What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Why has the housing market gotten so bad recently? (1 Viewer)

They are actually the largest group buying homes right now, and one of a few dozen reasons why prices are going up, but are just a blip on why.  About 40% of my buyers are them.  I would kill to be 22 right now and buying my first home in the Boise area. There is so much growth going on here and it's not going to stop for 30 years. Just too much land.
Yep. A lot of 20-somethings right now. It's a large generation. As they get jobs and work for a few years and approach 30, they're buying houses. Problem is the ages behind them are really small. Unless we get people through immigration, good luck finding home buyers in 10 years.

 
When you combine an undersupply of housing stock along with stagnant median wages for a few decades....this isn't a very surprising result
Yeah, as I have posted in other threads, the average millennial in their late 20s, early 30s is making less money now than people of that age did in the 70s.

 
One thing we see in Charlotte recently is a huge boom in expensive, luxury apartments near town but no condos along with little townhomes or new single family homes.  These apartment buildings are all built by the same few companies who would rather let units stay vacant than lower rents.  It is cartel-esque pricing.

 
Luckily we have a President with a strong real estate background who can solve this problem
The problem is solved by building a lot more than we are right now and every builder is stretched thin right now.   Lumber costs and labor shortage are other factors driving up the prices of all homes.

 
My point is it's not the living and spending habits nearly so much as the other factors - which, if anything, help dictate their living and spending habits. 
Living and spending habits are established through a myriad of things--parenting, social media, cultural changes and phenomenon, levels of debt--nobody is debating that.   When it comes to a "market" for anything (houses, collectibles..etc)-the two factors that matter most are supply and demand.  The supply is primarily dictated by the things that you have mentioned---and the demand is generally dictated by the reactions/actions/habits of the people towards the product being evaluated.   Rental prices are rising rapidly--to the point that in many areas--the cost for a month of rent could actually be more than the cost of a potential mortgage payment. Some (possibly a majority of it) is certainly because of the dynamics involving the housing side--the stuff that you've mentioned in detail.  However--look at the title of the thread--it says "why has the housing market gotten so bad recently".  Many of the responses focused predominately on just the housing/supply side of the equation. My only point is that this is an incomplete picture and that some of it has to do with the current lifestyle/spending habits of the public (and millenials are a part of this group).  Nothing that I said contradicted any claim that you had made.  In any case--it's an interesting topic and an interesting discussion. 

 
You can get an FHA loan with 3.5 percent down.   Every single one of my buyers I mentioned was on that program plus an Idaho housing program that allows them to finance 2.5 (620 score) or 3.0 (680 score) for ten years of that 3.5 percent down.  And the payments in every single one of the deals were at least $200 less than rent for the exact same house when they only put 0.5 or 1.0 percent down. 

I have two dozen buyers from three years ago that bought from 120 to 135 and their homes are now 185 to 200. I e had six of them sell and trade up this year with their equity.  Meeting another tonight.  

Biggest myth in the world is you need a lot down to buy a home.   Rates are still historically very low. Not one of my buyers has ever come close to losing their home later on.  You have to have a decent score and two year minimum work history. 
You beat me to posting about the FHA loan info. A lot of people could be better served with an education on these financial matters (similar to the personal finance thread where we talk about how many people don't know how 401k's work or even how to balance a checkbook.) I just got done talking with a young couple this past weekend who thought they were going to have to save 20% for a down payment. They'd never heard of an FHA loan, a first time home buyer program, or the many other ways you can get into your first house without having to scrape by and save for 10 plus years.

I'm trying to educate them and get them comfortable with the principals of "house hacking." While I hate calling it "hacking" (just a BS internet marketing word IMO), if you do the math and are responsible with your money, the principals make a ton of sense for young people trying to get started and afford real estate. If anyone reading this thread that wants to buy a house someday and wants to know more it's easy to learn by googling and I am more than happy to discuss it over PM's.

 
Yep. A lot of 20-somethings right now. It's a large generation. As they get jobs and work for a few years and approach 30, they're buying houses. Problem is the ages behind them are really small. Unless we get people through immigration, good luck finding home buyers in 10 years.
There are a lot of 20 something millenials but also the median age for a millenial is 30 so there are a ton of us in our 30s. I am a millenial and am closer to 40 than 30. 

 
You also can't go by permits alone. Net in migration / population growth is as important.

Ill look for the link when I can, but the data shows clearly that cities such as New York and Dallas, which have by and large kept permits and construction of new housing units in line with population growth have kept their housing affordability relatively on par with where it was say 5-10 years ago.  Areas like California (can't recall but perhaps Bostons on that list) have not, creating a surge in housing costs. 

