What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Who will be the biggest name traded before the 10/20 deadline? (1 Viewer)

Weapon of Mass Instruction

Watch my feet!
Not sure why, but I think we see more trades. Including Braylon Edwards, who do you forecast as the biggest name to be traded?

Quinn? Keith Bulluck or Jevon Kearse? Derrick Johnson or Glenn Dorsey? Others?

 
I hope TO, the Bills have wasted his talent, and it doesn't look to get any better.
No brainer for the Bills. One year deal, and they should be able to get a decent pick for him (3rd might be wishful thinking, but definitely possible). That's not bad at all.
 
Prediction: zero trades that involve offensive skill players or starting defenders. At best you might see a lineman or two, or maybe a backup cornerback.

Midseason NFL trades are extremely rare. They mentioned on Monday Night Football that there have only been 3 midseason trades since 1976 where a traded player actually started the next game for his new team.

 
And I can't see Quinn being traded. Sounds like a huge rumor. I believe the cap hit would be pretty huge for the Browns, no?

 
Prediction: zero trades that involve offensive skill players or starting defenders. At best you might see a lineman or two, or maybe a backup cornerback.Midseason NFL trades are extremely rare. They mentioned on Monday Night Football that there have only been 3 midseason trades since 1976 where a traded player actually started the next game for his new team.
yeah but if you look at the last few yrs the trend has been increasing. A WR has been traded in 3 consecutive years:Chris ChambersRoy WilliamsBraylon Edwards
 
I hope TO, the Bills have wasted his talent, and it doesn't look to get any better.
As a Bills fan I would love to see T.O. traded. I don't think there is one Buffalo Bills fan that can honestly say this season isn't done so we might as well look to the future. Get something for T.O. and let him go play somewhere else. The way he has handled himself here in Buffalo is almost deserving of a trade to a better situation. Buffalo is a laughing stockl in the NFL and T.O. has handled himself better than he ever has. Let him go and play for a team that can get him the ball. By the way, I was at the Bills/Cleveland game and it was awesome to see T.O. during commercial breaks and other times of the game. He was the only one trying to pump up the team and crowd. At first I felt bad for the Bills for bringing in Owens, now I feel bad for Owens having to be in Buffalo.
 
Prediction: zero trades that involve offensive skill players or starting defenders. At best you might see a lineman or two, or maybe a backup cornerback.Midseason NFL trades are extremely rare. They mentioned on Monday Night Football that there have only been 3 midseason trades since 1976 where a traded player actually started the next game for his new team.
yeah but if you look at the last few yrs the trend has been increasing. A WR has been traded in 3 consecutive years:Chris ChambersRoy WilliamsBraylon Edwards
I could see it happening to Chambers again...
 
I hope TO, the Bills have wasted his talent, and it doesn't look to get any better.
As a Bills fan I would love to see T.O. traded. I don't think there is one Buffalo Bills fan that can honestly say this season isn't done so we might as well look to the future. Get something for T.O. and let him go play somewhere else. The way he has handled himself here in Buffalo is almost deserving of a trade to a better situation. Buffalo is a laughing stockl in the NFL and T.O. has handled himself better than he ever has. Let him go and play for a team that can get him the ball. By the way, I was at the Bills/Cleveland game and it was awesome to see T.O. during commercial breaks and other times of the game. He was the only one trying to pump up the team and crowd. At first I felt bad for the Bills for bringing in Owens, now I feel bad for Owens having to be in Buffalo.
Thing is, 31 other teams had a chance to get T.O. in the offseason without having to give up a pick, and they all passed. I am not sure what T.O. has done since then to create interest where there was none before. Maybe it is what he has not done - he has certainly not acted out in any way - but his numbers stink, and he is still getting paid a lot of dough.Not sure I see it happening, although you never know.
 
It seems unlikely to me that TO gets traded. He was available to any team this past offseason after getting released by Dallas and there was very little interest in him then. Now a team would actually have to give up something to get him, and its not even for the entire season.

Maybe one of the contender teams will have an injury at WR this weekend and make a move for him. I think thats the most likely situation for him to get moved.

As far as Quinn, I dont see it happening unless the Browns get a relatively high pick for him. There is a misconception that his contract is very large, but its just not the case. Therefore it really doesnt benefit the Browns to move him that much. And right now his value seems to be pretty low. No way they trade him for a 5th round pick like I've seem many suggest. If there isnt at least a 3rd rounder involved, I doubt it happens.

