100% false.He didn't have spinal fusion surgery, he had a percutaneous discectomy.That procedure is analogous to arthroscopic surgery for a torn meniscus in the knee.Once over the post-surgical recovery, he is at no more increased risk for re-injury than any other player.Hasslebeck isn't too old. But a serious back injury is something you never fully recover from. He may be in great shape right now but one good hit to the back may knock him out for good.
link doesnt work, but I would be interested in hearing it!Everyone's different, which is why blanket statements like, "his career is over" just don't fly. Concerns with Knapp's new offense, sure, but to predict (or worry) about injury to a player in the NFL is like worrying that it might rain if you go outside.
Here's a good radio interview for those that enjoy listening to Matt:
http://a1135.g.akamai.net/f/1135/18227/ ... g_OnDemand
Again, 100% false.He had what has become a routine procedure for a very common injury.All back surgeries are not created equal. This was a simple discectomy. It was even the percutaneous variety so they didn't even open him up.He has nothing related to spinal instability or actual vertebral damage. He tore some cartilage that lives between the vertebrae, the surgeons excised the portion that was extruding into the nerve bed via a scope.It is a once and done injury similar to a fracture. If you are a young healthy male and if you break a leg, rehab it, and let it heal you are at no significant increased likelihood to refracture versus having never fractured it in the first place.I really don't have a horse in the Hasselbeck race, but facts and experience should be used in his injury evaluation.. Hasselbeck isn't recovering from minor surgery. He's recovering from an injury that is extremely serious, delicate and uncommon in the NFL...back surgery.
are you referring to the same Julius Jones that posted a career-best 4.4 rush avg on a 4-12 team last season? the same guy that helped Seattle rank 19th in rushing offense? now they get a guru of an OC in G. Knapp, who's rushing offenses finish in the top 10, seemingly every year..Now I'm not saying JJ will be Clinton Portis v2.0, but I think he holds some good value as a fantasy RB this season...he could rush for about 1000-1100 yards and perhaps score upwards of 8 TDsECV said:I'm not a believer in the Seahawks. Sure, Hasselbeck is a seasoned qb. Carlson had some gaudy numbers last season. A couple problems here. Hasselbeck isn't recovering from minor surgery. He's recovering from an injury that is extremely serious, delicate and uncommon in the NFL...back surgery. Keep a close eye on him in the pre-season. Carlson is no longer going to sneak up on opposing defenses (also, the Seahawks were down to their sixth and seventh wide outs making Carlson the only viable option by default). Their receivers have had chronic injury issues. Stating that their rbs are sub par might be kind. The last time Duckett was relevant was when he played along side Warrick Dunn. Julius Jones...let's just say he misses Barber and the Cowboys. As already stated, their offensive line hasn't been a dominant force since Hutchinson last played for them. Will the Seahawks be awful? No. They're linebackers are young and athletic (Curry was unbelievable at Wake). TJ should be able to rack up some respectable stats (no, not the Bungles of '06-'07...more like 85/1000, 7tds). They will be middle of the road (if Seneca has to play make that 5 or 6 wins for the year).
:X That was my first thought too.Vancouver's nearby
Are you suggesting that Walter Jones isn't tough?per rotoworld:Marcus Trufant out indefinitely Walter Jones out indefinitely tough times don't last, tough people do
hardlyAre you suggesting that Walter Jones isn't tough?per rotoworld:Marcus Trufant out indefinitely Walter Jones out indefinitely tough times don't last, tough people do
We've seen Forsett play meh football, back in college. He might be a contributor on special teams, nothing more.I haven't seen anyone hyping him. But granted it's been a nice summer and I haven't been glued to each and every little comment going around here or in the news in general.I know I am one guy from here who really likes what Forsett could possibly bring to the table. I have since he was a rookie. But that actualy has more to do with the fact that I know what JJ and TJ bring to the table.. and that aint so good.Still probably a better than Forsett. But we haven't seen Forsett play meh football yet like we have the other 2 guys. Personaly I don't think they would lose a whole lot giving him a chance to see what he can do.PS. Forsett hasn't even played professional football snaps long enough to have any gauge on him. There is no proof or reason for him to be that hyped up.
Seems where ever i turn the sports pundits (TSN, ESPN, Nfl Radio) are all high on this team winning the NFC West. What about this team is gives them this indication?
Matt Hasselback is about done
Their Oline is aged and worn down (IMO ever since they lost Hutchinson)
TJ Housh and the guy who gets injured every third play (i.e. Branch)
A running game that makes the oppositions 'D' tremble (Julius Jones and TJ Ducket), ewww look out.
Also, outside Housh and a couple IDP players is there anyone on this team worth drafting?
Its an old brittle team with very little young talent. Should have gone straight into rebuild mode this year, instead they will battle the Rams to see who can win 4 games.