What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Woodrow's Mock Draft Version 1.0 (1 Viewer)

Jason Wood

Zoo York
It's February, the NFL coaching carousel is pretty much over, and we're in that lull right before free agency, Pro Days and the April draft start getting going. There are a TREMENDOUS amount of unknowns about the NFL draft process at this point. We need to get real measurables on most of the prospects, and of course Pro Days will help settle a lot of the current debate about how positions rank. And, of course, team needs are going to narrow considerably once free agency gets rolling.

In any event, here's my first mock draft of the year with many revisions to follow as the offseason progresses.

Round One Mock Draft

1.01) Houston Texans -- RB Reggie Bush, USC

No surprises here, I personally believe Bush will do nothing to hurt his already lofty grade and with the Texans picking up the option on Carr, Bush is the guy IF the Texans stay at 1.01. Regardless of what people on this board may think of Bush, there hasn't been a non QB with as universally high a pre-Combine grade in a long, long time.

1.02) New Orleans Saints -- QB Matt Leinart, USC

Leinart should and will be the Saints choice. Leinart has just about everything a team could want in a young franchise QB prospect, carries a higher grade than any of the QBs coming out the last few years, and goes to a team that happens to have a real need for a new QB with Aaron Brooks expected to be sent packing. New head coach Sean Payton is known for his work with QBs, this pick is too easy.

1.03) Tennessee Titans -- OT D'Brickshaw Ferguson, Virginia

95% of all mocks have Vince Young going to the Titans but I'm not sure it plays out that way. One, I think as Brick works out further and shows that he's not only the best OT in this draft by a wide margin, but grades out as a true cornerstone tackle. Two, Vince Young's flaws as passer are exposed and Norm Chow makes the case that he's not a fit for the Titans offense, at least not as currently constituted.

1.04) New York Jets -- QB Vince Young, Texas

Young is going to fall, but not that far. The Jets, already committed to a youth movement top to bottom [GM, HC, OC] can't pass up the chance at greatness, even though Young has a ton of risk involved too. The Jets will, by April, know whether Chad Pennington was willing to take the big pay cut. If he does, Young interns for a year or two. If he doesn't, a veteran is brought in for a bit and Young's timetable to play is accelerated.

1.05) Green Bay Packers -- OLB A.J. Hawk, Ohio State

The first of many Buckeyes to be drafted early, Hawk is a special player who stands out in a year when the LB crop is excellent. The Packers need help in a lot of places, and won't pass up the best available talent, which is Hawk at this point. Hawk brings the kind of all purpose game the Packers haven't had on their defensive front seven in some time.

1.06) Oakland Raiders -- DE Mario Williams, NC State

6'6", almost 300 pounds and equally adept at rushing the passer and playing the run, Williams is the class of the defensive end group this year and will fit perfectly opposite surprise AFC sack leader Derrick Burgess.

1.07) San Francisco 49ers -- TE Vernon Davis, Maryland

The 49ers drafted Alex Smith last year and need to surround him with talented offensive players. Vernon Davis has the chance to be the next dominant TE in the league, and has rare athleticism and soft hands to go along with good size. In a great year for TEs, Davis won't escape the top 10 after teams get a look at him in his Pro Day and at the Combine.

1.08) Buffalo Bills -- DT Haloti Ngata, Oregon

It seems I'm in the majority on this pick, as many mocks have Ngata going to Buffalo. The pick makes so much sense given a) the Bills need to reinvigorate its run defense, b) Ngata's projected draft grade suggests he's a top-10 player and the best DT in the draft class.

1.09) Detroit Lions -- QB Jay Cutler, Vanderbilt

This pick confounds me and ultimately I doubt my final mock will have Cutler being drafted here. But for now I see the logic given Cutler's potential as a franchise QB and the Lions new coaching staff likely signaling the end of the Joey Harrington era. However, with Mike Martz signing on, the Lions could well give Harrington one year under Mike and in that case, would turn their attention elsewhere, potentially Winston Justice or Michael Huff.

1.10) Arizona Cardinals -- OT Winston Justice, USC

There are a lot of ways the Cardinals could go with this pick, but if they're serious in re-signing Kurt Warner [we'll know by the draft], they HAVE to make the OL a major priority. In Justice, they get someone that should start immediately. Furthermore, Denny Green has recently gone on record saying that the offensive line will be a major focal point this offseason.

1.11) St. Louis Rams -- DB Michael Huff, Texas

A lot of folks think the Rams will go offense because of Scott Linehan's hiring. But in listening to Linehan in recent interviews, he's laser focused on the need improve the defense. Huff projects as a physical corner and, in my opinion, will end up with a higher rating than Jimmy Williams or Tye Hill once the pre draft workouts commence.

1.12) Cleveland Browns -- OLB Chad Greenway, Iowa

This is one of those picks that makes too much sense not to project. The Browns had a need for playmaking linebackers to run Crennel's complex 3-4 scheme and Greenway reasserted himself as an elite LB prospect with a great Senior Bowl week.

1.13) Baltimore Ravens -- RB DeAngelo Williams, Memphis

It seems most mock drafts have the Ravens looking at LenDale White, likely because they project White as the closer approximation to Jamal Lewis [a big inside runner]. But DeAngelo Williams is the better all around back and, if he's available here, will give the Ravens something they don't currently have, an every down franchise runner.

1.14) Philadelphia Eagles -- DE Tamba Hali, Penn State

The Eagles could go a lot of directions with this pick [or could trade up given the plethora of picks they've stockpiled], but if they stay here, I believe Hali is their guy. Hali is someone the Eagles know well [a local product] and his performance at the Senior Bowl cemented his status as the 2nd best end in the draft [behind Mario Williams].

1.15) Atlanta Falcons -- DT Brodrick Bunkley, Florida State

No draft goes completely the way we expect, in that teams don't always draft for need [particularly the very good franchises]. While the Falcons have Rod Coleman and like what they see in Chad Lavalais, their defensive line needs young playmakers and Bunkley will be too tempting to pass up at this point. DTs have a way of vaulting up the charts and Bunkley is my pick for the 2006 "fast riser."

1.16) Miami Dolphins -- CB Tye Hill, Clemson

The Dolphins probably find some way to end up with Jay Cutler the more I think about things, but if they stay at 16 and let Madison walk as expected, I think they opt for Hill at this spot. Again, people are going to wonder why I have Hill going ahead of Jimmy Williams, but with the way Hill blanketed receivers at the Senior Bowl and given his projected speed, I think Hill goes higher. The NFL has a long history of coveting blazing 40 times at corner and Hill should oblige.

1.17) Minnesota Vikings -- RB LenDale White, USC

New HC Brad Childress is, believe it or not, a huge proponent of a power running game. He didn't get a chance to show that in Philadelphia under Andy Reid. White should flourish behind the Vikings sizable offensive line, and gives the team a big back with natural goal line skills allowing it to no longer have to rely on a committee.

1.18) Dallas Cowboys -- CB/S Jimmy Williams, Virginia Tech

The Jimmy Williams free fall ends in Dallas, where Bill Parcells isn't afraid to add Williams to the mix. Ultimately Williams may project as a safety in the NFL, and the Cowboys could find a spot for him at either CB or S in 2006.

1.19) San Diego Chargers -- WR Santonio Holmes, Ohio State

The Chargers are another team that could go in a ton of directions, but I think Holmes is too compelling an option at this point in the 1st round for the Chargers to pass up. They addressed the defense last year via the draft, and definitely have the need for a young potential WR1, particularly with Keenan McCardell getting into the twilight of his career.

1.20) Kansas City Chiefs -- CB Ashton Youboty, Ohio State

Back to back Buckeyes as Herm Edwards gets his wish and the Chiefs add a defensive playmaker in the secondary. Youboty needs to solidify his status as a first rounder, but if he performs at the Combine as projected, he'll come off the board in the mid- to late-first round IMHO.