 
The Colts should trade for a NT after cutting Ed Johnson today.

Colts waived NT Ed Johnson.

The move was originally reported by Profootballtalk.com and confirmed by the team Wednesday. Johnson started each of Indianapolis' first five games, helping the club to rank 14th in the league against the run, which is very good for usually leaky Colts. Johnson's behavioral problems date back to Penn State. He probably violated a team rule, and was re-signed before the season on a no-tolerance basis. Details figure to emerge soon. Oct. 14 - 12:06 pm et

I think that Chris Chambers may get traded. Naanee is clearly the better WR and should get his chance to start.

 
I hope TO, the Bills have wasted his talent, and it doesn't look to get any better.
As a Bills fan I would love to see T.O. traded. I don't think there is one Buffalo Bills fan that can honestly say this season isn't done so we might as well look to the future. Get something for T.O. and let him go play somewhere else. The way he has handled himself here in Buffalo is almost deserving of a trade to a better situation. Buffalo is a laughing stockl in the NFL and T.O. has handled himself better than he ever has. Let him go and play for a team that can get him the ball. By the way, I was at the Bills/Cleveland game and it was awesome to see T.O. during commercial breaks and other times of the game. He was the only one trying to pump up the team and crowd. At first I felt bad for the Bills for bringing in Owens, now I feel bad for Owens having to be in Buffalo.
It would make sense for the team. And, I would agree that I feel bad TO has to be part of this train-wreck, but I'd have a bit of a hard time swallowing that pill as a fan. A lot of fans (Not I) have spent $ on tickets, jerseys, etc. because of TO in Buffalo. To trade him now would be a slap in the face of all those people.Not to mention it would send the message to the players that they are totally giving up on this season. If they do trade TO, they HAVE to fire Jauron at the same time, and officially start the rebuilding process.
 
And I can't see Quinn being traded. Sounds like a huge rumor. I believe the cap hit would be pretty huge for the Browns, no?
His contract is incentive laden...
With NFL trade deadline approaching, are Cleveland Browns dangling Brady Quinn? An analysis

By Mary Kay Cabot

October 13, 2009, 1:28AM

BEREA, Ohio -- Could Brady Quinn be the next first-round pick to go?

With the trading deadline looming Oct. 20, it wouldn't be surprising if Quinn went the way of Braylon Edwards and was dealt to another team.

Browns coach Eric Mangini made it clear Monday that he's sticking with Derek Anderson despite a 2-of-17 performance for 23 yards, one interception and a 15.1 rating against Buffalo. "D.A. will continue to start," said Mangini, in no uncertain terms.

That means Quinn is stuck on the bench, where he's watching $11 million slip away. This year was the last chance for Quinn to hit the escalators in his contract that would've earned him an additional $11 million -- on top of the $9.2 million over five years in his base contract. The only stipulation was that he had to take 70 percent of the snaps -- which is highly unlikely unless Anderson gets hurt.

Quinn would've needed to start about 11 games this season to hit the 70 percent. He's played in only 21/2 games with little chance of getting on the field anytime soon.

Quinn's agent, Tom Condon, could not be reached for comment, but Quinn and his camp would most likely welcome a trade and a chance for Quinn to start. Condon just watched his other high-profile Brown -- Edwards -- get dealt to the New York Jets, where he gets a fresh start, a 3-1 team before last night's game against the Dolphins and maybe even a new contract.

Quinn, on the other hand, can't get on the field in place of a quarterback who now has one touchdown pass, five interceptions and a league-worst 39.0 rating. Quinn, who started against some of the best teams and defenses in the NFL -- the 5-0 Vikings, 5-0 Broncos and 3-2 Ravens -- has better numbers than Anderson with one touchdown, three interceptions, a 60.8 completion percentage to Anderson's 46.4, and a 62.9 rating.

But Anderson's ability to convert more third downs, move the chains and stretch the field has earned him the job -- for now. Even linebacker D'Qwell Jackson credited Anderson Monday with energizing the Browns' defense.

"D.A. brought that spark," said Jackson. "He can make every throw on that field. It's good knowing as a defensive player if you get your offense more than enough opportunities, they'll move the ball and create points."

The Browns have no real incentive for trading Quinn now -- unless someone makes an offer they can't refuse. But there's probably not much of a market for a quarterback who's 1-5 and was benched this season. If he does get back on the field and has a better showing, his market value would increase.

