Yankee23Fan
Fair Tax!
Reminder for everyone to vote in the current American Great head to head matchup taking place.
yepCan someone take a pM? Off to do a commercial and may not have time to peek in and pick.
Pretty sure both of these guys will get skipped before me.I may as well not show up for 2 hours.6. thatguy UP
7. Usual21 on deck
8. John Madden's Lunchbox
9. higgins
Well spoken.The more I think about this question, Larry, the more offensive I find it. Are you really expecting me to tell you that hating Jews is worse than hating other people? I happen to know a lot about the terrible mistreatment of Jews in Europe throughout the centuries because it involves my ancestry and it's something I've read a lot about. All racism is abhorrent. If my answer to your question was yes, that would make me racist as well. My answer is no.is hating Jews worse than hating other ethnicities/cultures/religions? Just curious...
Speaking of categories and drafts, can we have an All Eclectic Draft next?Categories could include -- Most Eclectic World Record Holder - Greatest Fanatic- Craziest Conspiracy Theory- Best Porn Star(ok, it's a rotten idea. I just wanted to make a draft where "Best Porn Star" would be a serious category)Executive decision. There are a few well known international business moguls, but in general I figured it would be a repetition of the American draft. Plus, just too many categories.Hey Tim, why'd we drop the Business Mogul category?
I don't want to turn this into a religious thread, but I'm ok with Solomon beign drafted. The problem I would have answering is that the bible is an important part of my life so it's hard to separate that from how I few those works in my life. Although, I'm guessing that most people know a proverb or two whether they actually know it is from proverbs, and probably very few know something of Socrates.I'm disappointed that more people haven't commented about Larry's selection of King Solomon as a philosopher. To me, this is the one of the most interesting draft picks made in a while, because it discusses the importance of the Bible aside from the issues of diviinity. What is the social importance of Proverbs, Song of Songs, and Ecclisiastes? How influential are these three tomes on people's way of living?

And by the same token, most people, even athiests or agnostics, know the parables of Jesus, such as the Prodigal Son or the Good Samaritan. They may not understand or agree with or believe in the underlying message, but they know the story and the point Jesus was trying to make.I don't want to turn this into a religious thread, but I'm ok with Solomon beign drafted. The problem I would have answering is that the bible is an important part of my life so it's hard to separate that from how I few those works in my life. Although, I'm guessing that most people know a proverb or two whether they actually know it is from proverbs, and probably very few know something of Socrates.I'm disappointed that more people haven't commented about Larry's selection of King Solomon as a philosopher. To me, this is the one of the most interesting draft picks made in a while, because it discusses the importance of the Bible aside from the issues of diviinity. What is the social importance of Proverbs, Song of Songs, and Ecclisiastes? How influential are these three tomes on people's way of living?![]()
He's hugely popular in Japan to this day, and he had plenty of success in Europe, infact the remix of Little Less Conversation wasn't an American creation. He's certainly an international celebrity.But he is "merely" an American celebrity.IMO, this is going to be a very tough category because of that fact.I think the greatest celebrities are going to be tough to assign to that category, because they will already be near the top of other categories (performer, athlete, politician, etc). I think Ali is the best example of that. He would be a top celebrity (perhaps the top), but he is also a top athlete.People dress up like him everywhere. There's an entire industry built around imitating this man. You see him in football stadiums. Wackos like Jerry Glanville purchased season tickets for Elvis at Falcons games (true story). People see him in cookies and try to sell it on ebay. It's insane. He's practically a god.
You may not like the question, but its valid. You always emphasize any wrong done to Jews by a particular person, and the tone is rather strenuous. Though I wouldnt say it implies racism, as you seem somewhat fixated on Jewish sufferring, but you're not suggesting Jews are superior or displaying prejudice towards other races.The more I think about this question, Larry, the more offensive I find it. Are you really expecting me to tell you that hating Jews is worse than hating other people? I happen to know a lot about the terrible mistreatment of Jews in Europe throughout the centuries because it involves my ancestry and it's something I've read a lot about. All racism is abhorrent. If my answer to your question was yes, that would make me racist as well. My answer is no.do you consider all people who were racist the same way or is hating Jews worse than hating other ethnicities/cultures/religions?[/b]Just curious...Look, given the nature of some of the bad guys who SHOULD be chosen, I don't really think Luther belongs on the list. But that doesn't mean he's a good guy. He didn't just "dislike" the Jews or "even to a point persecuting/making life difficult" for them. Let's be clear: what he did is set in motion a German anti-Semitism based, not on religious anti-Semitism, but on nationalistic anti-Semitism. Without Luther, there is no Hitler. Luther is also arguably the man most responsible for the Thirty Years War, which devestated Central Europe and set back European civilization by centuries.but in the scope of human history, disliking and even hating a group of people for their race or religion really isn't that villainous...
