy upside - Pittsburg

Just because the Rooney don't throw mad cash at borderline FAs, that makes them "cheap"? If you win in the 'Burgh, you have legacy. Bill Cowher is in the 'Burgh pantheon of sports heroes (coaches division) alongside Danny Murtaugh, Chuck Noll and Badger Bob Johnson.

 

[grtwhtsk]

I'm going to Miami. Let me just say, I have never coached college football and never will. I have also agreed to a clause which does not allow me to leave for another head coaching job. Now, let's get to work!

 

[kaso]

I took Oakland.

First reason, well I am a bit biased. Second reason, it's easy to improve from where they stand today.

 

[FUBAR]

I turned Rooney down. Who wants that job security with a good team and one of the best franchises in sports.

I'm holding out for Oakland.

 

[Godsbrother]

Pittsburgh is the best situation. But it is tough to follow a legend, as many coaches have found out. You are constantly being compared unfavorably with your predecessor.

I would have to disagree. Pittsburgh has alot of drawbacks. First you follow a legend so if you struggle in your first year you would constantly be hounded by the media, second you never get free agents and any good players that you draft end up leaving 4-5 years later via free agency. Lastly add in the fact that you have to face the Bengals, and Ravens 4x in one year and this just does not seem like the most appealing job.

This is a myth. For the most part the players the Steelers let go via free agency don't have much left and I can only think of two that made the Pro Bowl: Rod Woodson and Chad Brown.

 

[Colin Dowling]

Atlanta. I think they have more talent then anyone else on the list on both sides of the ball and the owner has demonstrated a willingness to allow bold moves to get better (Lelie, Abraham).

 

[posty]

Arizona... A lot of young talent on the offense... Get a decent O-line, you might be able to raise some heads...

 

[pgreenfan]

First I'd rule out the teams with morons for owners - Oakland, ArizonaThen I'd rule out cheap owners and franchises with limited legacy upside - PittsburgLastly I'd rule out any teams geographally challenged - MiamiWhich leaves Atlanta as the job of choice.

When did Pittsburg get an NFL team?

Come on now, is there really any confusion of which franchise he is talking about? Some people outside of the city really don't care how it is spelled.

Not really. It just amazes me that some people don't know how to spell major cities, states, presidents, etc.

Is Pittsburgh really a major city though?

 

[CrossEyed]

Pittsburgh is the best situation. But it is tough to follow a legend, as many coaches have found out. You are constantly being compared unfavorably with your predecessor.

I would have to disagree. Pittsburgh has alot of drawbacks. First you follow a legend so if you struggle in your first year you would constantly be hounded by the media, second you never get free agents and any good players that you draft end up leaving 4-5 years later via free agency. Lastly add in the fact that you have to face the Bengals, and Ravens 4x in one year and this just does not seem like the most appealing job.

Yeah, and who would want to work for an organization that is always competitive on the field and so stable they've only had 2 head coaches since 1969?

 

[BassNBrew]

Then I'd rule out cheap owners and franchises with limited legacy upside - Pittsburg

Just because the Rooney don't throw mad cash at borderline FAs, that makes them "cheap"? If you win in the 'Burgh, you have legacy. Bill Cowher is in the 'Burgh pantheon of sports heroes (coaches division) alongside Danny Murtaugh, Chuck Noll and Badger Bob Johnson.

With a couple of key additions, I think you're looking at a couple of more Super Bowls.

 

[Kleck.]

Arizona... A lot of young talent on the offense... Get a decent O-line, you might be able to raise some heads...

Tell us the real reason posty. Arizona... Spring training...

 

[BassNBrew]

First I'd rule out the teams with morons for owners - Oakland, ArizonaThen I'd rule out cheap owners and franchises with limited legacy upside - PittsburgLastly I'd rule out any teams geographally challenged - MiamiWhich leaves Atlanta as the job of choice.

When did Pittsburg get an NFL team?

Come on now, is there really any confusion of which franchise he is talking about? Some people outside of the city really don't care how it is spelled.

Not really. It just amazes me that some people don't know how to spell major cities, states, presidents, etc.

Sorry...I always think of Pittsburg Kansas. I won't forget the "h" again as I'll now associate it with "hell-hole".

 

[BassNBrew]

Pittsburgh is the best situation. But it is tough to follow a legend, as many coaches have found out. You are constantly being compared unfavorably with your predecessor.

I would have to disagree. Pittsburgh has alot of drawbacks. First you follow a legend so if you struggle in your first year you would constantly be hounded by the media, second you never get free agents and any good players that you draft end up leaving 4-5 years later via free agency. Lastly add in the fact that you have to face the Bengals, and Ravens 4x in one year and this just does not seem like the most appealing job.

