Not to nitpick, but Davis and KW2 usually go well before the rest here.Your question is which to target, not which to take first, so my answer is Greg Olsen. (I voted before thinking this through.) He goes below the rest, but in Chicago, where Clark was a top 10 last year, he can be a top 5 TE which you can draft below the top 12.Which young TE... that are usually in the same ranking tiering... would you want on your dynasty team?
Obviously, we are talking about potential here... not some you would rely on right now - but that you think as the best chance to become your FF stud in the long run...
I am big on Cooley this year. He started terrible last year and still have a solid year, especially after Campbell replaced Brunell. But I can't put him or anyone in this list ahead of Vernon Davis. He is going to be a beast of a TE.Cooley has to be the guy. He is the most likely to out preform his ADP. He has a proven track record. Cooley has not missed a game in 3. He has Finished in the top 5 the last two seasons.
In my last Dynasty Draft Davis went 6.11 and Cooley went 8.05. For me Cooley at 8.05 is much better value than Davis at 6.11.I am big on Cooley this year. He started terrible last year and still have a solid year, especially after Campbell replaced Brunell. But I can't put him or anyone in this list ahead of Vernon Davis. He is going to be a beast of a TE.Cooley has to be the guy. He is the most likely to out preform his ADP. He has a proven track record. Cooley has not missed a game in 3. He has Finished in the top 5 the last two seasons.
I think Witten would be a solid choice as well. Especially since Dallas did not really address the WR position via free agency or the draft.I would certainly prefer Davis, but Witten probably represents the best value considering ADP.
two words: Isaiah StanbackIdI think Witten would be a solid choice as well. Especially since Dallas did not really address the WR position via free agency or the draft.I would certainly prefer Davis, but Witten probably represents the best value considering ADP.
yes a converted QB playing WR. do you honestly believe he is going to come in and provide an immediate impact? I know he is talented, but it will take some time for him to develop as a WR. Even if he comes into camp and sets the world on fire, he would only be the 4th option at best behind Owens, Glenn, and Witten. The kid has great skills, but I think it will take some time to develop leaving Witten still as a great receiving option for The Boys. Stanback has great potential, but we all know it takes time for a conversion like this.two words: Isaiah StanbackIdI think Witten would be a solid choice as well. Especially since Dallas did not really address the WR position via free agency or the draft.I would certainly prefer Davis, but Witten probably represents the best value considering ADP.
The topic is concerning dynasty values, not just 2007 values. In an extremely rich WR draft, Stanback was Dallas' only pick for that position. That, when coupled with 2 old starting WR's and their non-involvement with free agent WR's, tells me they think very highly of him. Cowboys did fairly well with Crayton's transition and Stanback is, IMO, extremely more talented than him.yes a converted QB playing WR. do you honestly believe he is going to come in and provide an immediate impact? I know he is talented, but it will take some time for him to develop as a WR. Even if he comes into camp and sets the world on fire, he would only be the 4th option at best behind Owens, Glenn, and Witten. The kid has great skills, but I think it will take some time to develop leaving Witten still as a great receiving option for The Boys. Stanback has great potential, but we all know it takes time for a conversion like this.two words: Isaiah StanbackIdI think Witten would be a solid choice as well. Especially since Dallas did not really address the WR position via free agency or the draft.I would certainly prefer Davis, but Witten probably represents the best value considering ADP.
yeah I am anxious to see how it all shakes out in Dallas. Hopefully it will be more like Hines ward than Brad smith or some others who have tried this lately. If I remember right though, Hines only played QB for one season at Georgia though. Either way it's a good topic for conversation though. And sorry for the Hijack as well Jayman. this might be a good topic for another thread. Back to the TE talk.The topic is concerning dynasty values, not just 2007 values. In an extremely rich WR draft, Stanback was Dallas' only pick for that position. That, when coupled with 2 old starting WR's and their non-involvement with free agent WR's, tells me they think very highly of him. Cowboys did fairly well with Crayton's transition and Stanback is, IMO, extremely more talented than him.yes a converted QB playing WR. do you honestly believe he is going to come in and provide an immediate impact? I know he is talented, but it will take some time for him to develop as a WR. Even if he comes into camp and sets the world on fire, he would only be the 4th option at best behind Owens, Glenn, and Witten. The kid has great skills, but I think it will take some time to develop leaving Witten still as a great receiving option for The Boys. Stanback has great potential, but we all know it takes time for a conversion like this.two words: Isaiah StanbackIdI think Witten would be a solid choice as well. Especially since Dallas did not really address the WR position via free agency or the draft.I would certainly prefer Davis, but Witten probably represents the best value considering ADP.
Reminds me somewhat of Hines Ward.
Yes it'll take time to adjust. But I'm betting not as long as some might think.
