From the other tread about the trade... Personally, I think Furrey will take over the starting spot with McD will remain the WR3/slot.Whether you want to pickup Furrey is a different matter altogetherI remember reading the same thing. I think Furrey is the guy to target here if you want the WR2 in Detroit.I remembered reading earlier this season that McDonald was the de facto WR3 on the team but that if either starter went down with injury it'd be Furrey that would stand to gain the most as they'd prefer to keep McDonald in that WR3/slot position. I'll see if I can find it.Who is the pickup in Detroit?WR: Calvin Johnson (inj), Roy Williams, Shaun McDonald (PR), Mike Furrey, Brandon Middleton (KR), Reggie Ball (IR)MIke Furrey or Shaun McDonald?
1. Calvin Johnson2. Calvin Johnson3. Mike Furrey4. Shaun McDonaldDid I mention that Calvin Johnson benefits from this trade?Who benefits in Detroit, McDonald, Furrey ??
exactly. Calvin doesn't have a problem catching the ball in coverage. He can out muscle and out jump any CB or DB in the league. Only thing that stops Megatron is a QB who's dumb enough to throw it elsewhere. Get ready for 20 targets a game people!!!1. Calvin Johnson2. Calvin Johnson3. Mike Furrey4. Shaun McDonaldDid I mention that Calvin Johnson benefits from this trade?Who benefits in Detroit, McDonald, Furrey ??
I sure hope you're right.. This can't hurt that's for sure..exactly. Calvin doesn't have a problem catching the ball in coverage. He can out muscle and out jump any CB or DB in the league. Only thing that stops Megatron is a QB who's dumb enough to throw it elsewhere. Get ready for 20 targets a game people!!!1. Calvin Johnson2. Calvin Johnson3. Mike Furrey4. Shaun McDonaldDid I mention that Calvin Johnson benefits from this trade?Who benefits in Detroit, McDonald, Furrey ??![]()
![]()
I'm shocked it took 6 replies before this came up.Michael Crabtree - WR Texas Tech
I'm shocked it took 6 replies before this came up.Michael Crabtree - WR Texas Tech![]()
Didn't Furrey catch 100+ balls a year ago? I think it's a pretty easy answer.I believe the poster's choices were Furrey or McDonald. For those of us who could roster just one of these guys, which one is the better choice?
He did that a year before McDonald arrived.Last year McDonald had more receptions and yards then Furrey.Didn't Furrey catch 100+ balls a year ago?I believe the poster's choices were Furrey or McDonald. For those of us who could roster just one of these guys, which one is the better choice?
Had some 700+ people on the board a bit ago.Paging FBG staffers to the red courtesy phone.
AGREED.Had some 700+ people on the board a bit ago.Paging FBG staffers to the red courtesy phone.
I believe McDonald has been above Furrey on the depth chart in both Detroit and when they were together on the Rams.He did that a year before McDonald arrived.Last year McDonald had more receptions and yards then Furrey.Didn't Furrey catch 100+ balls a year ago?I believe the poster's choices were Furrey or McDonald. For those of us who could roster just one of these guys, which one is the better choice?
With Orlovsky checking down all the time on blitzes, I have to think that the guy in the slot will benefit more than the #2WR. As if orlovsky has time to throw it's prolly going to Megatron, no?duece2626 said:Furrey will be the #2 WR, McDonald will be the #3 slot WR.
October 15, 2008, 14:19Lions:: WRLions Will Start WR McDonald Opposite WR JohnsonDetroitLions.com- [Full Article]The Detroit Lions have moved WR Shaun McDonald into the starting lineup to replace the departed Roy Williams. Mike Furrey is listed as the backup to Calvin Johnson.
But it appears that the real answer is: nobody really knows.
Paging FBG staffers to the red courtesy phone.
PER Rotoworld:
Mike Furrey took all the snaps for Detroit in the Lions' two receiver sets last week after Calvin Johnson got dinged up.
We posted an item earlier today that Shaun McDonald was listed as a starter on the team's website. But based on last week's usage, Furrey is more likely to be Detroit's new starter. Shaun McDonald was used in the slot late in the game and appeared behind Furrey on the depth chart throughout the contest.
But it appears that the real answer is: nobody really knows.
I don't know either, but it's only Wednesday. I'm sure we'll learn more as the week progresses and practice reports start coming in. I'll be on the blogger the next two mornings plus Sunday morning, so I will definitely be looking for the status of this issue. You can be sure I will post anything I can find.From what I have gathered thus far, and after reading this entire post before posting, I'm thinking McDonald.But it appears that the real answer is: nobody really knows.
Paging FBG staffers to the red courtesy phone.
Thanks Andy.I was looking for opinions and feedback. It didnt have to be rock solid insider knowledge.I don't know either, but it's only Wednesday. I'm sure we'll learn more as the week progresses and practice reports start coming in. I'll be on the blogger the next two mornings plus Sunday morning, so I will definitely be looking for the status of this issue. You can be sure I will post anything I can find.From what I have gathered thus far, and after reading this entire post before posting, I'm thinking McDonald.But it appears that the real answer is: nobody really knows.