Yeah, and who would want to work for an organization that is always competitive on the field and so stable they've only had 2 head coaches since 1969?

The past isn't necessarily a predictor of future success, however past legends in Pittsburgh (and comparisions to them) will never die.

 

[Frenchy Fuqua]

First I'd rule out the teams with morons for owners - Oakland, ArizonaThen I'd rule out cheap owners and franchises with limited legacy upside - PittsburgLastly I'd rule out any teams geographally challenged - MiamiWhich leaves Atlanta as the job of choice.

When did Pittsburg get an NFL team?

Come on now, is there really any confusion of which franchise he is talking about? Some people outside of the city really don't care how it is spelled.

Not really. It just amazes me that some people don't know how to spell major cities, states, presidents, etc.

Sorry...I always think of Pittsburg Kansas. I won't forget the "h" again as I'll now associate it with "hell-hole".

Whatever it takes Einstein. I am beginning to see why pro sports teams from North Carolina shorten it to Carolina.

 

[posty]

Arizona... A lot of young talent on the offense... Get a decent O-line, you might be able to raise some heads...

Tell us the real reason posty. Arizona... Spring training...

Well that helps as well... But then Miami would be in the mix since they do have more teams there...

 

[nightshift]

That's easy, GB.

Which organization has had the best success with coaching, especially head coaches?

Pittsburgh.

Which organization has produced the most wins, including Super Bowl?

Pittsburgh.

Which organization builds upon it foundation, built by blue collar everyday guys who become legends, not to shadow, but serve as an example of what can be accomplished through dedication & hard work (thank you Coach Noll)?

Pittsburgh.

For all you coach potatoes worried about players, etc. - you don't work for them, you work for the organization.

Work for winners, you can become a winner.

On that note, you wanna know which coach will be the most successful of the ones hired in 2007?

The guy in Pittsburgh!

 

[AhrnCityPahnder]

Then I'd rule out cheap owners and franchises with limited legacy upside - Pittsburg

I hear this complaint quite a bit. When was the last time the Steelers were not right up against the salary cap?

 

[BassNBrew]

First I'd rule out the teams with morons for owners - Oakland, ArizonaThen I'd rule out cheap owners and franchises with limited legacy upside - PittsburgLastly I'd rule out any teams geographally challenged - MiamiWhich leaves Atlanta as the job of choice.

When did Pittsburg get an NFL team?

Come on now, is there really any confusion of which franchise he is talking about? Some people outside of the city really don't care how it is spelled.

Not really. It just amazes me that some people don't know how to spell major cities, states, presidents, etc.

Sorry...I always think of Pittsburg Kansas. I won't forget the "h" again as I'll now associate it with "hell-hole".

Whatever it takes Einstein. I am beginning to see why pro sports teams from North Carolina shorten it to Carolina.

Regardless of my spelling prowess, I suspect my technology contributions exceed yours Homer. Now get back to proof reading posts and making yourself feel important.

 

[Frenchy Fuqua]

First I'd rule out the teams with morons for owners - Oakland, ArizonaThen I'd rule out cheap owners and franchises with limited legacy upside - PittsburgLastly I'd rule out any teams geographally challenged - MiamiWhich leaves Atlanta as the job of choice.

When did Pittsburg get an NFL team?

Come on now, is there really any confusion of which franchise he is talking about? Some people outside of the city really don't care how it is spelled.

Not really. It just amazes me that some people don't know how to spell major cities, states, presidents, etc.

Sorry...I always think of Pittsburg Kansas. I won't forget the "h" again as I'll now associate it with "hell-hole".

Whatever it takes Einstein. I am beginning to see why pro sports teams from North Carolina shorten it to Carolina.

Regardless of my spelling prowess, I suspect my technology contributions exceed yours Homer. Now get back to proof reading posts and making yourself feel important.

Now, now no need to take it personally. I too would be frustrated if I lived in area where NASCAR races were a bigger priority than NFL games.

 

[BassNBrew]

Then I'd rule out cheap owners and franchises with limited legacy upside - Pittsburg

I hear this complaint quite a bit. When was the last time the Steelers were not right up against the salary cap?

I think Cowher would have made some different choices if he had the power. Again, I feel that the Steelers were just a couple of moves away from being discussed as a dynasty during the last decade.Regardless, coming in after Noll and Cowher will not be a peice of cake.

 

[simmonjm]

Pittsburgh is the best situation. But it is tough to follow a legend, as many coaches have found out. You are constantly being compared unfavorably with your predecessor.

I would have to disagree. Pittsburgh has alot of drawbacks. First you follow a legend so if you struggle in your first year you would constantly be hounded by the media, second you never get free agents and any good players that you draft end up leaving 4-5 years later via free agency. Lastly add in the fact that you have to face the Bengals, and Ravens 4x in one year and this just does not seem like the most appealing job.