Besides, he's not out misbehaving in nightclubs after dark, complaining about being benched or otherwise presenting a distraction. He's only making $1.72 million this season, not outlandish for a good backup. There are a few teams that could use quarterbacks, but they're in such disarray that it's not on the front burner right now.

Washington and Carolina have quarterback issues, but also coaches on the hot seat. JaMarcus Russell is struggling in Oakland, but the Raiders are unlikely to come after Quinn.

But everyone knows the Browns would be willing to at least listen to offers, because they took calls on Quinn in the off-season -- and have already dealt first-rounders Kellen Winslow and Edwards.

Mangini has said on numerous occasions that he'd do anything to improve the team. So Quinn isn't untouchable, even though former Browns General Manager Phil Savage surrendered a first-round pick in 2008 to trade up with Dallas to get him.

Quinn's contract also makes him tradeable. If he doesn't hit the 70 percent this season, he's due to make $2.08 million next year with a $700,000 bonus. The year after, he's a free agent.

Truth is, no one really knows what Quinn can do on this level. Several league sources have said they're still convinced he has what it takes to be a successful NFL quarterback -- in the right situation. And Notre Dame coach Charlie Weis would give any team a glowing scouting report.

Perhaps the Browns haven't given up on him entirely yet and are trying to preserve his psyche for the future. With a rebuilding line and mostly youngsters at receiver, maybe they figured they'd get him out of a hopeless situation before his confidence was shattered -- or even his bones.

After sitting for most of his first two seasons and now being benched for third, Quinn would undoubtedly love to go somewhere to play -- even though it's been his lifelong dream to play for the Browns. If Anderson wasn't starting, he might've asked the Browns to look around before the deadline.

If the Browns do trade Quinn, they'd have former Jet Brett Ratliff as their backup -- a Mangini favorite. The way it looks right now, the perfect suitor doesn't seem to be out there. But all that could change in a week.

link
 
rumors on chargers homer messages boards of Shaun Rogers coming from Cleveland to SD. But I highly doubt that happens
He's one of the few players for the Browns that they are actually happy with. Seems unlikely.
There were rumors during training camp that He was lobbying to get out of there and he wasnt meshing well with Mangini. Rogers was also wanting to get traded back to Detroit of all places. So who knows
 
I've wondered out loud why the Cowboys don't try to trade one of their 3 RBs. I could see moving Choice (not a bad contract) for secondary help or a pick.

 
I've wondered out loud why the Cowboys don't try to trade one of their 3 RBs. I could see moving Choice (not a bad contract) for secondary help or a pick.
Choice is the only one of the three who doesn't break like a china teacup. They almost can't afford to move him.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
At this point I can see why there would be no reason for the Bills not to trade TO - they would have nothing to lose at this point and getting a pick in return would be a nice return. However, I don't see a lot of teams that would necessarily lineup and try to trade for him. First, I really don't know how many teams were really interested in the off-season. Secondly, he hasn't demonstrated a lot this season to warrant a roster spot or giving up a draft pick (depending on what the Bills would want in return). What teams would be interested in TO at this point??

 
I never hear anyone mention SJax from the Rams. It seems to me that they could get some real value for him and use it to start rebuilding their Offensive Line, and team as a whole. Its clear they aren't going to win with him, no matter how good he may be. Am I missing something?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
At this point I can see why there would be no reason for the Bills not to trade TO - they would have nothing to lose at this point and getting a pick in return would be a nice return. However, I don't see a lot of teams that would necessarily lineup and try to trade for him. First, I really don't know how many teams were really interested in the off-season. Secondly, he hasn't demonstrated a lot this season to warrant a roster spot or giving up a draft pick (depending on what the Bills would want in return). What teams would be interested in TO at this point??
Ummm...that's because he's currently on the BILLS.How did Randy Moss due in Chokeland?

Bad coach = bad misuse of talent.

 
I never hear anyone mention SJax from the Rams. It seems to me that they could get some real value for him and use it to start rebuilding their Offensive Line, and team as a whole. Its clear they aren't going to win with him, no matter how good he may be. Am I missing something?
The team clearly wants to build around S-Jax, which means beefing up the line and getting some better skill players around him. Trading him would only exacerabate their issues at the skill positions - they can address the line (and QB) in FA or in the draft next year.It's nice to speculate these trades, but as someone mentioned earlier, big name players generally don't move that much via trade. Sure you have the Edwards trade and Roy Williams and Chambers of the world in recent years, but those are more the exception than the rule. It's not like other sports where big time players move a lot at the deadline.
 