It isn't good, but simply disliking/hating and even to a point persecuting/making life difficult for a group isn't that bad in comparison...
What incredible bs. I advise you to go back through the Great American Draft. I criticized Andrew Jackson for his treatment of Native Americans. I criticized another President for his treatment of African Americans. And I criticized a third president for his internment of Japanese Americans. I have a big thing with injustice. If you think I am focusing on Jews in particular, then all I can say is this is something YOU are looking for.You may not like the question, but its valid. You always emphasize any wrong done to Jews by a particular person, and the tone is rather strenuous. Though I wouldnt say it implies racism, as you seem somewhat fixated on Jewish sufferring, but you're not suggesting Jews are superior or displaying prejudice towards other races.The more I think about this question, Larry, the more offensive I find it. Are you really expecting me to tell you that hating Jews is worse than hating other people? I happen to know a lot about the terrible mistreatment of Jews in Europe throughout the centuries because it involves my ancestry and it's something I've read a lot about. All racism is abhorrent. If my answer to your question was yes, that would make me racist as well. My answer is no.do you consider all people who were racist the same way or is hating Jews worse than hating other ethnicities/cultures/religions?[/b]Just curious...Look, given the nature of some of the bad guys who SHOULD be chosen, I don't really think Luther belongs on the list. But that doesn't mean he's a good guy. He didn't just "dislike" the Jews or "even to a point persecuting/making life difficult" for them. Let's be clear: what he did is set in motion a German anti-Semitism based, not on religious anti-Semitism, but on nationalistic anti-Semitism. Without Luther, there is no Hitler. Luther is also arguably the man most responsible for the Thirty Years War, which devestated Central Europe and set back European civilization by centuries.but in the scope of human history, disliking and even hating a group of people for their race or religion really isn't that villainous...
It isn't good, but simply disliking/hating and even to a point persecuting/making life difficult for a group isn't that bad in comparison...
Speaking of categories and drafts, can we have an All Eclectic Draft next?Categories could include -Executive decision. There are a few well known international business moguls, but in general I figured it would be a repetition of the American draft. Plus, just too many categories.Hey Tim, why'd we drop the Business Mogul category?
- Most Eclectic World Record Holder
- Greatest Fanatic
- Craziest Conspiracy Theory
- Best Porn Star
(ok, it's a rotten idea. I just wanted to make a draft where "Best Porn Star" would be a serious category)

8:08 - Diana, Princess of Wales - CelebrityHer funeral on 6 September 1997 was broadcast and watched by an estimated 2.5 billion people worldwide
Diana, Princess of Wales, (Diana Frances;[N 1] née Spencer;1 July 1961 – 31 August 1997) was the first wife of Charles, Prince of Wales. Their sons, Princes William and Henry (Harry), are second and third in line to the thrones of the United Kingdom and fifteen other Commonwealth Realms.
A public figure from the announcement of her engagement to XXXX XXXX, Diana remained the focus of near-constant media scrutiny in the United Kingdom and around the world up to and during her marriage, and after her subsequent divorce. Her sudden death in a car crash was followed by a spontaneous and prolonged show of public mourning. Contemporary responses to Diana's life and legacy have been mixed but a popular fascination with the Princess endures. The long awaited Coroner's Inquest concluded in April 2008 that Diana had been unlawfully killed by the driver and the following paparazzi.[1]
"Candle in the Wind 1997" or "Goodbye England's Rose" is a remake of "Candle in the Wind" by XXXX XXXX that was released as a tribute single to Diana, Princess of Wales. With over 37 million copies sold, it is the best-selling single of all time. Released in September 1997, the song peaked at number one in the UK, becoming XXXX fourth number one single, and in most other countries worldwide, also becoming the first song in history (and only to date) to top the three major countries in music industry: United States, United Kingdom and Japan.