1.21) New England Patriots -- OLB Demeco Ryans, Alabama

The Patriots are never afraid to draft football players, regardless of their measurables. Some project Ryans to fall given his size [or lack thereof], but his unbelievably smart and consistent level of play for Alabama is all Belichick will need to add Ryans to the Patriots LB corps.

1.22) Denver Broncos [via Washington] -- C Nick Mangold, Ohio State

Mangold did everything he needed to at the Senior Week to work his way into the late 1st, early 2nd round mix. The Broncos need a youth infusion on the O-line and Mangold is the kind of smart, athletic blocker that has historically flourished under Shanahan. The Broncos may play Mangold at guard initially.

1.23) Tampa Bay Bucs -- OT Marcus McNeil, Auburn

McNeil was once considered a top 10 pick before the 2005 collegiate season, but he along with several other OT prospects failed to live up to lofty expectations. In any event, McNeil has a mean streak and is too athletic and technically sound for the Bucs to pass up. McNeil fills a need and is among the best players available.

1.24) Cincinnati Bengals -- TE Dominique Byrd, USC

It's a great TE class, with as many as six TEs possibly coming off the board in the first two rounds. Byrd outplayed [and out practiced] Marcedes Lewis at the Senior Bowl and is a natural fit with the Bengals as TE is one of the few offensive positions of need.

1.25) New York Giants -- LB Thomas Howard, UTEP

The Giants need 'backers and Howard is the best available at this point. Howard is a bit undersized but is versatile and should cement himself as a first rounder in the coming months.

1.26) Chicago Bears -- TE Leonard Pope, Georgia

The Bears need more offensive playmakers, but they're not going to lose their identity as a smash mouth, ball control team after the success they had in 2005. Pope is less polished offensively than the other top TE prospects but is still a quality player. But as importantly, he's the best blocker in the group and would help the running game as much as Rex Grossman.

1.27) Carolina Panthers -- DT Gate Watson, Michigan

Gabe Watson emerged from a crowded DT pack [after Ngata, that is], at the Senior Bowl and fits well with the Panthers. Watson is a classic 4-3 DT and would fit into the Panthers line rotation immediately and project as full time starter in a year or two.

1.28) Jacksonville Jaguars -- DE Matthius Kiwanuka, Boston College

Kiwanuka was viewed as a potential top-10 pick heading into the 2005 college season but nagging injuries have hampered his stock as he's been unable to display the natural pass rush moves seen earlier in his career. He was manhandled on a consistent basis by D'Brick at the Senior Bowl and will need a strong private workout to convince someone to take him in the late 1st. But the Jags have a need here and, injury concerns abated, Kiwanuka shouldn't fall this far based on his potential as a dominant DE with good size.

1.29) Denver Broncos -- DT Rod Wright, Texas

Rod Wright is the forgotten man of defensive tackles this year it seems but is a solid pro prospect with more athleticism than normally found in a stay at home DT. Wright could go much higher depending on his workouts, as DT is a coveted position traditionally, but if he's still on the board I think Denver snaps him up with their 2nd of two 1st round selections. This presumes the Broncos have some issue re-signing G. Warren; a priority this offseason.

1.30) Indianapolis Colts -- RB Laurence Maroney, Minnesota

Maroney would be a fantasy owners dream under this scenario, as he would be going to a ready made offense where teams couldn't stack the box, and he'd presumably have the starting job from Day One. Assuming Edge is gone in free agency, the Colts would have to look long and hard at Maroney who was highly productive as a workhorse back at Minnesota the last few seasons.

1.31) Seattle Seahawks -- FS Ko Simpson, South Carolina

The way the Seahawks safeties were exposed in the Super Bowl, Simpson seems like a great fit for a team without a ton of major needs. Simpson is a 3rd year sophomore who surprised many by declaring. He's a tackling machine but showed the ability to cover when called upon. The Hawks could go in a ton of directions here, but I'm projecting a bit that Simpson will continue to gain momentum as scouts get a look at him. As a sophomore playing for South Carolina, he doesn't have the high profile as some of the other DBs carrying potential 1st day grades.

1.32) Pittsburgh Steelers -- WR Sinorice Moss, Miami

When you just won the Super Bowl, you take a best player available approach most of the time. Assuming the Steelers lose Randel-El, they have a need for another wideout and a return man, and Moss is the most explosive option on the draft board.

Enjoy and feel free to comment/agree/disagree/debate/discuss! The next mock will come post the Combine, at which point 80% of these picks will probably be different. :)

 
I heard McNeil dropped out of the first round with his poor Senior Bowl.

Seemed slow to me, in what I saw. I'd rather see them take Ernie Sims who can tutor under Brooks for a year, and who seems real likely to go in the first round (and I don't see you having him listed).

Oline for the Bucs isn't as big of a concern as some people are making it out to be.

 
I heard McNeil dropped out of the first round with his poor Senior Bowl.

Seemed slow to me, in what I saw. I'd rather see them take Ernie Sims who can tutor under Brooks for a year, and who seems real likely to go in the first round (and I don't see you having him listed).

Oline for the Bucs isn't as big of a concern as some people are making it out to be.
Very mixed reviews of McNeil post the Senior Bowl, but he's too athletic to not work his way back into the 1st round picture [in my opinion] once he has his workouts.Sims could certainly factor into the 1st round, as could Bobby Carpenter. I just don't know that I see all those LBs making it to the 1st round, regardless of grade.

 
Thanks for sharing Woodrow. I like quite a few of the picks and am looking forward to analyzing the rest when I have more time.

 
I heard McNeil dropped out of the first round with his poor Senior Bowl.

Seemed slow to me, in what I saw. I'd rather see them take Ernie Sims who can tutor under Brooks for a year, and who seems real likely to go in the first round (and I don't see you having him listed).

Oline for the Bucs isn't as big of a concern as some people are making it out to be.
Very mixed reviews of McNeil post the Senior Bowl, but he's too athletic to not work his way back into the 1st round picture [in my opinion] once he has his workouts.Sims could certainly factor into the 1st round, as could Bobby Carpenter. I just don't know that I see all those LBs making it to the 1st round, regardless of grade.
I suppose. I see the Bucs though as a team that's reasonably close to at least winning the NFC -- last thing they need is some slug OT who's 2 years away (at least) from helping the team win. A guy like Sinorice Moss or Ernie Sims will fill a much bigger role not only in 2007 as step-in starters, but in 2006 as well as guys who would probably be more game ready if something happened to Brooks or Galloway.
 
great mock woodrow.

I dont think it's out of line to put brick above young, and LT is certainly a huge need for the titans. the thing that i think puts young over the top as the pick is his relationship with mcnair. I think bringing him to a team with a father figure that made a similar transformation as the one VY will have to make takes some of the risk out of the equation.

Davis to the niners is interesting - i could also see williams there (repeat of the caddy/gruden love affair from last year's senior bowl) and maybe even ngata if they like the way he projects to a 3-4 NT.

I like Greenway to the Browns. In the mock chaos commish and i are working on right now, we have them reaching for gabe watson, but greenway might work out in the 3-4 with his size.

Im not sure about SD taking Holmes. First of all, they do have their#1 WR of the future in vincent jackson. Second, they have needs in the D-backfield and O-line. I dont see them passing on Jonathan Scott to get another smallish/speedy WR, even if Holmes is an excellent specimen.

Which brings me to - McNeill over Scott? For that matter, where is Jonathan Scott? He might not have lit up the Senior Bowl like DaBrick, but he is still very solid and has the least risk of the 2nd tier OTs. I dont seem him making it out the first, but ill give you a shot to convince me he will.

Love Ryans to the Pats - great observation about their draft philosophy.

Love Mangold in the first. I would be THRILLED if the steelers take him at 32.

