i completely agree. Im pretty sure sankey is gonna run away with this. Due to the nature of the position. Who would win this poll if the person in front of them currently were to have a season ending injury?Sankey will run away with the poll, as he probably should. You'd hope that he'd be able to beat out Greene from day one. Not a 100% lock though.
Hill will have a role, but he won't be an every down guy with Gio there. I could see him being a little underrated for redraft purposes, but there's a lower ceiling on what he can do since it will be virtually impossible to run away with such a high workload that he can score like Lacy, Bell, Trent, Martin, etc.
Mason, Freeman, Williams, and West would be the next cluster. A lot can happen with that group, good and bad.
I think the others would all need an injury to have any real redraft relevance.
I'd say any of Hyde, Hill, Mason, and Freeman... I think any of those four could shine if given the opportunity. This was actually a pretty strong RB class (better than last year - IMO)...i completely agree. Im pretty sure sankey is gonna run away with this. Due to the nature of the position. Who would win this poll if the person in front of them currently were to have a season ending injury?Sankey will run away with the poll, as he probably should. You'd hope that he'd be able to beat out Greene from day one. Not a 100% lock though.
Hill will have a role, but he won't be an every down guy with Gio there. I could see him being a little underrated for redraft purposes, but there's a lower ceiling on what he can do since it will be virtually impossible to run away with such a high workload that he can score like Lacy, Bell, Trent, Martin, etc.
Mason, Freeman, Williams, and West would be the next cluster. A lot can happen with that group, good and bad.
I think the others would all need an injury to have any real redraft relevance.
If mason doesn't fumble his life away or get Bradford killed by failing at blitz pickups , then I'd hands down say tre mason is the oneI'd say any of Hyde, Hill, Mason, and Freeman... I think any of those four could shine if given the opportunity. This was actually a pretty strong RB class (better than last year - IMO)...i completely agree. Im pretty sure sankey is gonna run away with this. Due to the nature of the position. Who would win this poll if the person in front of them currently were to have a season ending injury?Sankey will run away with the poll, as he probably should. You'd hope that he'd be able to beat out Greene from day one. Not a 100% lock though.
Hill will have a role, but he won't be an every down guy with Gio there. I could see him being a little underrated for redraft purposes, but there's a lower ceiling on what he can do since it will be virtually impossible to run away with such a high workload that he can score like Lacy, Bell, Trent, Martin, etc.
Mason, Freeman, Williams, and West would be the next cluster. A lot can happen with that group, good and bad.
I think the others would all need an injury to have any real redraft relevance.
Is that what the thread topic and poll says?Another "who's the best Rookie RB" thread?
I agree with you on Mason. I am a little concerned with the division that he plays in though - 6 of the 16 games vs SF, SEA, and ARZ...If I had to put money down on it for this season, Id go with Sankey.
But....
Mason is every bit as good as Sankey and I actually like his situation BETTER than sankey. Reunited w Robinson, w what is arguable the no1 o-line in the league. A decent, but not elite QB w solid weapons at WR so the box stays unstacked.
As for Stacy, I own him in some dynasty leagues, and Ive been trying to sell. Ive been trying to acquire Mason in those same leagues or ones where I dont have him. I just think Stacy gets upstaged by a MUCH better RB within 6-8 weeks, and this goes from RBBC to a 70-30 split pretty quickly in Mason's favor.
Mason is gonna lock his eyes on Robinson's ###### and just follow his behemoth for yards, yards more yards and TDs.
I don't like your stance on much, but agree with you on this.If I had to put money down on it for this season, Id go with Sankey.
But....
Mason is every bit as good as Sankey and I actually like his situation BETTER than sankey. Reunited w Robinson, w what is arguable the no1 o-line in the league. A decent, but not elite QB w solid weapons at WR so the box stays unstacked.
As for Stacy, I own him in some dynasty leagues, and Ive been trying to sell. Ive been trying to acquire Mason in those same leagues or ones where I dont have him. I just think Stacy gets upstaged by a MUCH better RB within 6-8 weeks, and this goes from RBBC to a 70-30 split pretty quickly in Mason's favor.
Mason is gonna lock his eyes on Robinson's ###### and just follow his behemoth for yards, yards more yards and TDs.
Again, these are the same reports we heard while in KC... Yet it didn't happen. I'll believe it when I see it.Wrong. McCluster will be playing RB with the Titans. He will be their 3rd down back this season.
What happened with KC and Charles is irrelevant. Different time, different staff, different talent. He was brought to Tennessee to be a RB and is participating in their drills as a RB.