I never hear anyone mention SJax from the Rams. It seems to me that they could get some real value for him and use it to start rebuilding their Offensive Line, and team as a whole. Its clear they aren't going to win with him, no matter how good he may be. Am I missing something?
The team clearly wants to build around S-Jax, which means beefing up the line and getting some better skill players around him. Trading him would only exacerabate their issues at the skill positions - they can address the line (and QB) in FA or in the draft next year.It's nice to speculate these trades, but as someone mentioned earlier, big name players generally don't move that much via trade. Sure you have the Edwards trade and Roy Williams and Chambers of the world in recent years, but those are more the exception than the rule. It's not like other sports where big time players move a lot at the deadline.
I think you have to look at it from a timing perspective. By the time they build around S-Jax where they are considered a contender, Jackson will be around 29 or 30. He's past 26 now. Whereas if they trade Jackson while in his prime for a nice bounty, they can better secure their long term future.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nobody is giving any more than a 7th round pick for TO. Buffalo may as well keep him for ticket/merchandise sales in that case.

The only way TO gets traded is if a playoff bound team suffers a major injury to a stud WR & is willing to give up a 5th or better, I'd say there's a 1% chance.

 
I never hear anyone mention SJax from the Rams. It seems to me that they could get some real value for him and use it to start rebuilding their Offensive Line, and team as a whole. Its clear they aren't going to win with him, no matter how good he may be. Am I missing something?
The team clearly wants to build around S-Jax, which means beefing up the line and getting some better skill players around him. Trading him would only exacerabate their issues at the skill positions - they can address the line (and QB) in FA or in the draft next year.It's nice to speculate these trades, but as someone mentioned earlier, big name players generally don't move that much via trade. Sure you have the Edwards trade and Roy Williams and Chambers of the world in recent years, but those are more the exception than the rule. It's not like other sports where big time players move a lot at the deadline.
I think you have to look at it from a timing perspective. By the time they build around S-Jax where they are considered a contender, Jackson will be around 29 or 30. He's past 26 now. Whereas if they trade Jackson while in his prime for a nice bounty, they can better secure their long term future.
That was my thought process, but I didn't explain it as clearly as you did. Thanks.
 
I never hear anyone mention SJax from the Rams. It seems to me that they could get some real value for him and use it to start rebuilding their Offensive Line, and team as a whole. Its clear they aren't going to win with him, no matter how good he may be. Am I missing something?
Yes. This is absolutely ridiculous. He's still young and he's one of the best rb's in the game. Unless a team really overpaid for the guy, it would be crazy to move him. Not to mention the cap hit.
 
Would Miami be a good fit for TO?
Skills wise, absolutely. In fact I can think of few teams he'd be a better fit for. But it's not his skills that scare off other teams.I hate the Patriots but would love to see them give up a later round pick for the guy. That would be fun to watch.
 
The Colts should trade for a NT after cutting Ed Johnson today.Colts waived NT Ed Johnson.The move was originally reported by Profootballtalk.com and confirmed by the team Wednesday. Johnson started each of Indianapolis' first five games, helping the club to rank 14th in the league against the run, which is very good for usually leaky Colts. Johnson's behavioral problems date back to Penn State. He probably violated a team rule, and was re-signed before the season on a no-tolerance basis. Details figure to emerge soon. Oct. 14 - 12:06 pm etI think that Chris Chambers may get traded. Naanee is clearly the better WR and should get his chance to start.
I believe Malcolm Floyd is Chambers' backup, and Naanee is Jackson's backup. Doesn't mean Floyd would definitely start over Naanee if Chambers gets traded, but it could mean that.
 