I like Byrd as the #2 TE - ive been high on him for a while. Looks like Lewis is falling out of the first at this point due to 40 times (word from chaos commish)

Moss to the Steelers.... not the first mock i've seen this in, and im not sure what to make of it. If they go WR in the first, i would expect a guy like Stovall - a WR that adds a dimension to the passing game - Moss is not that different from Ced Wilson, and they can easily get a return specialist like Jeremy Bloom later... that being said, i would be excited to see what they can do with him.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I heard McNeil dropped out of the first round with his poor Senior Bowl.

Seemed slow to me, in what I saw. I'd rather see them take Ernie Sims who can tutor under Brooks for a year, and who seems real likely to go in the first round (and I don't see you having him listed).

Oline for the Bucs isn't as big of a concern as some people are making it out to be.
Very mixed reviews of McNeil post the Senior Bowl, but he's too athletic to not work his way back into the 1st round picture [in my opinion] once he has his workouts.Sims could certainly factor into the 1st round, as could Bobby Carpenter. I just don't know that I see all those LBs making it to the 1st round, regardless of grade.
I suppose. I see the Bucs though as a team that's reasonably close to at least winning the NFC -- last thing they need is some slug OT who's 2 years away (at least) from helping the team win. A guy like Sinorice Moss or Ernie Sims will fill a much bigger role not only in 2007 as step-in starters, but in 2006 as well as guys who would probably be more game ready if something happened to Brooks or Galloway.
You could well be right Cappy. It's way too early to pretend like I have any conviction in my projections...I think the Sims pick is a tad too cute for my tastes [Florida State guy replacing a Florida State legend, etc...], but it could happen.To be honest, I see the Bucs adding someone like D'Qwell Jackson in the 2nd round, thus my decision to not go OLB in the 1st round.

 
I heard McNeil dropped out of the first round with his poor Senior Bowl.

Seemed slow to me, in what I saw. I'd rather see them take Ernie Sims who can tutor under Brooks for a year, and who seems real likely to go in the first round (and I don't see you having him listed).

Oline for the Bucs isn't as big of a concern as some people are making it out to be.
Very mixed reviews of McNeil post the Senior Bowl, but he's too athletic to not work his way back into the 1st round picture [in my opinion] once he has his workouts.Sims could certainly factor into the 1st round, as could Bobby Carpenter. I just don't know that I see all those LBs making it to the 1st round, regardless of grade.
as long as Carpenter's ankle tests out ok at the combine, he'll get in the first. if he's completely healthy, i wouldnt be shocked to see him go to the browns at 12 ( i think his rugged style is a better fit for the 3-4, while Greenway is a more ideal 4-3 chase WLB because he's similar to Derrick Johnson in that he likes to run around blockers more than take them on). If Carpenter gets a clean bill of health, i see no way he gets past dallas at 19 - he screams parcells type player.of course, we are all guessing...

 
I heard McNeil dropped out of the first round with his poor Senior Bowl.

Seemed slow to me, in what I saw. I'd rather see them take Ernie Sims who can tutor under Brooks for a year, and who seems real likely to go in the first round (and I don't see you having him listed).

Oline for the Bucs isn't as big of a concern as some people are making it out to be.
Very mixed reviews of McNeil post the Senior Bowl, but he's too athletic to not work his way back into the 1st round picture [in my opinion] once he has his workouts.Sims could certainly factor into the 1st round, as could Bobby Carpenter. I just don't know that I see all those LBs making it to the 1st round, regardless of grade.
I suppose. I see the Bucs though as a team that's reasonably close to at least winning the NFC -- last thing they need is some slug OT who's 2 years away (at least) from helping the team win. A guy like Sinorice Moss or Ernie Sims will fill a much bigger role not only in 2007 as step-in starters, but in 2006 as well as guys who would probably be more game ready if something happened to Brooks or Galloway.
You could well be right Cappy. It's way too early to pretend like I have any conviction in my projections...I think the Sims pick is a tad too cute for my tastes [Florida State guy replacing a Florida State legend, etc...], but it could happen.To be honest, I see the Bucs adding someone like D'Qwell Jackson in the 2nd round, thus my decision to not go OLB in the 1st round.
the thing is, sims really is the second coming of brooks. a vicious chase WLB who is too small to have to work through traffic, but a perfect perfect perfect guy for the weakside in a cover 2. Sims hits like a sledgehammer, he just needs the right scheme to be a big time impact player.
 
I heard McNeil dropped out of the first round with his poor Senior Bowl.

Seemed slow to me, in what I saw. I'd rather see them take Ernie Sims who can tutor under Brooks for a year, and who seems real likely to go in the first round (and I don't see you having him listed).

Oline for the Bucs isn't as big of a concern as some people are making it out to be.
Very mixed reviews of McNeil post the Senior Bowl, but he's too athletic to not work his way back into the 1st round picture [in my opinion] once he has his workouts.Sims could certainly factor into the 1st round, as could Bobby Carpenter. I just don't know that I see all those LBs making it to the 1st round, regardless of grade.
I suppose. I see the Bucs though as a team that's reasonably close to at least winning the NFC -- last thing they need is some slug OT who's 2 years away (at least) from helping the team win. A guy like Sinorice Moss or Ernie Sims will fill a much bigger role not only in 2007 as step-in starters, but in 2006 as well as guys who would probably be more game ready if something happened to Brooks or Galloway.
You could well be right Cappy. It's way too early to pretend like I have any conviction in my projections...I think the Sims pick is a tad too cute for my tastes [Florida State guy replacing a Florida State legend, etc...], but it could happen.
Yeah I don't particularly like that either -- in fact, I mocked somebody yesterday for saying this HAD to happen, as if it's written in some sort of stone or something.That said, Sims fits the defense pretty well, from a measurables standpoint. But he's a bit too erratic for my tastes and probably wouldn't fit into such a constrained D. Kind of reminds me of Arrington in the way he likes to freelance.

I'd rather them take Moss. I know it's early, but WR is a need, in 2006 and down the line.

Or Bunkley (another FSU guy ;) ) -- he would actually be about the best fit for the team.

 
I heard McNeil dropped out of the first round with his poor Senior Bowl.

Seemed slow to me, in what I saw. I'd rather see them take Ernie Sims who can tutor under Brooks for a year, and who seems real likely to go in the first round (and I don't see you having him listed).

Oline for the Bucs isn't as big of a concern as some people are making it out to be.
Very mixed reviews of McNeil post the Senior Bowl, but he's too athletic to not work his way back into the 1st round picture [in my opinion] once he has his workouts.Sims could certainly factor into the 1st round, as could Bobby Carpenter. I just don't know that I see all those LBs making it to the 1st round, regardless of grade.
I suppose. I see the Bucs though as a team that's reasonably close to at least winning the NFC -- last thing they need is some slug OT who's 2 years away (at least) from helping the team win. A guy like Sinorice Moss or Ernie Sims will fill a much bigger role not only in 2007 as step-in starters, but in 2006 as well as guys who would probably be more game ready if something happened to Brooks or Galloway.
You could well be right Cappy. It's way too early to pretend like I have any conviction in my projections...I think the Sims pick is a tad too cute for my tastes [Florida State guy replacing a Florida State legend, etc...], but it could happen.To be honest, I see the Bucs adding someone like D'Qwell Jackson in the 2nd round, thus my decision to not go OLB in the 1st round.
the thing is, sims really is the second coming of brooks. a vicious chase WLB who is too small to have to work through traffic, but a perfect perfect perfect guy for the weakside in a cover 2. Sims hits like a sledgehammer, he just needs the right scheme to be a big time impact player.
You're absolutely right, but he's really too much of a freelance guy. One of his big problems at FSU was his inability to stay within the defense. Monte would have to be convinced he could teach him otherwise, and really, there's no reason why he couldn't. But you are right -- he's perfect for that weakside spot.

 
great mock woodrow.

I dont think it's out of line to put brick above young, and LT is certainly a huge need for the titans. the thing that i think puts young over the top as the pick is his relationship with mcnair. I think bringing him to a team with a father figure that made a similar transformation as the one VY will have to make takes some of the risk out of the equation.

