What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Which Rookie RB will be Most (Fantasy) Productive? (1 Viewer)

Who Will Be the Most Productive Fantasy Wise PPR?

  • Sankey

    Votes: 104 66.2%
  • Hyde

    Votes: 3 1.9%
  • Freeman

    Votes: 22 14.0%
  • Mason

    Votes: 5 3.2%
  • Hill

    Votes: 14 8.9%
  • Crowell

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • Carey

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • West

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • Williams

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sims

    Votes: 6 3.8%

  • Total voters
    157
Sankey has the best opportunity for touches. Touches = points . Others are more dependant on injuries / schemes

 
Sankey will run away with the poll, as he probably should. You'd hope that he'd be able to beat out Greene from day one. Not a 100% lock though.

Hill will have a role, but he won't be an every down guy with Gio there. I could see him being a little underrated for redraft purposes, but there's a lower ceiling on what he can do since it will be virtually impossible to run away with such a high workload that he can score like Lacy, Bell, Trent, Martin, etc.

Mason, Freeman, Williams, and West would be the next cluster. A lot can happen with that group, good and bad.

I think the others would all need an injury to have any real redraft relevance.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sankey will run away with the poll, as he probably should. You'd hope that he'd be able to beat out Greene from day one. Not a 100% lock though.

Hill will have a role, but he won't be an every down guy with Gio there. I could see him being a little underrated for redraft purposes, but there's a lower ceiling on what he can do since it will be virtually impossible to run away with such a high workload that he can score like Lacy, Bell, Trent, Martin, etc.

Mason, Freeman, Williams, and West would be the next cluster. A lot can happen with that group, good and bad.

I think the others would all need an injury to have any real redraft relevance.
i completely agree. Im pretty sure sankey is gonna run away with this. Due to the nature of the position. Who would win this poll if the person in front of them currently were to have a season ending injury?
 
Sankey will run away with the poll, as he probably should. You'd hope that he'd be able to beat out Greene from day one. Not a 100% lock though.

Hill will have a role, but he won't be an every down guy with Gio there. I could see him being a little underrated for redraft purposes, but there's a lower ceiling on what he can do since it will be virtually impossible to run away with such a high workload that he can score like Lacy, Bell, Trent, Martin, etc.

Mason, Freeman, Williams, and West would be the next cluster. A lot can happen with that group, good and bad.

I think the others would all need an injury to have any real redraft relevance.
i completely agree. Im pretty sure sankey is gonna run away with this. Due to the nature of the position. Who would win this poll if the person in front of them currently were to have a season ending injury?
I'd say any of Hyde, Hill, Mason, and Freeman... I think any of those four could shine if given the opportunity. This was actually a pretty strong RB class (better than last year - IMO)...

 
Sankey will run away with the poll, as he probably should. You'd hope that he'd be able to beat out Greene from day one. Not a 100% lock though.

Hill will have a role, but he won't be an every down guy with Gio there. I could see him being a little underrated for redraft purposes, but there's a lower ceiling on what he can do since it will be virtually impossible to run away with such a high workload that he can score like Lacy, Bell, Trent, Martin, etc.

Mason, Freeman, Williams, and West would be the next cluster. A lot can happen with that group, good and bad.

I think the others would all need an injury to have any real redraft relevance.
i completely agree. Im pretty sure sankey is gonna run away with this. Due to the nature of the position. Who would win this poll if the person in front of them currently were to have a season ending injury?
I'd say any of Hyde, Hill, Mason, and Freeman... I think any of those four could shine if given the opportunity. This was actually a pretty strong RB class (better than last year - IMO)...
If mason doesn't fumble his life away or get Bradford killed by failing at blitz pickups , then I'd hands down say tre mason is the one

 
If I had to put money down on it for this season, Id go with Sankey.

But....

Mason is every bit as good as Sankey and I actually like his situation BETTER than sankey. Reunited w Robinson, w what is arguable the no1 o-line in the league. A decent, but not elite QB w solid weapons at WR so the box stays unstacked.

As for Stacy, I own him in some dynasty leagues, and Ive been trying to sell. Ive been trying to acquire Mason in those same leagues or ones where I dont have him. I just think Stacy gets upstaged by a MUCH better RB within 6-8 weeks, and this goes from RBBC to a 70-30 split pretty quickly in Mason's favor.

