That is the key question. OLine has been playing good, but haven't faced anyone like the Steelers LB's. Pressure early spells doom for the Cards imho.I am always somewhat concerned with the steelers pass coverage, if Warner gets time, could be a loooooooooong day.Undecided - Depends on Pass Protection etc.I think the most important question is can the Cardinals' offensive line keep Kurt Warner's jersey clean?
Puh-lease....That is the key question. OLine has been playing good, but haven't faced anyone like the Steelers LB's.Undecided - Depends on Pass Protection etc.
I think the most important question is can the Cardinals' offensive line keep Kurt Warner's jersey clean?
Reggie Wayne disagrees with you (and I don't care about how his long TD was almost intercepted).Also, for the record, the Steelers faced 3 of the top 10 WRs (based on receiving yards) this season. Here is how those WRs did:Andre Johnson 10-112-0Wes Welker 4-30-0Reggie Wayne 6-114-1They pretty much locked down every receiver they played against this year, so I voted yes.
Andre Johnson was all garbage time, he didn't do anything in the game when it counted, we were in prevent the whole time. Wayne caught a defelction, congrats on that. Also, that's why I said pretty much, not totally, and I expect the same will happen to Fitz.Reggie Wayne disagrees with you (and I don't care about how his long TD was almost intercepted).Also, for the record, the Steelers faced 3 of the top 10 WRs (based on receiving yards) this season. Here is how those WRs did:Andre Johnson 10-112-0Wes Welker 4-30-0Reggie Wayne 6-114-1They pretty much locked down every receiver they played against this year, so I voted yes.
Johnson had 44 yds on 3 receptions in the 1st quarter and also had a huge 40 yd reception taken away thanks to a meaningless penalty in the 2nd quarter.Andre Johnson was all garbage time, he didn't do anything in the game when it counted, we were in prevent the whole time. Wayne caught a defelction, congrats on that. Also, that's why I said pretty much, not totally, and I expect the same will happen to Fitz.Reggie Wayne disagrees with you (and I don't care about how his long TD was almost intercepted).Also, for the record, the Steelers faced 3 of the top 10 WRs (based on receiving yards) this season. Here is how those WRs did:Andre Johnson 10-112-0Wes Welker 4-30-0Reggie Wayne 6-114-1They pretty much locked down every receiver they played against this year, so I voted yes.
Uh, not quite. On Houston's first two drives, Johnson caught 3 passes for 44 yards (all in the first 11 minutes). Just because Houston fell way behind and Johnson caught a few balls in the 4th quarter of a blowout doesn't mean that he didn't do some damage early on. Fact is, like I pointed out in the SB game thread, the Steelers haven't had to face most of the best WRs this season (since most of the best ones this season were in the NFC). If they are gonna contain Fitzgerald and (a hopefully healthy) Boldin, it will have to be because they get their pass rush going good, because it is impossible to cover those two guys good enough to shut them both down for 60 minutes. Not gonna happen.Andre Johnson was all garbage time, he didn't do anything in the game when it counted, we were in prevent the whole time.
Care to elaborate? I just can't compare Atl/Car/Phil LB's to steelers at all.Puh-lease....That is the key question. OLine has been playing good, but haven't faced anyone like the Steelers LB's.Undecided - Depends on Pass Protection etc.
I think the most important question is can the Cardinals' offensive line keep Kurt Warner's jersey clean?
No question a #1 WR can put up numbers against this team.Thing is you've got be able to threaten the run or the short passing game to get the zones shortened up and pull Troy into the box.I'm just not sure the ARIZ TE's or RB's have the speed to force the LB's up out of their drops.Ariz is a smart tough team, so I am sure they will find a way to continue Fitz's hot streak.Johnson had 44 yds on 3 receptions in the 1st quarter and also had a huge 40 yd reception taken away thanks to a meaningless penalty in the 2nd quarter.
Then he had 51 yards in the 4th quarter. Like I said, I don't expect Fitz to go crazy, he get his, but he also might get KedTFO.Uh, not quite. On Houston's first two drives, Johnson caught 3 passes for 44 yards (all in the first 11 minutes). Just because Houston fell way behind and Johnson caught a few balls in the 4th quarter of a blowout doesn't mean that he didn't do some damage early on. Fact is, like I pointed out in the SB game thread, the Steelers haven't had to face most of the best WRs this season (since most of the best ones this season were in the NFC). If they are gonna contain Fitzgerald and (a hopefully healthy) Boldin, it will have to be because they get their pass rush going good, because it is impossible to cover those two guys good enough to shut them both down for 60 minutes. Not gonna happen.Andre Johnson was all garbage time, he didn't do anything in the game when it counted, we were in prevent the whole time.
