Andy Herron
Footballguy
Interesting.
Last edited by a moderator:
Knowing Shanahan's ways, I'm sure Parker is only the first of what may become a long line.Shanahan will probably want a rotation of at least 3 capable RBs.With all the vet RB out there why bring in Willie Parker for a look?Brian Westbrook, LT, Thomas Jones, Fargas ect ect but willie Dont get it
I think you're right Andy. If I'm keeping track correctly, the Redskins have cut every RB on their roster except Portis (Betts, Cartwright, Mason, Ganther, and some other guy).Knowing Shanahan's ways, I'm sure Parker is only the first of what may become a long line.Shanahan will probably want a rotation of at least 3 capable RBs.
Ganther was cut? didnt see that.I think PJ Hill is still rosteredI think you're right Andy. If I'm keeping track correctly, the Redskins have cut every RB on their roster except Portis (Betts, Cartwright, Mason, Ganther, and some other guy).Knowing Shanahan's ways, I'm sure Parker is only the first of what may become a long line.Shanahan will probably want a rotation of at least 3 capable RBs.
Shanahan isn't looking for the next Terrell Davis in an over-priced, over 30, high mileage RB. He's looking for someone to come in, provide competition and most likely be part of a committee. Of the vet RBs available, Parker may be able to best fill the role with a much more palatable price tag.With all the vet RB out there why bring in Willie Parker for a look?Brian Westbrook, LT, Thomas Jones, Fargas ect ect but willie Dont get it
Hmmm. I thought Ganther was given a right-of-first-refusal tender. I'll see if I can find another link.
Jason Reid, Washington Post, yesterdayWe now know that at least five of the tailbacks who finished last season as members of the Redskins -- Rock Cartwright, Ladell Betts, Quinton Ganther, Marcus Mason and Eddie Williams -- will be continuing their careers somewhere else.
If...and that is a huge IF....Portis can stay healthy for a full season, he is still a stud RB. Willie Parker would be a nice COP back that could be the starter if Portis gets hurt again. There is so much competition out there that they may be able to get FWP for a decent price too.
Sorry, it was Lorenzo Alexander that was tendered with the right of first refusal. For some reason I had thought it was one of the RBs.Hmmm. I thought Ganther was given a right-of-first-refusal tender. I'll see if I can find another link.
Age vs. mileagePortis is still on the right age of 30. Ronnie Brown and Michael Turner are close in age to Portis and while there value isn't as high as its been in the past they have not taken as big of a hit as Portis who is entering into THE system . You know... That one that made Portis in the first place and made Rueben Droughns into a capable back.
Ronnie can't stay healthy and Turner had over 400 carries in one season not to mention was ran into the ground in college. Perspective on Portis is skewed because he entered the league at 21. If Jamal Lewis was still a somewhat productive back on the knees he had Portis still has the capability to be a 2 or 3 in Shanny's system and is a great buy low right now.Age vs. mileagePortis is still on the right age of 30. Ronnie Brown and Michael Turner are close in age to Portis and while there value isn't as high as its been in the past they have not taken as big of a hit as Portis who is entering into THE system . You know... That one that made Portis in the first place and made Rueben Droughns into a capable back.
He played two years in college and had 338 attempts one year and 310 the other. Hardly what I would consider run into the ground in college.Turner had over 400 carries in one season not to mention was ran into the ground in college.Age vs. mileagePortis is still on the right age of 30. Ronnie Brown and Michael Turner are close in age to Portis and while there value isn't as high as its been in the past they have not taken as big of a hit as Portis who is entering into THE system . You know... That one that made Portis in the first place and made Rueben Droughns into a capable back.
Given that he played 12 games a year, that means he carried the ball about 27 times a game on average.Portis, on the other hand, carried 440 times in 3 years....220 carries was the highest number....20 times per game.....He played two years in college and had 338 attempts one year and 310 the other. Hardly what I would consider run into the ground in college.Turner had over 400 carries in one season not to mention was ran into the ground in college.Age vs. mileagePortis is still on the right age of 30. Ronnie Brown and Michael Turner are close in age to Portis and while there value isn't as high as its been in the past they have not taken as big of a hit as Portis who is entering into THE system . You know... That one that made Portis in the first place and made Rueben Droughns into a capable back.
Those 440 carries the past three years is on top of another 1,736 (2,176 career carries). Dude's tread is well past the wear indicators.Tuner had 376 in 2008 (not 400) with a career total of 782.Given that he played 12 games a year, that means he carried the ball about 27 times a game on average.Portis, on the other hand, carried 440 times in 3 years....220 carries was the highest number....20 times per game.....He played two years in college and had 338 attempts one year and 310 the other. Hardly what I would consider run into the ground in college.Turner had over 400 carries in one season not to mention was ran into the ground in college.Age vs. mileagePortis is still on the right age of 30. Ronnie Brown and Michael Turner are close in age to Portis and while there value isn't as high as its been in the past they have not taken as big of a hit as Portis who is entering into THE system . You know... That one that made Portis in the first place and made Rueben Droughns into a capable back.
I like him too. I realize folks think he is getting older, but he literally did not play between the ages of 18-24...I think with a decent line in front of him (not that the Skins are better than the Steelers), he would do fine as a complementary back.Godsbrother said:I am one of teh few that believe that Parker still has some gas in the tank. I don't think of him as a starter but he is still a decent back and should come at a good price.
Parker will be fine in a complementary role. He still is faster than 80% of the league's rbs. Parker never has had very good running instincts. If OL provides obvious hole than Willie will utilize his speed and looks good. If he needs to instinctively make a cut to a hole forget about it. He will run up the back of his OL then. Very good teammate and I will still root for him, but he can be very frustrating at times.I like him too. I realize folks think he is getting older, but he literally did not play between the ages of 18-24...I think with a decent line in front of him (not that the Skins are better than the Steelers), he would do fine as a complementary back.Godsbrother said:I am one of teh few that believe that Parker still has some gas in the tank. I don't think of him as a starter but he is still a decent back and should come at a good price.
Alex Gibbs. Why do you think that Shanny's abandoned that scheme?Why does everybody think Shanny is the reason behind the great rushing totals of the Broncos past? I thought that was all the OL coach and his zone blocking scheme. Can't think of the OL coaches name atm.