What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Whitlock on Vince Young (1 Viewer)

gianmarco

Footballguy
Whitlock article on Vince Young

I'm going to do my best to avoid turning this into an I-told-you-so column.

But the truth is, I told you before the 2006 draft that Vince Young was primed for NFL failure. He entered the league with an attitude, mindset and supporting cast totally unprepared to survive the pressure, challenge and responsibility that goes along with the most prestigious and difficult job in all of sports.

Did Vince Young never learn how to handle adversity? (Kevin C. Cox / Getty Images)

When I explained all of this in 2006, my naive and misguided critics called me an Uncle Tom. Yeah, they ripped me for attempting to issue a young black kid a warning about what awaited him in The League and the attitude he would need to cope and excel.

Some people foolishly think it's every black media member's job to assist in the mental and emotional crippling of black youth. We're supposed to blow rainbows up the asses of every black athlete who "makes it" and assure him/her that anyone who utters a word of criticism is a jealous bigot or irrational sellout.

So, no, I'm not surprised Vince Young tried to quit in the middle of Sunday's game after throwing a second interception and hearing boos from Titans fans frustrated by his inability to read a defense or throw accurately. I'm not all that shocked that two days later Jeff Fisher called the police and asked them to hunt down his inconsistent quarterback. I'm not surprised the Titans team psychologist is apparently worried that Vince Young is suffering depression.

And I'm really not surprised that Vince Young's mother told The Tennessean that her baby boy needs a little space and a lot of love and support.

The question is, when Young rebounds from his emotional abyss and recovers from his knee injury, what kind of love and support are we going to give him? Are the people who already love Young going to replant their heads in Young's rear end and their hands in his wallet? Or will a few people within Team Vince do the right thing and level with him about what he needs to do to make it in the NFL as a quarterback?

Vince Young, like a lot of young African-American men, desperately needs to hear the truth from the people who love him. Too often we pave the road to failure for black boys by believing the cure for bigotry — and there is still plenty of bigotry in America — is the ability to recognize it in (and blame it for) everything. That cure has more negative side effects than most of the drugs trumpeted by the pharmaceutical companies in television commercials. That cure serves as a convenient crutch, and turns a talent such as Vince Young into a quitter the moment adversity strikes. That cure helped land Michael Vick in jail.

Everyone told Vince Young and Michael Vick the NFL would be easy. They'd revolutionize the QB position with their legs, and they could pop bottles, roll with a posse and pretend to be Jay-Z in their spare time.

It just doesn't work. Not for Young or Vick. Not for Matt Leinart. Not for anyone who wants to star at the position and avoid the boo-birds.

No one revolutionizes the starting quarterback position. The position revolutionizes the person playing it. Just ask Donovan McNabb. He figured it out and changed his game. Over the objection of idiots, McNabb developed his skills as a pocket passer. He concentrated on becoming a student of the game. If he can stay healthy over the next three or four years, McNabb will surpass Warren Moon as the best black quarterback ever to play the game.

Unfortunately, there are still people, especially black people, who don't appreciate McNabb. They think he let "us" down by de-emphasizing his athleticism, and they criticize him for being cozy with his organization the way Peyton Manning is with the Colts and Brady is with the Patriots.

McNabb doesn't get to enjoy the luxury of being a company man the way other franchise QBs in their prime do.

But McNabb has never threatened to quit or asked out of a game because the Philly fans were too rough. McNabb understands that in some instances the scrutiny of a black quarterback might be a tad more intense than that of a white one. He also understands that the best way to combat it isn't whining. It's performance. It's work ethic. It's professionalism.

It's not a coincidence that McNabb comes from a supportive, two-parent household.

I bring that up not to castigate Vince Young and his mother. I don't even know the story of Young's upbringing.

I raise the issue to point out that in modern professional sports — with the astronomical players' salaries — ownership and management examine the upbringing of the athletes and factor that into their decision-making.

Vick's failure, Young's potential failure and the guaranteed money they were given will make ownership more reluctant to anoint another kid from the 'hood a franchise quarterback straight out of college.

It's not about color. It's about fitting the profile of someone who can handle all that goes along with being an NFL quarterback. If I'm an owner, I spend my quarterback dollars on young men who were raised by strong fathers. It wouldn't be an infallible system, but on average I bet I'd hit more winners than if I turned over the leadership of my team to a kid who isn't used to having a strong male authority figure.

