What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

World Cup Soccer - How Interested Are You? (1 Viewer)

What's your interest level in the upcoming World Cup?

  • Extremely Interested. It's a huge deal.

    Votes: 80 30.0%
  • Very Interested. Really looking forward to it.

    Votes: 67 25.1%
  • Moderately Interested. I'll watch.

    Votes: 39 14.6%
  • Slightly Interested. I'll maybe watch but won't go out of my way.

    Votes: 35 13.1%
  • On the fence. Totally ambivalent.

    Votes: 15 5.6%
  • Zero Interest. And kind of getting tired of hearing about it.

    Votes: 13 4.9%
  • Zero Interest. And definitely getting tired of hearing about it.

    Votes: 5 1.9%
  • Zero Interest. And can't stand hearing about it.

    Votes: 13 4.9%

  • Total voters
    267
Still a long way to go but anyone who does not see the growth really needs to take a look. The growth in MLS itself from a league half dead 8 years ago to the thriving (relative) one today is pretty amazing.
The people paying for MLS teams certainly don't appear to believe it's on the brink of oblivion. Would love to see a simple line graph with the price of the last X MLS team/franchise purchases.
I can do it for you (these are estimates by the media since they don't publicly release this info). The .... represent gaps in time so I tried to group these together starting from 2005 till this season.

Chivas, RSL and Toronto: $10 million

......

Seattle: $30m

Philly: $35m

Montreal, Vancouver and Portland: $40m

.........

Columbus: $68m*****

Orlando and Atlanta: $70m

NY: $100m

I left Miami off the list because the cut rate expansion fee of $25m was built into Beckhams contract when he signed with MLS.

**** This is a team sale, not an expansion fee. The rest were all expansion fees.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I will probably watch some of the semis & finals.
The semis are tricky to catch for many people due to the weekday afternoon time slot.

A Brazil-Argentina type final though will easily break the TV ratings record for a soccer game in the US (the 2010 WC final holds the current record at 24.3 million viewers)

 
Hell, taking into account the location, start times of the games, and (hopefully) better odds of a US run, the Copa Panamerica might actually be bigger here than the World Cup.

 
Hell, taking into account the location, start times of the games, and (hopefully) better odds of a US run, the Copa Panamerica might actually be bigger here than the World Cup.
With Brazil, Argie, US and Mexico all but assured to be separated in the 4 groups, it maximizes everything in terms of ratings and attendance. If all 4 advance, the quarterfinal ratings are going to be through the roof considering this will likely be in prime time.

Granted this all goes to hell if FIFA does not get a big enough suit case to get this on the calendar but there is so much money to be made I can't see it not getting done.

 
I'm probably gonna split out from work early once the games start and do some drinking. Who knows? the games might even be on TV at the bar.

 
Very interested.

There's something about playing for ones country that touches a nerve for me. And the passion of the fans is unbelievable. I was lucky enough to be in buenos aires for Argentina vs England 12 years ago. That was an experience!! Just a touch of vitriol there.

 
I've become more interested with each WC. NewlyRetired told me last summer that this would be my favorite one yet since I was becoming familiar with the Euro clubs and he was absolutely right. I'm taking vacation days next month to see as many games as possible. Can't wait, best sporting event in the world.

 
Big fan.

A lot of hard core soccer guys would probably call me a bandwagon soccer fan but I don't really care. I don't watch MLS, watch Euro league matches rarely, but love international soccer. I follow the USMNT passively leading up to the WC, watch friendlies and qualifiers, etc, and then I'm all in for the WC. I watch matches with countries that I don't care about just because of how awesome it is. If the WC is held in some crazy timezone I'll be up at 3 AM watching Armenia vs. Croatia or some crap. It's that good imo.

Pretty stoked that it's in a normal set of timezones this go 'round.
I wouldn't say that at all. You seemed to follow qualifying pretty closely.

 
You guys take off work? That's nutty
Vacation days aren't precious where I work. It's coming up on that time where I've got to use 'em or lose 'em anyway.

I'll be rooting for the home team but the USMNT performance won't affect my viewing one way or the other. I like the competition.

 
My interest was significantly higher before I started reading that the US was already planning ahead for 2018. I don't know how accurate that is, but based on the first round draw and the players selected, it could be.

 
Moderately interested. I will watch the games when I can, I will watch all of US games. Won't be taking off work for it though like March Madness.

 
My interest was significantly higher before I started reading that the US was already planning ahead for 2018. I don't know how accurate that is, but based on the first round draw and the players selected, it could be.
The US is likely to get swamped. They have almost the hardest group they could have drawn up.

They have the #2 and #3 ranked teams in the entire world in their group and the other team in the group has given the US fits.

The betting odds of advancement for the US hover around 25% (not good).

It all should come down to the first game. Get 3 points against Ghana and they have an outside chance. Anything less and the chance of advancement reduces to a very low number imo.

 
Obviously, I'm extremely interested. I don't think it's the best example to show casual fans though. I still think this sets up as an unusually intriguing tournament with lots of story lines.

 
Big fan.

A lot of hard core soccer guys would probably call me a bandwagon soccer fan but I don't really care. I don't watch MLS, watch Euro league matches rarely, but love international soccer. I follow the USMNT passively leading up to the WC, watch friendlies and qualifiers, etc, and then I'm all in for the WC. I watch matches with countries that I don't care about just because of how awesome it is. If the WC is held in some crazy timezone I'll be up at 3 AM watching Armenia vs. Croatia or some crap. It's that good imo.

Pretty stoked that it's in a normal set of timezones this go 'round.
I wouldn't say that at all. You seemed to follow qualifying pretty closely.
If you look at the soccer thread a ton of guys started out just watching the WC and then it eventually grew from there. I would not label Worm a bandwagon fan. Anyone who watches friendlies is pretty hard core to me.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't wait. The community i live in, Pasadena, CA, embraces all of the games. Last cup there was a line around the block at 5 am for all of the US games. I can't wait.

