With D. Jax gone, will the real DJ please stand up? (1 Viewer)

[Baron Samedi]

 

[identikit]

Seemed to me that when DJ was in there in the last half of the year (when Djax was out), Hasselback favored him with looks and actual passes over Branch.

Seattle homers, can you shed any light on this?

Id

 

[Trey]

Part of me says Branch more catches, but DJ more yards?

Though I admittedly have not seen much Seahawks action here.

 

[Mister CIA]

Does anyone have projections on Hackett?

Is 75-1000-6 a conservative projection?

 

[fsufan]

the Seahawks must feel good about DJ is they traded D jax

 

[Riffraff]

Hackett needs a new contract as he's in his final year.

Hope he doesn't think he's worth WR#1 money like DJack.

 

[BeTheMatch]

If Hackett stays healthy (and Hasselbeck does, too), I think he could be in for a huge year. There's no doubt in my mind that he'll outproduce Branch. I think Hackett is an emerging star, and that's why they felt they could let DJax go.

 

[Baron Samedi]

If Hackett stays healthy (and Hasselbeck does, too), I think he could be in for a huge year. There's no doubt in my mind that he'll outproduce Branch. I think Hackett is an emerging star, and that's why they felt they could let DJax go.

 

[Alluro]

Can we even say for certain that Hackett would start over Nate Burleson?

 

[BeTheMatch]

Can we even say for certain that Hackett would start over Nate Burleson?

With 99.9 percent certainty.

 

[identikit]

Can we even say for certain that Hackett would start over Nate Burleson?

Yes.

 

[Baron Samedi]

Can we even say for certain that Hackett would start over Nate Burleson?

 

[mad sweeney]

Can we even say for certain that Hackett would start over Nate Burleson?

He already was.

 

[gman8343]

Can we even say for certain that Hackett would start over Nate Burleson?

Buddy Hackett would start over Nate Burleson.

 

[ThePittbully]

I am considering him at 2.1 in my rook draft

 

[Tommy Collins]

I am considering him at 2.1 in my rook draft

Hackett's a rookie again?