As black people, we need to ask ourselves whether we are doing a good job preparing our boys for positions of immense leadership, responsibility and scrutiny.

You are going to get criticized playing quarterback. If your instinct is to dismiss the criticism as racist, maybe you shouldn't play the position. If you are surrounded by people who spend every waking minute telling you that you can do no wrong and that everyone who criticizes you is a bigot, then maybe you shouldn't play quarterback.

The position requires thick skin and genuine self-confidence. If you need four or five male groupies with you at all times, a half million dollars of jewelry around your neck and wrists and a dozen tattoos to feel confident, then maybe you should play wide receiver or start rapping.

The average NFL fan has no idea how much time a franchise spends working on self-esteem issues with a typical player. You think these guys are self-assured. Many of them are not. They self-medicate with booze, drugs, steroids, bling, women and attention-getting stunts such as name changes.

Remember when Terrell Owens' assistant claimed he had 25 million reasons to live? It was an accidental moment of clarity and honesty. Too many players have their whole sense of self-worth tied up in their contracts.

It doesn't take much to crack a man with no real identity, especially if he's grown accustomed to having all of his shortcomings rationalized.
 
I can't say I care much for Whitlock's work. Personally I think the guy is a hack.

He writes his articles seemingly about race to bait someone into reading it. Rambles on about nothing and really only hits on 2-3 paragraphs with a solid point.

That said, I don't agree or disagree with his notion that having a strong male authority figure prepares a person better for a position of "leadership, responsibility and scrutiny".

 
I think it's a great article. I'm sick of the coddling of Vince Young, the depression talk.

Grow up and stop being such a wimp. If you are depressed and want to quit, QUIT. If it's clinical depression, than it's serious and he has no business being a starting QB. But I see no reason to think it's clinical depression.

If it's not, then stop being such a pansy and play football.

 
If the shoe fits....

Young is a average QB, and a headcase. What's wrong with someone pointing that out ?

 
Decent article. He made some solid points. But there's too much hyperbole, it's a bit long-winded for the number of points actually made, and it took too much tweaking to fit McNabb's career trajectory into the box in which he wanted it.

Not bad. Not great. Worth reading, but not life-changing.

 
Don't know anything about WHitlock
He generally makes every event a race issue and ends with a paragraph on how blacks need to improve as peopleHis Sean Taylor article last season was very inappropriate IMO. Hours after the death he was basically saying how Taylor's past had finally caught up to him. :P
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's all over the place with this article, and none of it is very factual, just a lot of assumptions to support his premise. The usual Whitlock nonsense.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Had a great rookie season, thought he had it made ROY, then reality hits. Fans boo, VY is shattered. We must remember he is a competitor and given the support of his teammates will work his way back into playing. I agree that there is much work to do to get his game up to par and I think this break will be good for him. I also like the added competition of having Simms in there. The ball is now in VY's hands to get his job back.

 
Tough crowd here. I don't read Whitlock very much so I wasn't carrying a preconceived notion of him into reading this article, but it made sense to me. Basically, "Dear V.Y., Sack up."

 
Max Power said:
His Sean Taylor article last season was very inappropriate IMO. Hours after the death he was basically saying how Taylor's past had finally caught up to him. :blackdot:
Whitlock isn't dumb. He knows his audience eats that stuff up.
 
He makes a lot of great points:

"As black people, we need to ask ourselves whether we are doing a good job preparing our boys for positions of immense leadership, responsibility and scrutiny.

"If I'm an owner, I spend my quarterback dollars on young men who were raised by strong fathers. It wouldn't be an infallible system, but on average I bet I'd hit more winners than if I turned over the leadership of my team to a kid who isn't used to having a strong male authority figure."

Now I'm not going to throw out demographic stats but these are very true facts for the black community stated by news media, etc. A lot of single moms raising kids with no father/husband help. This is an on going issue and is obvious and sad.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think Witlock is about as honest as they come.

Its about time a block person wrote about the problems of black society. God knows a white writer would be crucified for writing the same article. Whats wrong with calling out the people that need called out?

The dudes bringing to the forefront issues that need addressed. Instead of cutting him up for it why not do the same for your community?

 
I generally shun anything I see from Jason Whitlock and move on, and did for a period of time seeing his name attached to this thread/article.

That being said, he's on the button here. While you can't take anything away from what Vince Young did in the college ranks, I criticized his game all along.

