What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Why Not Clinton Portis? (1 Viewer)

tex

Footballguy
With Al Saunders now in Washington, and after the outstanding seasons that Priest and LJ had with Saunders as OC, does anyone think Portis can't become the next Priest or LJ? I know Portis is already ranked pretty highly but he has certainly had no seasons like that. Or was Priest and LJ's success in KC a result of their superior OL? I'm not really a big Portis supporter, but I could see him approaching Priest-like #'s.

 
With Al Saunders now in Washington, and after the outstanding seasons that Priest and LJ had with Saunders as OC, does anyone think Portis can't become the next Priest or LJ? I know Portis is already ranked pretty highly but he has certainly had no seasons like that. Or was Priest and LJ's success in KC a result of their superior OL? I'm not really a big Portis supporter, but I could see him approaching Priest-like #'s.
Not this year but maybe next year he might have those type numbers but until I see it I think it is crazy to draft Portis in the top 3. Special Note: Maybe in a dynasty draft or larger keeper league but not in a basic redraft.
 
I don't see Portis approaching Johnson-like numbers. I've alluded to this in another thread so I won't rehash it here, but I believe that the Redskins can look forward to a big improvement in the passing game. Everything from the protection schemes, the utilization of tight ends, getting more production from lesser #4 and #5 receivers on the roster. Those are the kinds of things Saunders excelled in with the Chiefs.

The Chiefs are in one of the more unique situations when it comes to the running game. On the offensive line, they have two Hall of Famers; three Pro Bowlers (should be four); and superb coaching from Mike Solari (new offensive coordinator). They have a passing attack that annually burns defenses for 4000 yards which keeps the opposing defense more honest than most. And last, but certainly not least, they have a great talent in Larry Johnson, and, just my (biased) opinion, he'd be a Pro Bowler in any system.

If I was to guess now, i'd project that Portis actually has slightly less carries next year but improves his yards per carry average by 2 to 3 points. I don't see a major improvement in the touchdown department but it could happen; the Redskins, however, have a decent receiving corps who should take some away from Portis, which the receivers in Kansas City didn't do. One area I see potentially being a big improvement is with Portis' receiving numbers.

One of Saunder's favorite plays is the screen, and it worked. You attribute some of that to Holmes' great receiving skills, Johnson's decent receiving skills and the rare ability of KC's offensive line to get out and block - but I still see an upswing in Portis' numbers here.

 
If Saunders lets Portis regress to the back he was in Denver, I can see this surely.

But he has developed into a Gibbs back, a more north-south guy these days.

As perry stated above, I could follow this gravy train, but it would take him a year to reach, and in '07 he'll have Campbell at the helm, which is not necessarily a plus or a minus, simply worth a mention.

It's a shark line of thought, but I think that it's a year early. We're only a few seasons removed from a pretty terrible, injury-riddled Redskins OL and a RB in Portis who was struggling to adopt the new schemes while trying to find the endzone at all, much less 20+ times. Give it some time (another season).

 
Personally I have Portis as my #2 RB behind Tomlinson. My gut is telling me that the Chiefs are overvalued as a whole this season. I just feel like this is the year their age catches up with them, and while LJ is a youngbuck, the o-line, QB, Kennison, Gonzo, all are getting long in the tooth. Herm doesnt excite me as an offensive coach . . . I feel like KC's window of opportunity closed on them last season.

 
If Saunders lets Portis regress to the back he was in Denver, I can see this surely.

But he has developed into a Gibbs back, a more north-south guy these days.
Portis is reported to be losing the weight he put on to be more durable last year. He's still a natural one-cut runner, and the 'Skins (at least until Saunders showed up) were doing more and more zone blocking, and were getting better at it with repetition. Question: does Saunders like to utilize zone blocking?

 
Portis is going to have a HUGE year. I do agree, he'll see less carries, but that's a good thing. I'm happy to see him with 300 carries vs 350+ He will have a MUCH better YPC as teams are going to HAVE to respect the passing game now. And i also agree Portis will see a lot more screens and passes this year. He did VERY well catching the ball last year. I believe Portis will have between 1500-1800 rushing yards, 400 receiving yards, and 15-20 TDs.

 
Portis is going to have a HUGE year. I do agree, he'll see less carries, but that's a good thing. I'm happy to see him with 300 carries vs 350+ He will have a MUCH better YPC as teams are going to HAVE to respect the passing game now. And i also agree Portis will see a lot more screens and passes this year. He did VERY well catching the ball last year. I believe Portis will have between 1500-1800 rushing yards, 400 receiving yards, and 15-20 TDs.
I like the idea of getting Portis in space which I don't think the Redskins have done enough of the last 2 years but I still don't see the Redskin offense allowing for a 20 touchdown season to put him in the LJ & Priest territory. He went from 5 to 11 rushing touchdowns last year, and despite the addition of the new WR and Saunders I think it would have to take an increase in the offensive line to get him to true elite levels.
 
If I get the #3 pick this year I'd take Portis. I think he has so much upside, and I don't expect Alexander to repeat last year's performance.