You have far more confidence in Troy's coverage skills than I do. Pitt can be beat by top notch WRs with or w/o Troy in the box. As a Steeler fan, I'd rather have him in up at there 7 of 10 plays.No question a #1 WR can put up numbers against this team.Thing is you've got be able to threaten the run or the short passing game to get the zones shortened up and pull Troy into the box.Johnson had 44 yds on 3 receptions in the 1st quarter and also had a huge 40 yd reception taken away thanks to a meaningless penalty in the 2nd quarter.
I'm just not sure the ARIZ TE's or RB's have the speed to force the LB's up out of their drops.
Ariz is a smart tough team, so I am sure they will find a way to continue Fitz's hot streak.
On an island he's below average.He's tough within a disciplined zone when he can free lance.You have far more confidence in Troy's coverage skills than I do. Pitt can be beat by top notch WRs with or w/o Troy in the box. As a Steeler fan, I'd rather have him in up at there 7 of 10 plays.No question a #1 WR can put up numbers against this team.Thing is you've got be able to threaten the run or the short passing game to get the zones shortened up and pull Troy into the box.Johnson had 44 yds on 3 receptions in the 1st quarter and also had a huge 40 yd reception taken away thanks to a meaningless penalty in the 2nd quarter.
I'm just not sure the ARIZ TE's or RB's have the speed to force the LB's up out of their drops.
Ariz is a smart tough team, so I am sure they will find a way to continue Fitz's hot streak.
Shut up Spoiler, I'll come up the street and slap you around.It also depends on if the refs allow Harrison to get held all day, which has been happening most of the year. I thought you said the Steelers would be lucky to be 8-8 ?I do NOT think they will shutdown them down. I'm guessing Fitz with 135yds with a TD or 2, Boldin 40yds, Breaston with 75yds.Typically in the past history the steelers have been suspect to the deep threat. Arizona will definately NOT be able to run against the steelers and I am expecting an early barrage of blitzs to throw Warner off. Warner does however get rid of the ball quickly.Hoping the steelers win, BUT even Philly with double coverage could NOT stop Fitz.
.........The Steelers have the best LBs in the NFL. This is common knowledge. Not sure where your response is coming from?Puh-lease....That is the key question. OLine has been playing good, but haven't faced anyone like the Steelers LB's.Undecided - Depends on Pass Protection etc.
I think the most important question is can the Cardinals' offensive line keep Kurt Warner's jersey clean?
I didn't see Philly double covering Fitz that often.I do NOT think they will shutdown them down. I'm guessing Fitz with 135yds with a TD or 2, Boldin 40yds, Breaston with 75yds.Typically in the past history the steelers have been suspect to the deep threat. Arizona will definately NOT be able to run against the steelers and I am expecting an early barrage of blitzs to throw Warner off. Warner does however get rid of the ball quickly.Hoping the steelers win, BUT even Philly with double coverage could NOT stop Fitz.
DRC will SHUT DOWN whoever he takes...probably Santonio. Ward and Miller will probably have good games...whoever Rod Hood is covering will have a field day.The question is, can the AZ D contain Santonio, Hines and Heath?
What a curious comment considering the Cardinals were 9-7 while playing in the NFL's weakest division year in, year out.As for the poll I don't care how many yards Fitz and "Tantrum" Boldin get. The objective is to win the game. The Steelers defense has been money all year facing a tougher schedule than the Cardinals. Nothing is a sure thing but I like their chances.You're not in the AFC North anymore Stillers!!!
Miller has as much athleticism as Celek, likely more.ConstruxBoy said:Celek's field day in the NFCC game makes me think that Miller will have some success, although I'm not sure he has the athleticism to get away from coverage like Celek showed.
I don't doubt DRC's long-term potential but statements like this don't jive with the facts. Outside of Delhomme's annual meltdown 2 weeks ago the Cards haven't shut many WR down. 42 TD passes in 19 games this year, far & away most in the NFL. Outside of the Carolina game WR have torched them all year and in the playoffseSean Jackson 6-92 1 TDLHUCKS said:DRC will SHUT DOWN whoever he takes...probably Santonio. Ward and Miller will probably have good games...whoever Rod Hood is covering will have a field day.CrossEyed said:The question is, can the AZ D contain Santonio, Hines and Heath?