The double edged sword is that technically, these trends help existing homeowners as it pushes the price of heir houses up. Of course, that's a shallow and unnuanced view, is it discounts 1. That if someone sells there home they likely have to get a new one, and if they want to remain in those desirable areas and certainly their market/neighbourhood their new home will also see those price increases 2. Often the older generations  bought when land (and taxes) were far less of an economic burden which stands in the way of the next generation getting a foothold (and being pushed out where the transportation costs in dollars and time away from family is much higher) and 3. When the younger gen can't live anywhere within a region, eventually that strangles local economies and LONG term, could have significant negative impacts on any number of economic indicators and realities, including housing/land values.
Yes, definitely other factors. I just went the easy route because I don't want to take the time and effort to put all those data together. If you have a link with everything, that would be cool to see.

I've definitely read that all the building DC has done the last 5 or so years has stabilized rents some.

 
For those that are homeowners and have a significant amount of equity in your house, what's your plan?  

We would like to upgrade in a few years and buy a larger house with a pool but as the price of our house grows, the price of whatever we buy grows as well.  It's looking like almost all of our equity would just go to the more expensive house.

 
The REAL cost for housing is more accurately reflected ny the cost for housing plus transportation. This combined cost is what you need to get to work, get essential goods, etc. The irony, closely entwined with the above three points, is that those areas which have least expensive housing usually have the highest associated transportation costs. For single family, it's the drive till you can afford principle where someone finds the type of home they want... but the closer in and therefore more desirable (generally speaking) bedroom communities have too high a cost.  Also, there is still lent up demand for urban living and therefore there are price premiums from 20% to over 100% price premiums (you read that right, more than double) for land in urban, walkable and mixed use neighborhoods, even more so if combined with good transit connections. So the people that have the least and could most use an apartment (or small home) that is within close proximity to work either by walking or transit so as not to need another car, are those who are least able to afford to live within most of those neighborhoods. Fact: If a family could go from a two-car family to a one-car, the cost savings represents $150,000 MORE in mortgage capability. You read that right, too. According to one of the most prominent experts in development, who owned and ran the world's largest firm that did/does economic and feasibility analysis and market studies for developers (Chris Leinberger of Brookings and head of GWUs real estate program, and noted author of The Option of Urbanism). 
That is an interesting study.  I'm just moving from a townhome 6 minute walk from a stop to a single-family house a 6 minute walk from a train stop.  Probably would be a good time to lose one of these cars (my wife will still drive because of her sensitivity to sunlight), but both are paid off with only around 40k miles. 

Certainly a large premium for living in a walkable place though. I cannot see it being lessened anytime soon.  Particularly if governments continue to under-invest in infrastructure. 

 
Living and spending habits are established through a myriad of things--parenting, social media, cultural changes and phenomenon, levels of debt--nobody is debating that.   When it comes to a "market" for anything (houses, collectibles..etc)-the two factors that matter most are supply and demand.  The supply is primarily dictated by the things that you have mentioned---and the demand is generally dictated by the reactions/actions/habits of the people towards the product being evaluated.   Rental prices are rising rapidly--to the point that in many areas--the cost for a month of rent could actually be more than the cost of a potential mortgage payment. Some (possibly a majority of it) is certainly because of the dynamics involving the housing side--the stuff that you've mentioned in detail.  However--look at the title of the thread--it says "why has the housing market gotten so bad recently".  Many of the responses focused predominately on just the housing/supply side of the equation. My only point is that this is an incomplete picture and that some of it has to do with the current lifestyle/spending habits of the public (and millenials are a part of this group).  Nothing that I said contradicted any claim that you had made.  In any case--it's an interesting topic and an interesting discussion. 
All good points. To further your point of emphasis, which is valid as I better understand it, there's a reason many millennials (and boomers) choose to rent - some due to economic realities including those acutely felt by millennials, and others are lifestyle... 

Not coincidentally, there is increased demand to live in walkable and mobility/transit rich neifgborhoods... but, as noted above, there is not NEARLY the supply for these options as demand warrants, at least in select but highly desired and job rich metros.  That is a result of 70 years of sprawl where the primary mode of building, unfairly supported by federal tax dollars at the expense of rentals, was almost exclusively single family homes.

So you have millennials that want to live in these more urban areas, but that's not what's available for all the reasons listed above and here. 