...
As the song was a tribute to the popular Diana and because pre-order numbers had been high, it was expected by chart analysts for the song to top the charts, but its results were record breaking. Released on September 13, 1997, it became the fastest-selling single in the UK, selling 658,000 copies in the UK on that day alone, and over 1.5 million copies in its first week. The single would remain at number one for 5 weeks. All in all, it eventually sold 4.86 million copies in the UK, overtaking the 13-year-old record held by Band Aid's "Do They Know It's Christmas?". It has been certified as the best-selling single of all time in the UK.[1]
The response in the USA was quite similar. It became the 7th album/song in history to debut at number one, and sold over a million copies in its first week. As a result, the album/single held on to the number one position for 14 weeks, the record for a male solo artist. In total, it sold over 11 million copies in the United States to become the #1 best-selling single worldwide, after receiving advance orders of nearly 9 million...selling over 37 million copies worldwide as highest ever. [2]
Besides being the best-selling single in the USA, it is also the most shipped single in the USA with a certification of 11x platinum. This makes "Candle In The Wind 1997" the only album/song in the USA ever to be certified for more than 4 million copies sold, and the only diamond single ever.
Its success was also seen in most countries around the world.[citation needed] In Canada, it spent three years in the top 20, with 46 weeks at the top spot. However, the song's unusual chart performance in Canada has also been explained as a structural factor — due to the relative lack of CD singles available for sale in Canadian stores, in some weeks the song was able to chart on sales of less than 100 copies across the entire country.
From a worldwide perspective, over 33 million copies were sold around the globe, making it the best-selling single of all time worldwide. It is estimated[citation needed] that at the peak of sales, almost six copies of the single were sold across the world per second. All artist and composer royalties and record company profits were donated to the Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund.
Didn't say you ignore other groups, I said you emphasize Jews. We all have our preconceptions. No one is unbiased. Im sure my biases come into play in this, yet you claim yours dont?What incredible bs. I advise you to go back through the Great American Draft. I criticized Andrew Jackson for his treatment of Native Americans. I criticized another President for his treatment of African Americans. And I criticized a third president for his internment of Japanese Americans. I have a big thing with injustice. If you think I am focusing on Jews in particular, then all I can say is this is something YOU are looking for.You may not like the question, but its valid. You always emphasize any wrong done to Jews by a particular person, and the tone is rather strenuous. Though I wouldnt say it implies racism, as you seem somewhat fixated on Jewish sufferring, but you're not suggesting Jews are superior or displaying prejudice towards other races.
Bonus picSir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill (30 November 1874 - 24 January 1965) was a British politician known chiefly for his leadership of the United Kingdom during World War II. He served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1940 to 1945 and again from 1951 to 1955. A noted statesman and orator, Churchill was also an officer in the British Army, a historian, a Nobel Prize-winning writer, and an artist.
During his army career, Churchill saw action in India, in the Sudan and the Second Boer War. He gained fame and notoriety as a war correspondent and through contemporary books he wrote describing the campaigns. He also served briefly in the British Army on the Western Front in World War I, commanding the 6th Battalion of the Royal Scots Fusiliers.
At the forefront of the political scene for almost fifty years, he held many political and cabinet positions. Before the First World War, he served as President of the Board of Trade, Home Secretary and First Lord of the Admiralty as part of the Asquith Liberal government. During the war he continued as First Lord of the Admiralty until the disastrous Battle of Gallipoli caused his departure from government. He returned as Minister of Munitions, Secretary of State for War and Secretary of State for Air. In the interwar years, he served as Chancellor of the Exchequer in the Conservative government.
After the outbreak of the Second World War, Churchill was again appointed First Lord of the Admiralty. Following the resignation of Neville Chamberlain on 10 May 1940, he became Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and led Britain to victory against the Axis powers. Churchill was always noted for his speeches, which became a great inspiration to the British people and embattled Allied forces.