The Colts should trade for a NT after cutting Ed Johnson today.Colts waived NT Ed Johnson.The move was originally reported by Profootballtalk.com and confirmed by the team Wednesday. Johnson started each of Indianapolis' first five games, helping the club to rank 14th in the league against the run, which is very good for usually leaky Colts. Johnson's behavioral problems date back to Penn State. He probably violated a team rule, and was re-signed before the season on a no-tolerance basis. Details figure to emerge soon. Oct. 14 - 12:06 pm etI think that Chris Chambers may get traded. Naanee is clearly the better WR and should get his chance to start.
I believe Malcolm Floyd is Chambers' backup, and Naanee is Jackson's backup. Doesn't mean Floyd would definitely start over Naanee if Chambers gets traded, but it could mean that.
Yeah, I've seen those posts that point out a particular player backing up another because of position. I don't put too much into that unless it's the slot. Whether it's flanker or split end, there's not much difference between them. However, some players are more suited to playing the slot than others (exp, Austn Collie). With split end and flanker I think the more talented WR will take the open spot, and Naanee is more talented than Floyd.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Colts should trade for a NT after cutting Ed Johnson today.Colts waived NT Ed Johnson.The move was originally reported by Profootballtalk.com and confirmed by the team Wednesday. Johnson started each of Indianapolis' first five games, helping the club to rank 14th in the league against the run, which is very good for usually leaky Colts. Johnson's behavioral problems date back to Penn State. He probably violated a team rule, and was re-signed before the season on a no-tolerance basis. Details figure to emerge soon. Oct. 14 - 12:06 pm etI think that Chris Chambers may get traded. Naanee is clearly the better WR and should get his chance to start.
I believe Malcolm Floyd is Chambers' backup, and Naanee is Jackson's backup. Doesn't mean Floyd would definitely start over Naanee if Chambers gets traded, but it could mean that.
You are leaving out Craig Davis the first-round pick in 2007 he had some injury issued but it seems like he did look good in training camp.
 
A lot of fans (Not I) have spent $ on tickets, jerseys, etc. because of TO in Buffalo. To trade him now would be a slap in the face of all those people.
The product that the Bills are putting on the field is a slap in the face to the entire fan base. Keeping Jauron as our coach because everybody else on the coaching staff is even worse is a slap in the face.
Not to mention it would send the message to the players that they are totally giving up on this season.
The players have already given up on this season. Their "effort" the last two weeks should make that clear.
 
Flying Spaghetti Monster said:
Just Win Baby said:
The Colts should trade for a NT after cutting Ed Johnson today.Colts waived NT Ed Johnson.The move was originally reported by Profootballtalk.com and confirmed by the team Wednesday. Johnson started each of Indianapolis' first five games, helping the club to rank 14th in the league against the run, which is very good for usually leaky Colts. Johnson's behavioral problems date back to Penn State. He probably violated a team rule, and was re-signed before the season on a no-tolerance basis. Details figure to emerge soon. Oct. 14 - 12:06 pm etI think that Chris Chambers may get traded. Naanee is clearly the better WR and should get his chance to start.
I believe Malcolm Floyd is Chambers' backup, and Naanee is Jackson's backup. Doesn't mean Floyd would definitely start over Naanee if Chambers gets traded, but it could mean that.
You are leaving out Craig Davis the first-round pick in 2007 he had some injury issued but it seems like he did look good in training camp.
When was that? I don't recall him looking good. More importantly, he had only 7 targets last season and has 0 this season. I'm not even sure if he has been active for a game this year. If Chambers is traded, he might actually get onto the active roster, but no way would he replace Chambers as a starter.
 
Hoss_Cartwright said:
Just Win Baby said:
The Colts should trade for a NT after cutting Ed Johnson today.

Colts waived NT Ed Johnson.

The move was originally reported by Profootballtalk.com and confirmed by the team Wednesday. Johnson started each of Indianapolis' first five games, helping the club to rank 14th in the league against the run, which is very good for usually leaky Colts. Johnson's behavioral problems date back to Penn State. He probably violated a team rule, and was re-signed before the season on a no-tolerance basis. Details figure to emerge soon. Oct. 14 - 12:06 pm et

I think that Chris Chambers may get traded. Naanee is clearly the better WR and should get his chance to start.
I believe Malcolm Floyd is Chambers' backup, and Naanee is Jackson's backup. Doesn't mean Floyd would definitely start over Naanee if Chambers gets traded, but it could mean that.
Yeah, I've seen those posts that point out a particular player backing up another because of position. I don't put too much into that unless it's the slot. Whether it's flanker or split end, there's not much difference between them. However, some players are more suited to playing the slot than others (exp, Austn Collie). With split end and flanker I think the more talented WR will take the open spot, and Naanee is more talented than Floyd.
Like I said, I could see it go either way. I have been higher on Floyd than most people.Interesting that you bring up split end/flanker vs. the slot. Naanee seems better suited for the slot IMO, so while he might get some reps wide if Chambers is traded, I'd expect most of those to go to Floyd... this is one reason I would argue that if Chambers is traded, Floyd will be his replacement and will stand to see the biggest uptick in targets and production.

The season so far reflects this IMO: Naanee has 12/117/0 (9.8 ypr) on 16 targets and Floyd has 4/127/0 (31.8 ypr) on 8 targets.