I agree it's a complex and compelling discussion. IMO, and what I preach professionally, is balance... appropriate modes of activity and vibrancy with the requested densities strategically built or better yet, revitalized within traditionally low density single use areas. That's really the best of both worlds. And a lot of that is happening, just against huge headwinds as we are discussing 

 
For those that are homeowners and have a significant amount of equity in your house, what's your plan?  
Sit tight, we have first of 4 kids starting college next year. We've done well saving for college and she will likely get some $ from the schools she has looked at. Our goal is to get the kids through school with minimal debt so they can get a good start. If all goes according to plan we won't have to dip into our equity but we'll see I guess. :oldunsure:  

 
That is an interesting study.  I'm just moving from a townhome 6 minute walk from a stop to a single-family house a 6 minute walk from a train stop.  Probably would be a good time to lose one of these cars (my wife will still drive because of her sensitivity to sunlight), but both are paid off with only around 40k miles. 

Certainly a large premium for living in a walkable place though. I cannot see it being lessened anytime soon.  Particularly if governments continue to under-invest in infrastructure. 
The joy of a (somewhat) free market is that those regions that have and will embrace more investment in well designed and planned infrastructure that ties into land use and then mobility services are thriving and will likely do so into the future - adapting to, adopting and evolving as new technologies such as automated transit comes to fruition. 

Another important not I preach though as a word of warning - we focus too much on the technology. As if technology is an end, which it then becomes. For example we engineer and built roads to accommodate bigger faster cars.... we destroy cities to let cars get to it or through it - all at the expense of the very PLACES we are driving to. We lose site of the human experience by giving into and focusing on the technology, building infrastructure around it rather than our desired economic and cultural outcomes.

And we see this again with the asinine concepts like hyperloop, or the potential direction of automated vehicles... people don't realize the automakers see a potential very lucrative future where they have us "trapped" in some vehicle where without driving we will be bombarded with media and advertising and the like. Anyhoo, a. It of topic, but honestly it ALL plays together. 

Land use / zoning, physical infrastructure, public policies, business regulations and the operating systems of how we run public systems  

 
Still confused about this supposed millennial effect. If all of this wasn't a supply side issue, and millennials weren't doing enough buying, wouldn't we be seeing an oversupply of condos/starter homes and decreasing value of whatever is on the market in that range?

 
They are actually the largest group buying homes right now, and one of a few dozen reasons why prices are going up, but are just a blip on why.  About 40% of my buyers are them.  I would kill to be 22 right now and buying my first home in the Boise area. There is so much growth going on here and it's not going to stop for 30 years. Just too much land.
It’s a multi-faceted issue.  They might be buying now—but I don’t remember where I read it—but the average millennial rents for 10-12 years before they get into home ownership.  So yes—you could see some waves of them purchasing homes as they get to their mid-late 30’s—but this is generally after an active decade or so of being renters.  I’m not contradicting you—just adding to your premise that while they maybe buying—a ton of them are renting and most have massively supported the rental market for a decade.  They’ve effectivley strengthened both sides.  

As a landlord myself—one of the things that I look at are rising tuition costs.  As tuitions rise faster than wage growth—this generally leads to a dynamic where graduates come out of school deeper in student loans.   This can result in them being forced to be renters for a longer period of time.  As long as this trend continues—I’ll be looking to add to my investment property portfolio.  

 
Sit tight, we have first of 4 kids starting college next year. We've done well saving for college and she will likely get some $ from the schools she has looked at. Our goal is to get the kids through school with minimal debt so they can get a good start. If all goes according to plan we won't have to dip into our equity but we'll see I guess. :oldunsure:  
Dipping into your home equity to pay for your kids' college? Is that what you're saying you might have to do (but obviously hope you don't)?

 
Dipping into your home equity to pay for your kids' college? Is that what you're saying you might have to do (but obviously hope you don't)?
It depends on a bunch of different factors but it's an option we may have to consider. Obviously not something we want to do and currently looks like we wont need to but things change over time. 

 
For those that are homeowners and have a significant amount of equity in your house, what's your plan?  

We would like to upgrade in a few years and buy a larger house with a pool but as the price of our house grows, the price of whatever we buy grows as well.  It's looking like almost all of our equity would just go to the more expensive house.
A couple of viable strategies: 1) Rent out current house and use the equity to buy the next place. 2) Stay in current house, use equity to buy rentals to supplement your income. 3) Sell and move to a lower cost of living area... etc. etc. All these options are extremely prevalent right now with people that have built up a lot of equity through rising prices. But if anyone reads this post and starts thinking about option 1 or option 2, make sure to do your homework first. Educate yourself, read up, make sure your financial house is in order first, crunch the numbers, and then don't borrow and buy unless the numbers make sense.