I'm sorry, are you saying that the Cardinals will just have to wait until the Fourth Quarter to get major passing yards? You pretty much proved my point. The Steelers knew the Texans were going to pass the ball, and they didn't stop it. What happens if the Cardinals get a running game going?MWalker 107 Yards. 200 Passing. 26 Yards Rushing - Once again, the Jags a running team could not run the ball. So they passed the ball, quite effectively for them. Now lets just say the Cardinals don't get the running game going... the past tells us that when even when the Steelers KNOW the pass is coming they can't stop it. I'd like to see them stop Fitz and Boldin... oh let's throw Breaston in there.Ummm...AJohnson 112. Team 202 passing. (35-3 heading into 4th. When Hou got 105 passing yards and scored 2 TDs). Walter had 41. Walter gained 30 of it in the 4th. Johnson had 61 in the 4th. 47 yards rushing in 4th (of 71 total)Mike Walker of the Jacksonville Jaguars a very pass oriented team, went over 100-Yards against these Steelers. If HE can do it, then Fitz will do it easily. Also Hank Baskett as #2/3 reciever went for 80+ yards against the Steelers, hrm... Boldin and Breaston are better than him!
Walter and Johnson went for 150+ and a TD, Boldin, Warner, and Breaston can easily top that.
I'm not saying the Steelers Pass Defense is weak, I'm just saying its EXTREMELY overrated.
MWalker 107. Team 200 passing. 26 yards rushing.
Baskett 85. Team 214 passing. 65 yards rushing.
Dude you gotta be smarter than this. The Steelers were up 35-3 with only 7:00 left in the game and the Texans scored a couple TDs in garbage time when the Steelers had their scrubs in. The Cardinals have lost 7 times this season and none of those teams had a better defense than the Steelers. They have a good team and they may win but they certainly aren't unbeatable.I'm sorry, are you saying that the Cardinals will just have to wait until the Fourth Quarter to get major passing yards? You pretty much proved my point. The Steelers knew the Texans were going to pass the ball, and they didn't stop it. What happens if the Cardinals get a running game going?MWalker 107 Yards. 200 Passing. 26 Yards Rushing - Once again, the Jags a running team could not run the ball. So they passed the ball, quite effectively for them. Now lets just say the Cardinals don't get the running game going... the past tells us that when even when the Steelers KNOW the pass is coming they can't stop it. I'd like to see them stop Fitz and Boldin... oh let's throw Breaston in there.
... they will trade yards and points for CLOCK in order to win the game. See Ravens, Baltimore. See Chargers, San Diego.the past tells us that when even when the Steelers KNOW the pass is coming they can't stop it.
*Takes bow*Alright I now see the legitimacy in your arguments. In my estimation however, I believe the Cardinals have enough fire power in their passing game to beat Steelers for a respectable amount of yards.Dude you gotta be smarter than this. The Steelers were up 35-3 with only 7:00 left in the game and the Texans scored a couple TDs in garbage time when the Steelers had their scrubs in. The Cardinals have lost 7 times this season and none of those teams had a better defense than the Steelers. They have a good team and they may win but they certainly aren't unbeatable.I'm sorry, are you saying that the Cardinals will just have to wait until the Fourth Quarter to get major passing yards? You pretty much proved my point. The Steelers knew the Texans were going to pass the ball, and they didn't stop it. What happens if the Cardinals get a running game going?
MWalker 107 Yards. 200 Passing. 26 Yards Rushing - Once again, the Jags a running team could not run the ball. So they passed the ball, quite effectively for them. Now lets just say the Cardinals don't get the running game going... the past tells us that when even when the Steelers KNOW the pass is coming they can't stop it. I'd like to see them stop Fitz and Boldin... oh let's throw Breaston in there.
I'm sure I haven't seen Miller as much as a Steeler fan, but I always thought he looked sort of stiff. Any other opinions on Miller v. Celek?Miller has as much athleticism as Celek, likely more.Celek's field day in the NFCC game makes me think that Miller will have some success, although I'm not sure he has the athleticism to get away from coverage like Celek showed.