"He can't pass." That's what it all boils down to. He's got talent and God-given ability in other areas, but unless you can pass the football effectively in the NFL you simply won't have success. It's that simple.

I'm not here to knock on Young. This is his third year in the NFL and his technique, mechanics and footwork have not changed. He still makes poor reads, doesn't set his feet, doesn't protect the football, and doesn't display common sense. His maturation has not progressed at all from the first day he took a snap in the NFL. We still see the same Vince Young. Yes, he's a great athlete. Well, so are the defenders he sees every week in the NFL. This is a different level from high school and college. He's been stripped of his "Superman" cape and has to play as Clark Kent now. "The Daily Planet" just doesn't play into his favor, and there are no phone booths for him to duck into any longer.

He just doesn't have it for the NFL. Plain and simple.

ETA: This has absolutely nothing to do with race. I'm so tired of that. Either you can play at the NFL level or you can't.

Ryan Leaf, Tim Couch and Heath Shuler didn't fare all that well either. There are multiple examples.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
One of the things he brings up that I think is interesting is the idea that these athletic QBs were going to revolutionize the position. McNabb became much better when he became more of a pocket passer. Vick couldn't seem to learn to be a QB. Athleticism is a great thing to have, but you still have to read defenses, and be an accurate passer, or it isn't going to matter.

Another point that he brings up is the Leinart, Culter, Young comparison. My point isn't racial, but I do think there is something to the fact that Leinart was on a team with vastly superior talent. Young had good talent. Cutler was getting his brains beat in a lot. Cutler faced a lot of adversity in college. Both Leinart and Young were coddled and had talent often much better than the competition. Cutler had to fight and scrap every week. That certainly helped him in his transition to the NFL.

 
One of the things he brings up that I think is interesting is the idea that these athletic QBs were going to revolutionize the position. McNabb became much better when he became more of a pocket passer. Vick couldn't seem to learn to be a QB. Athleticism is a great thing to have, but you still have to read defenses, and be an accurate passer, or it isn't going to matter.Another point that he brings up is the Leinart, Culter, Young comparison. My point isn't racial, but I do think there is something to the fact that Leinart was on a team with vastly superior talent. Young had good talent. Cutler was getting his brains beat in a lot. Cutler faced a lot of adversity in college. Both Leinart and Young were coddled and had talent often much better than the competition. Cutler had to fight and scrap every week. That certainly helped him in his transition to the NFL.
You are so on the money here. I don't know how many games you or anybody else saw of Cutler at Vanderbilt, but that guy had to fight for his life every week with very little, if any, talent around him. He took a beating and kept on fighting. Very "Rocky" like in some weeks. He just kept coming and never gave up. He's tough both mentally and physically. Something Leinart and Young lack. They came from different schools in more ways than one.
 
Generally I agree with a lot of the knocks on Whitlock posted above. He tries to make everything about race. That said, I agree with many of the points he makes in this article.However, this stood out as odd to me...he mentions Leinart in the same breath as Young and then says...

As black people, we need to ask ourselves whether we are doing a good job preparing our boys for positions of immense leadership, responsibility and scrutiny.
I'm just a plain ol' straight up whitey, & I have to ask myself if I'm doing a good enough job of preparing my 2 boys every single day. While I see where he's going with that remark, the problem he's referring to isn't wholly race-specific. Most children these days are coddled or otherwise lack preparation on many different levels.How about...
As parents, we need to ask ourselves whether we are doing a good job preparing our children for positions of immense leadership, responsibility and scrutiny
I wonder if he made the same prediction about all the other guys in the league who were raised up by their mamas.He also comes up with...
If your instinct is to dismiss the criticism as racist, maybe you shouldn't play the position.
. To whom is he referring here?This was also strange...
If you need four or five male groupies with you at all times, a half million dollars of jewelry around your neck and wrists and a dozen tattoos to feel confident, then maybe you should play wide receiver or start rapping.
So it's ok for WRs to "keep it hood"? Wow. That's just a blatantly weird double standard.I think the guy makes a lot of good points, but people would take him a lot more seriously if he wouldn't mix in so many idiotic points. Maybe they're his own form of "attention-getting stunts".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think what he's getting at THS is that being the leader of a team at the elite level of, well...anything demands a confidence and resolve in the midst of adversity. It is a wierd double-standard, but it's accurate. QB's are the leader. They're held to a different standard. Not that I'm saying that's right.