Davis to the niners is interesting - i could also see williams there (repeat of the caddy/gruden love affair from last year's senior bowl) and maybe even ngata if they like the way he projects to a 3-4 NT.

I like Greenway to the Browns. In the mock chaos commish and i are working on right now, we have them reaching for gabe watson, but greenway works well in the 3-4 with his size.

Im not sure about SD taking Holmes. First of all, they do have their#1 WR of the future in vincent jackson. Second, they have needs in the D-backfield and O-line. I dont see them passing on Jonathan Scott to get another smallish/speedy WR, even if Holmes is an excellent specimen.

Which brings me to - McNeill over Scott? For that matter, where is Jonathan Scott? He might not have lit up the Senior Bowl like DaBrick, but he is still very solid and has the least risk of the 2nd tier OTs. I dont seem him making it out the first, but ill give you a shot to convince me he will.

Love Ryans to the Pats - great observation about their draft philosophy.

Love Mangold in the first. I would be THRILLED if the steelers take him at 32.

I like Byrd as the #2 TE - ive been high on him for a while. Looks like Lewis is falling out of the first at this point due to 40 times (word from chaos commish)

Moss to the Steelers.... not the first mock i've seen this in, and im not sure what to make of it. If they go WR in the first, i would expect a guy like Stovall - a WR that adds a dimension to the passing game - Moss is not that different from Ced Wilson, and they can easily get a return specialist like Jeremy Bloom later... that being said, i would be excited to see what they can do with him.
Bloom, can't wait for the Chaos/Bloom mock. You guys were killer with the All Star game coverage.As to your points...

I think some of these OTs are going to fall [much like Khalif Barnes did a year ago], and Scott was my pick based on some of the anecdotal feedback I've heard of him of late. That said, so much is left to evaluate right now and he could EASILY reassert himself as a 1st round lock after the Combine and UT Pro Day; no question.

My projection of Vernon Davis to the 49ers isn't the most conventional viewpoint, but I think this is a guy who the media and scouts will be going nuts over once he works out [i'm 99% sure you're hyped on him too], so he will be in my top 10 somewhere until I'm provided a solid reason why he doesn't warrant such consideration.

Gabe Watson to the Browns would be a stretch, but it could certainly happen. Obviously my view on Bunkley is a bit of a speculation at this point, and Watson could easily move up the board if Bunkley doesn't follow up on his great Senior Bowl week showing. With Wroten's weed issues, I think both Watson and Bunkley are 1st rounders barring a major screw up in workouts.

San Diego. I REALLY don't see Vincent Jackson as their WR1 of the future and agree that defensive backfield help is a major need. No way am I going to argue emphatically right now that Holmes goes to the Chargers.

I'm believing the Byrd hype a bit via the Senior Bowl. It was difficult to not have Marcedes Lewis in the 1st round, but one has to believe only so many TEs are getting drafted this early. Whoever gets Lewis, Fasano and Klopfenstein in the 2nd/3rd round area has the chance to come away with great value.

 
good job Jason. One question: I am trying to remember which staff member said that mocks in february were not wworth the paper they were written on. Can you help me remember who this was?

 
good job Jason. One question: I am trying to remember which staff member said that mocks in february were not wworth the paper they were written on. Can you help me remember who this was?
:lmao: That was me...which is why I emphasize that a) this is purely because I'm bored, and b) it's going to change a LOT between now and then.

To put a finer point on what you've alluded to, I was trying to make the case that any mock written in February whether it by a guy on this board or Kiper or Scouts or NFL Draft Scout is just as likely to be accurate or not. The "experts" are going to be any more predictive than we Shark Pool nuts pre free agency and pre Combine.

 
One more thing about the Bucs -- I could see them taking Mangold if he makes it to #23. Wade wasn't really all that good this year and could be on his way out, and other than DBrickashaw, Mangold seems to be the olineman that is most ready to play.

 
One more thing about the Bucs -- I could see them taking Mangold if he makes it to #23. Wade wasn't really all that good this year and could be on his way out, and other than DBrickashaw, Mangold seems to be the olineman that is most ready to play.
how do you feel about mahan shifting back to center? that could allow them to take max jean-gilles, the man mountain from georgia.
 
Good stuff Woodrow!

A couple of thoughts on the Steelers...

I like the idea of taking a WR in round 1. Got to keep plenty of weapons around Roethlisberger. Losing Plax last year and likely Randle El this year means they'll likely spend a 1st day pick on a WR.

Moss' size scares me. I'd prefer a bigger/as fast WR like Chad Jackson. Hines should have 3-4 top flight years in him and this would give the new CJ plenty of time to develop with Roethlisberger. I have a hard time imagining Sin Moss ever emerging as a go-to guy in the NFL at 5-7 1/2.

I think Mangold would make alot of sense for the Steelers if he slipped to 32 and they can find a way to keep Hartings for one more year.

 
I think Mangold would make alot of sense for the Steelers if he slipped to 32 and they can find a way to keep Hartings for one more year.
Every day I become more convinced that he is THE PICK for us at 32.
 
Good stuff Woodrow!

A couple of thoughts on the Steelers...

I like the idea of taking a WR in round 1. Got to keep plenty of weapons around Roethlisberger. Losing Plax last year and likely Randle El this year means they'll likely spend a 1st day pick on a WR.

Moss' size scares me. I'd prefer a bigger/as fast WR like Chad Jackson. Hines should have 3-4 top flight years in him and this would give the new CJ plenty of time to develop with Roethlisberger. I have a hard time imagining Sin Moss ever emerging as a go-to guy in the NFL at 5-7 1/2.

I think Mangold would make alot of sense for the Steelers if he slipped to 32 and they can find a way to keep Hartings for one more year.
The WR class is difficult to project right now because a) it's a relatively weak class and b) no WR is without flaws.Personally I think Jon Orr could be the best of the bunch, and I think Demetrius Williams from Oregon is also an enticing pick. Neither will sniff the 1st round without blowing people away at their workouts though.

As to Chad Jackson, I'm a fan but want to wait and see him run the fast time he's been promising before I jump completely on the bandwagon. I've talked to several guys that say there's no WAY he runs as fast as he suggests, in which case I think he falls back to the pack.

Ultimately I think very little separates the WR corps this year [with the exception of Holmes], and it's going to be a buyers market [every team will have a dramatically different value chart on the position this year].

 
Good stuff Woodrow! 

A couple of thoughts on the Steelers...

I like the idea of taking a WR in round 1.  Got to keep plenty of weapons around Roethlisberger.  Losing Plax last year and likely Randle El this year means they'll likely spend a 1st day pick on a WR.

Moss' size scares me.  I'd prefer a bigger/as fast WR like Chad Jackson.  Hines should have 3-4 top flight years in him and this would give the new CJ plenty of time to develop with Roethlisberger.  I have a hard time imagining Sin Moss ever emerging as a go-to guy in the NFL at 5-7 1/2. 

I think Mangold would make alot of sense for the Steelers if he slipped to 32 and they can find a way to keep Hartings for one more year.
The WR class is difficult to project right now because a) it's a relatively weak class and b) no WR is without flaws.Personally I think Jon Orr could be the best of the bunch, and I think Demetrius Williams from Oregon is also an enticing pick. Neither will sniff the 1st round without blowing people away at their workouts though.

As to Chad Jackson, I'm a fan but want to wait and see him run the fast time he's been promising before I jump completely on the bandwagon. I've talked to several guys that say there's no WAY he runs as fast as he suggests, in which case I think he falls back to the pack.