I know you're not very experienced in terms of big game analysis and/or trash talking, but this is embarrassing by any standard. You scour through the Steelers season looking for evidence of deficiencies. Apparently, the best you could do was find journeyman receivers who put up good yardage against the Steelers on September 21 and October 5.Then, you compare their talent level with the Cards receiving corps to show that the Steelers have no chance to slow down the Cardinals passing attack. I would say Fitz and Boldin are at least three times the receiver Mike Walker is, so each of them should be good for at least 321 yards receiving in the Super Bowl. Might be a record or something.This is fun! Let's do it again, but with a twist. Let's apply this same high-level analysis in the opposite direction.I was going to just say that the Steelers beat the Patriots by 23 points on the same field that one month later, the Patriots beat the Cardinals by 40. so that should make the Steelers a 63-point favorite, right? But that doesn't work, because it uses games from the last half of the season. I need to go to September or early October for a more similar analysis to yours.Jason Campbell threw for 204 yards and 2 TDs against the Cardinals in Week 3. In his 36 games as a starting QB, he has thrown 35 TDs and has a record as a starting QB of 16-20. Ben Roethlisberger has started 80 games (counting nine playoff games). In those 80 games, Ben has thrown for 115 TDs and has a record of 58-22. It's pretty clear that Ben is 50% better than Jason Campbell, so he should be good for 306 yards and 3 TDs.One week later, the Jets forced seven turnovers against the Cardinals. The Steelers are arguably better on defense than the Jets, so I figure they should force eight turnovers.So there you have it: Using your methods of analysis, while the Steelers might allow 800 passing yards to Fitzgerald, Boldin and Breaston, that will be somewhat counterbalanced by the eight turnovers they force and the 306 yards and 3 TDs thrown by Ben.Should be a good one.Mike Walker of the Jacksonville Jaguars a very pass oriented team, went over 100-Yards against these Steelers. If HE can do it, then Fitz will do it easily. Also Hank Baskett as #2/3 reciever went for 80+ yards against the Steelers, hrm... Boldin and Breaston are better than him!the past tells us that when even when the Steelers KNOW the pass is coming they can't stop it. I'd like to see them stop Fitz and Boldin... oh let's throw Breaston in there.
At worst, Miller is going to be Celek's equal in just about any category, at least at this point in their respective careers. He's a former first round draft pick who has averaged 42 receptions for 483 yards and 5.25 TDs per season in his four years in the NFL. This season he was injured for three games and has only begun hitting his stride again in the post-season. (6 catches, 99 yards, 1 TD the past two weeks.) He would be a much better known figure if the Steelers had a better offensive line and did not require him to stay in as often to help with the blocking, and also if he had greater fantasy worth as opposed to pure football worth. He is enough of a vertical threat to have had a 50 and 87 yard reception in his career. I remember him most being featured on the first two drives of the divisional playoffs in 2005-06 at Indy when the Steelers jumped out to a 14-0 first quarter lead.I'm sure I haven't seen Miller as much as a Steeler fan, but I always thought he looked sort of stiff. Any other opinions on Miller v. Celek?Miller has as much athleticism as Celek, likely more.Celek's field day in the NFCC game makes me think that Miller will have some success, although I'm not sure he has the athleticism to get away from coverage like Celek showed.
Less than 3 TD's between them.What is your definition of "contain"?
If the Cards win, Warner will probably be the MVP. It's rare for a WR to get it - only if the QB plays poorly or he vastly outplays the other WR's. I do agree that Boldin could outplay Fitz though, just not enough to get MVP.SB MVP WRs:I think that this is the game that Boldin shines, possibly outplaying Fitzgerald and even winning the Super Bowl MVP as the Cardinals win.
Super Bowl X WR Lynn Swann PittsburghSuper Bowl XI WR Fred Biletnikoff OaklandSuper Bowl XXIII WR Jerry Rice San FranciscoSuper Bowl XXXIX WR Deion Branch New England PatriotsSuper Bowl XL WR Hines Ward Pittsburgh Steelers
Thanks and you may very well be right. But I was hoping for a non-Steeler fan opinion. Of course you think Miller is better. I think he's underperformed (and maybe as a result of the PIT offense and therefore not his fault) more than most highly drafted TEs. So I was looking for other opinions.At worst, Miller is going to be Celek's equal in just about any category, at least at this point in their respective careers. He's a former first round draft pick who has averaged 42 receptions for 483 yards and 5.25 TDs per season in his four years in the NFL. This season he was injured for three games and has only begun hitting his stride again in the post-season. (6 catches, 99 yards, 1 TD the past two weeks.) He would be a much better known figure if the Steelers had a better offensive line and did not require him to stay in as often to help with the blocking, and also if he had greater fantasy worth as opposed to pure football worth. He is enough of a vertical threat to have had a 50 and 87 yard reception in his career. I remember him most being featured on the first two drives of the divisional playoffs in 2005-06 at Indy when the Steelers jumped out to a 14-0 first quarter lead.I'm sure I haven't seen Miller as much as a Steeler fan, but I always thought he looked sort of stiff. Any other opinions on Miller v. Celek?Miller has as much athleticism as Celek, likely more.Celek's field day in the NFCC game makes me think that Miller will have some success, although I'm not sure he has the athleticism to get away from coverage like Celek showed.