 
I think what he's getting at THS is that being the leader of a team at the elite level of, well...anything demands a confidence and resolve in the midst of adversity. It is a wierd double-standard, but it's accurate. QB's are the leader. They're held to a different standard. Not that I'm saying that's right.
Oh yeah, I understand that, but it's almost like he's selling the idea of a squeaky clean standard for the qb and an acceptable gangsta standard for the wr.
 
I think what he's getting at THS is that being the leader of a team at the elite level of, well...anything demands a confidence and resolve in the midst of adversity. It is a wierd double-standard, but it's accurate. QB's are the leader. They're held to a different standard. Not that I'm saying that's right.
Oh yeah, I understand that, but it's almost like he's selling the idea of a squeaky clean standard for the qb and an acceptable gangsta standard for the wr.
I think hes being sarcastic and antagonistic to make a point
 
The QB should be held to a different standard.

Ernie Accorsi, in his book 'The GM', said something to the effect that you have to evaluate QB's different than any other position. Essentially, they are playing a different sport.

When you think about the great QB's in the history of this game; how many were supremely talented from a physical standpoint? Elway? Favre? Who else...? What set them apart was their grasp of the game, the ability to execute, and how they were able to lead men. Physical talent is just another check box...and it's not at the top.

Point being - Whitlock talks about evaluating the upbringing of a prospect, and the fact is, if you are going to invest $72M in a top tier prospect at QB like what the Falcons did with Ryan...you almost have to evalate his life up until then... not just his talent or football skills. Some of the red flags may not even be the fault of the prospect you are evaluating, but it still needs to be taken into consideration.

 
I think what he's getting at THS is that being the leader of a team at the elite level of, well...anything demands a confidence and resolve in the midst of adversity. It is a wierd double-standard, but it's accurate. QB's are the leader. They're held to a different standard. Not that I'm saying that's right.
Oh yeah, I understand that, but it's almost like he's selling the idea of a squeaky clean standard for the qb and an acceptable gangsta standard for the wr.
I think hes being sarcastic and antagonistic to make a point
Eh, you're probably right.
 
Were there really critics of McNabb developing more into a pocket passer? I don't remember any of those discussions.

While I enjoyed the article, Whitlock is short on evidence that Vince is surrounded by the type of support system that does more harm than good.

 
Were there really critics of McNabb developing more into a pocket passer? I don't remember any of those discussions.While I enjoyed the article, Whitlock is short on evidence that Vince is surrounded by the type of support system that does more harm than good.
Yes there were critics. I believe the NAACP was one.edit to paste article.Local NAACP head stands by criticism of McNabbPHILADELPHIA (AP) — Donovan McNabb is still taking shots — the latest from an NAACP leader who criticized the quarterback's leadership skills and said he "played the race card" in explaining why he no longer runs the ball. J. Whyatt Mondesire, who publishes a newspaper for blacks and is the president of the Philadelphia branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, recently wrote that the Eagles' star quarterback failed as a team leader and choked in the Super Bowl. McNabb responded sharply, but Mondesire hasn't changed his stance. "He doesn't get it," Mondesire said Wednesday. "If he got it, I wouldn't have written the article." Mondesire, publisher of the Philadelphia Sunday Sun, criticized McNabb in a column in his newspaper on Dec. 4. He wrote that McNabb's tendency to run the ball early in his career "not only confused defenses, it also thrilled Eagles fans," but that abandoning that element "by claiming that 'everybody expects black quarterbacks to scramble' not only amounts to a breach of faith but also belittles the real struggles of black athletes who've had to overcome real racial stereotypcasting in addition to downright segregation." Mondesire said the bottom line is that McNabb is "not that good." "In essence Donny, you are mediocre at best," Mondesire wrote. "And trying to disguise that fact behind some concocted reasoning that African American quarterbacks who can scramble and who can run the ball are somehow lesser field generals ... is more insulting off the field than on." McNabb was stunned by Mondesire's comments. "Obviously, if it's someone else who is not African American, it's racism," McNabb told reporters attending his annual holiday party last Saturday. "But when someone of the same race talks about you because you're selling out because you're not running the ball, it goes back to, 'What are we really talking about here?' "If you talk about my play, that's one thing. When you talk about my race, now we've got problems. If you're trying to make a name off my name, again, I hope your closet is clean because something is going to come out about you ... I always thought the NAACP supported African Americans and didn't talk bad about them. Now you learn a little bit more." McNabb's season ended last month when he decided to have surgery for a sports hernia. It's been a miserable year for the five-time Pro Bowl selection, starting with his feud with now-banished wideout Terrell Owens. Mondesire wrote that McNabb shared the blame for Owens' departure. "Finally, your failure as a team leader off the field to my mind did as much as anything to exacerbate the debacle that has become synonymous with T.O.'s full name." Mondesire said the article expressed his opinion of McNabb, not the view of the NAACP. When Rush Limbaugh said on ESPN two years ago that McNabb is overrated because the media wanted to see a black quarterback succeed, the NAACP criticized the conservative commentator and called on him to quit. Limbaugh resigned from ESPN three days later. Mondesire said McNabb's agent, Fletcher Smith, called him after the story appeared. He returned the call twice, but hasn't spoken to McNabb. McNabb had a strong start this season, throwing for 1,333 yards and 11 touchdowns while leading the Eagles to a 3-1 record. But he was bothered by injuries and struggled over the next several games before going on injured reserve. McNabb clearly wasn't the same quarterback who led the Eagles to the NFC championship game the last four years. He threw a costly interception in the fourth quarter in each of his last three games, and had nine picks this season. Overall, McNabb passed for 2,507 yards, 16 TDs and had a passer rating of 85.0 this season. McNabb was reluctant to leave the pocket this year. He had just 55 yards rushing on 25 carries, including several kneel-downs. McNabb's problems with Owens dominated the headlines most of the year. Their issues began when Owens dissed McNabb after the Eagles lost to New England in the Super Bowl last February. The two didn't speak for a prolonged period, but performed well on the field together. Owens was suspended last month for a series of infractions and critical public comments about McNabb and the organization, dating back to his offseason demands for a new contract. An arbitrator later upheld the Eagles' decision to deactivate him for the remainder of the season. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Were there really critics of McNabb developing more into a pocket passer? I don't remember any of those discussions.