Seems like everyone has the opinion that we are already in another bubble or at least nearing a top. IDK if we are (seems like there would less people calling the top and more people talking about how things are different this time.) If you are thinking of buying soon just keep it rational, analyze your income/expenses and make sure anything you buy you can comfortably afford... especially if you have to hold onto it for 3~5 years through a down cycle.

 
Its all relative.  There is nothing ingrained that says you need to spend 3500-/mo. on rent.  This is the issue, IMO.  Many of us will stick in an area when the costs are outlandish.  I was in this situation in NY.  My taxes were $13k a year and I had a well, septic and private garbage, no real services and no kids in school.  Commutes were hellish, close to 1 1/2 hoors each way, winters brutal.  Sold and moved to NC, figured we could find jobs, which we did.  First house here in a nice Raleigh suburb was a new KB construction that based at $176k......yes, $176k for new construction.  That house in NY would've been $750k.  taxes dipped to $3k, commute under 1/2 hoor.  Wife took a big pay cut, I stayed neutral, but cost of living dropped by 30%.  Wife found a new job and makes a decent amount more than she made in NY.  with the drop in overall expenses, savings have ramped up and I'm almost out of a 15 yr mortgage in 7 years.  There is life outside the major American cities, sure Koya is having a blast.

Also, houses in my new neighborhood literally sell in 5 days for about $150/sq ft. 

 
The problem here in this area is houses sell so fast that if you want to go house to house you lose out to renters making non contingent offers. 

 
The problem here in this area is houses sell so fast that if you want to go house to house you lose out to renters making non contingent offers. 
And cash offers.  The problem is everywhere.   Two years ago, we had record low levels of inventory and now we have 36 percent less than that.   

 
I think one of the clusters in CA is how the property taxes work.  People who bought 20 years ago don't want to upgrade because the increase in property taxes on a larger home could be $600-700+.  Instead of smaller, older homes opening up to a new generation, fewer people want to upgrade limiting new buyers into the market.

 
And cash offers.  The problem is everywhere.   Two years ago, we had record low levels of inventory and now we have 36 percent less than that.   
If a college grad with a decent job and lived at home for five years, it wouldn't be hard for them to save up $200k+.  I'm guessing there's a good market of those types of buyers

 
And cash offers.  The problem is everywhere.   Two years ago, we had record low levels of inventory and now we have 36 percent less than that.   
There are also "shadow houses" on the market that just get whispered out, basically a "make me an offer" on zillow that change hands before stuff even hit the market.

Getting in the shadow market requires 6% commission, or more.  It's working to keep inventory down because realtors are getting hammered on fees right now with the market so hot.

 
If a college grad with a decent job and lived at home for five years, it wouldn't be hard for them to save up $200k+.  I'm guessing there's a good market of those types of buyers
Average salary for first job after earning a bachelor's is about $50,000. If we assume a 10% raise each year in career advancements, that totals about $300,000 over five years. Take into account taxes, hopefully retirement savings, and other living expenses and I think saving up $200,000 is stretch. If my grown, fully employed, college graduate is living in my house, then I'm charging rent. Even as little as $500/month is going to cost them $30,000 over those five years. Sure, maybe the most frugal of people can do it, especially if parents aren't going to charge rent, but very few people would come close to that much savings in five years right out of college.

If you assume a higher starting salary and faster promotions, then maybe.

 
One thing we see in Charlotte recently is a huge boom in expensive, luxury apartments near town but no condos along with little townhomes or new single family homes.  These apartment buildings are all built by the same few companies who would rather let units stay vacant than lower rents.  It is cartel-esque pricing.
This complexes are everywhere north of Boston . Prices like $2000-2200 for a studio add $500 per bedroom . Crazy

 
Average salary for first job after earning a bachelor's is about $50,000. If we assume a 10% raise each year in career advancements, that totals about $300,000 over five years. Take into account taxes, hopefully retirement savings, and other living expenses and I think saving up $200,000 is stretch. If my grown, fully employed, college graduate is living in my house, then I'm charging rent. Even as little as $500/month is going to cost them $30,000 over those five years. Sure, maybe the most frugal of people can do it, especially if parents aren't going to charge rent, but very few people would come close to that much savings in five years right out of college.

If you assume a higher starting salary and faster promotions, then maybe.
People do tend to marry.  I mean you can go 2x on those figures.  But, 200k at age 30 to just drop on a house is a huge stretch.  

