What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Worst 5 NFL teams as of week 16. (1 Viewer)

Andy Dufresne

Footballguy
5. Kansas City Cheifs - Ever seen a team age 10 years in one offseason? Herm Edwards is subtraction by addition. They're screwed without Trent Green.

4. Houston Texans - "Can we have a do-over?"

3. Oakland Raiders - They're gonna get worked tonight.

2. Tennesse Titans - You just DON'T replace your starting QB one week before the season with another guy that's been kicked to the curb by three other franchises.

1. Green Bay Packers - Ugh. Next year's controversy - "Should the Pack draft Quinn even if they have Rogers?"

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If your throwing KC on there, then CAR and TB HAVE to be on there as they both lost @ home.......the other two teams got dominated.

 
If your throwing KC on there, then CAR and TB HAVE to be on there as they both lost @ home.......the other two teams got dominated.
Ahead of which teams?We know those teams have SOME talent. They just didn't play anywhere near up to it.These five are stinky and have nowhere to go.
 
Andy Dufresne said:
Kevin Ashcraft said:
If your throwing KC on there, then CAR and TB HAVE to be on there as they both lost @ home.......the other two teams got dominated.
Ahead of which teams?We know those teams have SOME talent. They just didn't play anywhere near up to it.These five are stinky and have nowhere to go.
Put $50 on it......KC will NOT be a bottom 5 team. 7-9 at worst.
 
Andy Dufresne said:
Kevin Ashcraft said:
If your throwing KC on there, then CAR and TB HAVE to be on there as they both lost @ home.......the other two teams got dominated.
Ahead of which teams?We know those teams have SOME talent. They just didn't play anywhere near up to it.

These five are stinky and have nowhere to go.
Put $50 on it......KC will NOT be a bottom 5 team. 7-9 at worst.
Not with this schedule.
 
The Browns deserve at least an honorable mention for losing to the Saints at home.

And having to play the Steelers, Bengals and Ravens twice ain't going to be easy...

 
The Browns deserve at least an honorable mention for losing to the Saints at home. And having to play the Steelers, Bengals and Ravens twice ain't going to be easy...
Yes. They're hovering near that list. Melvin Fowler :eek: is their starting center? :lmao:Injuries have hurt this team too.
 
No mention of San Francisco? :lmao:

While the 'Niners should be more competitive this year, I still don't see them winning over 5 games.

 
Wow, before the season the Bills were definitely on this list. People finally opening their eyes :)
I didn't see any of their game. How did their two #1's, Whitner and McCargo look?Sounds like McGahee may be back though, eh?
Whitner had an INT 4 solo tackles and 4 assisted tackles, so that's pretty good. Not sure on McCargo. Honestly there hasn't been a ton of talk about him period. Kyle Williams is the guy that got rave reviews during preseason. Williams had 3 solo and 3 assisted tackles. McCargo had just one assisted tackle. I do like Whitner and maybe it will all turn out great in the end, but with Bunkley looking like a total beast, it makes the Bills look kind of silly acting like McCargo was just as good as Bunkley.
 
Wow, before the season the Bills were definitely on this list. People finally opening their eyes :)
Also funny how Pat backers are pounding their chest at 1-0. Ya beat the BILLS...by TWO...at HOME!! Pats are 6-10 this year at best. :yes:
Schedule.Doubt it. With games against the Jets (twice), Packers, Texans, and Titans, they're 8-8 at worst.
Ummmm...even if they win all 5 of those (which they won't) that's 6 wins. Not to mention that 3 of those 5 are road games. I don't see them sweeping the Jets and I think the Titans are better than they played, so, while I wouldn't automatically put those in the loss column, I wouldn't count them as automatic Ws either. Maybe they can beat the Lions (who did hold NFC champ Seattle to 3 FGs) or split with the Dolphins, but I can't see them taking it to the Jags, Colts, Bears, Bengals, Broncos, etc.
 