While I enjoyed the article, Whitlock is short on evidence that Vince is surrounded by the type of support system that does more harm than good.
Yes there were critics. I believe the NAACP was one.edit to paste article.

Local NAACP head stands by criticism of McNabb

PHILADELPHIA (AP) — Donovan McNabb is still taking shots — the latest from an NAACP leader who criticized the quarterback's leadership skills and said he "played the race card" in explaining why he no longer runs the ball.

J. Whyatt Mondesire, who publishes a newspaper for blacks and is the president of the Philadelphia branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, recently wrote that the Eagles' star quarterback failed as a team leader and choked in the Super Bowl.

McNabb responded sharply, but Mondesire hasn't changed his stance.

"He doesn't get it," Mondesire said Wednesday. "If he got it, I wouldn't have written the article."

Mondesire, publisher of the Philadelphia Sunday Sun, criticized McNabb in a column in his newspaper on Dec. 4.

He wrote that McNabb's tendency to run the ball early in his career "not only confused defenses, it also thrilled Eagles fans," but that abandoning that element "by claiming that 'everybody expects black quarterbacks to scramble' not only amounts to a breach of faith but also belittles the real struggles of black athletes who've had to overcome real racial stereotypcasting in addition to downright segregation."

Mondesire said the bottom line is that McNabb is "not that good."

"In essence Donny, you are mediocre at best," Mondesire wrote. "And trying to disguise that fact behind some concocted reasoning that African American quarterbacks who can scramble and who can run the ball are somehow lesser field generals ... is more insulting off the field than on."

McNabb was stunned by Mondesire's comments.

"Obviously, if it's someone else who is not African American, it's racism," McNabb told reporters attending his annual holiday party last Saturday. "But when someone of the same race talks about you because you're selling out because you're not running the ball, it goes back to, 'What are we really talking about here?'

"If you talk about my play, that's one thing. When you talk about my race, now we've got problems. If you're trying to make a name off my name, again, I hope your closet is clean because something is going to come out about you ... I always thought the NAACP supported African Americans and didn't talk bad about them. Now you learn a little bit more."

McNabb's season ended last month when he decided to have surgery for a sports hernia. It's been a miserable year for the five-time Pro Bowl selection, starting with his feud with now-banished wideout Terrell Owens.

Mondesire wrote that McNabb shared the blame for Owens' departure.

"Finally, your failure as a team leader off the field to my mind did as much as anything to exacerbate the debacle that has become synonymous with T.O.'s full name."