The Nashville Tennessean confirms the Titans plan to use Dexter McCluster at running back.
New coach Ken Whisenhunt is looking to form a committee around power back Shonn Greene and passing back McCluster. He's also expected to use a draft pick, possibly No. 42 overall, on a running back. McCluster hasn't been a ball-carrier since 2011 and is listed at just 5'8/170, but he can be penciled into a Danny Woodhead or Darren Sproles kind of role. How much volume McCluster gets will depend on effectiveness. Apr 7 - 10:00 AM
Source: Nashville Tennessean
Coach Ken Whisenhunt said he sees newly signed Dexter McCluster as more of a running back than wide receiver.
The 5'8/170 McCluster last played running back in 2011, when he carried 114 times for 516 yards (4.52 YPC) with one touchdown. It looks like Whiz indeed wants McCluster to be his new Danny Woodhead, who rushed 106 times and caught 76 passes for the Chargers last season. "It could vary week to week," Whisenhunt said of McCluster's role. "As long as he makes a lot of plays he is going to get a lot of touches." Mar 13 - 12:43 PM
Source: Nashville Tennessean
This is all before the draft...Wrong. McCluster will be playing RB with the Titans.
What happened with KC and Charles is irrelevant. Different time, different staff, different talent. He was brought to Tennessee to be a RB and is participating in their drills as a RB.
The Nashville Tennessean confirms the Titans plan to use Dexter McCluster at running back.
New coach Ken Whisenhunt is looking to form a committee around power back Shonn Greene and passing back McCluster. He's also expected to use a draft pick, possibly No. 42 overall, on a running back. McCluster hasn't been a ball-carrier since 2011 and is listed at just 5'8/170, but he can be penciled into a Danny Woodhead or Darren Sproles kind of role. How much volume McCluster gets will depend on effectiveness. Apr 7 - 10:00 AM
Source: Nashville Tennessean
Coach Ken Whisenhunt said he sees newly signed Dexter McCluster as more of a running back than wide receiver.
The 5'8/170 McCluster last played running back in 2011, when he carried 114 times for 516 yards (4.52 YPC) with one touchdown. It looks like Whiz indeed wants McCluster to be his new Danny Woodhead, who rushed 106 times and caught 76 passes for the Chargers last season. "It could vary week to week," Whisenhunt said of McCluster's role. "As long as he makes a lot of plays he is going to get a lot of touches." Mar 13 - 12:43 PM
Source: Nashville Tennessean
http://www.titansonline.com/news/article-1/Whisenhunt-Happy-with-Progress-as-Titans-Wrap-Offseason/a27c91e5-37d6-442b-8c88-21852150a2e8
Running back Dexter McCluster
http://www.tennessean.com/story/sports/nfl/titans/2014/03/22/titans-dexter-mccluster-danny-woodhead-ken-whisenhunt/6755515/
From the coaches' mouth:
http://www.tennessean.com/videos/sports/nfl/titans/2014/03/14/6341733/
Craig_MiamiFL said:PPR:
The McC(luster) on Sankey will wear off when he's not in the game when Titans in comeback mode in 2014.
Ryan Mathews type usage is good comp......but I don't see the Titans playing with the lead anywhere as much as SD did in 2013. Nor do I think Sankey will be as effective Year 1.
McCluster is the PPR value play for 2014. They didn't guarantee the $$ they did (on the 1st day of free agency) for him to not have a role (presumably the Woodhead one.....on a team that'll be playing from behind a lot). If I'm not mistaken, he is the free agent RB that got the most guaranteed $$.
Good call!If Cinci is serious about running the ball as much as Sea this year, Hill has to be a huge contender in this. He could have 230 touches with 10 TDs in that scenario.
Sankey was the first back drafted this year.This is just 1 reason to not bump a guy above more talented ones due to situation. We don't know if Sankey is done yet, but his situation seemed ripe and it just didn't happen this year
Talent wise he was between 2-5 for most I saw. He was 4 for me initially then I bumped him to 2 due to situationSankey was the first back drafted this year.Sankey 54This is just 1 reason to not bump a guy above more talented ones due to situation. We don't know if Sankey is done yet, but his situation seemed ripe and it just didn't happen this year
Hill 55
Hyde 57
Sims 69
Mason 75
West 94
McKinnon 96
Sankey is fine. He's not a super-elite talent but he does possess the min athleticism/skill to be a rb1.IheartGuinness said:I'm still disappointed with Sankey. I drafted him fairly high in my keeper league thinking he'd be a good one to hold on to. I don't really understand what went wrong there. Is it just a question of talent, or is it more the system he's in?