What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WIS XVII - The Cartereaganbush League: Scoobus beats Sammy in the Wis Series (1 Viewer)

Does it make a difference? No matter how we order them ... we still have a one-in-three shot at their best season :shrug:  
In these troubled times, I wanted the dice roll to unify us toward a communal outcome, instead of being another opportunity for shenanigans.

 
Maybe we can do away with the strict order by total salary.  It seems like another potential point of failure. 

As long as drafters don't try to game the system too much by intentional contrarianism, we can just let people sequence their possible years as they please.
I'm in favor of sticking with WIS salary. I don't trust any of these nerds not to game the system. Especially not myself - if I thought we could order them however want, I would've taken Guidry over Sandberg and stuck 78 in the 3 slot.
... I wasn't actually aware that "strict order by salary" was ever a rule in this thing. Missed that somehow.

That said ... if it's the same rule for everyone, it's a fair rule, no?

 
Lol yeah I’m not checking any of this stuff, GB our fearless commish Eephus and anyone else checking, so whatever they want I’m totally cool with.

But since Koya mentioned he was doing random I went and looked and he has Scott’s insane 86 season in his 2 spot, which again is fine if that’s what we’re doing, but otherwise.

 
Obviously it's still up for discussion, but a rules post bump:

Deleted the original rules post :bag:

Players must have three WIS eligible seasons between 1977 and 1992.  At the end of each round a d3 will be rolled to select which season will be used in the sim for all players drafted in the preceding round.  By default the three potential seasons for the random roll will be the top three eligible seasons ranked according to WIS salary.  If a drafter wants to substitute a different season prior to the roll, he/she must specify the season.  WIS salaries will still be used to determine order of the seasons for the dice roll.

No cap, clones or partials.

Trades allowed after round 4

 
Lol yeah I’m not checking any of this stuff, GB our fearless commish Eephus and anyone else checking, so whatever they want I’m totally cool with.

But since Koya mentioned he was doing random I went and looked and he has Scott’s insane 86 season in his 2 spot, which again is fine if that’s what we’re doing, but otherwise.
This is why we can't have nice things

ETA:  I've reordered them on the draft sheet

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm in favor of sticking with WIS salary. I don't trust any of these nerds not to game the system. Especially not myself - if I thought we could order them however want, I would've taken Guidry over Sandberg and stuck 78 in the 3 slot.
Same here. I thought that was what we were doing anyway. Thus the comments on the last page about not wanting us to roll a 1 so that we didn't get any crazy good pitcher seasons. 

 
***OFFICIAL

You can pick any three player seasons you want but they must be listed in descending order of WIS salary.

I've checked the pitchers and changed Mike Scott.  I think the others were all OK. 

I'll do the hitters before the round #1 roll

 
No but it's consistent and well defined.

...and harder for Koya to game it.
Oh, I'll figure SOMEthing.

*within the rules.  We do still get to choose which three seasons though yes, doesn't have to be their top three by salary (that would be a hill I might die on.  digitally speaking, that is). But we will order them by salary. AS YOU COMMAND.

 
Well, Sabe's best season, anyway.
His other two should perform very well, and don't have as much volatility as Scott nor Guidry IIRC.  At one point I had Sabe's ahead for that reason (forget which was the third season)

 
Maybe Guidry going from a $12.8 M pitcher to a $6.7 M pitcher?

Nolan Ryan's 1977 has several great metrics ... but over 6 BB/9   :eek:   Maybe the Ks will smooth that out :shrug:
At least he won't be facing Eddie Stanky in this format

 
Maybe Guidry going from a $12.8 M pitcher to a $6.7 M pitcher?

Nolan Ryan's 1977 has several great metrics ... but over 6 BB/9   :eek:   Maybe the Ks will smooth that out :shrug:
Scott is also an obvious one. Both he and Guidry have 3rd seasons with better numbers but lower IP and thus less salary.

Richard joins Ryan in having an otherwise nice #2 season with a gross BB/9 (4.61).

Most who took hitters are probably happy with the 2. Brett and Schmidt miss out on insanely good seasons but still have really nice fallback options.

 
Who was hit the hardest by the 2? 
I was probably the only person hoping for 3. 91 Bonds had his most PAs and still came in at .936 normOPS.  Slight drop off from 92, but would’ve been worth it to push everyone else down.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top