Mondesire said the article expressed his opinion of McNabb, not the view of the NAACP. When Rush Limbaugh said on ESPN two years ago that McNabb is overrated because the media wanted to see a black quarterback succeed, the NAACP criticized the conservative commentator and called on him to quit. Limbaugh resigned from ESPN three days later.

Mondesire said McNabb's agent, Fletcher Smith, called him after the story appeared. He returned the call twice, but hasn't spoken to McNabb.

McNabb had a strong start this season, throwing for 1,333 yards and 11 touchdowns while leading the Eagles to a 3-1 record. But he was bothered by injuries and struggled over the next several games before going on injured reserve.

McNabb clearly wasn't the same quarterback who led the Eagles to the NFC championship game the last four years. He threw a costly interception in the fourth quarter in each of his last three games, and had nine picks this season.

Overall, McNabb passed for 2,507 yards, 16 TDs and had a passer rating of 85.0 this season. McNabb was reluctant to leave the pocket this year. He had just 55 yards rushing on 25 carries, including several kneel-downs.

McNabb's problems with Owens dominated the headlines most of the year. Their issues began when Owens dissed McNabb after the Eagles lost to New England in the Super Bowl last February. The two didn't speak for a prolonged period, but performed well on the field together.

Owens was suspended last month for a series of infractions and critical public comments about McNabb and the organization, dating back to his offseason demands for a new contract. An arbitrator later upheld the Eagles' decision to deactivate him for the remainder of the season.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Oh, my. Criticizing McNabb for his play in the Super Bowl is fair play. And one could even argue in good faith, though I wouldn't agree with it, that he could have exerted better leadership in the TO drama. But connecting his quarterbacking change of style with the cause of racial progress is out there, man.
 
This article is filled with a lot of truth. One thing that I have noticed is that most people, (and by most I mean 95%) can’t handle, won’t listen too, and have no desire for truth. Truth, in and of itself, is not always friendly. Often times it is very bitter. People have an amazing proclivity to totally dismiss truth if it doesn’t line up with their predigested, preconceived opinion.

This man made some very stinging and relevant observations about athletes, and they deserve a lot more thought than some of the comments give thus so far. Some dismiss the writer as a “jackass”, and a “hack” without even addressing the points that Whitlock makes. Try looking at some of Whitlock’s points and dealing with them, instead of immediately dismissing them. And reread that last line again: “It doesn't take much to crack a man with no real identity, especially if he's grown accustomed to having all of his shortcomings rationalized.” There’s a lot of truth there.

The gist of Whitlock’s article is that Vince Young needs to hear the truth. He sucks. That’s what he needs to be told. And if it causes him to quit football then so be it. It’s only a game. He still has the rest of his life after football to deal with. And if he can’t handle truth (in the form of criticism) he’ll be crippled for life.

 
Good article. I often think of Magic Johnson and Michael Jordan on how big a role their fathers played by being involved in their life.

 
Anyone who thinks there is anything wrong with even one word in this article is part of the problem. Spot on, Mr. Whitlock.
+1
:wub: :yes: :yes:
I'll read it again and report back, maybe it went over my head.The article has a point, but as I originally stated it is also chock full of conjecture (and as others have mentioned hyperbole) in relating it to Young. To say not one word of it is wrong is wrong.
"I don't even know the story of Young's upbringing"
You just can't write a line like this yet have such a hardline stance on why Vince Young is in the position he is in right now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This article is filled with a lot of truth. One thing that I have noticed is that most people, (and by most I mean 95%) can’t handle, won’t listen too, and have no desire for truth. Truth, in and of itself, is not always friendly. Often times it is very bitter. People have an amazing proclivity to totally dismiss truth if it doesn’t line up with their predigested, preconceived opinion. This man made some very stinging and relevant observations about athletes, and they deserve a lot more thought than some of the comments give thus so far. Some dismiss the writer as a “jackass”, and a “hack” without even addressing the points that Whitlock makes. Try looking at some of Whitlock’s points and dealing with them, instead of immediately dismissing them. And reread that last line again: “It doesn't take much to crack a man with no real identity, especially if he's grown accustomed to having all of his shortcomings rationalized.” There’s a lot of truth there.The gist of Whitlock’s article is that Vince Young needs to hear the truth. He sucks. That’s what he needs to be told. And if it causes him to quit football then so be it. It’s only a game. He still has the rest of his life after football to deal with. And if he can’t handle truth (in the form of criticism) he’ll be crippled for life.
I don't think Whitlock is a hack because of the points he brings up. It's how he goes about it. His points are generally so/so IMO. He hits on some and misses on some. He takes an issue and brings it to light through a controversial way (which I understand helps him sell his work). A good journalist doesn't need a gimmick to sell his work. Race could have been left out of this entire article and his main point would still be the same. Many QB's before and many QB's after Young will go through the same things. As an earlier poster mentioned, Leinhart was a star before he was even in the NFL. Being knocked down a notch can't be easy on him either. I also think he assumes an awful lot in this article. Is he implying Mack Brown is easy on all his players? Or just black QBs? He knows nothing about Vince personally, but can obviously tell that he is lacking a strong male figure in his life...And what was the point of bringing McNabb into this again?That said, the article does bring up some interesting points. However, Whitlock is still a hack. If someone started a Peyton Manning article by saying he has been so successful in the NFL because he is white, from a good background, student of the game, and so on... The article is now relevent because the race card was played.
 