Ultimately I think very little separates the WR corps this year [with the exception of Holmes], and it's going to be a buyers market [every team will have a dramatically different value chart on the position this year].
we are both pretty high on Orr. I was bummed that he got hurt in the shrine game. Orr is the kind of WR that can be a big time game breaker if he develops some consistency. His size/speed package is right there with Jackson (assuming jackson runs a 4.4)totally agree on the WR class - the fun thing is that there are WRs of all kinds...

the big targets - Stovall, Nance, Baskett, Marshall (i have a football man crush on this guy)

the gamebreakers - Dwilliams, jackson, orr, watkins

the steady guys - hass, hagan, avant

the small quick guys - holmes, moss (burners) jennings, brandon williams, green (less top end speed)

and that still leaves out very interesting prospects like greg lee, travis wilson, marques colston, cory rodgers, delanie walker, and michael robinson among others.

there will be at least two or three starting NFL WRs down the line drafted on the second day this year. this WR class lacks the "ooh aah" factor, but it is deep and varied. should make for a lot of surprises on draft day.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
One more thing about the Bucs -- I could see them taking Mangold if he makes it to #23. Wade wasn't really all that good this year and could be on his way out, and other than DBrickashaw, Mangold seems to be the olineman that is most ready to play.
how do you feel about mahan shifting back to center? that could allow them to take max jean-gilles, the man mountain from georgia.
Seems to be the plan long-term, but if they don't take an OG, that leaves someone like Jeb Terry to play OG, and he doesn't seem to be ready.
 
Nice mock as usual, Jason.

I like the selection of D'Brick over the usual selection of Young for most mocks. Yeah, I know McNair's his mentor and all, but Ferguson is an excellent choice for Tennessee.

As a Raider fan, I'd be more than happy to see AJ Hawk or Mario Williams selected. Hawk's just a specimen, and Williams with Burgess on the other side would be a hellacious combo.

Nice job.

 
First Jason, great mock. I agree with Bloom and love the Mangold pick much higher than he's currently projected. I've been thinking the same way since Senior Bowl week, but didn't have the guts to come out with it. I did that with Watson as Bloom says. I have a question and I've asked it about ten times here and elsewhere and never get an answer. I read this:

1.31) Seattle Seahawks -- FS Ko Simpson, South CarolinaThe way the Seahawks safeties were exposed in the Super Bowl, Simpson seems like a great fit for a team without a ton of major needs. Simpson is a 3rd year sophomore who surprised many by declaring. He's a tackling machine but showed the ability to cover when called upon. The Hawks could go in a ton of directions here, but I'm projecting a bit that Simpson will continue to gain momentum as scouts get a look at him. As a sophomore playing for South Carolina, he doesn't have the high profile as some of the other DBs carrying potential 1st day grades.
And I want more information. At least you don't have Ko in the top 20 like many do. I am not impressed with this kid. He looked very slow in his bowl game, and worse errors than Boulware's could be assigned to him for the loss. Granted he was dealing with Brad Smith, but he looked horrible against the run and pass, and he looked slow. I've seen him twice and my impression was the same both times. Joseph is the stud in that secondary.But two times is a terrible sample and bigger brains than mine are much higher on him than you are. It cannot be intangibles. He's one of the oldest players in the draft (24) and very inexperienced on top of that. Darnell Bing, Jason Allen, Pat Watkins, Greg Blue, Donte Whitner... all of these guys have shown me better game than I have seen in Simpson. What am I missing? I'm willing to join the crowd and consider him a first rounder (very late like you), but I have strong doubts about his size, speed, instincts, age, experience etc...
 
I'd prefer a bigger/as fast WR like Chad Jackson. Hines should have 3-4 top flight years in him and this would give the new CJ plenty of time to develop with Roethlisberger. I have a hard time imagining Sin Moss ever emerging as a go-to guy in the NFL at 5-7 1/2.
Fwiw, if a wannabe sportswriter who did a write up on the All-Star Challenge is to be believed, Jackson is consistently running faster than Moss at the same training facility in Florida. I'll wait for the combine, but Jackson did look faster in the 40 at the end of the obstacle course-- both running tired at that point.

:shrug:

 
I'd prefer a bigger/as fast WR like Chad Jackson.  Hines should have 3-4 top flight years in him and this would give the new CJ plenty of time to develop with Roethlisberger.  I have a hard time imagining Sin Moss ever emerging as a go-to guy in the NFL at 5-7 1/2. 
Fwiw, if a wannabe sportswriter who did a write up on the All-Star Challenge is to be believed, Jackson is consistently running faster than Moss at the same training facility in Florida. I'll wait for the combine, but Jackson did look faster in the 40 at the end of the obstacle course-- both running tired at that point.

:shrug:
Hey. take it easy on us wannabees :bye:
 
It's February, the NFL coaching carousel is pretty much over, and we're in that lull right before free agency, Pro Days and the April draft start getting going. There are a TREMENDOUS amount of unknowns about the NFL draft process at this point. We need to get real measurables on most of the prospects, and of course Pro Days will help settle a lot of the current debate about how positions rank. And, of course, team needs are going to narrow considerably once free agency gets rolling.

In any event, here's my first mock draft of the year with many revisions to follow as the offseason progresses.

Round One Mock Draft

1.15) Atlanta Falcons -- DT Brodrick Bunkley, Florida State

No draft goes completely the way we expect, in that teams don't always draft for need [particularly the very good franchises]. While the Falcons have Rod Coleman and like what they see in Chad Lavalais, their defensive line needs young playmakers and Bunkley will be too tempting to pass up at this point. DTs have a way of vaulting up the charts and Bunkley is my pick for the 2006 "fast riser."

Are we totally discounting last years #2 pick Jonathan Babineux from Iowa? Atlanta seems to have much more severe needs elsewhere, and has pretty exceptional depth at DT.

1.22) Denver Broncos [via Washington] -- C Nick Mangold, Ohio State

Mangold did everything he needed to at the Senior Week to work his way into the late 1st, early 2nd round mix. The Broncos need a youth infusion on the O-line and Mangold is the kind of smart, athletic blocker that has historically flourished under Shanahan. The Broncos may play Mangold at guard initially.

The Broncos have Ben Hamilton ready to move in for Tom Nalen, who just recently signed a 3 yr extension which he said he intends to honor. Im not sure I can see Mangold being as effective as a guard in the Denver system.

1.23) Tampa Bay Bucs -- OT Marcus McNeil, Auburn

McNeil was once considered a top 10 pick before the 2005 collegiate season, but he along with several other OT prospects failed to live up to lofty expectations. In any event, McNeil has a mean streak and is too athletic and technically sound for the Bucs to pass up. McNeil fills a need and is among the best players available.

Hed have to have some amazing combine/pro day to remain up here with his back problems/horrid Senior Bowl.

1.29) Denver Broncos -- DT Rod Wright, Texas

Rod Wright is the forgotten man of defensive tackles this year it seems but is a solid pro prospect with more athleticism than normally found in a stay at home DT. Wright could go much higher depending on his workouts, as DT is a coveted position traditionally, but if he's still on the board I think Denver snaps him up with their 2nd of two 1st round selections. This presumes the Broncos have some issue re-signing G. Warren; a priority this offseason.

Wright will be lucky not to fall out of Round 2. No way hes a 1st rounder.
These are the 4 that seem most obviously questionable to me.
 
Is Chad Jackson slipping?
It depends on where you start him. If anything he appears to be moving up. For a long time Santonio Holmes and Derek Hagan (slipping big time, btw) were the only two WRs you could find in most Rd 1 mocks. Jackson is well ahead of Hagan now, and popping up in several first rounds. I personally, think there's a possibility of NO WRs in the first round. The one's who've looked the best in post-season stuff are NOT first rounders. If Holmes and Jackson grade equal to or below them (Moss, Stovall, Hagan)... zero 1st rounders is possible. :eek:

 
Nice Mock as always...

i disagree with Denver's picks of Nick Mangold and Rod Wright. I think DE and Safety are more pressing needs and Denver would love the oppurtunity to draft Kiwi and Ko Simpson with those two picks, and look to get some depth on the O-line in the next few rounds.

edit: my ####ty spelling

 
Last edited by a moderator:
McNeil was once considered a top 10 pick before the 2005 collegiate season, but he along with several other OT prospects failed to live up to lofty expectations. In any event, McNeil has a mean streak and is too athletic and technically sound for the Bucs to pass up. McNeil fills a need and is among the best players available.

