Why should you get any credit for posting clothed women at :e:?Way to not give credit to me for posting this at :e:....![]()
Because I gave credit re: where I found it.Pay it forward, bro. Pay it forward.Why should you get any credit for posting clothed women at :e:?Way to not give credit to me for posting this at :e:....![]()
Doubtful. Why does it matter?Are all of these chicks legal?
Cause the feds like arresting people associated with posting suggestive pics of underage girls lately.Doubtful. Why does it matter?Are all of these chicks legal?
1 does look fun, I agree.Two is really pretty but one looks like she'd be much more fun. I'm all about the F in fun.![]()
It was a picture taken in a public place, obviously with their consent.Good luck making THAT case stick.Cause the feds like arresting people associated with posting suggestive pics of underage girls lately.Doubtful. Why does it matter?Are all of these chicks legal?![]()
Consent of underage is invalid. Privacy issues have nothing to do with it anyway. Doesn't matter if it was taken in a public place or private place if its content is illegal.It was a picture taken in a public place, obviously with their consent.Good luck making THAT case stick.Cause the feds like arresting people associated with posting suggestive pics of underage girls lately.Doubtful. Why does it matter?Are all of these chicks legal?![]()
Consent of underage is invalid. Privacy issues have nothing to do with it anyway. Doesn't matter if it was taken in a public place or private place if its content is illegal.It was a picture taken in a public place, obviously with their consent.Good luck making THAT case stick.Cause the feds like arresting people associated with posting suggestive pics of underage girls lately.Doubtful. Why does it matter?Are all of these chicks legal?![]()
See bolded part of my response. Was responding to his argument that public place makes the picture legal. Better argument is obviously that there is nothing illegal about taking pictures of clothed women.Consent of underage is invalid. Privacy issues have nothing to do with it anyway. Doesn't matter if it was taken in a public place or private place if its content is illegal.It was a picture taken in a public place, obviously with their consent.Good luck making THAT case stick.Cause the feds like arresting people associated with posting suggestive pics of underage girls lately.Doubtful. Why does it matter?Are all of these chicks legal?![]()
Link to where it's illegal to take, possess or distribute a picture of ANYONE in their swimsuit?
I think his point was that because the activity was occurring in a public place (in this case, a hotel swimming pool with lots of people around) it was presumambly legal.See bolded part of my response. Was responding to his argument that public place makes the picture legal. Better argument is obviously that there is nothing illegal about taking pictures of clothed women.Consent of underage is invalid. Privacy issues have nothing to do with it anyway. Doesn't matter if it was taken in a public place or private place if its content is illegal.It was a picture taken in a public place, obviously with their consent.Good luck making THAT case stick.Cause the feds like arresting people associated with posting suggestive pics of underage girls lately.Doubtful. Why does it matter?Are all of these chicks legal?![]()
Link to where it's illegal to take, possess or distribute a picture of ANYONE in their swimsuit?
I still just think it goes to content. If the picture also showed R. Kelly urinating on them, then the fact it was taken by a swimming pool (with a lot of people around) would not be relevant.ETA: At least as far as distribution of the picture is concerned. Obviously, R. Kelly would have public indecency charges, etc.I think his point was that because the activity was occurring in a public place (in this case, a hotel swimming pool with lots of people around) it was presumambly legal.See bolded part of my response. Was responding to his argument that public place makes the picture legal. Better argument is obviously that there is nothing illegal about taking pictures of clothed women.Consent of underage is invalid. Privacy issues have nothing to do with it anyway. Doesn't matter if it was taken in a public place or private place if its content is illegal.It was a picture taken in a public place, obviously with their consent.Good luck making THAT case stick.Cause the feds like arresting people associated with posting suggestive pics of underage girls lately.Doubtful. Why does it matter?Are all of these chicks legal?![]()
Link to where it's illegal to take, possess or distribute a picture of ANYONE in their swimsuit?