After losing the 1945 election, he became Leader of the Opposition. In 1951, he again became Prime Minister before finally retiring in 1955. Upon his death the Queen granted him the honour of a state funeral, which saw one of the largest assemblies of statesmen in the world.
He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature "for his mastery of historical and biographical description as well as for brilliant oratory in defending exalted human values".
Winston Churchill was also an accomplished artist and took great pleasure in painting, especially after his resignation as First Lord of the Admiralty in 1915.[188] He found a haven in art to overcome the spells of depression—or as he termed it, the "Black Dog"—which he suffered throughout his life. As William Rees-Mogg has stated, "In his own life, he had to suffer the 'black dog' of depression. In his landscapes and still lives there is no sign of depression".[189] He is best known for his impressionist scenes of landscape, many of which were painted while on holiday in the South of France or Morocco.[189] He continued his hobby throughout his life and painted dozens of paintings, many of which are on show in the studio at Chartwell.
In a 2002 BBC poll of the "100 Greatest Britons", he was proclaimed "The Greatest of Them All" based on approximately a million votes from BBC viewers. Churchill was also rated as one of the most influential leaders in history by Time magazine. Churchill College, Cambridge was founded in 1958 on his behalf.
Had not thought of her, but probably a strong contender for #1. Makes the person I was considering look like a weak pick.I was struggling with this pick until a light bulb went off in my head.
Who had the paparazzi hounding her for years?
Who could sell magazines, books and assorted crap to women?
Who died a tragic young death?
The perfect Celebrity
She didn't have a talent like Elvis or MJ
She didn't look as hot as Marilyn Monroe
What she was however was the most famous woman in the world
For heavens sake, that abomination of a tribute by XXXXX XXXX was No.1 for about 6 years and is officially the biggest selling song of all time.
How many did it well when it was about Marilyn?
Britain (Yes the whole of Britain went into a state of shock)
I was in Australia at the time and it was similar.
When the news was broadcast I heard 4 women in the block of flats I was living at scream and burst into tears and commiserate with each other in the hallway.
8:08 - Diana, Princess of Wales - CelebrityHer funeral on 6 September 1997 was broadcast and watched by an estimated 2.5 billion people worldwideDiana, Princess of Wales, (Diana Frances;[N 1] née Spencer;1 July 1961 – 31 August 1997) was the first wife of Charles, Prince of Wales. Their sons, Princes William and Henry (Harry), are second and third in line to the thrones of the United Kingdom and fifteen other Commonwealth Realms.
A public figure from the announcement of her engagement to XXXX XXXX, Diana remained the focus of near-constant media scrutiny in the United Kingdom and around the world up to and during her marriage, and after her subsequent divorce. Her sudden death in a car crash was followed by a spontaneous and prolonged show of public mourning. Contemporary responses to Diana's life and legacy have been mixed but a popular fascination with the Princess endures. The long awaited Coroner's Inquest concluded in April 2008 that Diana had been unlawfully killed by the driver and the following paparazzi.[1]"Candle in the Wind 1997" or "Goodbye England's Rose" is a remake of "Candle in the Wind" by XXXX XXXX that was released as a tribute single to Diana, Princess of Wales. With over 37 million copies sold, it is the best-selling single of all time. Released in September 1997, the song peaked at number one in the UK, becoming XXXX fourth number one single, and in most other countries worldwide, also becoming the first song in history (and only to date) to top the three major countries in music industry: United States, United Kingdom and Japan.
...
As the song was a tribute to the popular Diana and because pre-order numbers had been high, it was expected by chart analysts for the song to top the charts, but its results were record breaking. Released on September 13, 1997, it became the fastest-selling single in the UK, selling 658,000 copies in the UK on that day alone, and over 1.5 million copies in its first week. The single would remain at number one for 5 weeks. All in all, it eventually sold 4.86 million copies in the UK, overtaking the 13-year-old record held by Band Aid's "Do They Know It's Christmas?". It has been certified as the best-selling single of all time in the UK.[1]
The response in the USA was quite similar. It became the 7th album/song in history to debut at number one, and sold over a million copies in its first week. As a result, the album/single held on to the number one position for 14 weeks, the record for a male solo artist. In total, it sold over 11 million copies in the United States to become the #1 best-selling single worldwide, after receiving advance orders of nearly 9 million...selling over 37 million copies worldwide as highest ever. [2]
Besides being the best-selling single in the USA, it is also the most shipped single in the USA with a certification of 11x platinum. This makes "Candle In The Wind 1997" the only album/song in the USA ever to be certified for more than 4 million copies sold, and the only diamond single ever.