This is a myth. For the most part the players the Steelers let go via free agency don't have much left and I can only think of two that made the Pro Bowl: Rod Woodson and Chad Brown.

Just off the top of my head I can remember players like Chris Hope, Antwaan Randal-El, Kendrell Bell, Plaxico, and Kendrick Clancy all being let go via free agency. As a coach losing the above named players would be very frustrating to say the least.

 

[simmonjm]

That's easy, GB.Which organization has had the best success with coaching, especially head coaches?Pittsburgh.Which organization has produced the most wins, including Super Bowl?Pittsburgh.Which organization builds upon it foundation, built by blue collar everyday guys who become legends, not to shadow, but serve as an example of what can be accomplished through dedication & hard work (thank you Coach Noll)?Pittsburgh.For all you coach potatoes worried about players, etc. - you don't work for them, you work for the organization. Work for winners, you can become a winner.On that note, you wanna know which coach will be the most successful of the ones hired in 2007?The guy in Pittsburgh!

Sig bet that says Arizona, Oakland, Atlanta, or Miami will have a better record then your beloved Steelers. You in?

 

[PatsWillWin]

For me, definitely Arizona.

It's actually a very young and talented offense and there's some good talent on defense as some positions too.

Like others have said, this team mainly needs an offsenive line.

New stadium, and pretty low expectations and low pressure. A lot of pressure in Pittsburgh. Plus I can't stand Steeler fans.

So, I'd rather go to Arizona, build an OL (maybe hire Gibbs!), turn the Cardinals around, and be considered a genius.

Thanks Denny Green.

 

[BassNBrew]

First I'd rule out the teams with morons for owners - Oakland, Arizona

Then I'd rule out cheap owners and franchises with limited legacy upside - Pittsburg

Lastly I'd rule out any teams geographally challenged - Miami

Which leaves Atlanta as the job of choice.

When did Pittsburg get an NFL team?

Come on now, is there really any confusion of which franchise he is talking about? Some people outside of the city really don't care how it is spelled.

Not really. It just amazes me that some people don't know how to spell major cities, states, presidents, etc.

Sorry...I always think of Pittsburg Kansas. I won't forget the "h" again as I'll now associate it with "hell-hole".

Whatever it takes Einstein. I am beginning to see why pro sports teams from North Carolina shorten it to Carolina.

Regardless of my spelling prowess, I suspect my technology contributions exceed yours Homer. Now get back to proof reading posts and making yourself feel important.

Now, now no need to take it personally. I too would be frustrated if I lived in area where NASCAR races were a bigger priority than NFL games.

NASCAR is cool if you're into aerodynamics and mechanics of materials. Unfortunately I don't have time to follow it in January as I will be swinging the sticks or pushing the pedals.

 

[PatsWillWin]

First I'd rule out the teams with morons for owners - Oakland, ArizonaThen I'd rule out cheap owners and franchises with limited legacy upside - PittsburgLastly I'd rule out any teams geographally challenged - MiamiWhich leaves Atlanta as the job of choice.

When did Pittsburg get an NFL team?

Come on now, is there really any confusion of which franchise he is talking about? Some people outside of the city really don't care how it is spelled.

Not really. It just amazes me that some people don't know how to spell major cities, states, presidents, etc.

Sorry...I always think of Pittsburg Kansas. I won't forget the "h" again as I'll now associate it with "hell-hole".

Whatever it takes Einstein. I am beginning to see why pro sports teams from North Carolina shorten it to Carolina.

Wow you're a tool.

 

[CrossEyed]

Pittsburgh is the best situation. But it is tough to follow a legend, as many coaches have found out. You are constantly being compared unfavorably with your predecessor.

I would have to disagree. Pittsburgh has alot of drawbacks. First you follow a legend so if you struggle in your first year you would constantly be hounded by the media, second you never get free agents and any good players that you draft end up leaving 4-5 years later via free agency. Lastly add in the fact that you have to face the Bengals, and Ravens 4x in one year and this just does not seem like the most appealing job.

Yeah, and who would want to work for an organization that is always competitive on the field and so stable they've only had 2 head coaches since 1969?

The past isn't necessarily a predictor of future success, however past legends in Pittsburgh (and comparisions to them) will never die.

Cowher followed Noll. Didn't seem to hurt him too much.

 

[BassNBrew]

For me, definitely Arizona.It's actually a very young and talented offense and there's some good talent on defense as some positions too.Like others have said, this team mainly needs an offsenive line.New stadium, and pretty low expectations and low pressure. A lot of pressure in Pittsburgh. Plus I can't stand Steeler fans.So, I'd rather go to Arizona, build an OL (maybe hire Gibbs!), turn the Cardinals around, and be considered a genius.Thanks Denny Green.