I agree with DD. She does look like she would be fun. The hard right nipple and ample chest puts her over the top."1"Two is really pretty but one looks like she'd be much more fun. I'm all about the F in fun.![]()
I bet if this poll was about who was likely the easiest, three would be leading the way.1 [ 22 ] [21.57%]
2 [ 25 ] [24.51%]
3 [ 1 ] [0.98%]
4 [ 10 ] [9.80%]
5 [ 1 ] [0.98%]
6 [ 4 ] [3.92%]
7 [ 39 ] [38.24%]
Total Votes: 102
i voted #2 and i prefer brunettes.The whole "I vote for ANY blond regardless of her figure and no matter how plain she looks" shtick is getting tired![]()
Someone please explain to me 2 features that put #2 over #1![]()
Just to save time, I'll knock some off ...
hips
hair
face
eyes
chest
I guess that still leaves teeth, personality, hands, legs and ears![]()
The whole "I vote for ANY blond regardless of her figure and no matter how plain she looks" shtick is getting tired![]()
Someone please explain to me 2 features that put #2 over #1![]()
Just to save time, I'll knock some off ...
hips
hair
face
eyes
chest
I guess that still leaves teeth, personality, hands, legs and ears![]()
Normally I'm anti blonde. I think the fact that #2 was standing next to #3 made her look better at first glance. Id like to change to #1, kthx.The whole "I vote for ANY blond regardless of her figure and no matter how plain she looks" shtick is getting tired![]()
Someone please explain to me 2 features that put #2 over #1![]()
Just to save time, I'll knock some off ...
hips
hair
face
eyes
chest
I guess that still leaves teeth, personality, hands, legs and ears![]()
How did 5 get in that pic?
I think #1 has an unattractive face.The whole "I vote for ANY blond regardless of her figure and no matter how plain she looks" shtick is getting tired![]()
Someone please explain to me 2 features that put #2 over #1![]()
Just to save time, I'll knock some off ...
hips
hair
face
eyes
chest
I guess that still leaves teeth, personality, hands, legs and ears![]()
I didn't think it was necessary to add the disclaimer about the content.We could all see for ourselves that they are in bathing suits.I still just think it goes to content. If the picture also showed R. Kelly urinating on them, then the fact it was taken by a swimming pool (with a lot of people around) would not be relevant.ETA: At least as far as distribution of the picture is concerned. Obviously, R. Kelly would have public indecency charges, etc.I think his point was that because the activity was occurring in a public place (in this case, a hotel swimming pool with lots of people around) it was presumambly legal.See bolded part of my response. Was responding to his argument that public place makes the picture legal. Better argument is obviously that there is nothing illegal about taking pictures of clothed women.Consent of underage is invalid. Privacy issues have nothing to do with it anyway. Doesn't matter if it was taken in a public place or private place if its content is illegal.It was a picture taken in a public place, obviously with their consent.Good luck making THAT case stick.Cause the feds like arresting people associated with posting suggestive pics of underage girls lately.Doubtful. Why does it matter?Are all of these chicks legal?![]()
Link to where it's illegal to take, possess or distribute a picture of ANYONE in their swimsuit?
It's not "suggestive". They are in bathing suits and are not posing in a provocative manner.I guess stores/companies better stop including photos of young girls in swimsuits in their fliers and catalogues then.Cause the feds like arresting people associated with posting suggestive pics of underage girls lately.Doubtful. Why does it matter?Are all of these chicks legal?![]()
Font get stuck in yelling mode, Fitzgerald?
Accept my humble apologies Raider. I wasn't trying to take credit for your discovery. Nice work.Because I gave credit re: where I found it.Pay it forward, bro. Pay it forward.Why should you get any credit for posting clothed women at :e:?Way to not give credit to me for posting this at :e:....![]()
![]()
I can't believe 6 isn't getting more love. She has the best face in the group and a tight little body.
maybe his keyboard got stuck from something else.Font get stuck in yelling mode, Fitzgerald?
Not sure, but apparently she posts here!How did 5 get in that pic?
1 [ 45 ] [20.36%]
2 [ 70 ] [31.67%]
3 [ 3 ] [1.36%]
4 [ 19 ] [8.60%]
5 [ 1 ] [0.45%]
6 [ 8 ] [3.62%]
7 [ 75 ] [33.94%]
I agree with the need for more pictures. Set up us the album.If there were more pictures for people to review, I'm sure #4 would be getting more love.