Hed have to have some amazing combine/pro day to remain up here with his back problems/horrid Senior Bowl.
I think you made solid points on three of your disagreements. So, I'll retract the praise of Mangold's team, but I still think his value is Rd 1 20-32. I'll disagree with you on McNeill. The back problem has been thoroughly checked out and it's a non-story. Even when he had the problem it was very very minor. He and his coaches are confused by how much was made out of it. Day one of the Senior Bowl he had a death in the family. He was mourning and distracted all week with family vs. football stuff. I give him a mulligan for the rough week and so did the coaches in attendance. His play against the SEC's best has been nothing short of dominant, and his combination of size and athleticism is too rare to slide much further in the draft. One thing you don't hear much about is how dedicated this guy is to football and the craft of being a tackle. His upside is as high as any tackle in the draft. Late first round he's a steal, despite the shakey all-star week.

 
1.09) Detroit Lions -- QB Jay Cutler, Vanderbilt

This pick confounds me and ultimately I doubt my final mock will have Cutler being drafted here. But for now I see the logic given Cutler's potential as a franchise QB and the Lions new coaching staff likely signaling the end of the Joey Harrington era. However, with Mike Martz signing on, the Lions could well give Harrington one year under Mike and in that case, would turn their attention elsewhere, potentially Winston Justice or Michael Huff.

1.20) Kansas City Chiefs -- CB Ashton Youboty, Ohio State

Back to back Buckeyes as Herm Edwards gets his wish and the Chiefs add a defensive playmaker in the secondary. Youboty needs to solidify his status as a first rounder, but if he performs at the Combine as projected, he'll come off the board in the mid- to late-first round IMHO.
EVERY draft I see has these two picks. So they won't happen.
 
McNeil was once considered a top 10 pick before the 2005 collegiate season, but he along with several other OT prospects failed to live up to lofty expectations. In any event, McNeil has a mean streak and is too athletic and technically sound for the Bucs to pass up. McNeil fills a need and is among the best players available.

Hed have to have some amazing combine/pro day to remain up here with his back problems/horrid Senior Bowl.
I think you made solid points on three of your disagreements. So, I'll retract the praise of Mangold's team, but I still think his value is Rd 1 20-32. I'll disagree with you on McNeill. The back problem has been thoroughly checked out and it's a non-story. Even when he had the problem it was very very minor. He and his coaches are confused by how much was made out of it. Day one of the Senior Bowl he had a death in the family. He was mourning and distracted all week with family vs. football stuff. I give him a mulligan for the rough week and so did the coaches in attendance. His play against the SEC's best has been nothing short of dominant, and his combination of size and athleticism is too rare to slide much further in the draft. One thing you don't hear much about is how dedicated this guy is to football and the craft of being a tackle. His upside is as high as any tackle in the draft. Late first round he's a steal, despite the shakey all-star week.
Fair enough. Im always leery of guys his size, and Ill admit I do not have more than a superficial knowledge of his injury problems and personality.
 
First Jason, great mock.  I agree with Bloom and love the Mangold pick much higher than he's currently projected.  I've been thinking the same way since Senior Bowl week, but didn't have the guts to come out with it.  I did that with Watson as Bloom says. 

I have a question and I've asked it about ten times here and elsewhere and never get an answer.  I read this:

1.31) Seattle Seahawks -- FS Ko Simpson, South Carolina

The way the Seahawks safeties were exposed in the Super Bowl, Simpson seems like a great fit for a team without a ton of major needs. Simpson is a 3rd year sophomore who surprised many by declaring. He's a tackling machine but showed the ability to cover when called upon. The Hawks could go in a ton of directions here, but I'm projecting a bit that Simpson will continue to gain momentum as scouts get a look at him. As a sophomore playing for South Carolina, he doesn't have the high profile as some of the other DBs carrying potential 1st day grades.
And I want more information. At least you don't have Ko in the top 20 like many do. I am not impressed with this kid. He looked very slow in his bowl game, and worse errors than Boulware's could be assigned to him for the loss. Granted he was dealing with Brad Smith, but he looked horrible against the run and pass, and he looked slow. I've seen him twice and my impression was the same both times. Joseph is the stud in that secondary.But two times is a terrible sample and bigger brains than mine are much higher on him than you are. It cannot be intangibles. He's one of the oldest players in the draft (24) and very inexperienced on top of that.

Darnell Bing, Jason Allen, Pat Watkins, Greg Blue, Donte Whitner... all of these guys have shown me better game than I have seen in Simpson. What am I missing?

I'm willing to join the crowd and consider him a first rounder (very late like you), but I have strong doubts about his size, speed, instincts, age, experience etc...
Simpson is the common pick going to the Chargers, but I'm not sold on him yet. I'd rather see the Chargers trade up to get Jimmy Williams if they want to go safety. I don't see WR as an option with the pick since the draft there is too much talent at the need postions of safety and tackle. If the Chargers don't go with a safety, the pick will probably be the best tackle available, McNeill or Scott. They could go WR but they would have to be blown away by Holmes or Jackson.If I were making the pick, it would be McNeill at this point.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
McNeil was once considered a top 10 pick before the 2005 collegiate season, but he along with several other OT prospects failed to live up to lofty expectations. In any event, McNeil has a mean streak and is too athletic and technically sound for the Bucs to pass up. McNeil fills a need and is among the best players available.

Hed have to have some amazing combine/pro day to remain up here with his back problems/horrid Senior Bowl.
I think you made solid points on three of your disagreements. So, I'll retract the praise of Mangold's team, but I still think his value is Rd 1 20-32. I'll disagree with you on McNeill. The back problem has been thoroughly checked out and it's a non-story. Even when he had the problem it was very very minor. He and his coaches are confused by how much was made out of it. Day one of the Senior Bowl he had a death in the family. He was mourning and distracted all week with family vs. football stuff. I give him a mulligan for the rough week and so did the coaches in attendance. His play against the SEC's best has been nothing short of dominant, and his combination of size and athleticism is too rare to slide much further in the draft. One thing you don't hear much about is how dedicated this guy is to football and the craft of being a tackle. His upside is as high as any tackle in the draft. Late first round he's a steal, despite the shakey all-star week.
team personnel types & scouts have to look at the body of work more than a few days at senior bowl... chances are they already have formulated some pretty strong opinions on players after seeing them in game action for 3-4 years... albeit these are subject to revision...it will probably reflect well on mcneil that he was the key blocker on an OL that paved the way for two top 5 RBs & a first round QB in 2005.

 
I heard McNeil dropped out of the first round with his poor Senior Bowl.

Seemed slow to me, in what I saw. I'd rather see them take Ernie Sims who can tutor under Brooks for a year, and who seems real likely to go in the first round (and I don't see you having him listed).

Oline for the Bucs isn't as big of a concern as some people are making it out to be.
Very mixed reviews of McNeil post the Senior Bowl, but he's too athletic to not work his way back into the 1st round picture [in my opinion] once he has his workouts.Sims could certainly factor into the 1st round, as could Bobby Carpenter. I just don't know that I see all those LBs making it to the 1st round, regardless of grade.
as long as Carpenter's ankle tests out ok at the combine, he'll get in the first. if he's completely healthy, i wouldnt be shocked to see him go to the browns at 12 ( i think his rugged style is a better fit for the 3-4, while Greenway is a more ideal 4-3 chase WLB because he's similar to Derrick Johnson in that he likes to run around blockers more than take them on). If Carpenter gets a clean bill of health, i see no way he gets past dallas at 19 - he screams parcells type player.of course, we are all guessing...
good observation on carpenter being a good fit in DAL...it seems like the biggest needs in DAL (not necessarily in order)...

LB... ware looks like future star at weakside 3-4 OLB, despite ups & downs... but ILB bradie james is very inconsistent... undersized & broken down dat nguyen's retirement is imminent... i think rookie second rounder kevin burnett had been shifted from OLB to ILB, but he was injured & the team doesn't have a good sense of his capabilities there... of the personell currently on roster, fujita is probably the best option at stronside OLB (or al singleton if healthy?)... carpenter would obviously be a massive upgrade there...