One word on why you're wrong...BidwillOf course with my spelling let's make that 5 words....Bidwill, Bidwell, Bidwel, Biddwil, Biwedel

 

[CrossEyed]

Pittsburgh is the best situation. But it is tough to follow a legend, as many coaches have found out. You are constantly being compared unfavorably with your predecessor.

I would have to disagree. Pittsburgh has alot of drawbacks. First you follow a legend so if you struggle in your first year you would constantly be hounded by the media, second you never get free agents and any good players that you draft end up leaving 4-5 years later via free agency. Lastly add in the fact that you have to face the Bengals, and Ravens 4x in one year and this just does not seem like the most appealing job.

This is a myth. For the most part the players the Steelers let go via free agency don't have much left and I can only think of two that made the Pro Bowl: Rod Woodson and Chad Brown.

Just off the top of my head I can remember players like Chris Hope, Antwaan Randal-El, Kendrell Bell, Plaxico, and Kendrick Clancy all being let go via free agency. As a coach losing the above named players would be very frustrating to say the least.

Newsflash: If your team is good you will lose players to free agency.

 

[PatsWillWin]

For me, definitely Arizona.It's actually a very young and talented offense and there's some good talent on defense as some positions too.Like others have said, this team mainly needs an offsenive line.New stadium, and pretty low expectations and low pressure. A lot of pressure in Pittsburgh. Plus I can't stand Steeler fans.So, I'd rather go to Arizona, build an OL (maybe hire Gibbs!), turn the Cardinals around, and be considered a genius.Thanks Denny Green.

One word on why you're wrong...BidwillOf course with my spelling let's make that 5 words....Bidwill, Bidwell, Bidwel, Biddwil, Biwedel

Thise iz ae gud pointe. Eye tHinke itz phunny thatt Atlatna haz fuuer votez thane Oaklan.

 

[AB in DC]

Arizona. For one, there is a good nucleus on the team, but the big reason is there's no pressure. If you win, great, but if you lose, hey, it's the Cardinals, nobody expected you to win anyway.

 

[BassNBrew]

Pittsburgh is the best situation. But it is tough to follow a legend, as many coaches have found out. You are constantly being compared unfavorably with your predecessor.

I would have to disagree. Pittsburgh has alot of drawbacks. First you follow a legend so if you struggle in your first year you would constantly be hounded by the media, second you never get free agents and any good players that you draft end up leaving 4-5 years later via free agency. Lastly add in the fact that you have to face the Bengals, and Ravens 4x in one year and this just does not seem like the most appealing job.

Yeah, and who would want to work for an organization that is always competitive on the field and so stable they've only had 2 head coaches since 1969?

The past isn't necessarily a predictor of future success, however past legends in Pittsburgh (and comparisions to them) will never die.

Cowher followed Noll. Didn't seem to hurt him too much.

For every one you name, there are handful that failed. Besides...who's the best....Cowher or Noll?

 

[BassNBrew]

For me, definitely Arizona.It's actually a very young and talented offense and there's some good talent on defense as some positions too.Like others have said, this team mainly needs an offsenive line.New stadium, and pretty low expectations and low pressure. A lot of pressure in Pittsburgh. Plus I can't stand Steeler fans.So, I'd rather go to Arizona, build an OL (maybe hire Gibbs!), turn the Cardinals around, and be considered a genius.Thanks Denny Green.

One word on why you're wrong...BidwillOf course with my spelling let's make that 5 words....Bidwill, Bidwell, Bidwel, Biddwil, Biwedel

Thise iz ae gud pointe. Eye tHinke itz phunny thatt Atlatna haz fuuer votez thane Oaklan.

:( You may be right about Arizona, I'm biased as an ex-Cards fan from years ago.

 

[Southside Stosh]

As much as I think being the HC of the Steelers would be the ####; I think the Arizona gig has more upside.

 

[bigupsetter]

tell you, Az could draftg one o-lineman, spend some cap on2 FA and be a playoff team next year.

 

[jurb26]

This is a nobrainer for me. It's Pittsburgh and by a mile. You're looking at some of the best ownership in the NFL. Some of the best fans in the NFL. Great facilities. Inheriting a franchise QB, great assistant coaches (assuming it's not one of them that gets the gig) and a great D. Not to mention this is a team that UNDERperformed this past season so the opportunity for improvment is there. Following a legand is meaningless in Pitt because the ownership will be loyal none the less. ONly draw back IMO is that the division is very tough with both Balt and Cinci.