 
Portis is going to have a HUGE year. I do agree, he'll see less carries, but that's a good thing. I'm happy to see him with 300 carries vs 350+ He will have a MUCH better YPC as teams are going to HAVE to respect the passing game now.  And i also agree Portis will see a lot more screens and passes this year. He did VERY well catching the ball last year. I believe Portis will have between 1500-1800 rushing yards, 400 receiving yards, and 15-20 TDs.
I like the idea of getting Portis in space which I don't think the Redskins have done enough of the last 2 years but I still don't see the Redskin offense allowing for a 20 touchdown season to put him in the LJ & Priest territory. He went from 5 to 11 rushing touchdowns last year, and despite the addition of the new WR and Saunders I think it would have to take an increase in the offensive line to get him to true elite levels.
"True elite level" doesn't require more than 20 TD's. Alexander was a stud by any definition before last year when he was consistently getting 15 or so rushing TD's a year. Clinton can easily attain that staying healthy in this offense, and he would have the possibility depending upon circumstances to better that. That's all you can ask. Nobody goes into a season "expecting" their RB to break 20 TD's.

 
per the blogger:

Portis' big score

By Charles Robinson, Yahoo! Sports

June 30, 2006

Charles Robinson

Yahoo! Sports

ASHBURN, Va. – There were times when Clinton Portis spent his bruised and battered regular-season Mondays dying for days like this. He would bite his tongue, mutter curse words under his breath in meetings and then pray.

For what?

"A guy like Al Saunders," the running back said of the Washington Redskins' new offensive coordinator. "And an offense like this."

In fact, the first time Portis sat down and really went through some of the offensive film produced by Saunders – highlight clips featuring backs like Priest Holmes, Marshall Faulk and Larry Johnson – he cursed again.

"I remember saying this is the (expletive) I've been waiting for," Portis said.

ADVERTISEMENT

As far as Portis can see, what Saunders brings to Washington is like nothing he's ever seen. Four- and five-wide receiver sets. Snappy huddles. Adjustments at the line of scrimmage. Up-tempo management. And most importantly, spacious running lanes that would rival the tarmac at Washington Dulles International Airport. All of which – to Portis – provides hope for a career year.

Larry Johnson can have his 2,000-yard season in Kansas City. Portis could be making a run at the single-season record for rushing touchdowns.

"The last time I saw a field spread out like this was in Denver," Portis said. "We didn't spread it out around here. That wasn't our system. You had to adapt. You had to change your game to fit whatever they brought to you. Now I've got the golden opportunity. For two years, I had the opportunity of getting pounded. Pounded here and pounded there. But I found a way out of that and I have the opportunity of my career.

"You don't have to talk to those guys who have gone through him before. Just go look at the film. When Marshall Faulk was in his prime, coach Saunders was there. When Priest was in his prime, coach Saunders was there. If I'm in my prime, I'm in the right place."

Some will scoff at the idea of Portis making a run at 20-plus touchdowns, particularly in what might be the NFL's toughest division. But even the upgrades by the Cowboys, Giants and Eagles don't promise to improve run defenses that ranked from 12th to 21st last season. Portis is counting on Saunders and other offseason additions to make a difference, especially after seeing a diminutive Holmes – almost the exact size of Portis – develop into one of the most prolific scorers in league history with the Chiefs.

For a player who ran through a series of brick walls during his first season under Joe Gibbs, Portis has seen the Redskins' offense come a long way from the rudimentary power scheme he once labeled as "vanilla." Now the offense has arguably as many options as Saunders had when he helped the Rams win Super Bowl XXXIV – from the explosiveness of Santana Moss and the versatility of Antwaan Randle El to the possession capabilities of Brandon Lloyd, David Patten and Chris Cooley.

Barring another spate of injuries on the offensive line, or the loss of one of the principals (Portis, Moss or quarterback Mark Brunell), the unit should be diverse enough to avoid the sputtering it encountered in the playoffs last season.

"Looking around at Lloyd and Randle El and Patten – looking around at guys that should have spectacular years, along with Santana and Cooley – that's going to open [things] up a lot," Portis said. "You can't put eight people in the box. If you do, we're going to throw a bomb on you. You'll rather give me 20 or 30 [yards] than give them 80."

As Joe Gibbs put it more succinctly: "You need to be able to keep people off balance. That's what we'll be striving for."

Whether or not the offensive production clicks will depend on Brunell and the receivers.

Saunders' passing offense heavily favors timing – to the point where Brunell will be expected to make quicker drops in the pocket and release some of his passes before his target makes his final cut. Brunell broke a finger early in June and missed the team's final minicamp, so his repetitions in practice have been nonexistent over the last month.

"It will be fine. I've got some work to do – we all do with this scheme – but we have some time to get it together," Brunell said. "Actually, I'm really excited. We made a lot of moves in the offseason to try and get better, but I honestly think Al might have been the biggest of all of them.

"Everyone is working hard with his scheme. You can see it's paying off, too. Guys were starting to click and make plays out there [in minicamp], so you can see how it's going to open things up – especially for Clinton."

Portis said he expects to arrive in training camp between 210 and 212 pounds, shedding the weight he gained to sustain last year's pounding. Now he's styling a more cut physique to suit the quickness Saunders' offense requires. And Portis points out that he's just now entering the four-year window that should be the peak of his career.

"I've got to hit some home runs before people start writing me off and saying I can't do it anymore," he said. "I'm looking for a couple of 90-yarders this year.

"You look at my start in this league, and only Eric Dickerson and Edgerrin James have had [an initial four seasons] like me. I look back, two years ago, I had 1,300 yards. People wrote me off like I was a bust. And the people that [the media] are hugging up on now haven't even had 1,300 yards. If 1,300 is my worst season, bro, I'm all for that."

And with the new scheme?

"Hopefully, the only thing that changes for me is by the third quarter I'll be sitting on the sideline with my hat turned to the back, waving to the cameras, talking about how this win is in the books and we'll see you next week."

Charles Robinson is the national NFL writer for Yahoo! Sports. Send him a question or comment for potential use in a future column or webcast.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top