Fair enough. Being a fan of a team does not automatically disqualify you from being objective. It may be difficult, but it's not impossible to be objective about your favorite team. To me, where being a fan clouds judgment is in a more subjective discussion on who has the best fans, the best history, controversial officiating, etc. For example, I can tell you that I would be surprised if the Steelers offensive line is not one of the five worst to ever play in a Super Bowl. Same thing for the punter.Thanks and you may very well be right. But I was hoping for a non-Steeler fan opinion. Of course you think Miller is better. I think he's underperformed (and maybe as a result of the PIT offense and therefore not his fault) more than most highly drafted TEs. So I was looking for other opinions.
When you are underutilized, it's hard to live up to expectations. Miller has fly paper hands, works the seams well, and it great in the red zone. Does he run a little stiff? Maybe, but so does Witten at times, and he seems to do OK.Thanks and you may very well be right. But I was hoping for a non-Steeler fan opinion. Of course you think Miller is better. I think he's underperformed (and maybe as a result of the PIT offense and therefore not his fault) more than most highly drafted TEs. So I was looking for other opinions.At worst, Miller is going to be Celek's equal in just about any category, at least at this point in their respective careers. He's a former first round draft pick who has averaged 42 receptions for 483 yards and 5.25 TDs per season in his four years in the NFL. This season he was injured for three games and has only begun hitting his stride again in the post-season. (6 catches, 99 yards, 1 TD the past two weeks.) He would be a much better known figure if the Steelers had a better offensive line and did not require him to stay in as often to help with the blocking, and also if he had greater fantasy worth as opposed to pure football worth. He is enough of a vertical threat to have had a 50 and 87 yard reception in his career. I remember him most being featured on the first two drives of the divisional playoffs in 2005-06 at Indy when the Steelers jumped out to a 14-0 first quarter lead.I'm sure I haven't seen Miller as much as a Steeler fan, but I always thought he looked sort of stiff. Any other opinions on Miller v. Celek?Miller has as much athleticism as Celek, likely more.Celek's field day in the NFCC game makes me think that Miller will have some success, although I'm not sure he has the athleticism to get away from coverage like Celek showed.
Agree on all points here. Miller may in fact be the most underrated Steeler on the roster. He is every bit as good as Celek IMO.Sheriff66 said:When you are underutilized, it's hard to live up to expectations. Miller has fly paper hands, works the seams well, and it great in the red zone. Does he run a little stiff? Maybe, but so does Witten at times, and he seems to do OK.ConstruxBoy said:Thanks and you may very well be right. But I was hoping for a non-Steeler fan opinion. Of course you think Miller is better. I think he's underperformed (and maybe as a result of the PIT offense and therefore not his fault) more than most highly drafted TEs. So I was looking for other opinions.The Jerk said:At worst, Miller is going to be Celek's equal in just about any category, at least at this point in their respective careers. He's a former first round draft pick who has averaged 42 receptions for 483 yards and 5.25 TDs per season in his four years in the NFL. This season he was injured for three games and has only begun hitting his stride again in the post-season. (6 catches, 99 yards, 1 TD the past two weeks.) He would be a much better known figure if the Steelers had a better offensive line and did not require him to stay in as often to help with the blocking, and also if he had greater fantasy worth as opposed to pure football worth. He is enough of a vertical threat to have had a 50 and 87 yard reception in his career. I remember him most being featured on the first two drives of the divisional playoffs in 2005-06 at Indy when the Steelers jumped out to a 14-0 first quarter lead.ConstruxBoy said:I'm sure I haven't seen Miller as much as a Steeler fan, but I always thought he looked sort of stiff. Any other opinions on Miller v. Celek?Miller has as much athleticism as Celek, likely more.Celek's field day in the NFCC game makes me think that Miller will have some success, although I'm not sure he has the athleticism to get away from coverage like Celek showed.