Says the ravens trollIt's simply a backwards franchise. Zero interest in analytics in this day and age? http://www.steelerslounge.com/2013/08/steelers-apparently-shown-interest-curiosity-analytics/
Says the ravens trollIt's simply a backwards franchise. Zero interest in analytics in this day and age? http://www.steelerslounge.com/2013/08/steelers-apparently-shown-interest-curiosity-analytics/
Fixed.fred_1_15301 said:You've just made me vomit in my mouth a little with theGodsbrother said:Because the Steelers problems are not at QB. The offensive line is horrible and even worse there is no depth. Manny Sanders is gone next year and so is Cotchery so you are going to be very thin at WR. Bell looked good yesterday but that was one game -- and behind him you have Dwyer, Redman and Felix Jones. Putting a rookie QB with this group will be a disaster.ebsteelers said:why? ben isnt going to play forever, its not like 5-10 years where you wait on rookie qbs..(besides ben 10 years ago)Godsbrother said:Assuming the Steelers do get a top 5, there is no way I want them drafting a QB. Even setting aside the possible bust factor, putting a rookie QB to run this team would be crazy.
they come in and need to contribute..it cant get any worse.. to add another o linemen in the top 5 wont be the answer. clearly the development in the oline isnt there.
I wouldnt mind seeing Bridgewater, or Marotia come in here. Landry Jones isn the answer, and qb needs to be addressed sooner or later.
I love Ben but hes got a huge salary and its hurts when you cant add quality at any other spots
The defense has absolutely no play makers and the outlook for 2014 is even worse. Ryan Clark, Troy Polamalu and Ike Taylor may all be gone next year. What are you going to do for a secondary? Did you see Cotex Allen yesterday?
Keisel may be done and Foote is almost certainly gone. Ziggy Hood and Jason Worilds are both UFA and frankly I don't think I want either of them back.
The Steelers have so many needs on defense that it actually trumps their needs on the offensive line.
Drafting a QB in the 1st round next year makes absolutely no sense to me.bleak outlooktruth.
Just think about what you're saying here for 10 secondsmsudaisy26 said:I think the Steelers are the best of the 0 - 4 teams
They've had an absolutely BRUTAL schedule so far..... and that's including AT Oakland, where it's still not easy to play despite how horrible ppl think the raiders are.JaxBill said:Jags have a huge interest in analytics and the owners' son is VP of Analytics but it hasn't helped them.Paulymaggs said:It's simply a backwards franchise. Zero interest in analytics in this day and age? http://www.steelerslounge.com/2013/08/steelers-apparently-shown-interest-curiosity-analytics/
watmoondog said:Says the ravens trollPaulymaggs said:It's simply a backwards franchise. Zero interest in analytics in this day and age? http://www.steelerslounge.com/2013/08/steelers-apparently-shown-interest-curiosity-analytics/
Jags schedule is ridiculous this season. This week is at St. Louis which is a potentially beatable team but that's a rough place to play. Then they go to Denver in 2 weeks (!) - they serious could be 27 point underdogs in that one.They've had an absolutely BRUTAL schedule so far..... and that's including AT Oakland, where it's still not easy to play despite how horrible ppl think the raiders are.JaxBill said:Jags have a huge interest in analytics and the owners' son is VP of Analytics but it hasn't helped them.Paulymaggs said:It's simply a backwards franchise. Zero interest in analytics in this day and age? http://www.steelerslounge.com/2013/08/steelers-apparently-shown-interest-curiosity-analytics/
the jags team is ridiculousJags schedule is ridiculous this season. This week is at St. Louis which is a potentially beatable team but that's a rough place to play. Then they go to Denver in 2 weeks (!) - they serious could be 27 point underdogs in that one.They've had an absolutely BRUTAL schedule so far..... and that's including AT Oakland, where it's still not easy to play despite how horrible ppl think the raiders are.JaxBill said:Jags have a huge interest in analytics and the owners' son is VP of Analytics but it hasn't helped them.Paulymaggs said:It's simply a backwards franchise. Zero interest in analytics in this day and age? http://www.steelerslounge.com/2013/08/steelers-apparently-shown-interest-curiosity-analytics/
-QG
Being that the NFL is a passing oriented league, you can't under estimate the value of a top tier QB who leadership intangibles.I am starting to be concerned that the steelers may finish poorly enough to get a pick high enough to grab one of the top tier QBs. I agree with many that this is NOT what thy should do, but if they fall in love with a QB i can see it happening
NFL teams love young would-be-franchise QBs
The old steelers organization would not do it, but i am not so sure the organization we see now can be trusted as much
They already have that and they have too many other needs to ignore. They would be better off trading down for more picks or grab a shutdown corner or the best OT in the draft.Being that the NFL is a passing oriented league, you can't under estimate the value of a top tier QB who leadership intangibles.I am starting to be concerned that the steelers may finish poorly enough to get a pick high enough to grab one of the top tier QBs. I agree with many that this is NOT what thy should do, but if they fall in love with a QB i can see it happening
NFL teams love young would-be-franchise QBs
The old steelers organization would not do it, but i am not so sure the organization we see now can be trusted as much
they can trade down to the Browns. yes, i just typed that.They already have that and they have too many other needs to ignore. They would be better off trading down for more picks or grab a shutdown corner or the best OT in the draft.Being that the NFL is a passing oriented league, you can't under estimate the value of a top tier QB who leadership intangibles.I am starting to be concerned that the steelers may finish poorly enough to get a pick high enough to grab one of the top tier QBs. I agree with many that this is NOT what thy should do, but if they fall in love with a QB i can see it happening
NFL teams love young would-be-franchise QBs
The old steelers organization would not do it, but i am not so sure the organization we see now can be trusted as much
Probably one of the biggest misconceptions about the Steelers.Steelers typically go best player available. If it's a quarterback, I think they'd do it.
what is funny is i read his comment as a defense of Ben, but thought it could also be used as an excuse to draft a QBThey already have that and they have too many other needs to ignore. They would be better off trading down for more picks or grab a shutdown corner or the best OT in the draft.Being that the NFL is a passing oriented league, you can't under estimate the value of a top tier QB who leadership intangibles.I am starting to be concerned that the steelers may finish poorly enough to get a pick high enough to grab one of the top tier QBs. I agree with many that this is NOT what thy should do, but if they fall in love with a QB i can see it happening
NFL teams love young would-be-franchise QBs
The old steelers organization would not do it, but i am not so sure the organization we see now can be trusted as much