Mason is gonna lock his eyes on Robinson's ###### and just follow his behemoth for yards, yards more yards and TDs.

 
If I had to put money down on it for this season, Id go with Sankey.

But....

Mason is every bit as good as Sankey and I actually like his situation BETTER than sankey. Reunited w Robinson, w what is arguable the no1 o-line in the league. A decent, but not elite QB w solid weapons at WR so the box stays unstacked.

As for Stacy, I own him in some dynasty leagues, and Ive been trying to sell. Ive been trying to acquire Mason in those same leagues or ones where I dont have him. I just think Stacy gets upstaged by a MUCH better RB within 6-8 weeks, and this goes from RBBC to a 70-30 split pretty quickly in Mason's favor.

Mason is gonna lock his eyes on Robinson's ###### and just follow his behemoth for yards, yards more yards and TDs.
I agree with you on Mason. I am a little concerned with the division that he plays in though - 6 of the 16 games vs SF, SEA, and ARZ...

Talk about running uphill....

I do think that Robinson is a run game maker. He is such a beast!!!

 
If I had to put money down on it for this season, Id go with Sankey.

But....

Mason is every bit as good as Sankey and I actually like his situation BETTER than sankey. Reunited w Robinson, w what is arguable the no1 o-line in the league. A decent, but not elite QB w solid weapons at WR so the box stays unstacked.

As for Stacy, I own him in some dynasty leagues, and Ive been trying to sell. Ive been trying to acquire Mason in those same leagues or ones where I dont have him. I just think Stacy gets upstaged by a MUCH better RB within 6-8 weeks, and this goes from RBBC to a 70-30 split pretty quickly in Mason's favor.

Mason is gonna lock his eyes on Robinson's ###### and just follow his behemoth for yards, yards more yards and TDs.
I don't like your stance on much, but agree with you on this.

Mason is every bit as talented as Sankey if not more, and people are giving him the starting gig over Green and McCluster right off the bat. That may be the case, nothing is certain.

Injuries and lack of talent in the NFL is going to effect many rookies. My money is on Mason shaking out to be the best RB this year when its said and done. Many people didnt think Lacy would be the best when it shook out last year.

For the record I did draft Sankey in my SSL league since I think he will be more effective early but as the season plays out Mason is the guy I would want.

 
PPR:

The McC(luster) on Sankey will wear off when he's not in the game when Titans in comeback mode in 2014.

Ryan Mathews type usage is good comp......but I don't see the Titans playing with the lead anywhere as much as SD did in 2013. Nor do I think Sankey will be as effective Year 1.

McCluster is the PPR value play for 2014. They didn't guarantee the $$ they did (on the 1st day of free agency) for him to not have a role (presumably the Woodhead one.....on a team that'll be playing from behind a lot). If I'm not mistaken, he is the free agent RB that got the most guaranteed $$.

 
McCluster is a WR, which is why he got more money than the RBs. He is basically no threat to Sankey at all. We went thru this same talk 2 years ago with Charles.

 
Wrong. McCluster will be playing RB with the Titans.

What happened with KC and Charles is irrelevant. Different time, different staff, different talent. He was brought to Tennessee to be a RB and is participating in their drills as a RB.

The Nashville Tennessean confirms the Titans plan to use Dexter McCluster at running back.
New coach Ken Whisenhunt is looking to form a committee around power back Shonn Greene and passing back McCluster. He's also expected to use a draft pick, possibly No. 42 overall, on a running back. McCluster hasn't been a ball-carrier since 2011 and is listed at just 5'8/170, but he can be penciled into a Danny Woodhead or Darren Sproles kind of role. How much volume McCluster gets will depend on effectiveness. Apr 7 - 10:00 AM
Source: Nashville Tennessean

Coach Ken Whisenhunt said he sees newly signed Dexter McCluster as more of a running back than wide receiver.
The 5'8/170 McCluster last played running back in 2011, when he carried 114 times for 516 yards (4.52 YPC) with one touchdown. It looks like Whiz indeed wants McCluster to be his new Danny Woodhead, who rushed 106 times and caught 76 passes for the Chargers last season. "It could vary week to week," Whisenhunt said of McCluster's role. "As long as he makes a lot of plays he is going to get a lot of touches." Mar 13 - 12:43 PM
Source: Nashville Tennessean

http://www.titansonline.com/news/article-1/Whisenhunt-Happy-with-Progress-as-Titans-Wrap-Offseason/a27c91e5-37d6-442b-8c88-21852150a2e8
Running back Dexter McCluster
http://www.tennessean.com/story/sports/nfl/titans/2014/03/22/titans-dexter-mccluster-danny-woodhead-ken-whisenhunt/6755515/

From the coaches' mouth:

http://www.tennessean.com/videos/sports/nfl/titans/2014/03/14/6341733/

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wrong. McCluster will be playing RB with the Titans. He will be their 3rd down back this season.

