I agree.Hartline had his best ever season with 4 TDs last year after having the previous three seasons of 1 each. 5 years and 9 TDs is not a go to WR. With a new OC that moves Wallace around it seems Wallace is without question the guy to own, a very few think differently according to the poll.Should be a landslide
Some people like to overthink things.I agree.Hartline had his best ever season with 4 TDs last year after having the previous three seasons of 1 each. 5 years and 9 TDs is not a go to WR. With a new OC that moves Wallace around it seems Wallace is without question the guy to own, a very few think differently according to the poll.Should be a landslide
You totally read the question wrong, the question was #1 WR in Miami.Highly doubtful anyone in Mia puts up WR1 numbers. Imo, Wallace could get borderline 2 numbers but will be boom or bust game to game
In a 12 team league, by definition there will only be 12 WRs putting up WR1 numbers - I think most people have Wallace ranked outside the top 12 WRs so I don't think it's a revolutionary position to take that he's not a WR1. The thing is we all need to fill out our rosters with WR2s, WR3s etc. - the pendulum has swung on Wallace making him a great value pick.No, i read it right. From answers above it looked as tho the majority think Wallace is the guy there. My point was more to his fantasy relevance, and the fact that, while he is 'the guy' there, it doesnt mean the same thing as being the guy somewhere else.
You should take Mike Wallace out of the poll & ask who the next guy is going to be.
Wallace's ADP is WR31 and Hartline's is WR59.In a 12 team league, by definition there will only be 12 WRs putting up WR1 numbers - I think most people have Wallace ranked outside the top 12 WRs so I don't think it's a revolutionary position to take that he's not a WR1. The thing is we all need to fill out our rosters with WR2s, WR3s etc. - the pendulum has swung on Wallace making him a great value pick.No, i read it right. From answers above it looked as tho the majority think Wallace is the guy there. My point was more to his fantasy relevance, and the fact that, while he is 'the guy' there, it doesnt mean the same thing as being the guy somewhere else.
That is debateable, and it wasn't the question.You should take Mike Wallace out of the poll & ask who the next guy is going to be.Wallace's ADP is WR31 and Hartline's is WR59.In a 12 team league, by definition there will only be 12 WRs putting up WR1 numbers - I think most people have Wallace ranked outside the top 12 WRs so I don't think it's a revolutionary position to take that he's not a WR1. The thing is we all need to fill out our rosters with WR2s, WR3s etc. - the pendulum has swung on Wallace making him a great value pick.No, i read it right. From answers above it looked as tho the majority think Wallace is the guy there. My point was more to his fantasy relevance, and the fact that, while he is 'the guy' there, it doesnt mean the same thing as being the guy somewhere else.
Hartline is far more likely to out-perform his ADP than Wallace.
Sign me up for both at those prices.You should take Mike Wallace out of the poll & ask who the next guy is going to be.Wallace's ADP is WR31 and Hartline's is WR59.In a 12 team league, by definition there will only be 12 WRs putting up WR1 numbers - I think most people have Wallace ranked outside the top 12 WRs so I don't think it's a revolutionary position to take that he's not a WR1. The thing is we all need to fill out our rosters with WR2s, WR3s etc. - the pendulum has swung on Wallace making him a great value pick.No, i read it right. From answers above it looked as tho the majority think Wallace is the guy there. My point was more to his fantasy relevance, and the fact that, while he is 'the guy' there, it doesnt mean the same thing as being the guy somewhere else.
Hartline is far more likely to out-perform his ADP than Wallace.
The question is ambiguous, and the first part of it does indeed imply that this is the question:That is debateable, and it wasn't the question.You should take Mike Wallace out of the poll & ask who the next guy is going to be.Wallace's ADP is WR31 and Hartline's is WR59.In a 12 team league, by definition there will only be 12 WRs putting up WR1 numbers - I think most people have Wallace ranked outside the top 12 WRs so I don't think it's a revolutionary position to take that he's not a WR1. The thing is we all need to fill out our rosters with WR2s, WR3s etc. - the pendulum has swung on Wallace making him a great value pick.No, i read it right. From answers above it looked as tho the majority think Wallace is the guy there. My point was more to his fantasy relevance, and the fact that, while he is 'the guy' there, it doesnt mean the same thing as being the guy somewhere else.