This article has average and high achiever NW of Millenials.

https://thecollegeinvestor.com/14611/average-net-worth-millennials/

 
Average salary for first job after earning a bachelor's is about $50,000. If we assume a 10% raise each year in career advancements, that totals about $300,000 over five years. Take into account taxes, hopefully retirement savings, and other living expenses and I think saving up $200,000 is stretch. If my grown, fully employed, college graduate is living in my house, then I'm charging rent. Even as little as $500/month is going to cost them $30,000 over those five years. Sure, maybe the most frugal of people can do it, especially if parents aren't going to charge rent, but very few people would come close to that much savings in five years right out of college.

If you assume a higher starting salary and faster promotions, then maybe.
That's fair.  I was using a higher starting salary assumption.  $50k is quite conservative in CA given how many tech jobs are here.

Also, I would never charge rent for a house I am already paying for if they are working hard and being responsible.  You would rather fatten your own pockets instead of helping your kids get a jump start in life?  That is crazy anyone would ever do that.

 
For those that are homeowners and have a significant amount of equity in your house, what's your plan?  

We would like to upgrade in a few years and buy a larger house with a pool but as the price of our house grows, the price of whatever we buy grows as well.  It's looking like almost all of our equity would just go to the more expensive house.
Sit on our hands until we are no longer paying as much for child care. 

Cross every appendage we have in the meantime in hopes the housing bubble doesn't burst before then.

Get home equity loan to fix up house.

Slide that loan payment into the place in the budget currently reserved for child care.

Fix/upgrade what we need to.

Sell.

Re-assess market.

Decide whether to buy, build new, or rent depending largely on the aforementioned housing market.

---

Ideally, we start this process a year from now and go from beginning-to-end in about 9 months but we could be two years out.  Just now figured out child care costs for this year, so we're about 11 months out from figuring out next year's budget - per usual.

 
Average salary for first job after earning a bachelor's is about $50,000. If we assume a 10% raise each year in career advancements, that totals about $300,000 over five years. Take into account taxes, hopefully retirement savings, and other living expenses and I think saving up $200,000 is stretch. If my grown, fully employed, college graduate is living in my house, then I'm charging rent. Even as little as $500/month is going to cost them $30,000 over those five years. Sure, maybe the most frugal of people can do it, especially if parents aren't going to charge rent, but very few people would come close to that much savings in five years right out of college.

If you assume a higher starting salary and faster promotions, then maybe.
Forget about all that, even if it was possible. What 27 year old needs to be buying a $1MM+ house?

 
Getzlaf15 said:
And cash offers.  The problem is everywhere.   Two years ago, we had record low levels of inventory and now we have 36 percent less than that.   
This is a big issue (problem? natural market place occurrence?) with properties in Denver (and from what I have read, a lot of other places.) Investors and/or people with tons of equity pay in cash to get into the house and refinance later taking their capital out. It crowds out the first time home buyers and regular joe home buyers coming in with contingent offers based on their existing house selling or looks less appealing to sellers when someone has a VA or an FHA loan that rests on a more stringent appraisal. This motivates the non-all cash folks to either walk away or up their offer and tack on things like appraisal guarantees or foolish things like inspection waivers.

Have seen this a lot on mid-level and high-end properties too, usually with out of state offers coming in all cash. Almost always people cashing out of places like California & NY, or in some cases like the following: a young 20's couple just did a showing at my wife's listing a few days ago. This was a high-end, totally remodeled and beautiful place in an awesome neighborhood with some of the best schools in the city, it is listed for $725K when median homes here are in the 400's. They showed up with one of their mothers. The couple thought that the place was trash and not nearly nice enough for them... turns out Mom is loaded from money back in NY, recently moved to the Denver and is buying their house for them.

Side note: going back to the discussion about American values these days, guess which one of the young couple and the mom was driving the loaded out new Dodge Ram and which one was driving the 10 year old no frills pickup?

 
tjnc09 said:
Also, I would never charge rent for a house I am already paying for if they are working hard and being responsible.  You would rather fatten your own pockets instead of helping your kids get a jump start in life?  That is crazy anyone would ever do that.
To each their own, but I have no interest in my kids living with me when they are adults, especially if they are working a full time job making $50k+. My goal is to get them out. I'd never charge them rent because they won't be living with me.

 
To each their own, but I have no interest in my kids living with me when they are adults, especially if they are working a full time job making $50k+. My goal is to get them out. I'd never charge them rent because they won't be living with me.
We were able to buy a house in our mid 20's in large part because my wife lived with her parents for one year post grad.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top