I think there's a good chance Young doesn't suffer from depression, but is just a spoiled brat that can't handle adversity, and isn't willing to put in the work to improve his game.

 
This article is filled with a lot of truth. One thing that I have noticed is that most people, (and by most I mean 95%) can’t handle, won’t listen too, and have no desire for truth. Truth, in and of itself, is not always friendly. Often times it is very bitter. People have an amazing proclivity to totally dismiss truth if it doesn’t line up with their predigested, preconceived opinion. This man made some very stinging and relevant observations about athletes, and they deserve a lot more thought than some of the comments give thus so far. Some dismiss the writer as a “jackass”, and a “hack” without even addressing the points that Whitlock makes. Try looking at some of Whitlock’s points and dealing with them, instead of immediately dismissing them. And reread that last line again: “It doesn't take much to crack a man with no real identity, especially if he's grown accustomed to having all of his shortcomings rationalized.” There’s a lot of truth there.The gist of Whitlock’s article is that Vince Young needs to hear the truth. He sucks. That’s what he needs to be told. And if it causes him to quit football then so be it. It’s only a game. He still has the rest of his life after football to deal with. And if he can’t handle truth (in the form of criticism) he’ll be crippled for life.
I don't think Whitlock is a hack because of the points he brings up. It's how he goes about it. His points are generally so/so IMO. He hits on some and misses on some. He takes an issue and brings it to light through a controversial way (which I understand helps him sell his work). A good journalist doesn't need a gimmick to sell his work. Race could have been left out of this entire article and his main point would still be the same. Many QB's before and many QB's after Young will go through the same things. As an earlier poster mentioned, Leinhart was a star before he was even in the NFL. Being knocked down a notch can't be easy on him either. I also think he assumes an awful lot in this article. Is he implying Mack Brown is easy on all his players? Or just black QBs? He knows nothing about Vince personally, but can obviously tell that he is lacking a strong male figure in his life...And what was the point of bringing McNabb into this again?That said, the article does bring up some interesting points. However, Whitlock is still a hack. If someone started a Peyton Manning article by saying he has been so successful in the NFL because he is white, from a good background, student of the game, and so on... The article is now relevent because the race card was played.
First - You say gimmick. I say writing style. Second - The only way race would have been left out of the arguement is if it had been written by a white person. In which case it would have been left out because white people are not allowed to write about anything a black person is "going through." White people will never be able to relate to how a black person lives their life. Thus the expectations should be as different as the circumstances. (Or not)Third - Leinart is not publicly quitting on his team. His mother has not made any statements to any media outles requesting love and support. She hasn't asked that anyone be "prayerful" either. Fourth - What would you like him to do so that he is not assuming? He's applying experience and thought to add - I'm assuming - insight to a situation. Of course he's assuming. Young's working with a shrink, he's assuming a lot himself these days. Fifth - He knows that Vince is a young black man (which I'm assuming Mr. Whitlock was once - there's that word again) who cannot handle the pressure he is currently under and he is fading mentally into a place that is not conducive to being an elite quarterback. Sixth - McNabb IS an elite NFL quarterback. A black, elite NFL quarterback. A black, elite NFL quarterback who plays in a much tougher media city than Nashville. While McNabb has his detractors, he's handled himself pretty well and has NEVER publicly quit on his team.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top