Wow, before the season the Bills were definitely on this list. People finally opening their eyes :)
I didn't see any of their game. How did their two #1's, Whitner and McCargo look?Sounds like McGahee may be back though, eh?
McGahee looked very sharp. I didn't hear or see much about McCargo but I do know they ran ALL OVER the Bills so I'm assuming McCargo and the rest of the line didn't do so hot. TKO did go out with an injury so that's difficult. Whitner however had an INT that would've been returned for a TD later in the game but a block in the back brought it back. Kind of like the drive the Bills were putting together in the 2nd half that ended up dying because of a block in the back. Those two illegal blocks probably cost them the game.
 
The Browns deserve at least an honorable mention for losing to the Saints at home. And having to play the Steelers, Bengals and Ravens twice ain't going to be easy...
Yes. They're hovering near that list. Melvin Fowler :eek: is their starting center? :lmao:Injuries have hurt this team too.
Actually, Fowler is the starting C for the Bills and has done a decent job so far.The starting C for the Browns is Hank Fraley (who they traded for like a week ago)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
5. Kansas City Cheifs - Ever seen a team age 10 years in one offseason? Herm Edwards is subtraction by addition. They're screwed without Trent Green. 5. The Vikes. I think we'll see how inept their offense will be this year tonight.

4. Houston Texans - "Can we have a do-over?"

3. Oakland Raiders - They're gonna get worked tonight. 3. Cleveland. That OL is gonna kill them all year.

2. Tennesse Titans - You just DON'T replace your starting QB one week before the season with another guy that's been kicked to the curb by three other franchises.

1. Green Bay Packers - Ugh. Next year's controversy - "Should the Pack draft Quinn even if they have Rogers?"
49ers knocking on the door.
 
Wow, before the season the Bills were definitely on this list. People finally opening their eyes :)
Also funny how Pat backers are pounding their chest at 1-0. Ya beat the BILLS...by TWO...at HOME!! Pats are 6-10 this year at best. :yes:
Schedule.Doubt it. With games against the Jets (twice), Packers, Texans, and Titans, they're 8-8 at worst.
Ummmm...even if they win all 5 of those (which they won't) that's 6 wins. Not to mention that 3 of those 5 are road games. I don't see them sweeping the Jets and I think the Titans are better than they played, so, while I wouldn't automatically put those in the loss column, I wouldn't count them as automatic Ws either. Maybe they can beat the Lions (who did hold NFC champ Seattle to 3 FGs) or split with the Dolphins, but I can't see them taking it to the Jags, Colts, Bears, Bengals, Broncos, etc.
They'll win some they shouldn't and lose some they shouldn't. Still, I can't see less than 8-8. :shrug: They're nowhere near as bad as the 5 I've listed.

 
Wow, before the season the Bills were definitely on this list. People finally opening their eyes :)
Also funny how Pat backers are pounding their chest at 1-0. Ya beat the BILLS...by TWO...at HOME!! Pats are 6-10 this year at best. :yes:
Schedule.Doubt it. With games against the Jets (twice), Packers, Texans, and Titans, they're 8-8 at worst.
Ummmm...even if they win all 5 of those (which they won't) that's 6 wins. Not to mention that 3 of those 5 are road games. I don't see them sweeping the Jets and I think the Titans are better than they played, so, while I wouldn't automatically put those in the loss column, I wouldn't count them as automatic Ws either. Maybe they can beat the Lions (who did hold NFC champ Seattle to 3 FGs) or split with the Dolphins, but I can't see them taking it to the Jags, Colts, Bears, Bengals, Broncos, etc.
With the way the Pats ran the ball this weekend, they shouldn't have any problems beating them. That's 5 weak teams on the Pats schedule, starting to get a little curious why the most dominant football team of this decade has such a light schedule?
 
The Browns deserve at least an honorable mention for losing to the Saints at home. And having to play the Steelers, Bengals and Ravens twice ain't going to be easy...
Yes. They're hovering near that list. Melvin Fowler :eek: is their starting center? :lmao:Injuries have hurt this team too.
:confused: Melvin isn't on the Browns anymore, thank goodness.
That was off the top of my head. Who am I thinking of then? Who is he starting for?Regardless, my point is that their starting center is NOT LeCharles Bentley. Which, obviously, would have helped tremendously. And made Droughns look much better.
 