The last game log also reflects this. In week 4, Floyd played 26 plays and was in the slot for 3 of them; Naanee played 23 plays and was in the slot for 17 of them. Not sure where to find cumulative numbers/percentages on this stuff and don't feel like adding it up for all the games.

 
The Colts should trade for a NT after cutting Ed Johnson today.

Colts waived NT Ed Johnson.

The move was originally reported by Profootballtalk.com and confirmed by the team Wednesday. Johnson started each of Indianapolis' first five games, helping the club to rank 14th in the league against the run, which is very good for usually leaky Colts. Johnson's behavioral problems date back to Penn State. He probably violated a team rule, and was re-signed before the season on a no-tolerance basis. Details figure to emerge soon. Oct. 14 - 12:06 pm et

I think that Chris Chambers may get traded. Naanee is clearly the better WR and should get his chance to start.
I believe Malcolm Floyd is Chambers' backup, and Naanee is Jackson's backup. Doesn't mean Floyd would definitely start over Naanee if Chambers gets traded, but it could mean that.
Yeah, I've seen those posts that point out a particular player backing up another because of position. I don't put too much into that unless it's the slot. Whether it's flanker or split end, there's not much difference between them. However, some players are more suited to playing the slot than others (exp, Austn Collie). With split end and flanker I think the more talented WR will take the open spot, and Naanee is more talented than Floyd.
Like I said, I could see it go either way. I have been higher on Floyd than most people.Interesting that you bring up split end/flanker vs. the slot. Naanee seems better suited for the slot IMO, so while he might get some reps wide if Chambers is traded, I'd expect most of those to go to Floyd... this is one reason I would argue that if Chambers is traded, Floyd will be his replacement and will stand to see the biggest uptick in targets and production.

The season so far reflects this IMO: Naanee has 12/117/0 (9.8 ypr) on 16 targets and Floyd has 4/127/0 (31.8 ypr) on 8 targets.

The last game log also reflects this. In week 4, Floyd played 26 plays and was in the slot for 3 of them; Naanee played 23 plays and was in the slot for 17 of them. Not sure where to find cumulative numbers/percentages on this stuff and don't feel like adding it up for all the games.
Given that I believe there's a large difference in talent between the two, I respectfully disagree and feel that Naanee is the one to own if Chambers is traded, not Floyd.
 
The Colts should trade for a NT after cutting Ed Johnson today.

Colts waived NT Ed Johnson.

The move was originally reported by Profootballtalk.com and confirmed by the team Wednesday. Johnson started each of Indianapolis' first five games, helping the club to rank 14th in the league against the run, which is very good for usually leaky Colts. Johnson's behavioral problems date back to Penn State. He probably violated a team rule, and was re-signed before the season on a no-tolerance basis. Details figure to emerge soon. Oct. 14 - 12:06 pm et

I think that Chris Chambers may get traded. Naanee is clearly the better WR and should get his chance to start.
I believe Malcolm Floyd is Chambers' backup, and Naanee is Jackson's backup. Doesn't mean Floyd would definitely start over Naanee if Chambers gets traded, but it could mean that.
Yeah, I've seen those posts that point out a particular player backing up another because of position. I don't put too much into that unless it's the slot. Whether it's flanker or split end, there's not much difference between them. However, some players are more suited to playing the slot than others (exp, Austn Collie). With split end and flanker I think the more talented WR will take the open spot, and Naanee is more talented than Floyd.
Like I said, I could see it go either way. I have been higher on Floyd than most people.Interesting that you bring up split end/flanker vs. the slot. Naanee seems better suited for the slot IMO, so while he might get some reps wide if Chambers is traded, I'd expect most of those to go to Floyd... this is one reason I would argue that if Chambers is traded, Floyd will be his replacement and will stand to see the biggest uptick in targets and production.

The season so far reflects this IMO: Naanee has 12/117/0 (9.8 ypr) on 16 targets and Floyd has 4/127/0 (31.8 ypr) on 8 targets.

The last game log also reflects this. In week 4, Floyd played 26 plays and was in the slot for 3 of them; Naanee played 23 plays and was in the slot for 17 of them. Not sure where to find cumulative numbers/percentages on this stuff and don't feel like adding it up for all the games.
Given that I believe there's a large difference in talent between the two, I respectfully disagree and feel that Naanee is the one to own if Chambers is traded, not Floyd.
:bye:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top