 
I will watch the games when I can, I will watch all of US games. Won't be taking off work for it though like March Madness.
The 3rd US game (against Germany) will be at noon eastern on a weekday. But ESPN is showing every game online so you can probably watch while at work. I did that back in 2010 for more than a few games.

 
I went to my first MLS game ever this weekend. I had a pretty good time. On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest, I would have to say I am up to a 1.

 
roadkill1292 said:
JB, I have doubts about whether your poll is truly representative of your message board base.
Footballguys :shrug:

This isn't Americanfootballguys
I just think we few soccer nerds are voting in disproportionate numbers in Jhoe's pole. I don't think it accurately represents the thousands who post here every day.
People vote in polls in the FFA regardless of topic. Hell we have already had people post in the thread that they did not even know about the WC until they saw this thread.

It may take 24 hours to get a decent sample but by noon tomorrow the results should be pretty indicative of the general feeling of the FFA (I don't know what the cross over is between the FFA and other forums).

 
roadkill1292 said:
JB, I have doubts about whether your poll is truly representative of your message board base.
Footballguys :shrug:

This isn't Americanfootballguys
I just think we few soccer nerds are voting in disproportionate numbers in Jhoe's pole. I don't think it accurately represents the thousands who post here every day.
With all the aliases and what not, its really only about 12 people who post here every day.

 
There's always going to be a skew in forum polls towards people interested in a subject. When I skim the topics list, anything with soccer in it will catch my eye, and I voted "extremely interested". Others probably glossed over it.

That said, even factoring that in, this is a pretty good poll showing for the World Cup.

 
roadkill1292 said:
JB, I have doubts about whether your poll is truly representative of your message board base.
Footballguys :shrug:

This isn't Americanfootballguys
I just think we few soccer nerds are voting in disproportionate numbers in Jhoe's pole. I don't think it accurately represents the thousands who post here every day.
With all the aliases and what not, its really only about 12 people who post here every day.
Aren't you Zartan? I don't think I'm supposed to talk to you.

 
I can't remember the last time I took off work to watch a sporting event on tv. Live is obviously different.

to each their own...

 
BassNBrew said:
NewlyRetired said:
BassNBrew said:
NewlyRetired said:
Big fan.

It would have been interesting to see this exact poll in 2006 and 2010. I bet you would see a nice growth curve.
We've been hearing that for years.
You think the sport as a whole is at the same level of popularity today as it was 8 years ago?

Interesting. The facts (attendance and tv ratings) don't appear to support your theory.
I think there's more access now than then. Average and hardcore fan now have viewing options. I really believe the demand was there to some extent all along. I think you could say the same about several sports. Soccer fans have really benefitted from the explosive growth of sports networks and their need for programming.

Off course there's growth due to population increases and demographic changes in the US. IMO the Mexican national team outdraws team USA in most venues in the US.
I'm 46. I saw my first soccer game when I was 10- which happened to be the first soccer game I played in (baseball was my original sport). It was the first time my dad ever saw a game as well.

I was a soccer nerd and very good; a level below national team, heavily recruited by top 20 Div 1 schools, played at one of them, played semi-pro afterwards because there was no MLS- and I might not have been good enough anyways. I only got to see a handful of pro games live or on TV, but lived and breathed the sport in spite of that.

But it wasn't just soccer nerds who played... everybody- everybody I knew played soccer as kids. Yeah, we were coached by guys like my dad who had no idea how to play the sport, and yeah there was no soccer to watch for those who were interested. And yeah- there was nowhere for any of us to go with it. But everybody played- really for the first time in US history.

Fast-forward 30 years- not much time in the relative scheme of things (the Cubs last won when?)- and we've got a decent (not great) league that has been on a really steep growth curve the last 10 years. The USMNT is expected to beat everybody in our region including Mexico and qualify for every WC.

Native born Americans are watching the sport on all manner of media- and live (MLS numbers compare pretty well to most of our pro sports), and those of us who were part of that first wave where everybody played now have kids who are growing up from birth kicking a soccer ball and getting to watch pro, top quality soccer as much as they want. This isn't demographic changes- this is inherent growth of interest from within.

I don't see any point to comparing Mexico's attendance in the US to the US... Mexico has a rich, long history and tradition with the sport and yes- there has been an obvious demographic shift of Mexican American's to supply those numbers. Why not look only at US numbers, which have skyrocketed?

I ramble... my point was simply that for a country that has a cultural history with the sport only going back one generation, we are doing amazingly well to be consistently one of the top 32 teams in the world. it's not just soccer nerds like me and andy, and it's not just fuzzy ferners and their fern ways. It's not even my humble opinion any more: the US can beat any team in the world on a given day... and the WC is the optimal opportunity to prove that

eta: my son is 6, and not all that interested in soccer right now- but we go out and kick around the way I used to play catch with my dad. When I watch games, he'll sometimes watch with me and I'll explain everything that's going on- tactics, strategies, etc... the way my dad did with me about baseball and football. This kind of thing can only help our country continue to grow soccer's cultural identity.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was out a few weeks ago and chatting with someone who's way into it. I mentioned that I had seen Ronaldo play many years ago and was surprised he was still one of the best players in the world. He told me that was a different Ronaldo. Oh.

 
I was out a few weeks ago and chatting with someone who's way into it. I mentioned that I had seen Ronaldo play many years ago and was surprised he was still one of the best players in the world. He told me that was a different Ronaldo. Oh.
Fat Ronaldo (Brazil, the one you watched) vs skinny Ronaldo (Cristiano from Portugal).

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top