No worse than Bortles. Both started better than they finished IMO.I've heard Carr looked really bad on tape the last part of the season. Can't say I saw much of many Raiders games that late in the year though.
Not trying to be funny, but why would anyone take a recovering addict to be the face of their franchise. Same goes for Winston will all of these other options available. It's not like Johnny or Jameis show appreciably more talent than the other guys on the list and the other guys are clean from a PR standpoint. I live in Atlanta and there's still issues around here with what happened with Mike Vick. It divided a lot of the fanbase and there's still a contingent of fans who'll never accept Matt Ryan. Every Falcons game for a couple of years had people in Vick jerseys walking past people with anti-Vick signs. It takes the focus off the team in a bad way no matter where you side.Johnny Football tearing this up so far with 0 votes out of 30.
in what way? not character, not talent. Johnny has already shown he can't play.He's still above Mariota though.
i feel like Mariota is going to be what a lot of people thought Manziel would be.I like Manziel a lot but even I must concede he's near the bottom of this list. He's still above Mariota though.
So why wasn't Carr (or any other qb) drafted highly last year? I voted Bridgewater, but if it were based on on-field performance alone, I would choose Winston.I voted Bridgewater, but there's no way that Winston or Mariota should have more votes than Carr.
They're both hot garbage.
Winston and Mariota were drafted high because they play QB and all of the other QB's in this year's draft were stinkier hot garbage.
I like Carr and would have him #3 on the list, maybe above MM just because he's played a year and didn't implode, but what track record of success are you talking about? His team was 3-13 (mostly not his fault), his completion %, QB Rating, AY/A, and ANY/A were around #30. I'l give him a lot of credit for not taking many sacks or throwing too many INTs (same rate as Tannehill and Stafford - not bad for a rookie). But I'm just not seeing a track record of "success".Bridgewater/Carr - Both guys already have a track record of success, have shown that they have what it takes to succeed in the league, and look to have much improved situations moving forward.![]()
Can you please post your links to these apologies because I have not heard of one.Winston and Manziel - I do not think either has what it takes to make it as a backup QB in the NFL. Manziel's troubles are legion and well-documentd. Winston's, almost equally so, and now that he's been drafted, Lovie's had to step in front of cameras and apologize for him multiple times already, and the school that was recently hitched to his bandwagon is breaking its back to distance themselves from him. I see no way either of these guys doesn't outright bust.![]()
1 vote out of 144, but still an overestimation of Johnny Rehab.ok . . . c'mon, who voted Manziel?