What happened with KC and Charles is irrelevant. Different time, different staff, different talent. He was brought to Tennessee to be a RB and is participating in their drills as a RB.

The Nashville Tennessean confirms the Titans plan to use Dexter McCluster at running back.

New coach Ken Whisenhunt is looking to form a committee around power back Shonn Greene and passing back McCluster. He's also expected to use a draft pick, possibly No. 42 overall, on a running back. McCluster hasn't been a ball-carrier since 2011 and is listed at just 5'8/170, but he can be penciled into a Danny Woodhead or Darren Sproles kind of role. How much volume McCluster gets will depend on effectiveness. Apr 7 - 10:00 AM

Source: Nashville Tennessean

Coach Ken Whisenhunt said he sees newly signed Dexter McCluster as more of a running back than wide receiver.

The 5'8/170 McCluster last played running back in 2011, when he carried 114 times for 516 yards (4.52 YPC) with one touchdown. It looks like Whiz indeed wants McCluster to be his new Danny Woodhead, who rushed 106 times and caught 76 passes for the Chargers last season. "It could vary week to week," Whisenhunt said of McCluster's role. "As long as he makes a lot of plays he is going to get a lot of touches." Mar 13 - 12:43 PM

Source: Nashville Tennessean
Again, these are the same reports we heard while in KC... Yet it didn't happen. I'll believe it when I see it.
 
Wrong. McCluster will be playing RB with the Titans.

What happened with KC and Charles is irrelevant. Different time, different staff, different talent. He was brought to Tennessee to be a RB and is participating in their drills as a RB.

The Nashville Tennessean confirms the Titans plan to use Dexter McCluster at running back.

New coach Ken Whisenhunt is looking to form a committee around power back Shonn Greene and passing back McCluster. He's also expected to use a draft pick, possibly No. 42 overall, on a running back. McCluster hasn't been a ball-carrier since 2011 and is listed at just 5'8/170, but he can be penciled into a Danny Woodhead or Darren Sproles kind of role. How much volume McCluster gets will depend on effectiveness. Apr 7 - 10:00 AM

Source: Nashville Tennessean

Coach Ken Whisenhunt said he sees newly signed Dexter McCluster as more of a running back than wide receiver.

The 5'8/170 McCluster last played running back in 2011, when he carried 114 times for 516 yards (4.52 YPC) with one touchdown. It looks like Whiz indeed wants McCluster to be his new Danny Woodhead, who rushed 106 times and caught 76 passes for the Chargers last season. "It could vary week to week," Whisenhunt said of McCluster's role. "As long as he makes a lot of plays he is going to get a lot of touches." Mar 13 - 12:43 PM

Source: Nashville Tennessean

http://www.titansonline.com/news/article-1/Whisenhunt-Happy-with-Progress-as-Titans-Wrap-Offseason/a27c91e5-37d6-442b-8c88-21852150a2e8

Running back Dexter McCluster

http://www.tennessean.com/story/sports/nfl/titans/2014/03/22/titans-dexter-mccluster-danny-woodhead-ken-whisenhunt/6755515/

From the coaches' mouth:

http://www.tennessean.com/videos/sports/nfl/titans/2014/03/14/6341733/
This is all before the draft...

 
Craig_MiamiFL said:
PPR:

The McC(luster) on Sankey will wear off when he's not in the game when Titans in comeback mode in 2014.

Ryan Mathews type usage is good comp......but I don't see the Titans playing with the lead anywhere as much as SD did in 2013. Nor do I think Sankey will be as effective Year 1.