Its success was also seen in most countries around the world.[citation needed] In Canada, it spent three years in the top 20, with 46 weeks at the top spot. However, the song's unusual chart performance in Canada has also been explained as a structural factor — due to the relative lack of CD singles available for sale in Canadian stores, in some weeks the song was able to chart on sales of less than 100 copies across the entire country.
From a worldwide perspective, over 33 million copies were sold around the globe, making it the best-selling single of all time worldwide. It is estimated[citation needed] that at the peak of sales, almost six copies of the single were sold across the world per second. All artist and composer royalties and record company profits were donated to the Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund.
This is the person I referred to way back at the beginning of the draft as a woman I thought Larry might select. To me, there is no question she is the #1 celebrity. Really surprised she wasn't chosen previously--this is an excellent pick.I was struggling with this pick until a light bulb went off in my head.
Who had the paparazzi hounding her for years?
Who could sell magazines, books and assorted crap to women?
Who died a tragic young death?
The perfect Celebrity
She didn't have a talent like Elvis or MJ
She didn't look as hot as Marilyn Monroe
What she was however was the most famous woman in the world
For heavens sake, that abomination of a tribute by XXXXX XXXX was No.1 for about 6 years and is officially the biggest selling song of all time.
How many did it well when it was about Marilyn?
Britain (Yes the whole of Britain went into a state of shock)
I was in Australia at the time and it was similar.
When the news was broadcast I heard 4 women in the block of flats I was living at scream and burst into tears and commiserate with each other in the hallway.
8:08 - Diana, Princess of Wales - CelebrityHer funeral on 6 September 1997 was broadcast and watched by an estimated 2.5 billion people worldwideDiana, Princess of Wales, (Diana Frances;[N 1] née Spencer;1 July 1961 – 31 August 1997) was the first wife of Charles, Prince of Wales. Their sons, Princes William and Henry (Harry), are second and third in line to the thrones of the United Kingdom and fifteen other Commonwealth Realms.
A public figure from the announcement of her engagement to XXXX XXXX, Diana remained the focus of near-constant media scrutiny in the United Kingdom and around the world up to and during her marriage, and after her subsequent divorce. Her sudden death in a car crash was followed by a spontaneous and prolonged show of public mourning. Contemporary responses to Diana's life and legacy have been mixed but a popular fascination with the Princess endures. The long awaited Coroner's Inquest concluded in April 2008 that Diana had been unlawfully killed by the driver and the following paparazzi.[1]"Candle in the Wind 1997" or "Goodbye England's Rose" is a remake of "Candle in the Wind" by XXXX XXXX that was released as a tribute single to Diana, Princess of Wales. With over 37 million copies sold, it is the best-selling single of all time. Released in September 1997, the song peaked at number one in the UK, becoming XXXX fourth number one single, and in most other countries worldwide, also becoming the first song in history (and only to date) to top the three major countries in music industry: United States, United Kingdom and Japan.
...
As the song was a tribute to the popular Diana and because pre-order numbers had been high, it was expected by chart analysts for the song to top the charts, but its results were record breaking. Released on September 13, 1997, it became the fastest-selling single in the UK, selling 658,000 copies in the UK on that day alone, and over 1.5 million copies in its first week. The single would remain at number one for 5 weeks. All in all, it eventually sold 4.86 million copies in the UK, overtaking the 13-year-old record held by Band Aid's "Do They Know It's Christmas?". It has been certified as the best-selling single of all time in the UK.[1]
The response in the USA was quite similar. It became the 7th album/song in history to debut at number one, and sold over a million copies in its first week. As a result, the album/single held on to the number one position for 14 weeks, the record for a male solo artist. In total, it sold over 11 million copies in the United States to become the #1 best-selling single worldwide, after receiving advance orders of nearly 9 million...selling over 37 million copies worldwide as highest ever. [2]
Besides being the best-selling single in the USA, it is also the most shipped single in the USA with a certification of 11x platinum. This makes "Candle In The Wind 1997" the only album/song in the USA ever to be certified for more than 4 million copies sold, and the only diamond single ever.