FS... probably not one good enough to draft here (assuming huff is gone, or he could be mighty tempting)... bing could carry a grade that high at that point in draft, but he is a more natural SS... he could be a monster FS IF he had the requisite cover skills (likely fast enough... he was prep sprinter at LB poly)... BUT THAT IS A BIG IF...

OL... this was a huge problem last year... getting flozell adams back will help a lot, but allen & rivera (chronic back problems taking toll?) looked old, al johnson & gurode are not blue chip, elite centers, & petitti may be too slow footed to be anything more than a backup

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I heard McNeil dropped out of the first round with his poor Senior Bowl.

Seemed slow to me, in what I saw. I'd rather see them take Ernie Sims who can tutor under Brooks for a year, and who seems real likely to go in the first round (and I don't see you having him listed).

Oline for the Bucs isn't as big of a concern as some people are making it out to be.
Very mixed reviews of McNeil post the Senior Bowl, but he's too athletic to not work his way back into the 1st round picture [in my opinion] once he has his workouts.Sims could certainly factor into the 1st round, as could Bobby Carpenter. I just don't know that I see all those LBs making it to the 1st round, regardless of grade.
I suppose. I see the Bucs though as a team that's reasonably close to at least winning the NFC -- last thing they need is some slug OT who's 2 years away (at least) from helping the team win. A guy like Sinorice Moss or Ernie Sims will fill a much bigger role not only in 2007 as step-in starters, but in 2006 as well as guys who would probably be more game ready if something happened to Brooks or Galloway.
You could well be right Cappy. It's way too early to pretend like I have any conviction in my projections...I think the Sims pick is a tad too cute for my tastes [Florida State guy replacing a Florida State legend, etc...], but it could happen.To be honest, I see the Bucs adding someone like D'Qwell Jackson in the 2nd round, thus my decision to not go OLB in the 1st round.
great mock, woodrow...do you think jackson did enough at senior bowl to probably preclude him falling to bucs in second round... i'm not sure if he did enough to go in first, but i was thinking he would go no later than early to mid-second... guess that could be close to within striking range...

second round MLBs from class of 2005 such as tatupu & thurman had/have some similar traits (positive & negative)... supposedly undersized & admittedly without the classic, prototypical measurables you like to see from position... but outstanding instincts & leadership... with these guys doing so well, i wonder if it will "drive up the price" of a player seemingly cut from same cloth?

jackson is a tad lighter even than thurman (230), at a listed 225... leading to speculation that WLB could be best fit for him in the NFL... but at approximately same size as above blue chip rookie MLBs, it may well be this line of thinking is misguided.*

* bucs shelton quarles had a top-10 type season for a LB, & i believe he is about 225 as well... though 225 lb MLBs are somewhat of a rarity in the bigs... guys CLOSE to that (i would add vilma & antonio pierce to list) have THRIVED as three down MLBs in recent seasons, & their speed, quickness, agility, athleticism & coverage chops have compensated for an inability to stone a larry allen-type interior lineman (who can bench 700+ lbs) at the POA in the run game.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I realize you aren't projecting any trades, but if I'm running Houston's draft I'd gamble on trading the top pick. I'd make some quiet phone calls to the Jets & Packers about what they'd give to move up to the top pick and draft Bush.

To me, neither QB nor RB is Houston's problem. Bush won't be much more successful behind that awful OL than Domanick Davis is. To best improve the team, you trade down to draft Ferguson and acquire some extra picks to fill even more holes.

I'd think this is one trade that, five years from now, would be remembered as fondly as the Vick/Tomlinson trade in that it helped both teams improve.

(I can't see Favre retiring if Green Bay gets Bush ...)

 
Pretty solid mock. Different and still practical.

I agree whole-heartedly in your Bunkley being a fast-riser. I actually have him projected to #10 to the Cardinals in my newest mock (not released yet).

As a Bucs fan, it almost pains me to admit this, but I have a gut feeling they will take Sinorice Moss with their 1st round pick. As evidenced by Joey Galloway last year, the home-run deep threat is critical to the success of the Gruden Offense. Not a lot of talk about this guy yet, but he is the prototype Buc player if you ask me. Solid work ethic, all the leadership intangibles, etc etc. Galloway will be in sharp decline if not this year then next year. As soon as his speed goes a little, he'll be worthless. So, that would be about the time Moss starts to emerge.

Also, they won't draft McNeill, because although he's a solid prospect, they aren't going to want to deal with an injury risk on the OL. Just my thoughts.

Very well-thought out mock. I also disagree with the KC pick. I believe they go for an impact DT or another player that can immediately contribute and help them win a championship before their window shuts.

 
1.30) Indianapolis Colts -- RB Laurence Maroney, Minnesota

Maroney would be a fantasy owners dream under this scenario, as he would be going to a ready made offense where teams couldn't stack the box, and he'd presumably have the starting job from Day One. Assuming Edge is gone in free agency, the Colts would have to look long and hard at Maroney who was highly productive as a workhorse back at Minnesota the last few seasons.

Nice job Jason, It would be a dream but there is litlle chance Maroney falls this far they will have to go up to get him in my opinion.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Also, they won't draft McNeill, because although he's a solid prospect, they aren't going to want to deal with an injury risk on the OL. Just my thoughts.
He's been nothing but durable. It's been two and a half years since he wrenched his back falling on his hip. He's not an injury risk.
 
First Jason, great mock. I agree with Bloom and love the Mangold pick much higher than he's currently projected. I've been thinking the same way since Senior Bowl week, but didn't have the guts to come out with it. I did that with Watson as Bloom says.

I have a question and I've asked it about ten times here and elsewhere and never get an answer. I read this:

1.31) Seattle Seahawks -- FS Ko Simpson, South Carolina

The way the Seahawks safeties were exposed in the Super Bowl, Simpson seems like a great fit for a team without a ton of major needs. Simpson is a 3rd year sophomore who surprised many by declaring. He's a tackling machine but showed the ability to cover when called upon. The Hawks could go in a ton of directions here, but I'm projecting a bit that Simpson will continue to gain momentum as scouts get a look at him. As a sophomore playing for South Carolina, he doesn't have the high profile as some of the other DBs carrying potential 1st day grades.
And I want more information. At least you don't have Ko in the top 20 like many do. I am not impressed with this kid. He looked very slow in his bowl game, and worse errors than Boulware's could be assigned to him for the loss. Granted he was dealing with Brad Smith, but he looked horrible against the run and pass, and he looked slow. I've seen him twice and my impression was the same both times. Joseph is the stud in that secondary.But two times is a terrible sample and bigger brains than mine are much higher on him than you are. It cannot be intangibles. He's one of the oldest players in the draft (24) and very inexperienced on top of that.

Darnell Bing, Jason Allen, Pat Watkins, Greg Blue, Donte Whitner... all of these guys have shown me better game than I have seen in Simpson. What am I missing?

I'm willing to join the crowd and consider him a first rounder (very late like you), but I have strong doubts about his size, speed, instincts, age, experience etc...
I haven't seen Ko Simpson play a lot, so like you Chaos I'm not completely sold on Ko yet. However, I do have to appreciate the 100+ tackles, and the fact he was making plays on a defense without much talent around him. Personally I think it's tough for a safety to look great play in, play out when he's being asked to lead the team in tackles. I'm not a big fan of Darnell Bing, but Whitner and Blue could easily replaced Ko in my post Combine mocks once things shake out.
I heard McNeil dropped out of the first round with his poor Senior Bowl.

Seemed slow to me, in what I saw. I'd rather see them take Ernie Sims who can tutor under Brooks for a year, and who seems real likely to go in the first round (and I don't see you having him listed).