Id
PS sorry about the hijack
Cooleyjust a gut feeling here that he and Campbell will rise together
When I look for sleeper TEs, this is one thing I look for.A process:Step 1, list the developing QBs and their TE:Losman: Royal? Quinn: KW2Romo: WittenSchaub: Owen DanielsVY: Troupe/ScaifeCutler: SchefflerRivers: Gates Croyle: Gonzo Smith: DavisLeinart: Patrick? TJackson: Kleinsasser?Rex: OlsenCampbell: CooleyStep 2, take out those with other "safety valves or TEs who are not sleepers:Losman: Royal? Schaub: Owen DanielsVY: Troupe/ScaifeCutler: SchefflerTJackson: Kleinsasser?Rex: OlsenCampbell: CooleyStep 3, evaluate their role in the offense, and attempt to rank:Campbell: CooleyCutler: SchefflerVY: Troupe/ScaifeSchaub: Owen DanielsRex: OlsenTJackson: Kleinsasser?Losman: Royal? Step 4, compare to ADPCampbell: Cooley: TE7Cutler: Scheffler: TE15 VY: Troupe/Scaife: TE17/TE26Rex: Olsen: TE21Schaub: Owen Daniels: TE16TJackson: Kleinsasser?Losman: Royal? I'll probably target Troupe/Scaife and Olsen.Cooleyjust a gut feeling here that he and Campbell will rise togetherall young QB's would love an option like that.
You forgot Zach Miller. He is paired with a dynamic young QB in JaMarcus Russell. I like his long term upside more than a couple of guys you mentioned.
Troupe is the best value.Which young TE... that are usually in the same ranking tiering... would you want on your dynasty team?
Obviously, we are talking about potential here... not some you would rely on right now - but that you think as the best chance to become your FF stud in the long run...
I am big on Cooley this year. He started terrible last year and still have a solid year, especially after Campbell replaced Brunell. But I can't put him or anyone in this list ahead of Vernon Davis. He is going to be a beast of a TE.Cooley has to be the guy. He is the most likely to out preform his ADP. He has a proven track record. Cooley has not missed a game in 3. He has Finished in the top 5 the last two seasons.
Romo is not a developing QB?When I look for sleeper TEs, this is one thing I look for.A process:Step 1, list the developing QBs and their TE:Losman: Royal? Quinn: KW2Schaub: Owen DanielsVY: Troupe/ScaifeCutler: SchefflerRivers: Gates Croyle: Gonzo Smith: DavisLeinart: Patrick? TJackson: Kleinsasser?Rex: OlsenCampbell: Cooley
What is he thenRomo is not a developing QB?When I look for sleeper TEs, this is one thing I look for.A process:Step 1, list the developing QBs and their TE:Losman: Royal? Quinn: KW2Schaub: Owen DanielsVY: Troupe/ScaifeCutler: SchefflerRivers: Gates Croyle: Gonzo Smith: DavisLeinart: Patrick? TJackson: Kleinsasser?Rex: OlsenCampbell: Cooley
Ask OZ - like I did...What is he thenRomo is not a developing QB?When I look for sleeper TEs, this is one thing I look for.A process:Step 1, list the developing QBs and their TE:Losman: Royal? Quinn: KW2Schaub: Owen DanielsVY: Troupe/ScaifeCutler: SchefflerRivers: Gates Croyle: Gonzo Smith: DavisLeinart: Patrick? TJackson: Kleinsasser?Rex: OlsenCampbell: Cooley
Shhh... You think I'm giving away all my secrets?Romo is not a developing QB?When I look for sleeper TEs, this is one thing I look for.A process:Step 1, list the developing QBs and their TE:Losman: Royal? Quinn: KW2Schaub: Owen DanielsVY: Troupe/ScaifeCutler: SchefflerRivers: Gates Croyle: Gonzo Smith: DavisLeinart: Patrick? TJackson: Kleinsasser?Rex: OlsenCampbell: Cooley
Not a bad process - but it is Shiancoe in MIN.When I look for sleeper TEs, this is one thing I look for.A process:Step 1, list the developing QBs and their TE:Losman: Royal? Quinn: KW2Romo: WittenSchaub: Owen DanielsVY: Troupe/ScaifeCutler: SchefflerRivers: Gates Croyle: Gonzo Smith: DavisLeinart: Patrick? TJackson: Kleinsasser?Rex: OlsenCampbell: CooleyStep 2, take out those with other "safety valves or TEs who are not sleepers:Losman: Royal? Schaub: Owen DanielsVY: Troupe/ScaifeCutler: SchefflerTJackson: Kleinsasser?Rex: OlsenCampbell: CooleyStep 3, evaluate their role in the offense, and attempt to rank:Campbell: CooleyCutler: SchefflerVY: Troupe/ScaifeSchaub: Owen DanielsRex: OlsenTJackson: Kleinsasser?Losman: Royal? Step 4, compare to ADPCampbell: Cooley: TE7Cutler: Scheffler: TE15 VY: Troupe/Scaife: TE17/TE26Rex: Olsen: TE21Schaub: Owen Daniels: TE16TJackson: Kleinsasser?Losman: Royal? I'll probably target Troupe/Scaife and Olsen.Cooleyjust a gut feeling here that he and Campbell will rise togetherall young QB's would love an option like that.