I second this motion. It's time.1914 is the 100th anniversary of the Federal League. We should include them in the player pool.
Do we add them to the mix? Or maybe as the next round which will be all in 2014 we do fed league and some other oddball combinationI second this motion. It's time.1914 is the 100th anniversary of the Federal League. We should include them in the player pool.
Claude Hendrix alias?Should make it a requirement that everyone has to roster at least one Fed leaguer?
Can we all roster Claude Hendrix or Benny Kauff?Claude Hendrix alias?Should make it a requirement that everyone has to roster at least one Fed leaguer?
This has Benny Kauff written all over it.Claude Hendrix alias?Should make it a requirement that everyone has to roster at least one Fed leaguer?
Make it so o wise one.Make round 24 a federal league round? Everyone gets 1 and the teams that missed the great picks in round 1 get the best.
Is the Ruth to Bonds thing firm? Is it inclusive (1914-2007) or covering the gap between their careers (1936-84)?So, is it worth adding the federal league in a draft as deep as Ruth to bonds? It's basically adding Hendrix, Kauff and a few others. Maybe next go around we do Fed leaugue within another dead ball variation or something with one year from every decade and include Fed League.
Nothing's set in stone I'd think. That was the consensus when things died down after the last go round. The idea was after Ruth's career ended to before Bonds began. Gets a lot of outlier years out I'd think.Is the Ruth to Bonds thing firm? Is it inclusive (1914-2007) or covering the gap between their careers (1936-84)?So, is it worth adding the federal league in a draft as deep as Ruth to bonds? It's basically adding Hendrix, Kauff and a few others. Maybe next go around we do Fed leaugue within another dead ball variation or something with one year from every decade and include Fed League.
I thought we agreed on 36-84. If that's the case, not sure how the Federal League comes in here.Nothing's set in stone I'd think. That was the consensus when things died down after the last go round. The idea was after Ruth's career ended to before Bonds began. Gets a lot of outlier years out I'd think.Is the Ruth to Bonds thing firm? Is it inclusive (1914-2007) or covering the gap between their careers (1936-84)?So, is it worth adding the federal league in a draft as deep as Ruth to bonds? It's basically adding Hendrix, Kauff and a few others. Maybe next go around we do Fed leaugue within another dead ball variation or something with one year from every decade and include Fed League.
We had agreed, but not as if it's the law of the land here.I thought we agreed on 36-84. If that's the case, not sure how the Federal League comes in here.Nothing's set in stone I'd think. That was the consensus when things died down after the last go round. The idea was after Ruth's career ended to before Bonds began. Gets a lot of outlier years out I'd think.Is the Ruth to Bonds thing firm? Is it inclusive (1914-2007) or covering the gap between their careers (1936-84)?So, is it worth adding the federal league in a draft as deep as Ruth to bonds? It's basically adding Hendrix, Kauff and a few others. Maybe next go around we do Fed leaugue within another dead ball variation or something with one year from every decade and include Fed League.
Problem is it will really slant things if we slot it in during one specific round. Yeah, round 24 two guys get great players and then... well...Brady Marino said:Yeah, I kind of like the Fed league twist the more I think of it. This leeg needed a twist since this draft would have been mostly straightforward.
Slightly modified, but what about a "best of the decades" type of roster?A year per decade type thing or something
I could be down with that. Either for this go around or do ruth to bonds and then this in the wings.Slightly modified, but what about a "best of the decades" type of roster?A year per decade type thing or something
2 1890s
2 1900s
2 1910s
2 1920s
2 1930s
2 1940s
2 1950s
2 1960s
2 1970s
2 1980s
2 1990s
2 2000- present
1 Federal Leaguer
In light of the timing with this going to be the 100th anniversary of the Feds, I say we go with this, then post-Ruth to pre-Bonds with the next.I could be down with that. Either for this go around or do ruth to bonds and then this in the wings.Slightly modified, but what about a "best of the decades" type of roster?A year per decade type thing or something
2 1890s
2 1900s
2 1910s
2 1920s
2 1930s
2 1940s
2 1950s
2 1960s
2 1970s
2 1980s
2 1990s
2 2000- present
1 Federal Leaguer
Sounds to me like someone already has his KoyaSheet compiledWhile I like the eras, I'm not sure the end database will be much different than a general all era draft. Would prefer Ruth to Bonds and that one after, but ok either way.
Sounds to me like someone already has his KoyaSheet compiledWhile I like the eras, I'm not sure the end database will be much different than a general all era draft. Would prefer Ruth to Bonds and that one after, but ok either way.
All Decades is a pretty simple KoyaSheet - and the Ruth-Bonds would be a good chunk of it.Sounds to me like someone already has his KoyaSheet compiledWhile I like the eras, I'm not sure the end database will be much different than a general all era draft. Would prefer Ruth to Bonds and that one after, but ok either way.
And the "All Decades" theme presents a paradigm shift that he's ill prepared for...
Yes it's called hardball dynasty, but it does not include real players.Does wis offer dynasty leagues ?
Some of us aren't. You would think I would eventually figure this thing out.All Decades is a pretty simple KoyaSheet - and the Ruth-Bonds would be a good chunk of it.Sounds to me like someone already has his KoyaSheet compiledWhile I like the eras, I'm not sure the end database will be much different than a general all era draft. Would prefer Ruth to Bonds and that one after, but ok either way.
And the "All Decades" theme presents a paradigm shift that he's ill prepared for...
Plus, I think we are all pretty aware of the key dos and don'ts for an all era team.
Not vacation but traveling for work.Let's settle on this #### so we can start drafting before jfranco gets back from vacation
Have you no internet access while travelling for work? I've made some of my best picks while on the road. Then again, I drafted Dave Steib while taking a wizz at Mohegan Sun casino during a business meeting (note: the wizz occurred in the restroom, not in the meeting itself).jfranco77 said:Not vacation but traveling for work.Let's settle on this #### so we can start drafting before jfranco gets back from vacation
So much greatness in this post. I feel like the bolded should be made into a movie or six-part sitcom.Have you no internet access while travelling for work? I've made some of my best picks while on the road. Then again, I drafted Dave Steib while taking a wizz at Mohegan Sun casino during a business meeting (note: the wizz occurred in the restroom, not in the meeting itself).jfranco77 said:Not vacation but traveling for work.Let's settle on this #### so we can start drafting before jfranco gets back from vacation
I made a few picks while moving from SE Michigan to NW North Dakota earlier this year. I remember drafting Jim Abbott in a Grand Forks travel center's bathroom.Have you no internet access while travelling for work? I've made some of my best picks while on the road. Then again, I drafted Dave Steib while taking a wizz at Mohegan Sun casino during a business meeting (note: the wizz occurred in the restroom, not in the meeting itself).jfranco77 said:Not vacation but traveling for work.Let's settle on this #### so we can start drafting before jfranco gets back from vacation
Now we're talking.Co commish - Mr Pickles and Nipsey?Who is going to commish this one?
RnR and Eephus.Now we're talking.Co commish - Mr Pickles and Nipsey?Who is going to commish this one?