What about my beloved Brownies??? They made the Saints defense look like the second coming of the Steel Curtain?
I'm sure we'll be up there real soon.But the offense did look alot better in the 2nd half. Charlie was making some plays, he seems to have great pocket awareness and good ability to get on the move. They can't possibly run the ball any worse.I'm more worried about the DLine. They were being blown off the ball on running plays, not allowing the LBs to make many plays.
 
The Browns deserve at least an honorable mention for losing to the Saints at home. And having to play the Steelers, Bengals and Ravens twice ain't going to be easy...
Yes. They're hovering near that list. Melvin Fowler :eek: is their starting center? :lmao:Injuries have hurt this team too.
:confused: Melvin isn't on the Browns anymore, thank goodness.
That was off the top of my head. Who am I thinking of then? Who is he starting for?Regardless, my point is that their starting center is NOT LeCharles Bentley. Which, obviously, would have helped tremendously. And made Droughns look much better.
The Bills...somebody mentioned it above.
 
The Browns deserve at least an honorable mention for losing to the Saints at home. And having to play the Steelers, Bengals and Ravens twice ain't going to be easy...
Yes. They're hovering near that list. Melvin Fowler :eek: is their starting center? :lmao:Injuries have hurt this team too.
Actually, Fowler is the starting C for the Bills and has done a decent job so far.The starting C for the Browns is Hank Fraley (who they traded for like a week ago)
That's it. Thanks.Give the line a couple weeks to gel, and the offense could have signs of life.
 
5. Kansas City Cheifs - Ever seen a team age 10 years in one offseason? Herm Edwards is subtraction by addition. They're screwed without Trent Green. 5. The Vikes. I think we'll see how inept their offense will be this year tonight.
You're way wrong about this.
I don't see any above average skill position players--let alone a playmaker--on that offense. We'll see.
The whole is better than the sum of the parts.I think you and I could run behind McKinnie/Hutch/Birk/Richardson. And I don't know about you, but I'm not that good.

Plus Wiggins is verrrrry underrated. As is Brad Johnson.

And their defense will be top 10. Maybe higher.

 
5. Kansas City Cheifs - Ever seen a team age 10 years in one offseason? Herm Edwards is subtraction by addition. They're screwed without Trent Green.

4. Houston Texans - "Can we have a do-over?"

3. Oakland Raiders - They're gonna get worked tonight.

2. Tennesse Titans - You just DON'T replace your starting QB one week before the season with another guy that's been kicked to the curb by three other franchises.

1. Green Bay Packers - Ugh. Next year's controversy - "Should the Pack draft Quinn even if they have Rogers?"
I'm not a Raider's fan by any means and I have none of them on any fantasy teams but if your basing this list on this weekends event's it's unfair to put the Raiders on the list if they haven't even played.
 
5. Kansas City Cheifs - Ever seen a team age 10 years in one offseason? Herm Edwards is subtraction by addition. They're screwed without Trent Green.

4. Houston Texans - "Can we have a do-over?"

3. Oakland Raiders - They're gonna get worked tonight.

2. Tennesse Titans - You just DON'T replace your starting QB one week before the season with another guy that's been kicked to the curb by three other franchises.

1. Green Bay Packers - Ugh. Next year's controversy - "Should the Pack draft Quinn even if they have Rogers?"
I'm not a Raider's fan by any means and I have none of them on any fantasy teams but if your basing this list on this weekends event's it's unfair to put the Raiders on the list if they haven't even played.
After tonight, they'll likely move up the list.
 
5. Kansas City Cheifs - Ever seen a team age 10 years in one offseason? Herm Edwards is subtraction by addition. They're screwed without Trent Green.

4. Houston Texans - "Can we have a do-over?"

3. Oakland Raiders - They're gonna get worked tonight.

2. Tennesse Titans - You just DON'T replace your starting QB one week before the season with another guy that's been kicked to the curb by three other franchises.

