What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Which late round WR breaks the top 25 (1 Viewer)

Who do you think will breakout at wr for a cheap price

  • Stovall TB

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Robinson Rams

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Williamson Jags

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • None of the above

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Gopher State

Footballguy
I think one of these guys will be a steal, its just which one. All have had strong pre-season games for what it's worth.

 
I like Williamson of the three, but not sure if I can justify dropping Josh Morgan for him. Taking a wait-and-see approach.

 
Is Stovall the #2 in Tampa Bay? I thought Michael Clayton was (could very well be wrong).

I say L. Robinson and T. Williamson have a shot to be in the 20-30 range for WRs, but I'd definitely rate them below guys such as Morgan and Hixon (who both have much higher ADPs then those listed I think).

 
i'm a big fan of both Robinson and Stovall, and a huge detractor of Williamson. I wouldn't be surprised at all if Robinson or Stovall got 800+ yards, but would be pretty surprised if Williamson got more than 500.

 
Robinson's showed tremendous hands. Wouldn't be surprised at all if he bests Avery in PPR's this year.
That's what I'm hoping - I took him late myself, thinking Avery's foot injury could linger and he might be a factor at least early on.
 
Wound up taking a flier on Williamson Sunday night after his above average preseason (13th round). Saw today that he was named the starter - is there anyway this guy could be a top 36WR (12 team, start 3WR)?

 
MCguidance said:
Wound up taking a flier on Williamson Sunday night after his above average preseason (13th round). Saw today that he was named the starter - is there anyway this guy could be a top 36WR (12 team, start 3WR)?
his preseason stats looks like a fluke. 8-232 ???? Walker will get the starting nod sooner rather than later, that is if he stays healthy, and that's the biggest IF.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Robinson would be my pick by a pretty wide margin. I liked him as a rookie and he seems to be flourishing in STL.

I can't shake the memories of Troy Williamson dropping wide open TD passes. I won't trust him until he proves trustworthy.

Stovall has been invisible for his entire NFL career and the Bucs figure to be a weak passing offense. I don't like his chances.

 
of those 3 Id say none will sniff top 25. Id take a shot on a rookie here like Nicks/Maclin/Harvin -those guys may be jumped on too early(unless keeper/dynasty).

If anything happened to Driver in GB I think J.Jones would be huge..

*Im assuming the following guys will not be avail in the area you are looking for value: C.Henry, E.Bennett, D.Mason(great value where he's being drafted)

 
MCguidance said:
Wound up taking a flier on Williamson Sunday night after his above average preseason (13th round). Saw today that he was named the starter - is there anyway this guy could be a top 36WR (12 team, start 3WR)?
his preseason stats looks like a fluke. 8-232 ???? Walker will get the starting nod sooner rather than later, that is if he stays healthy, and that's the biggest IF.
These are my thoughts exactly. I'd feel better about Williamson's chances if he was 20-232 instead of 8-232. Unless he finally learned how to catch the ball in his 5th season in the NFL, i think the chances he betters 500 yards receiving is highly unlikely. People are really sleeping on Maurice Stovall imo. The Bucs top 2 Wrs have been injured all training camp, and Leftwich has got some good chemistry with Stovall as a result, and i expect it to carry over to the regular season as well. He's a big guy at 6'5 220, he has excellent hands, makes plays in traffic, good athlete, and good red zone target. Frankly i'm surprised how unsuccessful he;s been to this point in his career. Gruden harshly favouring veteran players may have been a significant reason.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top