Hartline is far more likely to out-perform his ADP than Wallace.
okThe question is ambiguous, and the first part of it does indeed imply that this is the question:That is debateable, and it wasn't the question.You should take Mike Wallace out of the poll & ask who the next guy is going to be.Wallace's ADP is WR31 and Hartline's is WR59.In a 12 team league, by definition there will only be 12 WRs putting up WR1 numbers - I think most people have Wallace ranked outside the top 12 WRs so I don't think it's a revolutionary position to take that he's not a WR1. The thing is we all need to fill out our rosters with WR2s, WR3s etc. - the pendulum has swung on Wallace making him a great value pick.No, i read it right. From answers above it looked as tho the majority think Wallace is the guy there. My point was more to his fantasy relevance, and the fact that, while he is 'the guy' there, it doesnt mean the same thing as being the guy somewhere else.
Hartline is far more likely to out-perform his ADP than Wallace.
Who is the best WR to own
I'm confused...didn't you start this thread/poll?Wallace should be a Top 20 WR based on opportunity and lack of other options alone. During the draft you are looking for safe production with tons of opportunity and a high ceiling. Wallace is that guy at WR3 value.
The guy who was swearing up and down and insisting Hartline is a better WR to own in Miami has been nowhere in this thread yet he visits here often.
Would love for him to lay out his story here since it was his idea to ask FBG about this. He is obsessed with starting polls to get others thoughts, especially on this site.
My assumptions this would be an embarrassing landslide are true and that is what is keeping him from posting.
Yes, but he wanted me to start this poll for thoughts since he loves polls. Sorry for confusion. I dont blame Rolling_akg for not wanting to put his face behind his Hartline thoughts.I'm confused...didn't you start this thread/poll?Wallace should be a Top 20 WR based on opportunity and lack of other options alone. During the draft you are looking for safe production with tons of opportunity and a high ceiling. Wallace is that guy at WR3 value.
The guy who was swearing up and down and insisting Hartline is a better WR to own in Miami has been nowhere in this thread yet he visits here often.
Would love for him to lay out his story here since it was his idea to ask FBG about this. He is obsessed with starting polls to get others thoughts, especially on this site.
My assumptions this would be an embarrassing landslide are true and that is what is keeping him from posting.
I think Clay will be #2 or 3 in targets on the team. For TEs overall he was the 7th most targeted TE from what I recall.so if Wallace and Hartine are 1-2 then who is 3 in terms of targets? Clay, Sims, or a slot?
Lazor doesn't need to bring Kelly as much as just avoid being as pitiful as Sherman at playcalling. It was very predictable. Add in the OL improvement and I am a buyer on Wallace at his ADP.SaintsInDome2006 said:Voted Wallace. I have no idea if Lazor can do what Kelly did in Philly, but if he does bring some semblance of the "Philly offense" to MIA my guess is that Wallace is DJax. Hartline certainly has deep speed but Foles thrived on finding DJax deep and in those wide open spaces. Maybe Hartline is the Cooper there. Or is it the other way around?
For 2013, it was the following:Phenix said:I think Clay will be #2 or 3 in targets on the team. For TEs overall he was the 7th most targeted TE from what I recall.saintfool said:so if Wallace and Hartine are 1-2 then who is 3 in terms of targets? Clay, Sims, or a slot?
Don't disagree with this at all. If price isn't taken into account, I'd prefer Wallace pretty easily. But Hartline is a hugely safe bet to just absolutely CRUSH his ADP in terms of value. Wallace in the 7th as a WR3 vs Hartline in the 15th as a WR6 (per MFL early ADP)? Give me both, actually, but Hartline is more of a no brainer IMO.I understand that people are jumping on Hartline as a value play because he is finishing top 24, had a bunch of targets, etc... at the end of the year. I mean, you have to acknowledge that he has been super consistent and put up almost an identical stat line 2 years in a row with TDs jumping from 1 to 4.
2012: 74/1083/1
2013: 76/1016/4
I get it, he is safe and CHEAP.
But how can you say Hartline is the one to own, when Wallace, who put up a very similar stat line is being thrown around in forums like he is worthless and people all off-season saying to take what you can get for him after his disappointing season?
By the way, that disappointing season consisted of 73/930/5
One did what he does and finished WR24, the other "sucks" and finished with 3 catches and 86 yards less while scoring one more TD as he transitioned to a new team and finished WR27 2 points behind the other...it seems like only one offers the upside to not be a "bye week filler guy/WR4" and will make a difference on your team and that is Wallace, IMO.