Best thing is to assume 8 years.
Carter was 4, before that it was Hoover.
For once I agree with Max. All the numbers and demographics argue Hillary will win but who knows? We're 6 months away.I love how the OP assumes Hillary is even elected to a 1st term. That's so cute.
Stop being so humble. You've agreed with me on many occasions.For once I agree with Max. All the numbers and demographics argue Hillary will win but who knows? We're 6 months away.
Even a broken clock...Stop being so humble. You've agreed with me on many occasions.![]()
Already endorsed Trump this time around:John Rocker?
I love how the OP assumes Hillary is even elected to a 1st term. That's so cute.
OddShark Presidential Betting: Clinton Well Ahead
OddShark provides “stats and odds from multiple sources” so users have “the information they need to make the most of their sports bets and fan predictions.” As of April 28, the odds greatly favored Hillary Clinton:
OddShark Presidential Odds
As of April 28
Hillary Clinton
-340
Donald Trump
+280
Clinton’s large lead is likely due to Clinton’s large lead in matchup polling and favorability. So far, Clinton has established double-digit polling lead son Trump and, while viewed unfavorably overall, is doing more than 20 points better than Trump on average.
George P is on track to be ready in 8 to 12 yrs...George Bush VIII
No. She is healthy enough to win in November but the stress of being POTUS and her back room dealings over the last few decades is going to take an incredible toll on her health. I believe that she will not even run in 2020.Do you really think she is going to make it to 2020?
I love how the OP assumes Hillary is even elected to a 1st term. That's so cute.
Without a doubt.We all agree that Chris Christie played this shrewdly and has the inside track from here on out, right?
On November 9 they will hem and haw about how they need to shift moderate.Curious how Republicans think they will be able to stop Hillary from being re-elected.
OofI love how the OP assumes Hillary is even elected to a 1st term. That's so cute.
oooeee, another farscist wildcard! yeah, they'll be primed for him, his bloody sock & picklehaub helmet. seig schill!Many, many people are telling me Curt Schilling. The best people. Believe me.
Yeah, mine as well.RealReactions said:Assuming she somehow wins this election mine as well just say screw it and through out George W Bush's wife and let them 2 duke it out
If you smell what the president is cookin'Where will republican primary voters go after the Trump loss? It might be reasonable to assume most of them will think the system was rigged against Trump, and these voters will swing further to the right. That might lead to a truly radical candidate in 2020. But there are ways to head that off. One way is to field a very charismatic centrist candidate from somewhere to pull voters back to the middle. Dwayne Johnson is a republican that has toyed with the idea of running for president. I mean, that might sound utterly nuts, but Trump is the nominee today, so nothing should be off the table.
So a repeat performance then.lod001 said:The stress won't kill her because she's so drunk on power she feels nothing. However we are fortunate that her body won't hold up and she most likely will spaz out sometime in the next 4 years and drop like the sack of #### that she is.
Trump will come back for round 2 as an independent and totally screw over the R's.
I think if that were to hapoen the Dems would keep her in the basement and let surrogates run things. Very similar to social security fraud cases.Do you really think she is going to make it to 2020?
A majority of Americans do not trust the Republican Party to run the country anymore. I can't see that changing in four years.Donald Trump Jr?
In all seriousness, I think it's very realistic to wonder whether the Republican Party will fully recover in time for 2020. I don't think we yet know the full damage and effects that this election cycle has had on the GOP.
In other words, tho GOP has a huge repair job they need to address following this election. I don't think the damage is finished just yet either. There's more to come. And four years may not be enough to fully recover. Whether people view this as a good thing or a negative thing, that's not my call to make, but at this point, only time will tell whether the GOP recovers from this.
Do you really think WE make it to 2020?Do you really think she is going to make it to 2020?
That first paragraph, explain how those policy points differ significantly from the democratic platform? They are certainly closer to the existing democratic platform than the republican platform,I know this is probably a pipe dream, but I dream of a day that we see a Republican candidate stand up and say something along the lines of "I want to help lower taxes for the middle class and small business owners to help spur the economy. I'm also not a xenophobe. I don't care who you marry. I don't care what bathroom you use. I don't care what women choose to do with their bodies. I'm not interested in locking up an entire generation of young men. I'm interested in revisiting our drug laws"
My hope in this debacle is that maybe, just maybe, it puts us a little closer to the day that the Republican Party can finally kick social conservatives to the curb. Smaller gubment and lower taxes should not continue to be wrapped up in a platform along with social conservatism. It just never made sense. In fact, it's contradictory as social conservatism is just bad economic policy.
The weird part is that Trump could've been such a candidate. Outside of his hatefulness and underlying racism and sexism in everything he says (which might be an act playing to the base), I really don't think he's a social conservative at heart. I highly doubt he's really a Christian, and certainly don't think he'd have any interest in using the government to promote Christian values.
That's, of course, the discouraging part. Even though might not be a true social conservative, he played heavily on some tenets of social conservatism with great success.
Michael Bloomberg fits the bill here.I know this is probably a pipe dream, but I dream of a day that we see a Republican candidate stand up and say something along the lines of "I want to help lower taxes for the middle class and small business owners to help spur the economy. I'm also not a xenophobe. I don't care who you marry. I don't care what bathroom you use. I don't care what women choose to do with their bodies. I'm not interested in locking up an entire generation of young men. I'm interested in revisiting our drug laws"
My hope in this debacle is that maybe, just maybe, it puts us a little closer to the day that the Republican Party can finally kick social conservatives to the curb. Smaller gubment and lower taxes should not continue to be wrapped up in a platform along with social conservatism. It just never made sense. In fact, it's contradictory as social conservatism is just bad economic policy.
The weird part is that Trump could've been such a candidate. Outside of his hatefulness and underlying racism and sexism in everything he says (which might be an act playing to the base), I really don't think he's a social conservative at heart. I highly doubt he's really a Christian, and certainly don't think he'd have any interest in using the government to promote Christian values.
That's, of course, the discouraging part. Even though might not be a true social conservative, he played heavily on some tenets of social conservatism with great success.
The Republican platform is a disaster, that's the point.That first paragraph, explain how those policy points differ significantly from the democratic platform? They are certainly closer to the existing democratic platform than the republican platform,