McCluster is the PPR value play for 2014. They didn't guarantee the $$ they did (on the 1st day of free agency) for him to not have a role (presumably the Woodhead one.....on a team that'll be playing from behind a lot). If I'm not mistaken, he is the free agent RB that got the most guaranteed $$.
:goodposting:

Craziness to see Sankey going 3rd round as I've seen several places. He went 26 overall in one. Not a chance he lives up to that with Dexter as 3DB and the Titans won't be very good. And that's not even considering that Greene/Battle will likely snag any limited # of goalline attempts. ADP right now is 53 (ahead of the likes of Gerhart, Vereen). And that'll rise as getting closer to season. Just crazy.

 
I like Sankey the best as a player and he also has a good situation with the clearest path to playing time. Maybe he won't take over completely out of the gate, but nobody really doubts he will at least play in a time share with a good shot at a feature role.

Consolations:

Mason has an interesting situation this season; it wouldn't surprise me to see him take over in St. Louis. At the same time, he has that other SEC guy to contend with in the backfield. Mason has a much more fluid situation - so many different ways it could play out.

Charles Sims will have a decent opportunity to put up some stats. The OC wants to use multiple backs, and Sims is the first up to share with Martin. Sims could carve himself into the receiving back role in Tedford's offense. He won't 'wow' anybody, so I doubt he has a shot to steal the show. If you're looking for crazy upside, look elsewhere.

 
If Cinci is serious about running the ball as much as Sea this year, Hill has to be a huge contender in this. He could have 230 touches with 10 TDs in that scenario.

 
I will draft to handcuff these guys. Gio/Hill, Stacey/Mason, Gore/Hyde, Sankey/Green and SJackson/Freeman all look like strong investments when packaged.

 
I'm liking Freeman as a very solid dark horse. There's a very real chance that SJax in ATL could be outproduced by Greene in TEN, and with nothing else proven in place Freeman could get the reins and accumulate more touches than Sankey does, with a strong ATL passing game to keep guys out of the box on D.

Should be interesting to watch.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is just 1 reason to not bump a guy above more talented ones due to situation. We don't know if Sankey is done yet, but his situation seemed ripe and it just didn't happen this year

 
This is just 1 reason to not bump a guy above more talented ones due to situation. We don't know if Sankey is done yet, but his situation seemed ripe and it just didn't happen this year
Sankey was the first back drafted this year.

Sankey 54

Hill 55

Hyde 57

Sims 69

Mason 75

West 94

McKinnon 96

 
This is just 1 reason to not bump a guy above more talented ones due to situation. We don't know if Sankey is done yet, but his situation seemed ripe and it just didn't happen this year
Sankey was the first back drafted this year.Sankey 54

Hill 55

Hyde 57

Sims 69

Mason 75

West 94

McKinnon 96
Talent wise he was between 2-5 for most I saw. He was 4 for me initially then I bumped him to 2 due to situation

 
:bag: Guessed Sankey. Would have drafted him too but he was picked early. :whew: Own Freeman and can't wait for Jackson to get let go.

 
Looks like answer was Hill. Probably would have been 3rd guess for me this year after Freeman & Hyde. Hill & Mason looked the most impressive this year.

Brewtown, what are your thoughts? :lmao: That's right, you couldn't have a big boy discussion and got banned.....

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Never liked Sankey much, but I would've backed him to beat out Shonn Greene and cobble together a decent season on opportunity alone. Turns out even that was asking too much. Here's how the rookie backs are ranked through 16 weeks in a typical PPR league:

1. Jeremy Hill

2. Andre Williams

3. Branden Oliver

4. Tre Mason

5. Isaiah Crowell

I think Hill, Mason, and Hyde will probably have the highest dynasty ADP next season. Hill has been impressive running the ball, but Mason has also finished the season pretty strong. If they expand his role in the passing game then I think he has a reasonable chance to be the top scorer from this group next season.

 
I'm still disappointed with Sankey. I drafted him fairly high in my keeper league thinking he'd be a good one to hold on to. I don't really understand what went wrong there. Is it just a question of talent, or is it more the system he's in?

 
IheartGuinness said:
I'm still disappointed with Sankey. I drafted him fairly high in my keeper league thinking he'd be a good one to hold on to. I don't really understand what went wrong there. Is it just a question of talent, or is it more the system he's in?
Sankey is fine. He's not a super-elite talent but he does possess the min athleticism/skill to be a rb1.

His biggest issue this season was Wiz who is a bottom 1 coach and will likely be fired.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top