Its success was also seen in most countries around the world.[citation needed] In Canada, it spent three years in the top 20, with 46 weeks at the top spot. However, the song's unusual chart performance in Canada has also been explained as a structural factor — due to the relative lack of CD singles available for sale in Canadian stores, in some weeks the song was able to chart on sales of less than 100 copies across the entire country.
From a worldwide perspective, over 33 million copies were sold around the globe, making it the best-selling single of all time worldwide. It is estimated[citation needed] that at the peak of sales, almost six copies of the single were sold across the world per second. All artist and composer royalties and record company profits were donated to the Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund.
I emphasize a lot of things. Mistreatment of Jews is something I know a lot about, as I wrote. Of course everyone has biases. But let's look at the question again:Do you consider all people who were racist the same way or is hating Jews worse than hating other ethnicities/cultures/religions?This question is asking me not about biases; it's asking me if I am racist. You think it's a valid question, and you write that I am "fixated" on Jewish suffering. Why shouldn't I find these remarks offensive?Martin Luther deserves to be castigated for his treatment of Jews. It was a terrible thing that he did, and it makes him a terrible man. This is fact, not a question of fixation. Luther is also an extremely important man, perhaps the most important man of the last 1,000 years, and I am glad that he lived, because if he didn't, I think we might very well all be much worse off. But that doesn't change the fact that he is scum.Didn't say you ignore other groups, I said you emphasize Jews. We all have our preconceptions. No one is unbiased. Im sure my biases come into play in this, yet you claim yours dont?What incredible bs. I advise you to go back through the Great American Draft. I criticized Andrew Jackson for his treatment of Native Americans. I criticized another President for his treatment of African Americans. And I criticized a third president for his internment of Japanese Americans. I have a big thing with injustice. If you think I am focusing on Jews in particular, then all I can say is this is something YOU are looking for.You may not like the question, but its valid. You always emphasize any wrong done to Jews by a particular person, and the tone is rather strenuous. Though I wouldnt say it implies racism, as you seem somewhat fixated on Jewish sufferring, but you're not suggesting Jews are superior or displaying prejudice towards other races.
And he hardly qualifies in either. I guess he wrote a novel but the vast majority of his writings were memoirs and other non-fiction.There is no "literary" category. There's novel/short story and poet/playwright.Writeup later -- he's slotted as a literary figure for now (he did win the Noble Prize for that), but I may slide him to something else later...
8.09 -- Winston Churchill, Literary.
Churchill
There is no "literary" category.There is a novelist/short story category, and a playwright/poetry category. Churchill is eligible for the former, as he wrote one novel during his lifetime: Savrola written when he was 22. It was not considered a success. Churchill won the Nobel Prize for his Memoirs of The Second World War, NOT fiction. (Though some critics might think so.)Writeup later -- he's slotted as a literary figure for now (he did win the Noble Prize for that), but I may slide him to something else later...
8.09 -- Winston Churchill, Literary.
Churchill
And Churchill's two greatest works were "History of the English Speaking People" and "The Second World War" No fiction. All history. And certainly not short.He's a great pick, but not for the category you have him in.There is no "literary" category. There's novel/short story and poet/playwright.Writeup later -- he's slotted as a literary figure for now (he did win the Noble Prize for that), but I may slide him to something else later...
8.09 -- Winston Churchill, Literary.
Churchill
MisfitBlondes said:Princess Di is a clear #1 celebrity to me. She is who I immediately thought of when I saw the category and I don't think Marylin Monroe comes anywhere near her in worldwide celebrity status.Awesome pick.8:08 - Diana, Princess of Wales - Celebrity![]()
![]()
![]()

My #1 celebrity. Great pick.8:08 - Diana, Princess of Wales - Celebrity
Wildcard works for the time being then...There is no "literary" category. There's novel/short story and poet/playwright.Writeup later -- he's slotted as a literary figure for now (he did win the Noble Prize for that), but I may slide him to something else later...
8.09 -- Winston Churchill, Literary.
