This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Broncos fan here. I voted no, but it's close.
Overall, I don't really think Plummer's a better QB than McNabb.
But he's just as good throwing on the run, probably better. And while he doesn't necessarily have a cannon, he's pretty good with the deep ball and he's great off of play action.
Plummer also, despite his reputation, has a better history of coming through in the clutch than McNabb. He's not been to a Super Bowl like McNabb, but he did lead the Cards to their only playoff victory in an almost 50-year span ... that's pretty amazing, too.
You are hilarious. Anything useful to add?Broncos fan here. I voted no, but it's close.
Overall, I don't really think Plummer's a better QB than McNabb.
But he's just as good throwing on the run, probably better. And while he doesn't necessarily have a cannon, he's pretty good with the deep ball and he's great off of play action.
Plummer also, despite his reputation, has a better history of coming through in the clutch than McNabb. He's not been to a Super Bowl like McNabb, but he did lead the Cards to their only playoff victory in an almost 50-year span ... that's pretty amazing, too.
If you really think you'd be better off with Plummer than McNabb, than no, I have nothing to add.You are hilarious. Anything useful to add?Broncos fan here. I voted no, but it's close.
Overall, I don't really think Plummer's a better QB than McNabb.
But he's just as good throwing on the run, probably better. And while he doesn't necessarily have a cannon, he's pretty good with the deep ball and he's great off of play action.
Plummer also, despite his reputation, has a better history of coming through in the clutch than McNabb. He's not been to a Super Bowl like McNabb, but he did lead the Cards to their only playoff victory in an almost 50-year span ... that's pretty amazing, too.
Ok, congratulations and carry on. "Because I said so" is the most effective way to make your point.If you really think you'd be better off with Plummer than McNabb, than no, I have nothing to add.You are hilarious. Anything useful to add?Broncos fan here. I voted no, but it's close.
Overall, I don't really think Plummer's a better QB than McNabb.
But he's just as good throwing on the run, probably better. And while he doesn't necessarily have a cannon, he's pretty good with the deep ball and he's great off of play action.
Plummer also, despite his reputation, has a better history of coming through in the clutch than McNabb. He's not been to a Super Bowl like McNabb, but he did lead the Cards to their only playoff victory in an almost 50-year span ... that's pretty amazing, too.
I think you need to add Hasselbeck to this list. The guy had the highest passer rating in the league this year and is entering his peak years of running a WCO.
And how far do you think the Broncos would of Got with McNabb?? Plummer got them to the AFC Championship. And no matter who the QB was that game the Broncos were not going to beat the Steelers that day. So I also say no.You can blame the season on TO all you want, but the Eagles with TO there were not a good team this season.If you really think you'd be better off with Plummer than McNabb, than no, I have nothing to add.You are hilarious. Anything useful to add?Broncos fan here. I voted no, but it's close.
Overall, I don't really think Plummer's a better QB than McNabb.
But he's just as good throwing on the run, probably better. And while he doesn't necessarily have a cannon, he's pretty good with the deep ball and he's great off of play action.
Plummer also, despite his reputation, has a better history of coming through in the clutch than McNabb. He's not been to a Super Bowl like McNabb, but he did lead the Cards to their only playoff victory in an almost 50-year span ... that's pretty amazing, too.
Not to mention we wouldn't have to play him twice a year.Yes to McNabb in Dallas.Cowboy fan
duh ................... YES
If Denver had McNabb I'd say they have a very real chance at being in the SB right now. The man has been in FOUR NFC championship games and one SB and he did it without any skill players except last year (and Owens didn't even play in the playoffs). No matter how badly the Eagles #### the bed this year, nothing can take that away. Seriously, you Denver fans are hilarious. I've never seen such blatent homerism in my life.And how far do you think the Broncos would of Got with McNabb?? Plummer got them to the AFC Championship. And no matter who the QB was that game the Broncos were not going to beat the Steelers that day. So I also say no.You can blame the season on TO all you want, but the Eagles with TO there were not a good team this season.If you really think you'd be better off with Plummer than McNabb, than no, I have nothing to add.You are hilarious. Anything useful to add?Broncos fan here. I voted no, but it's close.
Overall, I don't really think Plummer's a better QB than McNabb.
But he's just as good throwing on the run, probably better. And while he doesn't necessarily have a cannon, he's pretty good with the deep ball and he's great off of play action.
Plummer also, despite his reputation, has a better history of coming through in the clutch than McNabb. He's not been to a Super Bowl like McNabb, but he did lead the Cards to their only playoff victory in an almost 50-year span ... that's pretty amazing, too.
Well the problem with the Denver/Pittsburgh game was not Plummer. yes he made some bad choices, but the Defence could not stop you at QB that day.When teams are picking up 3 and long all game long I don't care what offence you have your not going to beat them. True Jake had a bad game, but the "WHOLE DENVER" team did as well.If Denver had McNabb I'd say they have a very real chance at being in the SB right now. The man has been in FOUR NFC championship games and one SB and he did it without any skill players except last year (and Owens didn't even play in the playoffs). No matter how badly the Eagles #### the bed this year, nothing can take that away. Seriously, you Denver fans are hilarious. I've never seen such blatent homerism in my life.And how far do you think the Broncos would of Got with McNabb?? Plummer got them to the AFC Championship. And no matter who the QB was that game the Broncos were not going to beat the Steelers that day. So I also say no.You can blame the season on TO all you want, but the Eagles with TO there were not a good team this season.If you really think you'd be better off with Plummer than McNabb, than no, I have nothing to add.You are hilarious. Anything useful to add?Broncos fan here. I voted no, but it's close.
Overall, I don't really think Plummer's a better QB than McNabb.
But he's just as good throwing on the run, probably better. And while he doesn't necessarily have a cannon, he's pretty good with the deep ball and he's great off of play action.
Plummer also, despite his reputation, has a better history of coming through in the clutch than McNabb. He's not been to a Super Bowl like McNabb, but he did lead the Cards to their only playoff victory in an almost 50-year span ... that's pretty amazing, too.
Are you kidding?
I don't even need to reply, do I? 