1. Green Bay Packers - Ugh. Next year's controversy - "Should the Pack draft Quinn even if they have Rogers?"
I'm not a Raider's fan by any means and I have none of them on any fantasy teams but if your basing this list on this weekends event's it's unfair to put the Raiders on the list if they haven't even played.
After tonight, they'll likely move up the list.
:wall:
 
5. Kansas City Cheifs - Ever seen a team age 10 years in one offseason? Herm Edwards is subtraction by addition. They're screwed without Trent Green. 5. The Vikes. I think we'll see how inept their offense will be this year tonight.
You're way wrong about this.
I don't see any above average skill position players--let alone a playmaker--on that offense. We'll see.
The whole is better than the sum of the parts.I think you and I could run behind McKinnie/Hutch/Birk/Richardson. And I don't know about you, but I'm not that good.

Plus Wiggins is verrrrry underrated. As is Brad Johnson.

And their defense will be top 10. Maybe higher.
Yep. Vikes O finished 26th last year in yards, 19th in points. They added Taylor, Hutchinson, Birk, Hicks and Richardson and didn't lose any major skill position players. :shrug: Nowhere to go but up!
 
Yep. Vikes O finished 26th last year in yards, 19th in points. They added Taylor, Hutchinson, Birk, Hicks and Richardson and didn't lose any major skill position players. :shrug: Nowhere to go but up!
More importantly, they added a head coach, and made the offensive line and offensive coordinator positions actually two SEPARATE positions*. Novel, I know.*Last year, Steve Loney was both the line coach AND OC.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
5. Kansas City Cheifs - Ever seen a team age 10 years in one offseason? Herm Edwards is subtraction by addition. They're screwed without Trent Green. 5. The Vikes. I think we'll see how inept their offense will be this year tonight.
You're way wrong about this.
I don't see any above average skill position players--let alone a playmaker--on that offense. We'll see.
The whole is better than the sum of the parts.I think you and I could run behind McKinnie/Hutch/Birk/Richardson. And I don't know about you, but I'm not that good.

Plus Wiggins is verrrrry underrated. As is Brad Johnson.

And their defense will be top 10. Maybe higher.
Yep. Vikes O finished 26th last year in yards, 19th in points. They added Taylor, Hutchinson, Birk, Hicks and Richardson and didn't lose any major skill position players. :shrug: Nowhere to go but up!
I'd say there was a significant downgrade at the most important position on the offense. :yes:
 
5. Kansas City Cheifs - Ever seen a team age 10 years in one offseason? Herm Edwards is subtraction by addition. They're screwed without Trent Green. 5. The Vikes. I think we'll see how inept their offense will be this year tonight.
You're way wrong about this.
I don't see any above average skill position players--let alone a playmaker--on that offense. We'll see.
The whole is better than the sum of the parts.I think you and I could run behind McKinnie/Hutch/Birk/Richardson. And I don't know about you, but I'm not that good.

Plus Wiggins is verrrrry underrated. As is Brad Johnson.

And their defense will be top 10. Maybe higher.
Yep. Vikes O finished 26th last year in yards, 19th in points. They added Taylor, Hutchinson, Birk, Hicks and Richardson and didn't lose any major skill position players. :shrug: Nowhere to go but up!
I'd say there was a significant downgrade at the most important position on the offense. :yes:
I wouldn't.
 
Based on this weekend:

Clev, lost to what is supposed to be a poor NO team at home.

KC, beaten rather bad at home... even though Cinci is good this team looked old and slow.

Car, :own3d: at home by Atl.

GB, :own3d: at home by Chi.

Tenn, how the hell do you loose at home to the Jets?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Browns deserve at least an honorable mention for losing to the Saints at home. And having to play the Steelers, Bengals and Ravens twice ain't going to be easy...
:goodposting: And I'm a Browns fan. The Saints are not good. It's going to be a long long year again for us Brown's fans. :kicksrock:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top