Churchill
First off, racism is a subset of bias, so even if he's accusing you of racism, he is asking about bias. Second, he is actually asking you about a bias regarding specific racists. And its the bolded sentence and others like it that make this a valid question. You suppose that this particular aspect of Luther overrides everything else about the man and defines him.I emphasize a lot of things. Mistreatment of Jews is something I know a lot about, as I wrote. Of course everyone has biases. But let's look at the question againDidn't say you ignore other groups, I said you emphasize Jews. We all have our preconceptions. No one is unbiased. Im sure my biases come into play in this, yet you claim yours dont?What incredible bs. I advise you to go back through the Great American Draft. I criticized Andrew Jackson for his treatment of Native Americans. I criticized another President for his treatment of African Americans. And I criticized a third president for his internment of Japanese Americans. I have a big thing with injustice. If you think I am focusing on Jews in particular, then all I can say is this is something YOU are looking for.You may not like the question, but its valid. You always emphasize any wrong done to Jews by a particular person, and the tone is rather strenuous. Though I wouldnt say it implies racism, as you seem somewhat fixated on Jewish sufferring, but you're not suggesting Jews are superior or displaying prejudice towards other races.o you consider all people who were racist the same way or is hating Jews worse than hating other ethnicities/cultures/religions?
This question is asking me not about biases; it's asking me if I am racist. You think it's a valid question, and you write that I am "fixated" on Jewish suffering. Why shouldn't I find these remarks offensive?
Martin Luther deserves to be castigated for his treatment of Jews. It was a terrible thing that he did, and it makes him a terrible man. This is fact, not a question of fixation. Luther is also an extremely important man, perhaps the most important man of the last 1,000 years, and I am glad that he lived, because if he didn't, I think we might very well all be much worse off. But that doesn't change the fact that he is scum.
Did you even bother to read the next line I wrote?First off, racism is a subset of bias, so even if he's accusing you of racism, he is asking about bias. Second, he is actually asking you about a bias regarding specific racists. And its the bolded sentence and others like it that make this a valid question. You suppose that this particular aspect of Luther overrides everything else about the man and defines him.I emphasize a lot of things. Mistreatment of Jews is something I know a lot about, as I wrote. Of course everyone has biases. But let's look at the question againDidn't say you ignore other groups, I said you emphasize Jews. We all have our preconceptions. No one is unbiased. Im sure my biases come into play in this, yet you claim yours dont?What incredible bs. I advise you to go back through the Great American Draft. I criticized Andrew Jackson for his treatment of Native Americans. I criticized another President for his treatment of African Americans. And I criticized a third president for his internment of Japanese Americans. I have a big thing with injustice. If you think I am focusing on Jews in particular, then all I can say is this is something YOU are looking for.You may not like the question, but its valid. You always emphasize any wrong done to Jews by a particular person, and the tone is rather strenuous. Though I wouldnt say it implies racism, as you seem somewhat fixated on Jewish sufferring, but you're not suggesting Jews are superior or displaying prejudice towards other races.o you consider all people who were racist the same way or is hating Jews worse than hating other ethnicities/cultures/religions?
This question is asking me not about biases; it's asking me if I am racist. You think it's a valid question, and you write that I am "fixated" on Jewish suffering. Why shouldn't I find these remarks offensive?
Martin Luther deserves to be castigated for his treatment of Jews. It was a terrible thing that he did, and it makes him a terrible man. This is fact, not a question of fixation. Luther is also an extremely important man, perhaps the most important man of the last 1,000 years, and I am glad that he lived, because if he didn't, I think we might very well all be much worse off. But that doesn't change the fact that he is scum.
I hate you.8:08 - Diana, Princess of Wales - Celebrity
Personally, I think timschochet is a poopie pants. Just sayin'...

Yes, I did. I never claimed your bias reached the level of blinders.timschochet said:Did you even bother to read the next line I wrote?
Nailed it.Truly a worldwide celebrity.John Maddens Lunchbox said:I was struggling with this pick until a light bulb went off in my head.