Paging FBG staffers to the red courtesy phone.
Matt Millen is gone, not sure if you heardMichael Crabtree - WR Texas Tech
I hear ya. Here's my problem with this-Dan Orlovsky is taking over at QB. The running game is in question, at best. The offensive line is poor. What would draw anybody to McDonald or Furrey right now?Thanks Andy.I was looking for opinions and feedback. It didnt have to be rock solid insider knowledge.I don't know either, but it's only Wednesday. I'm sure we'll learn more as the week progresses and practice reports start coming in. I'll be on the blogger the next two mornings plus Sunday morning, so I will definitely be looking for the status of this issue. You can be sure I will post anything I can find.From what I have gathered thus far, and after reading this entire post before posting, I'm thinking McDonald.But it appears that the real answer is: nobody really knows.
Paging FBG staffers to the red courtesy phone.
Just impressions and feelings. Many FA hit tuesday. Many more are wed. many more are thurs.
This may be the biggest news of the fantasy FA season up to this point... and ...![]()
Furrey is the guy to own, bank on it.Personally I think Shaun McDonald will be the guy to get more action.
1. Rod Marinelli was there last year when Shaun led the team in targets, recs, receiving yards and receiving TDs
2. McDonald is a great short yardage WR, which is perfect for an inexperienced QB like Orlavsky. Think Flacco to Mason, but with less targets
3. McDonald >> Furrey
4. So says the depth chart
They have a need for a wrMatt Millen is gone, not sure if you heardMichael Crabtree - WR Texas Tech
They have greater needs at other positions.They have a need for a wrMatt Millen is gone, not sure if you heardMichael Crabtree - WR Texas Tech![]()
ok I did... hope you are right.Hoss_Cartwright said:Furrey is the guy to own, bank on it.Jeff Haseley said:Personally I think Shaun McDonald will be the guy to get more action.
1. Rod Marinelli was there last year when Shaun led the team in targets, recs, receiving yards and receiving TDs
2. McDonald is a great short yardage WR, which is perfect for an inexperienced QB like Orlavsky. Think Flacco to Mason, but with less targets
3. McDonald >> Furrey
4. So says the depth chart
unless your in a 16 teamer... are u really going to play either one? I'm in a 16 teamer and found Furrey was left over, picked him but I doubt I play him.ok I did... hope you are right.Hoss_Cartwright said:Furrey is the guy to own, bank on it.Jeff Haseley said:Personally I think Shaun McDonald will be the guy to get more action.
1. Rod Marinelli was there last year when Shaun led the team in targets, recs, receiving yards and receiving TDs
2. McDonald is a great short yardage WR, which is perfect for an inexperienced QB like Orlavsky. Think Flacco to Mason, but with less targets
3. McDonald >> Furrey
4. So says the depth chart
Garbage time scoring. The Lions are going to be down by 20+ points in the 4th quarter a lot this year. Once the opposing team brings in their third stringers to close out the game and the Lions are passing every down, there will be a decent number of catches available.Andy Herron said:I hear ya. Here's my problem with this-Dan Orlovsky is taking over at QB. The running game is in question, at best. The offensive line is poor. What would draw anybody to McDonald or Furrey right now?BigSteelThrill said:Thanks Andy.I was looking for opinions and feedback. It didnt have to be rock solid insider knowledge.I don't know either, but it's only Wednesday. I'm sure we'll learn more as the week progresses and practice reports start coming in. I'll be on the blogger the next two mornings plus Sunday morning, so I will definitely be looking for the status of this issue. You can be sure I will post anything I can find.From what I have gathered thus far, and after reading this entire post before posting, I'm thinking McDonald.But it appears that the real answer is: nobody really knows.
Paging FBG staffers to the red courtesy phone.
Just impressions and feelings. Many FA hit tuesday. Many more are wed. many more are thurs.
This may be the biggest news of the fantasy FA season up to this point... and ...![]()
There are better options out there.
Lets see - Colston, Boldin and Crayton are players I own. So yea I might have to.unless your in a 16 teamer... are u really going to play either one? I'm in a 16 teamer and found Furrey was left over, picked him but I doubt I play him.ok I did... hope you are right.Hoss_Cartwright said:Furrey is the guy to own, bank on it.Jeff Haseley said:Personally I think Shaun McDonald will be the guy to get more action.
1. Rod Marinelli was there last year when Shaun led the team in targets, recs, receiving yards and receiving TDs
2. McDonald is a great short yardage WR, which is perfect for an inexperienced QB like Orlavsky. Think Flacco to Mason, but with less targets
3. McDonald >> Furrey
4. So says the depth chart
There has been nothing official about who will start, but most around here think it will be McDonald.any news from DET today?
I'm floored by that. I'll say it's 3:1 in favor of Furrey.There has been nothing official about who will start, but most around here think it will be McDonald.any news from DET today?