Oline for the Bucs isn't as big of a concern as some people are making it out to be.
Very mixed reviews of McNeil post the Senior Bowl, but he's too athletic to not work his way back into the 1st round picture [in my opinion] once he has his workouts.Sims could certainly factor into the 1st round, as could Bobby Carpenter. I just don't know that I see all those LBs making it to the 1st round, regardless of grade.
I suppose. I see the Bucs though as a team that's reasonably close to at least winning the NFC -- last thing they need is some slug OT who's 2 years away (at least) from helping the team win. A guy like Sinorice Moss or Ernie Sims will fill a much bigger role not only in 2007 as step-in starters, but in 2006 as well as guys who would probably be more game ready if something happened to Brooks or Galloway.
You could well be right Cappy. It's way too early to pretend like I have any conviction in my projections...I think the Sims pick is a tad too cute for my tastes [Florida State guy replacing a Florida State legend, etc...], but it could happen.To be honest, I see the Bucs adding someone like D'Qwell Jackson in the 2nd round, thus my decision to not go OLB in the 1st round.
great mock, woodrow...do you think jackson did enough at senior bowl to probably preclude him falling to bucs in second round... i'm not sure if he did enough to go in first, but i was thinking he would go no later than early to mid-second... guess that could be close to within striking range...

second round MLBs from class of 2005 such as tatupu & thurman had/have some similar traits (positive & negative)... supposedly undersized & admittedly without the classic, prototypical measurables you like to see from position... but outstanding instincts & leadership... with these guys doing so well, i wonder if it will "drive up the price" of a player seemingly cut from same cloth?

jackson is a tad lighter even than thurman (230), at a listed 225... leading to speculation that WLB could be best fit for him in the NFL... but at approximately same size as above blue chip rookie MLBs, it may well be this line of thinking is misguided.*

* bucs shelton quarles had a top-10 type season for a LB, & i believe he is about 225 as well... though 225 lb MLBs are somewhat of a rarity in the bigs... guys CLOSE to that (i would add vilma & antonio pierce to list) have THRIVED as three down MLBs in recent seasons, & their speed, quickness, agility, athleticism & coverage chops have compensated for an inability to stone a larry allen-type interior lineman (who can bench 700+ lbs) at the POA in the run game.
I don't know if D'Qwell will get into the 1st round, it's such a strong LB class that I just don't see him squeezing in there. Sure he had a nice all star game, but so did many other LBs. Chad Greenway re-asserted his elite grade. My personal LB man-love this year is reserved for UTEP's Thomas Howard. The kid, like Tatupu, is the son of an NFL vet who walked on in college b/c he was undersized. He's extremely well spoken and I saw him on NFL Network and was blown away by his understanding of the game and his ability to articulate his strengths and where he needs to improve. I see him as a "can't miss" weakside backer in the NFL.
1.30) Indianapolis Colts -- RB Laurence Maroney, Minnesota

Maroney would be a fantasy owners dream under this scenario, as he would be going to a ready made offense where teams couldn't stack the box, and he'd presumably have the starting job from Day One. Assuming Edge is gone in free agency, the Colts would have to look long and hard at Maroney who was highly productive as a workhorse back at Minnesota the last few seasons.

Nice job Jason, It would be a dream but there is litlle chance Maroney falls this far they will have to go up to get him in my opinion.
I wouldn't count on Maroney going much higher. With Edge James, Shaun Alexander, Ahman Green [most likely], Jamal Lewis, etc...being available this year plus three RBs clearly ahead of Maroney [bush, White and Williams], he should be a late 1st rounder.
 
With the draft evidently deep at TE, do you really think the Bengals will spend their 1st round pick on one? Admittedly, they have a glaring deficiency at the position, but I think the D-Line is more of a need here.

They could still take a TE in the 2nd and vastly improve on the likes of Schobel, Kelly, and Stewart.

 
good observation on carpenter being a good fit in DAL...

it seems like the biggest needs in DAL (not necessarily in order)...

LB... ware looks like future star at weakside 3-4 OLB, despite ups & downs... but ILB bradie james is very inconsistent... undersized & broken down dat nguyen's retirement is imminent... i think rookie second rounder kevin burnett had been shifted from OLB to ILB, but he was injured & the team doesn't have a good sense of his capabilities there... of the personell currently on roster, fujita is probably the best option at stronside OLB (or al singleton if healthy?)... carpenter would obviously be a massive upgrade there...

FS... probably not one good enough to draft here (assuming huff is gone, or he could be mighty tempting)... bing could carry a grade that high at that point in draft, but he is a more natural SS... he could be a monster FS IF he had the requisite cover skills (likely fast enough... he was prep sprinter at LB poly)... BUT THAT IS A BIG IF...

OL... this was a huge problem last year... getting flozell adams back will help a lot, but allen & rivera (chronic back problems taking toll?) looked old, al johnson & gurode are not blue chip, elite centers, & petitti may be too slow footed to be anything more than a backup
I'd say that right now, Carpenter is the most likely choice for Dallas at #18. Given that he seems tailor made to be a 3-4 OLB, Parcells' strong history of drafting defensive front seven players in the first round, and Dallas' need for more linebackers, he seems rather likely.The second most likely guy to go to Dallas at 18, imo, is Gabe Watson. Particularly if Glover is traded as expected. Dallas' only legit NT is 30+ year old Jason Ferguson. Parcells prefers to run a dline rotation. He needs another big body. Dallas was seen talking with Watson for quite awhile at the Senior Bowl. These facts, coupled with Parcells' history of drafting front seven guys early, and you have another likely pick at 18.

Regarding the FS need. Dallas clearly needs an upgrade here. They gave up way too many long pass plays. But let me ask you, is a rookie going to understand coverage responsibilities and diagnose offenses better than existing players or an experienced free agent? Probably not. So if Dallas does upgrade this position, its much more likely to be from free agency. There are several experienced free safeties expected to be available. Dallas has enough cap room to make some moves. This is a likely spot for a mid priced guy.

O-Line is much the same. At least as far as starters are concerned. Is a rookie going to come in and be better than Rivera? Or Allen? You might be able to argue that a McNeil might be better than a second-year Petitti. But how sure are you of that? For 2006, the more likely course of action at RT is another mid-priced FA like Tom Ashworth. Dallas then goes Oline in round 2 and/or 3. One last point here on the O-line. Its worth noting that Parcells' teams have never drafted a tackle in round 1 in his 19 years as a head coach.

The final guy that Dallas might draft at 18 that may surprise some is Vernon Davis were he to fall. Yes, they have Witten. But Parcells loves TEs and imagine the fun defenses would have trying to defend both of them.

Lastly on the Cowboys. I actually think they would be better off dropping back into the 30 to 50 range. There are a lot of guys like Lawson and Wimbley who would make excellent OLBs, lots of good Olinemen, and maybe a safety or two would represent good value in this range. I'm not conviced that the value is there at 18 for Dallas.

Woodrow, your pick of DeMarco Ryans at to New England is interesting. No question that he fits their "player" mold regardless of measurables. But even so, I have a hard time seeing a 220 pound linebacker being effective in a 3-4. All of the current NE LBs are at least 250, IIRC. Thats a big difference in size to overcome. No question that he will get bigger. But big enough to play 3-4?

Overall, Woodrow, lots of good things to read and consider. :) :thumbup:

 
1.10) Arizona Cardinals -- OT Winston Justice, USC

There are a lot of ways the Cardinals could go with this pick, but if they're serious in re-signing Kurt Warner [we'll know by the draft], they HAVE to make the OL a major priority. In Justice, they get someone that should start immediately. Furthermore, Denny Green has recently gone on record saying that the offensive line will be a major focal point this offseason.
Heard Denny on the radio a couple of weeks ago. They will definately address O-line this offseason. However, from what he said, it sounded like it won't be with their first pick. According to Rod Graves they'll pursue "at least" one free agent O-lineman and take an O-lineman on the "first day". When asked if it would be with the first pick, Denny sounded hesitant.I personally think it'll either be Cutler or a TE.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top