8:08 - Diana, Princess of Wales - Celebrity
Great pickThis pick didn't get the credit it deserves.Louis Armstong is arguably the most important musical figure of the 20th century.Gotta make a snap pick:
6.12 - Louis Armstrong, Musician
The light goes on . . .thatguy said:No time now for writeup:James Clerk Maxwell - Scientist
It's a very good pick, and I might be inclined to agree that when she lived, she was probably a bigger celebrity than even Elvis. But in terms of lasting celebrity, she's a distant 2nd to The King.Nailed it.Truly a worldwide celebrity.John Maddens Lunchbox said:I was struggling with this pick until a light bulb went off in my head.
8:08 - Diana, Princess of Wales - Celebrity
I wasn't sure there was one who wouldn't also rank very highly in some other category. She indeed would rank nowhere near any top list for anything other than celebrity.
Great pick
The Greek art of the drama had its roots in religious festivals for the gods, chiefly Dionysus, the god of wine.[5] During Aeschylus' lifetime, dramatic competitions became part of the City Dionysia in the spring.[5] The festival began with an opening procession, continued with a competition of boys singing dithyrambs, and culminated in a pair of dramatic competitions.[9] The first competition, which Aeschylus would have participated in, was for the tragedians, and consisted of three playwrights each presenting three tragic plays followed by a shorter comedic satyr play.[9] A second competition of five comedic playwrights followed, and the winners of both competitions were chosen by a panel of judges.[9]
Aeschylus entered many of these competitions in his lifetime, and it is estimated that he wrote some 70 to 90 plays.[10][11] Only seven tragedies have survived intact: The Persians, Seven against Thebes, The Suppliants, the trilogy known as The Oresteia, consisting of the three tragedies Agamemnon, The Libation Bearers and The Eumenides, and Prometheus Bound (whose authorship is disputed). With the exception of this last play—the success of which is uncertain—all of Aeschylus' extant tragedies are known to have won first prize at the City Dionysia. The Alexandrian Life of Aeschylus indicates that the playwright took the first prize at the City Dionysia thirteen times. This compares favorably with Sophocles' reported eighteen victories (with a substantially larger catalogue, at an estimated 120 plays), and dwarfs the five victories of xxx (who featured a catalogue of roughly 90 plays).
One hallmark of Aeschylean dramaturgy appears to have been his tendency to write connected trilogies in which each play serves as a chapter in a continuous dramatic narrative.[12] The Oresteia is the only wholly extant example of this type of connected trilogy, but there is ample evidence that Aeschylus wrote such trilogies often. The comic satyr plays that would follow his dramatic trilogies often treated a related mythic topic. For example, the Oresteia's satyr play Proteus treated the story of Menelaus's detour in Egypt on his way home from the Trojan War. Based on the evidence provided by a catalogue of Aeschylean play titles, scholia, and play fragments recorded by later authors, it is assumed that three other of Aeschylus' extant plays were components of connected trilogies: Seven against Thebes being the final play in an Oedipus trilogy, and The Suppliants and Prometheus Bound each being the first play in a Danaid trilogy and Prometheus trilogy, respectively (see below). Scholars have moreover suggested several completely lost trilogies derived from known play titles. A number of these trilogies treated myths surrounding the Trojan War. One—collectively called the Achilleis and comprising the titles Myrmidons, Nereids and Phrygians (alternately, The Ransoming of Hector)—recounts Hector's death at the hands of Achilles and the subsequent holding of Hector's body for ransom; another trilogy apparently recounts the entry of the Trojan ally Memnon into the war, and his death at the hands of Achilles (Memnon and The Weighing of Souls being two components of the trilogy); The Award of the Arms, The Phrygian Women, and The Salaminian Women suggest a trilogy about the madness and subsequent suicide of the Greek hero Ajax; Aeschylus also seems to have treated Odysseus' return to Ithaca after the war (including his killing of his wife Penelope's suitors and its consequences) with a trilogy consisting of The Soul-raisers, Penelope and The Bone-gatherers. Other suggested trilogies touched on the myth of Jason and the Argonauts (Argô, Lemnian Women, Hypsipylê); the life of Perseus (The Net-draggers, Polydektês, Phorkides); the birth and exploits of Dionysus (Semele, Bacchae, Pentheus); and the aftermath of the war portrayed in Seven against Thebes (Eleusinians, Argives (or Argive Women), Sons of the Seven).